Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chess pawn.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Chess pawn.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2017 at 18:16:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info created by Svklimkin - uploaded by Svklimkin - nominated by kasir -- Kasir (talk) 18:16, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Kasir (talk) 18:16, 5 September 2017 (UTC)- Support This is a really inventive one --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:12, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:48, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Null EV. --The Photographer 02:16, 6 September 2017 (UTC)- Support - I find this photo fun, it's well executed, and educational value can simply be seeing someone's imagination realized and figuring out how they did it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:34, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Paun with crown ? --Mile (talk) 07:30, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Question This is a very commen and free image from pixabay published under CC0 license. Can one change the license backdated? That might cause some problems as I believe--Ermell (talk) 08:09, 6 September 2017 (UTC)- Oppose not well executed. Charles (talk) 08:16, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Per The Photographer, sorry --A.Savin 13:04, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:42, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Not a real chess position, and the blurred pieces do not help. Sorry. Yann (talk) 21:24, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Looked at the picture again. Saw the blurred pieces. Saw a pawn with a misplaced crown on it. Regretted my first decision, sorry. --It's Kong of Lazers 你好 22:47, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per Yann. Looks just too cute. Daniel Case (talk) 04:52, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose It's a nice idea, but unsure about EV. Also, more importantly, since this looked like a stock image I did a google image search and found it was used many times before it was uploaded here, making for a licensing issue. e.g. this one from January 2015 (there are others). — Rhododendrites talk | 23:49, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per Rhododendrites, --cart-Talk 07:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. Blurred parts looks too unpleasant. -- Pofka (talk) 16:52, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 10 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 23:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
