User talk:Jay.Jarosz

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jay.Jarosz!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:20, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golden Mosaic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:00, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corcovado sunset silhouette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 08:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cycling across Waterloo Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you clean noise from the sky? --Nino Verde 08:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)  Comment Done, file updated; thank you for the feedback! --Jay.Jarosz 11:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 15:45, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Running in Vancouver.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, but heavy halo over statue. --Nino Verde 09:24, 8 November 2023 (UTC)  Comment Done, file updated; thank you for the feedback! --Jay.Jarosz 12:45, 9 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Much better :) --Nino Verde 15:45, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smile in Traffic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tenna 1642m.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:50, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cycling across Waterloo Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you clean noise from the sky? --Nino Verde 08:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)  Comment Done, file updated; thank you for the feedback! --Jay.Jarosz 11:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 15:45, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Running in Vancouver.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, but heavy halo over statue. --Nino Verde 09:24, 8 November 2023 (UTC)  Comment Done, file updated; thank you for the feedback! --Jay.Jarosz 12:45, 9 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Much better :) --Nino Verde 15:45, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spirograph Salesman in Kochi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 16:38, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hay Harvest in Versam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:39, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Corcovado sunset silhouette.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Corcovado sunset silhouette.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[[File:|75px|center]]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! [[:File:|]], which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 16:24, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Bienvenue en VI

VI is Commons' most interesting and useful label. But it is also the most complicated. We all had long training periods, but there is a good understanding and you will always find help. Solve the geocoding problem for your images. Take inspiration, if you wish, from the other nominations. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dairy Farm in Tenna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:55, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of Safien Valley and Tenna's Swiss Reformed Church from Höhbord.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question There are several other images that show the exterior view of the church in greater detail. Why is this one more valuable? --Tagooty (talk) 06:32, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 Comment Good question! I chose this photo as it best represents the geographical context of the church, which makes the church more special than it's architecture detail. --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 10:23, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 Question Idea: would a new scope such as "View of Safien Valley and Tenna Church" work better? --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 10:36, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment Indeed. Suggested: "Reformierte Kirche Tenna (Reformed Tenna Church) and Safien Valley - view from (direction)". Correct the English name, and put the direction. Also, for VI the image must be geocoded. --Tagooty (talk) 13:23, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
  
•  Question Thank you Tagooty! And can you please clarify the geocoding? The image already has GPS data + city/state/country data in the metadata. Where else should I include the geocoding?
•  Comment That is good enough. Since people may not look at the EXIF, it is useful to edit the Summary and add a template {{Location|10.16243|76.4414|heading:315}} (sample numbers) at the bottom. --Tagooty (talk) 06:03, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
  

 Info Added the location label to the image + updated scope. CC @Tagooty --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 10:59, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Category:Reformierte Kirche Tenna to View of Safien Valley and Tenna's Swiss Reformed Church from Höhbord --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 10:59, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Thank you. Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 13:43, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Versam-Safien railway station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:38, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Info @Archaeodontosaurus I added the Location tag to the photo now. --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 08:52, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Support OK now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:09, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lindner truck and tractor harvesting hay in Versam.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is too broad.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Thanks Archaeodontosaurus, I've updated the scope now. Please let me know if this new one works? --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 10:26, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment No: you have to link the scope to the category and it is too impressive. Lindner truck and tractor harvesting hay from the Swiss Alps in Versam. ; This scope works perfectly--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Info Updated the scope now. Excluded the "Swiss Alps" part because it's redundant. All of Versam itself is part of the Swiss Alp region. --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 10:20, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Support OK now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:20, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Hay harvest in Versam to Lindner truck and tractor harvesting hay in Versam --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 10:20, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of Safien Valley from the top of Innerbärg road in Tenna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is too broad. View of Safien Valley from the top of Innerbärg road in Tenna would be a very good scope. Don't forget the geocoding in the caption.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
   Comment Thank you for the feedback Archaeodontosaurus! I'm still new to the VI process so this has been helpful <3 I've added a caption to the image and updated the scope. I've just removed the "from the top of Innerbärg road" part as it might be too specific? This similar view can be seen from off-road as well. Its common to hike off-road there. Let me know if this works please. --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 10:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment The same subject can be photographed from several different points. The images are then very different and can claim to be eligible in VI. But for that the scopes must be different. The more precise a scope is, the less problem you will have with votes. The following formalization seems to me the most appropriate.View of Safien Valley from the top of Innerbärg road in Tenna --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Info @Archaeodontosaurus ok done! :) --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 10:39, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Support OK now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:18, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from View of Safien Valley from Tenna to View of Safien Valley from the top of Innerbärg road in Tenna --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 10:39, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barn with firewood in Tenna, Switzerland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is too broad. We must add a geocoding in caption --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Question Thanks Archaeodontosaurus! I updated the scope now + added an image caption. Please let me know if this works, I'm still new and trying to get the hangs of things here. --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 10:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment No, this nomination is not compliant. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Info @Archaeodontosaurus I added the Location tag to the photo now. I think this is what you mean by geocode in caption right? --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 09:00, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Support OK now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:21, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Barns in Tenna, Switzerland to Barn with firewood in Tenna, Switzerland --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 11:04, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tenna Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gugalcrom123 15:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lindner Unitrac 95L used for harvesting hay in Versam, Switzerland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria --Ercé (talk) 15:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose The scope is too broad. I suggest that the scope should concentrate on the truck brand rather than the country. If you do this, yo should crop the image so that the empasis is on the truck, but leave enough of the background in place so that the reader can see the type of terrain. Martinvl (talk) 21:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Info Updated scope + added "Location" label (i.e. geocoding). CC: @Ercé, @Archaeodontosaurus, @Martinvl --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 10:27, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Support The new scope is correct --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:57, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Agricultural vehicles in Switzerland to Lindner Unitrac 95L used for harvesting hay in Versam, Switzerland --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 10:27, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Info: @Jay.Jarosz: The scope is too narrow. In my view there are two problems:

• In my view the scope should be "Lindner Unitrac 95L". There are very few images in Commons of this particular vehicle and all the articles in both the English and German Wikipedias deal with all the Linder vehicles in a single article. The "95L" is sufficient to distinguish it from other Linder Unitrac vehicles.
• There is still too much background. When I look at the picture, the first thing that I see is the mountain in the top centre of the picture and then I see the truck. I suggest that you crop away enugh background so that the first thing that people see is the truck. You can do this by adjusting your crop so that the top of the mountain is no longer in the picture (the top 20% of the image as well as 20-30% of the left hand side of the image).

Martinvl (talk) 14:28, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Painted trail marker at top of Innerbärg road in Tenna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Info Done! cc:@Archaeodontosaurus --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 11:07, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Category:Hiking and footpath signs in the canton of Graubünden to Painted trail marker at top of Innerbärg road in Tenna --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 11:07, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Village of Tenna - Switzerland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Look at the scope change for the category. There is still one step missing: you must give the geocoding in the caption of the image. The image is perfectly acceptable. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
  
•  Comment Thanks Archaeodontosaurus! I've added a caption to the image, please let me know if it looks right now. Also I'm not sure what is meant by "Look at the scope change for the category"? Can you please clarify that part? --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 10:16, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment I modified the scope syntax, look at the changes. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Info Thanks @Archaeodontosaurus! Also I added the Location tag to the photo now. --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 09:07, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Support OK now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays and best wishes!

Thanks mate, and likewise 🤗 Jay.Jarosz (talk) 03:18, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays! Merry christmas! Best wishes for 2024! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:15, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Off Topic ? (Commons:Photo challenge/2023 - December - Fossil fuel)

Good morning Jay.Jarosz, I think brown coal briquettes are not "off topic"; otherwise, please post many further photos off-topic with brown coal topics - ore put my picture File:Erloschenes Kaminfeuer nach Verbrennung von gepressten Holzbriketts.jpg back, with burnt brown coal (and wood) briquettes. - Thank`s and best regards Gordito1869 (talk) 08:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi Gordito!

Agreed that coal briquettes would be on-topic.

The photo title translated to English says "wood briquettes" though. Could be a translation error?

Eitherway, I've added it back to the main gallery. Jay.Jarosz (talk) 08:37, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

...the ash is a mix of burned brown coal (and hardwood) briquettes - I explained this in the German description of the picture: "Erloschenes Kaminfeuer nach Verbrennung von gepressten Hartholz- und Braunkohlebriketts"; sorry for the misleading or incomplete description of the image. Best regards --Gordito1869 (talk) 08:45, 3 January 2024 (UTC)