Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maria Taferl Basilika Langhausfresko 01.JPG

File:Maria Taferl Basilika Langhausfresko 01.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2016 at 11:41:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Maria Taferl Basilika Langhausfresko 01.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maria Taferl Basilika Langhausfresko 01.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Austria
•  Info Ceiling fresco in the nave of Maria Taferl Basilica (Lower Austria) by Antonio Beduzzi (1714-1718): Glorification of St. Joseph. All by me -- Uoaei1 (talk) 11:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 11:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral quite nice, should be cropped a bit --Rettinghaus (talk) 15:35, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Question @Rettinghaus: And how? --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 15:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too bright in the center, blurred at the bottom of the image. A problems with quality, unfortunately -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:06, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - I really enjoyed that and like the soft light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per George Chernilevsky. --Karelj (talk) 21:31, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Weak support I would like to have seen stronger contrast, but that's not a dealbreaker for this one. Daniel Case (talk) 04:47, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

* Sadly per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Support better now --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:53, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Support I don't think I have seen the same image that the oppose voters.... Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 12:06, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

* Oppose -EV or HDR --Mile (talk) 18:15, 1 March 2016 (UTC) --Mile (talk) 09:32, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Info @George Chernilevsky, Karelj, Martin Falbisoner, and PetarM: New version with reduced brightness uploaded. I regard the dome at the bottom of the image as some kind of background, where less sharpness is acceptable. --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

   Comment - This version is fine with me, too. In view of of the discussion on the talk page, I will address the "wow" in this picture: I'm pretty wowed by the frescoes, and since this is a good photo of them, I think it deserves a feature. I obviously would agree that technical issues anyone has with this picture would be sound bases for opposing a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:21, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support--Hubertl 04:40, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment What bugs me in the current version are the two dark wedges at the end of the columns which appear in the lower corners. Cropping the bottom edge a bit tighter to remove the wedges would seal the deal for me. --Rftblr (talk) 17:09, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Info @Rftblr: New version uploaded which fixes this. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

 Support As this was the only problem I had, I now support your submission. Thanks for fixing this! --Rftblr (talk) 21:23, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Neutral I like the subject very much but on the other side it is a bit soft and I have sometimes problems to distinguish between painted and real reliefs (as everything looks a bit overprocessed, rather like a painting) --Poco² 23:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
  • @Poco a poco: This is a painting, no real reliefs here! --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:45, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
    • oops, in that case I guess I'd like to  Support :) --Poco² 06:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Poco² 15:18, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings