User talk:Micropix
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:57, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:41, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:55, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Is this root hair multicellular?
[edit]@Micropix: I have a question to you on your photo. The wikimedia photo of root-hairs on epiblema (rhizodermis) shows
a partition like (or cross-wall-like structure).
What is this?
up to my knowledge, root-hairs are unicellular. So it is giving me an awkward feeling. Then is it an exception? or this is just an artifact such as a fold or crack? (it does not seem to be artefact) . Or it could be an organell's (such as vacuole's membrane) (or if in this seemingly stained specimen if vacuoles do not survive then maybe a buble wall)? or maybe it is a stem hair? or maybe Solanum tuberosum contains more than one cell? or may be only this one root hair or only this one individual plant was anomalous?