User talk:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT/Archive 9

File:0 Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris.JPG

Bonsoir Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,

Désolé d'avoir envoyé Notre-Dame de Paris à la "revue consensuelle", mais je pense qu'elle ne peut pas être promue en l'état. Tout le long de presque toutes les lignes verticales (et de certaines statues), en grande taille, il y a des lignes rouges-magenta vraiment visibles, qui sont dues au soleil couchant. Je trouve par ailleurs que ce n'est globalement pas assez net, et il y a par dessus le marché des zones surexposées. Je pense que c'est améliorable, mais peut-être pas au point d'amener une promotion.

J'espère que tu ne m'en voudras pas !

Amitiés, --Jebulon (talk) 17:52, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Bonne renommée vaut mieux que statue dorée

Bonjour Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,

Merci de ta vigilance sur la statue du pont Alexandre III que tu connais bien. Tu as eu parfaitement raison, et j'ai donc écarté cette photo de la liste. Je l'ai retravaillée, et la reproposerai prochainement. Je crains d'avoir voulu aller trop vite pour cette image, heureusement que tu étais là.

Pour info, j'ai à proposer une image du même sujet que toi ("ronde des amours"), j'attends que ta promotion prenne effet afin qu'il n'y ait pas de concurrence (as-tu remarqué le cadenas -love padlock ?- sur la patte du crabe ?), mais ça sera amusant de comparer.

D'ici là, je te souhaite une bonne soirée de Noël, et je me réjouis de continuer à partager avec toi de belles images.

Bien cordialement.--Jebulon (talk) 12:07, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Lampadaire du Pont Alexandre III - Ronde des amours.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a bit noise but good composition and colours --Mbdortmund 02:14, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Haltinne - Château.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Sculpture du Pont Alexandre III - Néréide (A. Massoulle).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Jebulon 02:05, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Voeux

Cher ami d'outre-Quiévrain et collègue du Pont Alexandre III,

Merci infiniment de tes vœux qui me touchent.

Reçois les miens en retour, pour toi bien sûr et, hors de "Commons", pour ceux qui te sont chers.

Je me réjouis à l'avance de partager encore avec toi, cette année, de belles images.

Bien amicalement,--Jebulon (talk) 10:05, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Voeux II

Tous mes Voeux pour 2012 pour toi et ta famille et que l'aventure wikipedienne continue! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:08, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Voeux III

Merci pour tes voeux! A mon tour, je te souhaite une bonne année, pleine de bonheur ... et de belles photos, bien sûr! -- MJJR (talk) 17:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Bonne année !

Bonjour,

Tous mes vœux pour l'année 2012 ! Puisse-t-elle être une année de rencontres, de découvertes et de comptes-rendus photographiques passionnants.

Rendez-vous pour WLM2012 ?

Trizek ^{here or on fr:wp} 18:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wood sculptors at work, sculpteur sur bois..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful, but the quality is far too low IMO (color too warm, wrong white balance). It fails the criterion 3 in this case. Could you maybe improve this one ?--Jebulon (talk) 13:51, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment Improvements have been made -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 09:24, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
• Merci. Pardon de pinailler: est-ce vraiment de l'ébénisterie et non pas plutôt de la sculpture sur bois ?--Jebulon (talk) 18:11, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment C'est effectivement un sculpteur sur bois.
•  Support Nothing wrong. Useful and relevant. VI--Jebulon (talk) 14:19, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:01, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
the Houille river in Givet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:53, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

•  Question Why is this a valuable scope? --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose - nice image, but scope far too narrow. --Claritas (talk) 10:36, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment I suggest: "the Houille river in Givet" from scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:10, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment OK I agree with the suggestion of --Archaeodontosaurus -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 13:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Support The scope has changed I confirm my positive vote.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:13, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:39, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agapanthus praecox subsp. orientalis, flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - best in scope. --Claritas (talk)
•  Oppose I don't see this image within the scope provided.--Jetstreamer (talk) 21:25, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

10:37, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm not a botanist, but I'm pretty certain it's identified correctly. --Claritas (talk) 21:29, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment You are both right. the scope was badly formulated (see the new syntax) must also be reduced to "flower". The scope has changed it is necessary that the first positive vote is confirmed. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:55, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Claritas (talk) 10:31, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Support All criteria met now.--Jetstreamer (talk) 10:53, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:40, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

2012

Jean-Pol, merci pour les voeux. A mon tour je te présente, bien tardivement mais avec d'autant plus de plaisir, mes meilleurs voeux pour 2012. --Cayambe (talk) 20:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Fresque et stucs - G. Muziano - C. Nebbia - Galleria delle carte geografiche.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The composition is nearly symmetric, perhaps it should be cropped on the right side to make it symmetric. --Berthold Werner 18:53, 2 February 2012 (UTC)  Done it was true! Good quality now. --Berthold Werner 18:34, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Spa JPG05.jpg

Dear Mr. Gradmont,

I should like to inform you that I have used your image uploaded on wikimedia commons in my book „Nur wer tot ist, geht kein Risiko mehr ein“ a history of 20th century casino gambling, published at the German Libri Bod, ISBN: 978-3-8448-0977-0, on page 23, credit on page 597. Thank you for making the work available.

Yours faithfully

Henry Lohner, Munich, Germany --Zenwort (talk) 09:10, 22 August 2012 (UTC) User: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Zenwort

Bien vu

Merci pour la correction. --Agamitsudo (talk) 09:32, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Award

	Paréidolian photographical award
	For all the excellent photographic additions and your great work on Commons Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 09:21, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Filemover

Hi Jean-Pol. I've added the filemover right to your account. If you'd rather continue to use rename requests, I'm happy to rename files for you. I just wanted to give you the choice. INeverCry 19:35, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Palais Stoclet

Bonsoir Jean-Pol. Belle image du Palais Stoclet! Vous me demandez mon avis sur la proposition de la supprimer sur Commons. Lorsqu'on applique la loi belge sur les droits d'auteur, je crois que votre photo ne peut en effet pas être publiée, pour la simple raison que l'architecte est décédé en 1956, c'est-à-dire il y a moins de septante ans. Le fait qu'il s'agit d'un monument classé au patrimoine mondial de l'UNESCO n'y change rien. C'est évidemment complètement dingue et absurde - et révoltant pour un wikipédien pur et dur - mais même les lois stupides doivent être appliquées... Vous avez la malchance que quelques intégristes s'acharnent contre cette image. Ils ont malheureusement la loi de leur côté. Maintenant il faudra attendre 2026 pour publier l'image sur Commons - à moins que quelqu'un ne trouve la formule magique pour la faire passer quand-même d'une façon légalement acceptable.

Tout à fait autre chose: avez-vous participé cette année au concours WLM? L'année passée c'était un franc succès pour vous! Moi-même j'ai de nouveau participé, non seulement en Belgique, mais aussi aux Pays-Bas et en France. Je suis curieux ce que cela donnera, tout en ne me faisant pas trop d'illusions. Cordialement, Marc Ryckaert - MJJR (talk) 20:41, 9 October 2012 (UTC).

Bonsoir et désolé de cette réponse tardive. En effet, je rejoins les propos de MJJR. Il est vraiment dommage de ne pas pouvoir publier ce genre de photos. J'en ai moi-même fait les frais avec certaines photos de sculptures et peintures murales trop récentes. Il est temps que la loi belge s'assouplisse à ce niveau-là.

Je profite de cette intervention pour saluer le travail remarquable que vous fournissez depuis de nombreuses années sur Commons. Cordialement, JNélis 18:13, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Jean-Pol GRANDMONT, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 10:06, 27 October 2012 (UTC)