Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Nidarosdom 1857.jpg

File:Nidarosdom 1857.jpg, not delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2009 at 10:58:21

•  Info Reason to delist (Original nomination): 0.6 Megapixels only. Barely got Featured in 2005.
•  Delist As nominator. -- JovanCormac 10:58, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Delist —kallerna™ 12:09, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Delist --Karel (talk) 13:21, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep - there were no megapixels in 1857 when they took this photo.--Avala (talk) 13:48, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
  • There sure were when this photo was scanned, though. -- JovanCormac 15:28, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
    • You can't create more detail in the photo using a scanner if there is no more detail. If the image is small, it's small and scanning it as huge size will only get you to see the details of the paper, not the photo.--Avala (talk) 15:56, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep The problem with rescanning is access to the original, often it is just not available. This is a striking photo, regardless of the damage to the photo and scan resolution. --Tony Wills (talk) 19:41, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep per Avala and Tony Wills -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:48, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep It is taken in 1857. So what if it is 0.6 Megapixels? The historical value has to be taken into account. Ter890 (talk) 14:24, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep For the others. Jacopo Werther (talk) 17:31, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep - Per Avala. - ☩Damërung ☩. -- 09:02, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep historic/rare content can't be judged by the same standards as we do modern content, nominating old historic images for WP:POINT about 1mp isn't very good. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 18:35, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment Please explain how the nomination disrupts Wikipedia. -- Petritap (talk) 12:16, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
    • I fail to see that as well. Raeky, it appears to me as if you don't know what the FP delisting process on Commons is for. -- JovanCormac 14:47, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Delist Resolution. /Daniel78 (talk) 18:46, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 4 delist, 7 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /Daniel78 (talk) 21:24, 25 October 2009 (UTC)