Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Green-headed Tanager Ubatuba .jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Green-headed Tanager Ubatuba .jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2011 at 19:11:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Njaelkies Lea - uploaded by Njaelkies Lea - nominated by V-wolf (talk) -- V-wolf (talk) 19:11, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Support -- V-wolf (talk) 19:11, 2 April 2011 (UTC)- Support -- Looks a little bit blurry and noisy, but it's nice and I like the overall effect. Von.grzanka (talk) 20:39, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support Per above. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 05:09, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support Phantastic colors --Schnobby (talk) 06:51, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:50, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Oppose quality: poor detail, pixelated background, the bird is unsharp, DOF too small --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 10:07, 3 April 2011 (UTC)- Oppose -- The bird is gorgeous but not the image quality. Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:32, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Carschten and Alvesgaspar--Miguel Bugallo 12:21, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Bugallo !!--Jebulon (talk) 13:14, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Attis (talk) 14:03, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:51, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. W.S. 07:00, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support // tsca (talk) 19:13, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support It's sharp enough --FredericL (talk) 20:44, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support I think the demand for sharpness here is a little unreasonable. I'm a graphic designer and I do everything from websites to large posters, the sharpness in this picture is more than enough for about 99% of the projects it'll ever be used for. I doubt anyone will ever care (or notice) that a few feathers are out of focus other than some of the reviewers here. --Calibas (talk) 21:07, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose per others above, and for widespread CA. --Avenue (talk) 01:15, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose A very pretty bird, but I feel that featured bird candidates are plentiful enough to almost insist on a natural environment. Image quality is pretty good, but not outstanding enough to override the human bench it's sitting on. --99of9 (talk) 01:55, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support I understand why some people oppose this image.. but the overal result is featurable IMO. Ggia (talk) 16:27, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Weak support, a tricky choice while being aware of all the matters previously mentioned. --Ximonic (talk) 13:54, 6 April 2011 (UTC)- Oppose Overexposed highlights on the bird and unsharp both at the bird and wood.--Snaevar (talk) 00:59, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support --W.Rebel (talk) 06:14, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 10:40, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. --Yikrazuul (talk) 11:57, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose --Cephas (talk) 10:14, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 10 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:04, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
