Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 20 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Izbicko - Stubendorf - palace.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Izbicko/Stubendorf, Silesia - palace --Pudelek 21:41, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Distracting shadows and branches. --El Grafo 09:19, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. Good quality. In this case, the shadows are not distracting IMO. It would be good for this picture, if you can lighten up the dark areas Pudelek! --Hubertl 09:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment I could probably live with either the shadows or the branches, but with both of them in combination that's a bit too much distraction for me. Unfortunately, it gets worse in thumbnail size, which is what most people would see in a Wikipedia article (just as a side note – that's of course not part of the QI criteria). --El Grafo 09:37, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Normally I would say that the the branches are too dark. But in this case and a longer look you can see this as an artistic design. I like the hole shadow play is this picture. Also this on the building. --Hockei 20:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Subtle mixture of light and shadow--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support - I think it's a bit dark, but otherwise fine. Mattbuck 22:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Changed my mind: You are right, if you look at it from a more artistic perspective, the whole shadow thing makes a lot of sense. Thanks @all for opening my eyes, why didn't I see that before? --El Grafo (talk) 09:47, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Villacher Alpe Rosstratte Almhuetten 13022015 9829.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Log cabins at Rosstratte, Villacher Alpe, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 00:06, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Pretty, but lacks high-level contrast (possibly overexposed), and tilted clockwise. --Mattbuck 22:54, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Reworked version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 04:33, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
     Support - Much better. Mattbuck 22:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice composition and good quality -- Spurzem 12:17, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Klagenfurt Tarviser Strasse Rizzibruecke ueber Lendkanal 07102008 1050.jpg

[edit]

File:Albeck Seebachern Schafferalm Futterstelle inmitten von Zirbelkiefern und Laerchen 01112013 050.jpg

[edit]

File:Cologne_Germany_Cologne-Gay-Pride-2009_Parade-01.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Cologne, Germany: Drag queen "Miss Tammie Twilight" (Denmark) at Cologne Pride Parade 2014 --Cccefalon 00:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
     Oppose The composition of the photo is totally unsuccessful. The head is cut off the top and bottom missing the stethoscope. --Steindy 01:07, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Which stethoscope? As far as I remember, the drag queen had an extra long dildo attached there. It's precisely cut at a point, where the image is focussed on the face. --Cccefalon 04:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 Comment For me, the blue thing looks around his neck like a stethoscope. The discussion about what it is, in any case underlines the poor trimming. Above should indeed have been cut away and the over-exposed hair. --Steindy 01:17, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality, even if Tammie not very handsome. It is quite common to cut portraits like this --DKrieger 21:18, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The framing of this image is too tight, and the picture is disturbed in the bottom left --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Camera (or subject) shake is noticeable --Shansov.net 02:20, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Cccefalon 00:43, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Chiang_Mai_-_Wat_Inthakin_Sadue_Muang_-_0007.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Wat Inthakin Sadue Muang, Chiang Mai (vignetting was intentional) --DerFussi 14:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose I doubt that the posterisation in the vignetted areas was also intentional. Can you please look into that? --Cccefalon 14:55, 5 February 2015 (UTC)<br
  •  Comment />Are you sure there is some banding in the vignetted areas? I just looked at it in full resolution, but on my laptop... can't see anything... can't imagie that Lightroom works that bad.... hmmmm ... going to check it at when I am back at home. -- DerFussi 15:14, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I only could review from notebook screen as I am currently abroad. Perhaps, another user with calibrated screen should cross check, perhaps Christian? --Cccefalon 11:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Did a reupload with slightly different settings. But have no better idea... if not... its ok... -- DerFussi 14:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Still noticable banding. Mattbuck 00:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • *  Support I disagree. We have tons of QI with much more banding. More votes, please. --Smial 22:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Maybe it's affected by JPEG compression? I can see artifacts too. --Shansov.net 02:37, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
    • I alwys use the maximum quality setting when saving it as JPG. If it's caused by the compression, i can not fix it. -- DerFussi 09:35, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Steindy 00:38, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Schreitende_menschliche_Figur_by_Josefine_Sokole,_1987_-_03.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The sculpture Schreitende menschliche Figur (walking human figure) by Josefine Sokole created in 1987 is located in the Gemeindebau Breitenfurter Straße 401-413 in Liesing, Vienna. --Herzi Pinki 01:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm not sure about the colour balance, but regardless the image doesn't seem very crisp to me. --Mattbuck 00:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Question Is this the whole sculpture shown, or just the top part of it? I can’t see anything schreitend (striding) in this. --Kreuzschnabel 09:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Steindy 01:30, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Steindy 00:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Portrait_cameo_with_stones_front.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Portrait cameo with stones. Front view. First of 3 more. Not sure about the Description. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 20:52, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
     CommentPlease see my notes: some dust in the bottom left corner, and lens flares on the rignt --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:47, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Not done--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:58, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
     CommentThere are tiny dust particles all over the place. But the Boke generated by those is a problem? Nor can I recognize flare. Note: It is only 5 cm on the long side and contrast is adjusted via color checker passport. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 12:17, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'm afraid that the center in out of focus. --C messier 15:45, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Not done  Oppose --Steindy 00:23, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined XRay 11:59, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

File:USO-FCG_-_20140913_67.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination USO-FCG - 20140913 - Jumping --Pleclown 12:27, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good shot and QI -- Spurzem 13:12, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Chromatic noise on the redshirt. --Mattbuck 22:59, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 23:07, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Chroma noise everywhere, red channel blown on garments (oversaturated), sharpened JPEG artifacts all over the background audience (I know it’s not the main subject but still part of the picture) – below QI for me --Kreuzschnabel 10:04, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Color noise visible at 100% view. The k-5 II can do much better at ISO3200. Something went wrong in post processing. -- Smial 16:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment New version. Pleclown 21:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
    •  Neutral Better, but still rather grainy. Change vote to neutral. -- Smial 09:45, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 17:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The noisy background is too distracting, which is due to the relatively small focal length. For sports photos 70 mm are rarely capable. --Steindy 01:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 19:30, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 06:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

File:USO-ASM_-_20140927_-_Alexandre_Lapandry.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination USO-ASM - 20140927 - Alexandre Lapandry --Pleclown 12:27, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 13:09, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Background needs denoising. --Mattbuck 22:59, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose a very noisy image, no QI for me. --Alchemist-hp 13:40, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
  • A good picture but too many noising, in the background, and the red area on the right is disturbing --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment New version with less chroma noise. Pleclown 21:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 17:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Livioandronico2013 21:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Yes it is noisy, but the noise is not disturbing and it is a good sportphoto. --Steindy 01:49, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 06:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Heuliez GX 337 (Hybride) n°766 RÉSEAU MISTRAL Coupiane.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Bus in Toulon --Billy69150 09:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Please, a tigther crop at the top and a better one at the right Poco a poco 15:00, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
     Support now Poco a poco 20:07, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Composition osée mais intéressante. --Kvardek du 18:09, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm with Poco on this. --Mattbuck 23:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment ✓ Done --Billy69150 10:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  weak --Hubertl 08:43, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  weak too --TwoWings 16:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? Poco a poco 20:08, 19 February 2015 (UTC)