Template talk:Information

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Info non-talk.svg Template:Information has been protected indefinitely because it is a highly-used or visible template. Use {{Edit request}} on this page to request an edit.
Please test any changes in the template's /sandbox or /testcases subpages, or in a user subpage, and consider discussing changes at the talk page before implementing them.

Bitte um Hilfe[edit]

Die Datei: File:Ivo Puhonny Grauslich.jpg ist versehentlich im Rahmen des Kulturdenkmal-Wettbewerbs hochgeladen worden und trägt falsche Informationen, die ich nicht ändern kann. Der Creator der Marionette ist Ivo Puhonny. Und die passende Lizenz sollte anzeigen, dass der Urheber Puhonny vor 70 Jahren verstorben ist. Wäre schön, wenn ein Experte die Lizenz richtig stellen könnte und das selbst erstellt verschwinden lassen könnte. Danke im voraus --MoSchle 04:08, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Pictogram voting keep.svg Fixed --Jarekt (talk) 13:56, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Can we add {{Private correspondence}} to the list of acceptable options in the Source field?[edit]

{{edit request}}I've been wondering how to handle a recent concern I've had with how to properly fill in the |source= field for an image I uploaded when the author had given his permission in a private OTRS message and wished to remain confidential. I was eventually informed by LX that the correct option to use would have been {{Private correspondence}}. It would have been great if I could have found this right here in the Information template, and I would like to request that it be added to the description of |source= here so that it won't be so difficult for editors in the future to find. Can this be done? KDS4444 (talk) 23:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

It appears I was able to do this myself after all. This edit request may be ignored. KDS4444 (talk) 03:47, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Missing dates[edit]

Hi all, i'd like to find all files with missing date. Is there any easy way? Maybe we could add a category similar to when the author is missing. --Arnd (talk) 11:47, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Well, missing dates are not a big problem, compared to missing author or source. --Leyo 13:31, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
i know, but is this a reason against having such a category? I agree that a warning on the description page is not required. But a maintenance category would help at least me in reducing missing date. --Arnd (talk) 19:50, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Well, I am indifferent here, weighing benefits and costs. Other opinions? --Leyo 21:21, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Ok, i think i can generate such a list also by parsing a Commons dump or something like this. --Arnd (talk) 04:17, 23 September 2015 (UTC)