Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palo Alto Baylands January 2013 004.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Palo Alto Baylands January 2013 004.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2015 at 02:43:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:43, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:43, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Oppose. Nice time indeed, but rather boring landscape. No wow. -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:06, 27 May 2015 (UTC)- Support Very nice light and composition. --Code (talk) 05:54, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Support Honestly composition don't enthusiastic me, but the quality is very good--LivioAndronico talk 08:51, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Please dont use this kind of template, it is not allowed by the guidelines (corrected). Thank you.--Jebulon (talk) 17:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality is great, but the composition doesn't really satisfies me. There are lots of examples when imperfect objects looks great, but this one simply isn't one of these. -- Pofka (talk) 10:46, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Neutral per others, sorry. --Tremonist (talk) 12:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Comment too much sky at least about 600px IMO -- Christian Ferrer 04:54, 28 May 2015 (UTC)- Oppose Both versions, as compositionally wanting. Might be a little better if cropped in on the building and reflection, but still not sure ... Daniel Case (talk) 15:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Alt[edit]
- Info Cropped per Christian Ferrer's suggestion. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:26, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:26, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support I'll cut some more (or add some water) to try to make an horizontal symmetry however the subject attracts more and enough attention for me, thanks -- Christian Ferrer 11:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support I've changed my mind composition, light, reflection, colors deserve FP despite of tiny flaws. --Laitche (talk) 07:24, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support The best. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:55, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Support Not outstanding, but the best of the 3. Yann (talk) 14:38, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, King. Same boring landscape. No wow. Per Yann "Not outstanding, but the best of the 3" - is rather reason for oppose IMO --George Chernilevsky talk 16:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Support --LivioAndronico talk 18:51, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Pudelek (talk) 16:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral I think that this version is the best, but the result is not FP to me due to the power line posts behind the house, they spoil the composition Poco2 18:38, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral per Poco. --Tremonist (talk) 12:10, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Even with oppose from Daniel Case (Both versions) this is FP. This vote is counted to prevent a disput about promotion -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:13, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Alt 2[edit]
- Info My idea for the original composition was to have the power lines form a visual line and for the distant poles to help frame the subject. Clearly, that idea hasn't been very popular so far; perhaps it is just wasted space in your eyes. So I'm adding a shot of just the building itself (note that this is a different exposure, not merely a crop). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose The first alternative has some creativity, which is lost here. Yann (talk) 14:39, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per Yann. --Tremonist (talk) 12:10, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:13, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture
The chosen alternative is: File:Palo Alto Baylands January 2013 004 edit.jpg
