Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mallnitz Stappitzer See Südwest 02.jpg

File:Mallnitz Stappitzer See Südwest 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2017 at 17:44:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mallnitz Stappitzer See Südwest 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mallnitz Stappitzer See Südwest 02.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Austria
•  Info Lake Stappitz in the Seebach Valley near Mallnitz, High Tauern National Park, Carinthia, Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:44, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:44, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Daphne Lantier 19:06, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --fedaro (talk) 19:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not impressed by the lighting, especially the backlit cabin and lack of color in the sky due to the time of day. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:36, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support HalfGig talk 23:51, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per King of Hearts --Cvmontuy (talk) 01:56, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Great composition. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:49, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 05:42, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support per other supporters --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Okstartnow (talk) 06:24, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Neptuul (talk) 07:45, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Great detail but the wide-angle means the lake looks small, the boat tiny, and the vertical crop so low that the mountains aren't working for me. Prefer the view from the other side File:Stappitzer See Seebachtal Mallnitz 2013 08 a.jpg. -- Colin (talk) 16:34, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Great detail, since I´ve been there I'm convinced, that this location is represented very authentically, also the proportions. Maybe a little step on the shore right of the boat should be removed. I think the time of day is well choosen for this shot, because later or earlier a day such valleys are in shadow comletly. Perhaps the cabine should be lighten up a bit. --Milseburg (talk) 09:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

• Hi @Milseburg: You are very right, new version available. Thanks for the hint and your support. --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:54, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per KoH and Colin, sorry. --Basotxerri (talk) 13:25, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
• Mild  Support - I feel like this peaceful, comparatively simple composition is an FP, and I'm willing to tolerate the haziness in the further background for the rest. But I do agree with Colin that the other view he linked to could produce a more breathtaking FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:45, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
• Weak  Support per Ikan Kekek. --XRay ^talk 10:40, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's big, but the midday light and basic composition don't put this shot above a touristy shot IMO. - Benh (talk) 18:11, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Dэя-Бøяg 11:11, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per harsh midday light. I'd like to see an attempt from the other side per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 16:14, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not good crop. --Karelj (talk) 09:51, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support--M★Zaplotnik ^(edits) 15:02, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /M★Zaplotnik ^(edits) 20:27, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Austria