Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2021 Gugelhammer Bogenbrücke 01.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:2021 Gugelhammer Bogenbrücke 01.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2022 at 15:19:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
- Info created & uploaded by Derzno - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 15:19, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 15:19, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support A beautiful and serene scene which makes that bridge look really pretty and stand out because it’s the only colourful element. --Aristeas (talk) 15:32, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Convincing composition and contrast. Beautiful. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:34, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 16:38, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support my favourite --Ermell (talk) 17:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose It's beautiful, but unfortunately chroma noise, lack of sharpness, missing focus on the right... --A.Savin 18:39, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:32, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:50, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas and in spite of the technical issues correctly mentioned above. Cmao20 (talk) 19:49, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas, --GRDN711 (talk) 02:35, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:38, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:04, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:29, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support I'd like the bridge (and only the bridge) to be a bit sharper, but other than that it's just beautiful! --El Grafo (talk) 09:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support (I wish, the aperture would by something like f/8.) --XRay 💬 12:27, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support The colorful bridge in the mostly black & white context (though the reeds also have a little color) is really what makes this composition irresistible. I don't find the mild noise or lack of pinpoint sharpness disqualifying in this context. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:52, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Tempered support The pleasing symmetry and mood are enough to offset the technical imperfections noted. Daniel Case (talk) 06:14, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support quite a colourful image. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:21, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 16:52, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Very special, in cases like this quality issues can be overseen Poco a poco (talk) 19:18, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment (Overlooked. "Overseen" means "supervised." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC))
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:38, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:07, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 17:29, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 21:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany