Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pfarrkirche Going, 160623, ako.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Pfarrkirche Going, 160623, ako.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2017 at 06:44:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
- Info Interior of the roman-catholic parish church in Going am Wilden Kaiser (Tyrol, Austria). All by me -- Code (talk) 06:44, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Code (talk) 06:44, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:17, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support - This is one of two beautiful interiors of parish churches you recently nominated to QIC. The near corners are unsharp, so you might consider a crop if it doesn't damage the composition, but otherwise, it's great. (Aside: I really like the fresco in the dome; do you have another picture that includes the whole thing and/or do you know who painted it?) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:56, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Discussion about Fresco |
---|
|
- Support Jee 09:33, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support Excellent photo and sharp from left to right. Wrt Ikan's comment, the only bit "unsharp" are the corners of the nearby pews, which are out-of-focus. That's to be expected and in no way harms the composition and square framing. I'm really not sure why one would expect or need them to be in in focus. Are we going to start focus stacking church interiors now too? Please, let's accept reality a little. Having some parts out-of-focus is an indication they are not important and the eye is led elsewhere. -- Colin (talk) 11:04, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Discussion about DoF |
---|
|
- Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:53, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support great! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:01, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:37, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:07, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:58, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support lNeverCry 20:58, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 21:51, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support - Benh (talk) 22:44, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support A lot in this photograph to take in. Great quality. WClarke (talk) 01:05, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Thennicke (talk) 02:18, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:52, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 08:19, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- Neutral I understand that the light conditions are challenging here but some important areas of the pictures are too dark Poco2 09:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support I really don't like the style of the church (imo Baroque is quite messy in general), but well executed photo --DXR (talk) 19:23, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings