This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
You can delete all the pictures that you have said to me. Thanks! (Traduction with google traduction):Du kannst alle Abbildungen löschen, die du zu mir gesagt hast. Danke!
I don't want to delete your pictures (besides the fact that I'm not an administrator and can't do it). I only tagged your images as "no source", which means that there is no link provided to the original site you've got your images from. So nobody can prove that these pictures are really in public domain and because of that they may be deleted. If you simply provide sources for your images, you can remove my "no source" tags. See your picture Image:Rollover Atlantis.jpg for an example. --Bricktop01:52, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Do you know if anything is going to be done about Denniss removing categories from images? Was there ever a decision on this? Grenavitar02:11, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
No, I don't know anything new about Denniss, because I only have rocket/space images I uploaded by myself on my watchlist and Denniss stoped to precess them. But if you look at his discussion page, he is gaining some positive comments for his recent work. --Bricktop13:43, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
The issue link no longer works. I am having some differences with DennisS and his Categorization crusade on Commons. I was wondering if you could give me some advice on how to deal with him. Should I just write a bot that reverts all of his removals of categories? Or is the proper thing to escalate this to Village Pump again and press for a policy resolution. Dennis has reasons for his position, but I think he is in the extreme minority and there needs to be a systemic answer to this because he is just going to continue on year after year destroying metadata about images on commons. Mak19:56, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
I would say this issue should be discussed publicly. I also would preffer a clear decision for how to deal with images included both in articles and categories. But I must say, at this moment I haven't a clear opinion in this issue: on one side I can understand Dennis's point, but on the other side his system of putting images in articles and removing from categories could hinder finding images on commons. I also think writing a bot, which reverts Dennis edits, isn't a good idea, because this may lead to a kind of "edit war". But I may be wrong, because I hadn't much contact with Dennis and his edits in the last couple of months. --Bricktop11:54, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
His only response to my communications has been more mass reversions. I really hope this can be aired publically too. I do think this is an honest difference of opinion, but he was using bullying tactics. Today he has not reverted anything so maybe he is thinking about this.
But he really has a weak position from a number of perspectives. Categories cover Hyponymy relationships, and Articles cover Meronymy. His fundamental misunderstanding of these differences creates chaos in building a taxonomy. DennisS's conservative stance on application of categories to information objects is not an expression of greater understanding of categorization fundamentals. He has no cache there, so don't buy into it. If he would bother to educate himself on taxonomy formalisms he will see my point.
But let's take the particular practical question you mentioned. Take the idea that broad categories should be applied to articles not images. OK. Consider the article USS New York (BB-34) . BB34 was in both WWI and WWII. Now DennisS marked the article with both categories (ships of wwI and ships of wwII). Totally wrong. Why? Because BB35 was massively changed during it's lifetime. The BB35 of 1916 and the Great Fleet had secondary swing guns on the sides, and lattice cage masts characteristic of that period. Now, a novice viewing this article might conclude from this article tag that this is coal smoke belching beast is an example of a WWII battleship. The solution? Strip those two categories from the article, and place them on the images to which they apply.
Image:BepiColombo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
auf der zugehörigen NASA-Website steht "BepiColombo images courtesy of ESA", zudem ist das Bild auch in der ESA-Bildergallerie aufgelistet. Ich gehe davon aus, dass das Bild daher weiterhin unfrei ist. --Phrood08:58, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
Hallo Phrood. Der Grund wieso ich dachte dass dieses Bild frei ist, ist dass auf der NASA-Seite zwei weitere Bilder mit The Mercury Magnetospheric Orbiter and Mercury Surface Element BepiColombo images courtesy of ESA markiert sind. Und ich dachte zunächst dass bezieht sich nur auf diese zwei Bilder. Jetzt habe ich aber genauer hingeschaut: das sind wohl zwei getrennte Sätze, also BepiColombo images courtesy of ESA bezieht sich dann auf alle Bilder der Seite. Daher denke ich Du hast Recht und wir sollten das Bild löschen. --Bricktop09:25, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
Вопрос о фотографиях
Привет. Я хотел бы тебя спросить. На странице «Мюнхенской конференции по безопасности» есть фотографии здесь. Там стоит такое разрешение на использование их фотографий.
Our online editorial team will document the event in writing and with pictures.
You can download the texts and photographs (300 dpi) free of charge
for further use as long as you indicate the name of the author/photographer.
Unsere Online-Redaktion dokumentiert die Veranstaltung in Wort und Bild.
Texte und Fotos (Auflösung 300 dpi) können heruntergeladen werden und sind
zur weiteren Nutzung honorarfrei, soweit der Name des Verfassers/Fotografen genannt wird.
Привет! Мне кажется что эти фотки можно использовать. Сейчас спрошу на немецкой Википедии de:Wikipedia_Diskussion:Public-Domain-Bilderquellen, думаю там быстро разрешат этот вопрос. Кстати имхо подходящий template для таких фотографий этот {{copyrightedFreeUseProvidedThat|the name of the photographer is given}}
Мда реакция на немецкой Википедии была не такая бурная как я предполагал... Похоже что этими фотографиями можно пользоваться, но желательно заранее запросить у них по мэйлу письменное разрешение. --Bricktop13:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Hallo Uwe, Du hast natürlich recht! Habe die Bilder ohne nachzudenken falsch benannt. Danke für die Korrektur! Gruß --Bricktop11:27, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Image:Delta II 7940 rocket launching CALIPSO and CloudSat.jpg
Nicht schlimm, war kaum Arbeit, trotzdem ärgert man sich immer zuerst, dass man solche blöden Fehler beseitigen muß, die auch noch vom selben Autor wie die letzten sind :-) Hast du noch mehr Bilder, deren Namen ich noch mal vorsichtshalber kontrollieren sollte? :-) MFG --Uwe W.12:30, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Keine Ahnung, ob es noch mehr falsch benannte Bilder gibt. Wenn ich es wüßte hätte ich sie selbst schon längst korrigiert ;-). Der Delta-Fehler kam wohl davon, dass ich mich beim uploaden sehr beeilt habe, da ich noch etwas anderes zu tun hatte. Die CALIPSO/CloudSat-Fehler kamen zustande, weil diese Bilder von der Seite des Kennedy Space Centers Media Gallery kamen und ich diesen Ort für die Bildnamen ohne nachzudenken einfach übernahm. Obwohl ich natürlich wußte dass die Delta in VAFB startet.
Hi, the Vega program was a Soviet space project around 1986. Yet you claim that the photos from this Soviet space project are owned by NASA? Please add a source + license to this image as quickly as possible. Thuresson13:12, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
The source I got the picture from is given on the description page. However it apparently doesn't work any more. I tagged this picture as PD-USGov-NASA because it was on a NASA page and there it wasn't marked as copyrighted by someone else. But since this image comes from a Soviet Vega mission, it could also be not in PD, so I would also vote for deletion of this image. --Bricktop14:54, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Ich denke wir können mein Bild getrost löschen lassen, Deines ist ja viel schöner! Habe schon längst mein Bild in anderssprachigen Wikipedias durch Deins ersetzt. --Bricktop21:56, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi, mir ist bei Image:STS-121 Discovery approaching ISS.jpg zufällig aufgefallen, dass du da den weissen Rand unten weggeschnitten hast und du das Bild nachher in sehr hoher Qualität gespeichert hast, um durch die nochmalige Kompression die Bildqualität nicht zu stark zu verschlechtern. Dabei ist das Bild allerdings doppelt so gross geworden wie das Original. Wenn du das häufiger machst, kannst du dir ja mal Better JPEG anschauen, damit kann man entlang den JPEG-Blocks (meistens 16x16 Pixel) verlustfrei croppen. Kostet allerdings 25$, ich muss mir auch mal überlegen, ob es mir das Wert ist. Ich habe es hier genau für das benützt, finde ich ziemlich nett :) Gruss! - Pableu10:07, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Wenn ich mich da einmischen darf: das praktische kleine Programm jpegcrop ist kostenlos. Ebenfalls interessant ist jpegoptim, mit dem sich vor allem kleine JPEG-Dateien verlustlos verkleinern lassen. --Phrood10:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Darfst dich sehr gerne einmischen. jpegcrop gefällt mir gut, ich habe vorhin schon nach einer kostenlosen Alternative zu Better JPEG gesucht, aber nichts gefunden. Ich brauche ja wirklich nur den Cropping-Teil von Better JPEG, sonst nichts (ausser vielleicht Rotate, aber das können sowieso alle). Und genau das macht jpegcrop. Perfekt, danke! jepgoptimize kannte ich schon, aber das ist auch sehr praktisch. - Pableu10:48, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Danke für die Tips! Fand es auch nicht so gut, die Dateigröße nach dem croppen so anschwellen zu lassen, aber wußte nicht dass man JPEG ohne recompress und nochmaliges Speichern bearbeiten kann. Gruß --Bricktop17:58, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
No problem. Thanks for creating the articles! I will go through rest of them in the coming days. And I'm replacing the parameter {{{PAGENAME}}} you were using for the mission name, with the actual mission name, because someday we may rename some of the pages or something similar and with the actual mission designation we'll be on the safer side then. Greetings --Bricktop13:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
It would be the best solution. Maybe I can get AWB to work with Commons, then I'll replace {{{PAGENAME}}} with {{subst:PAGENAME}} in a semi-automatic mode. --Bricktop00:41, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Do you know this page? There are a lot of images of each STS mission, and I supose that they are in public domain. If you want we can upload best images for to complete the articles. --Emijrp20:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Sure I know about this page :). And I already uploaded many images from there. If I see a nice picture there I upload it to Commons, but I am normally only searching for pictures when trying to illustrate some wikipedia articles. But if you want you can go on uploading images from there! --Bricktop00:41, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Привет, Bricktop. На странице STS-116 стоит старая эмблема миссии. Я загрузил новую Image:STS-116_patch.jpg. Я мог бы её вставить в станицу STS-116, но, так как ты этим занимаешься, я подумал, что тебе это будет сподручнее сделать. Мне кажется, что там должны быть обе эмблемы.--Ygrek16:55, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Привет! Вставил новую эмблему, а старую поставил в галерею "Other". А вообще-то я ничего не имею против, если эти STS-странички будут обрабатываться другими пользователями ;-) (с этой целью они и создавались). --Bricktop17:45, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
_underway_at_high_speed_on_29_May_1915_(19-N-13046).jpg)
