User talk:Sailko

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archive 0
Archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3
Archive 4
Archive 5

Utilizzo immagine[edit]

Per il corretto utilizzo di questa immagine al di fuori di Wikipedia (es. per una pubblicazione storica), devo citare anche Sailko come autore della foto? O posso citare genericamente che si tratta di foto caricata in Commons in PD? Suggeriscimi per cortesia la soluzione migliore da citare nella pubblicazione, grazie. --Teseo () 18:32, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Cioao, questa è un'immagine in pubblico dominio, non sono io l'autore della foto e non devi citare niente in particolare. ;) --Sailko (talk) 18:34, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
@Sailko: grazie. Per cui se ho capito bene posso liberamente riprodurre qualsiasi immagine in PD senza citare alcuno, semplicemente specificando che si tratta di immagine in PD da Commons? --Teseo () 21:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Sì, non sarebbe neanche necessario citare la fonte in questo caso. --Sailko (talk) 07:18, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
@Sailko: grazie per la cortesia. --Teseo () 08:41, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Your picture on w:it:Abramo e gli angeli[edit]

God morning Sailko@, this photo you have uploaded to commons and which is used in the WP article w:it:Abramo e gli angeli shows a highe level of brightness than the original Italian website scuolagrandesanrocco.org.

According to the website owners, the published images are faithful and compliant to the original.

Possibly, I would like to know if it comes form a photo taken in the related place in Venice or if it has been object of some w:en:Digital image processing SW activity. Thanks for your eventual courtesy help. Have a good day, Micheledisaveriosp (talk) 14:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi! The image was shot directly in the museum, then I retouched it (cropping, straighting lined and fixing brightness). Possibly I could have highlighted a little the brightness, but not too much, as the reflection on the side is not burned. --Sailko (talk) 18:54, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi Sailko@, thanks for your courtesy answer. I didn't visit yet the School of Saint Rocco in Venice. So I've to ask you: do you remember if the left hand had the same particular thant the right one? I mean a bruise -if not a wound- which probably may recall the w:en:Five Holy Wounds of Jesus Christ the Lord. The right hand seems not to be well preserved as the opposite side. It is difficult to remember such a detail, but it may be possible you get more informations looking to your original shot image. Hope it helps.Micheledisaveriosp (talk) 20:18, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, I didnt' notice any. --Sailko (talk) 12:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Mi aiuti a dare delle categorie consone a questa immagine?[edit]

Ciao, ogni tanto faccio un giro tra le immagini da categorizzare che sono correlate al territorio italiano; oggi ho trovato File:Photographers (159206335).jpeg che però non so esattamente come inserire in qualche categoria di tecnica fotografica e/o categoria "artistica" per topologia di foto, spero di spiegarmi, perché categorizzata solo sotto Lago Trasimeno e data di scatto non la troverebbe nessuno... (volendo metto anche quella dei pontili italiani...)--Threecharlie (talk) 06:29, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Non bastano quelle che ci sono? Io credo sia a posto--Sailko (talk) 07:58, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Codice Urbani[edit]

Hello, I seek informations about the Codice Urbani. I have seen you have insert the advertissement about "Codice Urbani" on this picture : [[1]], but as this painting is situated in Vatican City and not in Italy, I would have thought that this restriction would not apply to it. Could you help me please about that ? --Trouverunpseudo (talk) 00:50, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Ok I removed. --Sailko (talk) 08:14, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
My aim was to have information about this situation. So as you are removing the advertissement I suppose you are sure the Codice Urbani do not apply to Vatican ?--Trouverunpseudo (talk) 09:31, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Yes I am sure. Actually the template is obsolete, since there is a new law from 2015 (Codice Franceschini), but content is similar, so I prefer not to change the template myself. --Sailko (talk) 10:03, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. I am wondering also if the restriction applies to old photographs or even old drawings of such objets from public domain books ? --Trouverunpseudo (talk) 14:43, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
In those case it should be ok (PD) --Sailko (talk) 18:51, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Immagini storiche di Firenze[edit]

Ciao, ti sottopongo un tour di immagini orfane che puoi trovare inserendo nella finestra di ricerca "Firenze incategory:All_media_needing_categories_as_of_2019"; alcune le ho inserite io ma tu sicuramente le riconoscerai a vista, o almeno molte più di me, così ti giro la patata bollente. :-) --Threecharlie (talk) 15:24, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

✓ Fatto ;) --Sailko (talk) 18:30, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Cicognini[edit]

La categoria del collegio è già sottocategoria di D'Annunzio. controlli anche gli altri file, per favore? --Ruthven (msg) 15:33, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Ruthven, scusa non ha senso, le foto sono già categorizzate nell'albero del cicognini, non ha senso rimetterle nella categoria generica. Ha senso invece metterle in D'Annunzio, perché sono i registri in cui compare il nome dell'illustre studente. Se mi dici che Collegio Cicognini ha come sottocategoria D'annunzio, adesso cobntrollo e rimuovo, perché non mi sembra che una scuola vada sottocategorizzata dentro gli alunni (semmai il contrario, tramite opposite sottocartelle). Io non avrò controllato tutti i file, ma tu controlla il "senso" delle categorie. Ciao --Sailko (talk) 16:22, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Fammi capire una cosa: il registro del colleggio Cicognini non va nella categoria "Cicognini"? Mi sembra logico :)
A parte gli scherzi, D'Annunzio dovrebbe essere sottocategoria del collegio, imho. Se sei d'accordo, spostiamo il tutto coerentemente. --Ruthven (msg) 18:02, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Ruthven Ha già un'altra categoria del collegio Cicognini (mi pare - Interior). Se vuoi puoi creare una categoria "Alumni of....". Grazie --Sailko (talk) 18:36, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Immaculate Conception by Maerten de Vos in San Francesco a Ripa[edit]

Hi Sailko, The traditional attribution of this work to Maerten de Vos was contested in 1995 by Nicole Dacos. Her new attribution to Antoon Sallaert gained acceptance, although apparently not by all (see references here). So that's why I included both names. I take the opportunity to thank you for your amazing contributions! Best, Karmakolle (talk) 21:22, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Hey, thank you! Karmakolle I understand, you are free to revert my edit, but are you sure it is the only Immaculate Conception painting in that church?? --Sailko (talk) 08:06, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Palazzo Ducale di Mantova[edit]

salve Sailko, ho notato che recentemente stai caricando alcuni ritratti gonzagheschi da te fotografati, be vedi tra i primi caricamenti che ho fatto, comprendono proprio proprio quei meravigliosi ritratti, con la differenze che i tuoi possiedono la cornice ed un' alta qualità grafica eccellente. se per caso me li potessi sovraccaricare con i tuoi, ma senza cornice, mi faresti cosa assai gradita--Bernhard Moltke (talk) 09:42, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Bernhard Moltke Ciao Bernhard, grazie dei complimenti, ma non posso sovraccaricare sulle tue immagini le mie per un discorso di riconoscimento dell'autore (mio e tuo) e altre cose legate al filename, ai crediti, ecc. Però puoi usare il Template:Superseded o altre cose simili per segnalare la presenza di un file migliore. Non aggiungo versioni senza cornice, ma puoi facilmente estrarle con lo strumento crop. Mi raccomando di caricare questi nuovi files separatamente, non sovrascrivendo quelli con cornice. Ciao e grazie --Sailko (talk) 12:26, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Thanks for uploading File:Presepe di santa chiara, da vari presepi del xviii secolo realizzati sotto ferdinando IV di borbone, 04.jpg that was selected as Picture of the month on the Neapolitan Wikisource. Ruthven (msg) 12:44, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Grazie Ruthven! La aggiungo con piacere alla pagina utente ;) --Sailko (talk) 13:30, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
L'avviso ti arriva tardi solo perché è oggi che ho creato il template per segnalare queste fotografie. Grazie a te per i tuoi contributi! ciao --Ruthven (msg) 13:36, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Mutter Erde (talk) 18:01, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Image corruption detected in File:Palazzo te, camera dei venti, 1527-28, segni e costellazioni, sagittario-arturo con prigionieri.jpg[edit]

Deutsch | English | +/−


Information icon
Hello Sailko, it appears that the version of File:Palazzo te, camera dei venti, 1527-28, segni e costellazioni, sagittario-arturo con prigionieri.jpg which you uploaded 2020-03-16T22:30:42Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 22:32, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Image corruption detected in File:Castiglione olona, arco della piazza del comune 04 corte con tracce di loggiato.jpg[edit]

Deutsch | English | +/−


Information icon
Hello Sailko, it appears that the version of File:Castiglione olona, arco della piazza del comune 04 corte con tracce di loggiato.jpg which you uploaded 2020-03-26T19:44:30Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 19:45, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Gustav adolf mossa, la donna morta, 1908, acquerello 02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Gustav adolf mossa, la donna morta, 1908, acquerello 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Regasterios (talk) 10:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Regarding your screenshots of Greed[edit]

About a year and a half ago (in late October 2018 to be more precise), i've asked you about 10 peculiar screenshots of the film Greed you uploaded to Commons in 2008 under the pretext that the film was published without a copyright notice and therefore in the public domain (the film is now in the public domain so there's seems to be no issues with copyright infigment now.). Two weeks later, you replied me in my Talk page that those were from a version of the movie "you dowloaded many years ago".

Do you still have the version? If Yes, specify the file size so I can look for a way you can send it to me. If No, Can you remember the website/link where you got the version from? (assuming that the site is still active)

I'll expect to receive your answer via PM. Mayimbú (talk) 03:20, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Geraki TLG 19:18, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Photos of the ponte Giovanni da Verrazzano (Florence)[edit]

Hello! On this site https://structurae.net/en/photos/199369-giovanni-da-verrazzano-bridge there's a picture you took of the Ponte Giovanni da Verrazzano in Florence. Would you mind uploading it here? I'd like to add it to the articles about the bridge on wikipedia. Thank you! --Spitzahorn (talk) 10:09, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Spitzahorn, the image was deleted here for infringement of supposed copyright of the architect... See here --Sailko (talk) 10:53, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Deletions[edit]

Hello!

When you want to delete something, please don't replace all the page's content with the deletion template. Just place it at the top. Regards, Jonteemil (talk) 10:57, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Jonteemil, funny, I've been deleting hundreds of categories like that and noone ever told me before 😂 --Sailko (talk) 11:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Yeah, it's a very minor thing so nobody probably gives a damn. But it's a good habit so nothing that can help admins is removed.Jonteemil (talk) 11:27, 21 April 2020 (UTC)