Commons:Deletion requests/File:ANA B767-381 JA8578 Pokemon-Jet98.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Neither Japan nor the US have a suitable FOP exception for 2D works. 84.62.193.111 12:35, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- Why do we need FOP here, the main object in this image is the aircraft, not the Pokemons ?!? --Denniss (talk) 14:03, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- I have to agree; the plane itself is what has been photographed. It is not an illustration of Pikachu, but a plane with his likeness on the side. Scapler (talk) 15:39, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- I also agree, the image is the airplane, not the Pokemon even though they are objects of interest. Sincerely Subzerosmokerain (talk) 17:03, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- I have to agree; the plane itself is what has been photographed. It is not an illustration of Pikachu, but a plane with his likeness on the side. Scapler (talk) 15:39, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- Just a small comment regarding licensing issues: images of the aircraft as a whole are fine, derivative works focussing on the Pokemons not. --Denniss (talk) 00:34, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Kept: per above comments Jcb (talk) 15:50, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Pokemon can't be de minimis here. Yann (talk) 09:27, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Keep, INUSE, there is already a COM:DM tag on the page, and (quote) we can't find a court case of a similar photo in fact being ruled derivative -- we do have rulings where it was not(unquote). –Be..anyone 💩 17:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: As explained in the previous deletion nomination discussion, the photo is of the aircraft in general and does not focus on individual Pokemon illustrations, so the de minimis exemption applies here. --DAJF (talk) 23:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
