Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Villach Wernberg II Sankt Ulrich Filialkirche hl. Ulrich 30012011 222.jpg

File:Villach Wernberg II Sankt Ulrich Filialkirche hl. Ulrich 30012011 222.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2018 at 11:24:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Villach Wernberg II Sankt Ulrich Filialkirche hl. Ulrich 30012011 222.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Villach Wernberg II Sankt Ulrich Filialkirche hl. Ulrich 30012011 222.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:24, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:24, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment The description has duplicate the geocodes tags Ezarateesteban 11:33, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

• Sorry for that! I removed the duplicate of the geocoding tag. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Very nice, although maybe one step to the right would have been an improvement. --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Would be better to remove the purple fringing if you can. --Laitche (talk) 15:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:26, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Ezarateesteban 17:31, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 19:41, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 22:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Great scene and I would love to call a shot like this my own but ... seems a little weirdly processed. The texture of the bark doesn't quite look natural, and the left edge of the church next to the sky seems to be a narrow pinkish blur. Was it downsized? Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

• @Daniel Case: I took a close look, and I don't see the problem with the left edge of the church, which makes me suspect that your display may be the problem. The bark is difficult for me to judge but I don't see something that looks so bad that it's clearly a problem in my opinion, so I will  Support. --Pine^✉ 07:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

What I see at the left edge is that it becomes more indistinct than the section immediately below it with the trees behind it. In fact, it looks like there is a slightly dark halo there, which may be part of the same problem. Daniel Case (talk) 04:11, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

• It was not shot in RAW, but in JPEG. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

• Btw @Daniel Case: , the matter of fact, that the photo was shot on a chilly January winter morning and the position of the sun was way down low (so the sunlight had to penetrate the hazy atmosphere almost parallel to the surface of the earth), the whole scenery is plunged in the long-wave reddish light; that’s the reason why the bark of the tilia trees is not brownish but more on the reddish side. That circumstance can evoke an unnatural appearance. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:34, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

I could see that it was shot at sunrise, and I can imagine it looked magical, and I don't blame you for taking it. But ... taking in mind what I noticed and remarked on in my reply to Pine, it looks as if perhaps the image was slightly oversharpened. The colors of the trees look alright, but something about the texture doesn't. Daniel Case (talk) 04:11, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 06:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:07, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 12:36, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Maybe the composition could be even better with the right side cut just before the altar, keeping only the building between the branches and the track, to make a more striking image, though I also like it as it is now -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:59, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:46, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:34, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Podzemnik (talk) 19:11, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --The NMI User (talk) 03:47, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 06:27, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 13:55, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 15:10, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 14:09, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings