Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016 Bahai House of Worship Langenhain 1 ks01.jpg

File:2016 Bahai House of Worship Langenhain 1 ks01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2016 at 13:19:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2016 Bahai House of Worship Langenhain 1 ks01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016 Bahai House of Worship Langenhain 1 ks01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings
•  Info Baha’i Temple Frankfurt, which is located at Langenhain village (about 25 kilometers off Frankfurt). Managed to catch it in good light this morning. Panorama image made of 8 exposures. I took 2 more views (see my user page) but I think this is the finest, and it’s entirely free of stitching errors AFAICS. c/u/n by --Kreuzschnabel 13:19, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Kreuzschnabel 13:19, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Well done, although I'm not sure whether the guy with the broom is a bug or a feature. --Code (talk) 13:40, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Good question. In the image, he’s a feature of course. In real, he turned out to be a bug when he told me my dog wasn’t allowed inside. That’s why I didn’t take any interiors today. --Kreuzschnabel 19:08, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

• Don't worry. Interiors would have been a copvio anyways. --Code (talk) 04:34, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment Yes, I like it and IMO a very good FPC. But there's a little thing: IMO the image is leaning in. Please have a look at the doors. Can you please check it? --XRay ^talk 14:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think I straightened them carefully but having had a very, very close look (and admired your sharp eyes), I admit the left side is leaning in by maybe 0.08 degrees. I don’t want to fix this since such a small correction might do more damage than benefit. Thanks for the hint anyway! --Kreuzschnabel 15:21, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - I see a couple minor stitching errors toward the left side of the frame (one in the foreground vines and an even smaller one in the background grass), but it took me a while to find them and they don't affect anything important. Not a big issue for me. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:58, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  CommentConsidering the eagerness you obviously put into your search for stitching errors, I am much satisfied you found as few larger ones as I did :-) --Kreuzschnabel 19:06, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Done Vine twig and grassline fixed. --Kreuzschnabel 19:53, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support FP without restriction for me. High EV furthermore, and useful for wp's.--Jebulon (talk) 19:17, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:09, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support of course yes: a centered building in average light ;-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:08, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Pleasing lines in the picture and a bit of clouds to soften the sky. This could have been a normal good pic of a building, but for some reason it is more than that. --cart-Talk 22:16, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - That's a really striking building and a good composition, so I'm willing to tolerate the blurry branches in the foreground on the left side, which I find a bit distracting at full size and definitely consider sub-optimal. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:27, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Interesting building (sort of reminds me of the U.S. Pro Football Hall of Fame (which has that shape for an entirely different reason) photographed well. Daniel Case (talk) 00:34, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Nice; but not beautiful as the one in India. Jee 02:19, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Excellent QI/VI to me, but I don't feel much wow from a centered frontal view of a building in regular daylight. I prefer shots like File:The Scoop at More London.jpg by Colin, or File:4 Cilindros, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-02-11, DD 04.JPG by Poco a poco, where the architecture really comes to life. INeverCry 08:13, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Since this is a circular building, any view will be frontal. I took two more shots: File:2016 Bahai House of Worship Langenhain 2 ks01.jpg and File:2016 Bahai House of Worship Langenhain 3 ks01.jpg but I think this one has the best balance of lit and shade regions on the architecture. --Kreuzschnabel 07:10, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 04:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral Per poco a poco, it's a good picture, but it lacks the impressive part (Wow factor) that I'm looking for in a FP. --PierreSelim (talk) 08:47, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Now I want to squeeze oranges and get fresh juice. :D - Benh (talk) 10:21, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support although the plants on both sides are disturbing a bit, but nevertheless a great image --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:39, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment The entire building is embedded in plants, forming a park. Therefore, I chose a planty foreground on purpose, to make the building kind of emerge from them --Kreuzschnabel 07:10, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /INeverCry 22:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings