Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Backlit ficus elastica leaf texture 2014 02.jpg

File:Backlit ficus elastica leaf texture 2014 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2017 at 13:32:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Backlit ficus elastica leaf texture 2014 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Backlit ficus elastica leaf texture 2014 02.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
•  Info created by Julian Herzog - uploaded by Julian Herzog - nominated by Shizhao -- shizhao (talk) 13:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC) renomination by --Mile (talk) 14:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- shizhao (talk) 13:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
• ex {{FPD}} ...i will retake nomination. --Mile (talk) 14:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Mile (talk) 14:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Everyone needs to look at this at full size. It's remarkable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support truly remarkable --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Impressing. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:23, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --cart-Talk 19:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 19:49, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose At full size, this seems soft. There is no definition to the leaf. And it seems that the black background has been added. Charles (talk) 22:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
  • The black background is real in this case. I would agree though that the image could be sharper. — Julian H.^✈ 07:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I remember this from the "Surface textures" photo challenge. It got 2nd place, despite not actually being a photograph of surface texture: being backlit it is more akin to an x-ray than a photograph of surface texture detail, which would require side lighting. -- Colin (talk) 08:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Taking into account Charles's criticisms, I nevertheless find this a pleasure to apprehend. Daniel Case (talk) 20:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Weak support I would have liked better resolution and having more parts of the leaf in focus, but the image looks good enough beyond the so-often-employed-100%-view that I'll let it be. – Lucas^T 22:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 09:39, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 15:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:44, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Nice structure --PtrQs (talk) 20:30, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 22:19, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants