User talk:Sealle

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

"Archived" without answering[edit]

You recently archived this thread without answering my question. You are an admin here and you were asked to tell another asmin to check if you did correct (svwp DID NOT CANVASS). I stead you started to bully me even on my talk page. Now you delete everything. Is that a correct way as an admin to solve dificult issues? Adville (talk) 22:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

@Adville: a. Your English is not easy to understand. b. go there and vote for "keep" instead of please, express your opinion on... is a clear case of canvassing. c. When you need a second opinion, you should look for it yourself. d. A request to be polite is not bullying, and if you continue insulting me [1], you will get a more strict warning. Sealle (talk) 08:14, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
3 errors because of the cell phone and you can not read. Pity. This discussion is and was about your revenge deletions which you proceeded with stubbornly wiyhout getting a second oppinion, which you should have done as a part in the case. You said yourself you would and thats why I proceed to ask because of your bad behavior on svwp. Now you want to warn me? Funny. Do you rememberyou wrote this in the link I gave above?
"I’m just on my way to find someone who can be sober minded and can explain to others, that this is not The Holy War for compatriots but copyright issues which not all of those who came can understand properly. Sealle (Diskussion) 00:18, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Thank God that you finnaly understood that we want somebody else to check this issues you started when you did not understand how things work on svwp about copyright."
Thats why I proceed to ask According to your edits in a discussion you should remind until you get an answer if the person does not answer within 24 hours... so I remind you. You show me the rules of Commlns. Adville (talk) 09:01, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
You may go on having fun on your wiki, where accusations and insults are apparently accepted as part of local culture. I see no more reason to talk to a person who failed to get a grip on their behavior. Sealle (talk) 09:54, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
I was not involved in the first discussion, but looked at it as a neutral admin. As you know the involved persons from external wikis (not you) were blocked on other wikis of the same reason they discussed on svwp. That was not accusations and insults from svwp users, but fact. However you came to svwp and tried to master the swedish admins. That was not nessesary. You know that, but proceeded with revenge here when told that. I have followed everything.
I accept that you fail to see what you did and that you can not explain why you did not ask for a second opinion as you said you would. And I also accept that you therefor do not want to discuss this any more. Hopefully you will ask for a second opinion as an admin next time without threatening those who wonders what and why you do things wrong. Admins shall work together to avoid this kind of conflicts that are a waist of time. Me myself always asks for a second opinion when involved in an admin related thing on svwp if I am a part of the case. Adville (talk) 10:12, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Aleksandr Garez[edit]

  • I received this photo personally from Alexander Garez. I also received permission to publish. This photo was not previously published anywhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sashko u (talk • contribs) 14:12, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Hammond Slides[edit]

  • По-прежнему остаётся разночтение.
  • Вы пишете, что автор Thomas Taylor Hammond, и только. Однако правообладатель указал на странице категории, что должна быть лицензия CC-BY и что атрибутировать надо автору и правообладателю, и потребовал указывать источник — University of Virginia Center for Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies.
  • Если указание правообладателя ошибочно, надо исправить запись, которую правообладатель сделал в категории. Сейчас эта запись противоречит тому, что указано на страницах с изображениями. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 09:21, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
    • Источник можно добавить, почему нет. Хотя прежде всего об этом стоило позаботиться сотруднице, которая загружает изображения – это именно её обязанность. Sealle (talk) 09:30, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
      • Сотрудник указывал CREEES.UVA при загрузке.
      • Если вы настроили программу для поправок, то можно заодно и эту деталь поправить.
      • А что с лицензией-то? На странице категории правообладатель указал CC-BY. Это правильно?
      • К имени добавлены числа в скобках. Скажите пожалуйста, неужели правообладатель требует указывать эти числа как часть имени автора?
      • Если лицензионный договор требует указывать эти числа как часть имени автора, и если подразумевается, что это годы жизни, тогда надо между ними тире писать, а не дефис. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 09:44, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
        • Поскольку они загрузили файлы под CC-BY-SA, это их собственное решение, и оно - безотзывное. Годы жизни автора чаще всего указываются для удобства понимания, когда его работы перейдут в общественное достояние. И вообще говоря, неплохо бы создать для этой серии шаблон Creator:Thomas Taylor Hammond, тем более что по крайней мере в одном языковом разделе о нём уже имеется объёмная статья. На остальные мелочи Вы напрасно обращаете столько внимания. Sealle (talk) 10:01, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
          • Гм. Я, наверное, неправильно вопрос задал. Уточню.
          • Формат атрибуции следует из договора, задан в договоре. Поэтому я и прошу у вас проверить в том договоре, который мы все заключили через OTRS, как следует указывать имя автора и как следует указывать правообладателя. Если в договоре требуется указывать годы, значит, будем указывать. Если же в договоре требуется указывать имя без годов, значит, указывать годы будет нарушением договора.
          • Это не мелочи, а важные требования договора. Потому что все требования договора важны.
          • Что же до загрузки по CC-BY-SA, то при обсуждении на форуме вы писали, что лицензионный договор следует заключать через OTRS. Поэтому надо указывать тот договор, который заключён таким способом. Если же указанный при загрузке договор не заключён через OTRS, значит, он фальшивый.
          • Отсюда и возникает вопрос, какой же именно договор заключён через OTRS?
          • Такой же вывод следует из COM:EVID. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
            • Я не настолько терпелив, чтобы переливать из пустого в порожнее и подробно разбирать каждое из Ваших непонятно на чём основанных заявлений. Файлы оформлены так, как следует из обсуждения в рамках OTRS. Sealle (talk) 10:36, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
              • О! Вот это я и хочу узнать! Спасибо!
              • 1) Следовательно, автора следует всегда указывать с годами, причём не через тире (по правилам пунктуации), а через дефис (то есть с ошибкой). Потому что это «следует из обсуждения в рамках OTRS».
              • 2) Следовательно, действует не договор, который заключён через OTRS, а другой — тот, который был указан при загрузке. Он отличается от заключённого через OTRS, однако он всё равно действует. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:47, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
                • От Вашего троллинга было бы больше пользы, если бы Вы не пытались бравировать знаниями русской типографики при обсуждении английской. В рамках OTRS никакие договора не заключаются, не всегда желание порассуждать о вопросах, в которых Вы недостаточно компетентны, позволяет найти отзывчивого и столь же праздного собеседника. Sealle (talk) 10:55, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
                  • Что-то вы меня запутали... Один участник OTRS объяснил мне, что переписка с OTRS нужна для заключения договора, потому что определяет обязательный атрибут договора — сведения о стороне, предлагающей оферту. Предположим, что это неправда. Тогда каково значение переписки с OTRS в терминах Гражданского кодекса РФ? --PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:08, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Как заменить файл во всех разделах[edit]

Я когда-то сфотал более лучшую, как мне кажется, версию этого файла и загрузил её как новую в тот же файл. Потом меня отменили, я загрузил её отдельно и теперь хочу узнать, можно ли каким-то тулом заменить все включения старого файла на новый? MBH (talk) 12:45, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

  • Теоретически такой способ есть, он требует админфлага и наглости — можно дать Delinker’у задание под видом переименования. Он тупой, поменяет, но стоит кому-нибудь спросить — какого рожна? — ответить будет нечего. Пользовался этим способом, когда менял несвободные фото орденов, прежде чем их удалить. Ещё скажу, что твой файл хорош по качеству, но из-за кучи машин на переднем плане имхо уступает нынешнему. Sealle (talk) 13:17, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

{{indefblocked}}[edit]

No, not you have been ☺ ☺ ☺

Only to inform that {{indefblocked}} has to be substed, otherwise it fails to categorize the page correctly. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:40, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Adding own image Copyright from Facebook[edit]

Hi, I uploaded my picture to my page here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kwamevaughan I realised the image (File:KwameVaughan.jpg)has been deleted due to copyright issue since I had already uploaded the image on facebook. i want to find out, does that mean if I want to add my picture to my page it should be an image which is not hosted elsewhere? Kindly let me know :) as I'm still learning new things here :) Kwamevaughan (talk) 20:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

  • @Kwamevaughan: When uploading an image on Commons, you must (due to local policy) provide appropriate evidence, that the author/copyright holder has released it under a compatible license. Usually a photographer has the copyright unless they transfer it by legal document. Simply owning the work or being depicted on it does not confer copyright. We usually delete images, which have been published before uploading on Commons unless the uploader can provide author's permission via OTRS. Sealle (talk) 21:52, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Copyright violations by Inoslav Bešker[edit]

Dear Mr. Sealle, Sir,

let me quote your letter:

“Hello Inoslav Bešker.

It has come to our attention that you have uploaded several files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. Continuing to upload copyright violations will result in your account being blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.”

Instead of questions, which may need an answer, I have some remarks.

I am grateful for the tone and style of your letter because it puts things in their right place: it is the discourse that the power uses with the subject. Still, as an old professor, I will try to explain a few facts. I do not think I'm going to change your attitude, I know that is in vain to appeal to the reason of authority. Still, in the world, besides the Wikimedia Commons, there is something called a common sense.

First, to introduce myself: my name is [Inoslav Bešker], I'm a journalist for 51 years, a university Professor for 22 years, I've worked for years in the publishing industry, so I was dealing with copyright and I still remember something about it.

If I enter a coat of arms of a municipality (Dicmo, for instance), that is, a public symbol, I do not attack anybody's copyright (who has a copyright on a public coat of arms, please?), I just inform the public that was disinformed because a former, actually invalid coat of arms was published.

If I enter my photocopy of a free copy of some newspaper (as it is written clearly on it), as I did today with [Jutarnji list], I do that only for the sake of information, because the public is disinformed by the photo of building which changed its shape in the midtime. Which and whose copyright is put in question by my action? After all, I'm a journalist of that paper, you are not.

If I offer a picture of the public building, do I put in question the copyright of its architect? Or of its mason?

Now something about pictures and posters of Rudolph Bunk. They were given to me by his daughter, a very old lady, who does not know how to the internet. And who did not attach her father's testament, but was glad that the works of that painter were available on Wikipedia. All right, you did not let it go. I didn’t object My only intention was to inform the audience with illustrations, as I do to the texts (see the list of my contributions, in a dozen languages). You are, dear Mr. Sealle, Sir, angry and you threaten me.

All right, I have no intention to offer any more illustration to Wiki Commons. Fiat (vostra) iustitia, pereat mundus. You're not right, but you have the power, and I must admit it.

Please do not answer this my letter.

Excuse my English.

Best regards, --Inoslav Bešker (talk) 20:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

I don't see any connection between your remark amd my answer above. I prefere to think that you did not want to insult me. I will not contribute anything anymore to Wikimedio Commons, so there is no need to address me anymore. Have a nice day, Sir. --Inoslav Bešker (talk) 21:10, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Катерина Белкина[edit]

Коллега Sealle, вероятно вам не пришёл пинг отсюда - я там напутал с порядком подписи. Как вы помните Екатерина Белкина выказывала претензии о присутствии её работ на Викискладе и вы их удалили. Участник User talk:Katerina Belkina это вероятно её муж - Karsten Meißner. Вот он об этом пишет - File:Katerina Belkina vor ihrem Werk "The Sinner" im Museum Kunstpalast Düsseldorf, 2017 (3).jpg. Я не думаю, что он правообладатель. Наверное надо удалять? НоуФрост (talk) 10:04, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

  • Позвал туда коллегу с немецким, подожду реакции. Кстати, массовую простановку no permission лучше делать при помощи COM:VFC – меньше места займёт на СО, и обсуждать удобнее. Sealle (talk) 10:52, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

speedy deletion[edit]

hello, I submitted for speedy deletion ten images (actually video stills) you uploaded to a commons page (here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Rachel_Kushner). Those stills are all from a video that had no creative commons license and has been deleted from youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNHx5oOgeY4

thanks. Rosepoussiere (talk) 19:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

  • Rosepoussiere, deleted - maybe, but at the time of uploading the video was available under the Creative Commons license (proof, like any other from the channel), and you know it, so take the trouble to pick your words carefully. Moreover, if you made any efforts to delete this video, then first of all it would be worthwhile to let me know instead of such energetic and disorderly actions. Sealle (talk) 20:17, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I don't really know the protocols of wikimedia so please accept my apologies if you're not happy with how I did this. The video is definitely deleted. I was informed by "Librarie Mollat" that they had deleted the video, because they did not own copyright. It wasn't due to my efforts--but you're right that it was there, now gone. I'm not energetic or disorderly, but these images you posted should not, it turns out, be on wikimedia commons, as their source didn't belong there, and is now gone. Is there some other method that's better? Apologies if so: I'm not experienced at wikimedia. Thanks, and very best, Rosepoussiere (talk) 21:16, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

@Sealle, per Rosepoussiere's reply to your 1st comment in the DR, it seems that the original uploader to Youtube never had the copyright to release them. Of course, neither you as the uploader nor anyone here could have known this. So, it's no one's fault here on Commons. Could you agree to a speedy closure (delete) of the DR? --Túrelio (talk) 17:15, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
@Túrelio, thanks for your comment. I've replied on your talk page. Sealle (talk) 19:17, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Lenin and stalin.jpg[edit]

Что-то я не понимаю, что с этой фотой. В шаблоне написано, что это оригинал 1922 года от Ульяновой, а тут со ссылкой на источники - что коллаж 1949. Похоже, дело ясное что дело тёмное, но моего английского в этом разобраться не хватает... Uncle Fred 23:06, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

  • Я бы поостерёгся считать серьёзным источником по этому вопросу статью о фотошопе в Guardian. Вот здесь упомянуто наличие этого фото в издании 22 года, может быть, кто-то в силах проверить. Sealle (talk) 05:38, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
    • Вот я и поостерёгся, написав Вам, а не на КУ :-) Uncle Fred 10:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Прошу вашей помощи[edit]

Ответьте, пожалуйста, "I.V.Babaycev.jpg" здесь! Filippfilipovich (talk) 14:24, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

По мемориальным табличкам[edit]

Здравствуйте! Хотелось бы понять причину номинации на удаление мемориальных табличек. В моём понимании, они являются частью общественных зданий, которые фотографировать по ГК РФ не запрещено. Что-то понимаю не так? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wine adept (talk • contribs) 20:57, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

  • Номинация снабжена ссылками на правила, а правило ссылается на ГК — читайте. Такая творческая работа к архитектуре отношения не имеет. Sealle (talk) 21:04, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Dagames.png[edit]

То ли это орисс, то ли местный чняв, то ли подложная лицензия (скорее всего последнее), но этому тут явно не место, ИМХО. Только я в местных правилах не настолько ориентируюсь, чтобы на КУ нести... Uncle Fred 13:28, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Снёс. Sealle (talk) 15:04, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Commons:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage[edit]

Добавь меня сюда: я переименовал категорию, а заменить не могу. Или тут есть свои скрипты для рекатегоризации? MBHbot (talk) 11:18, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

  • MBHbot, MBH, есть гаджет Cat-a-lot, он позволяет массовый перенос между категориями. Включается в настройках, на табине Гаджеты, в секции Инструменты для категорий. --Michgrig (talk) 11:29, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
    • Он у меня включен. И где он в интерфейсе? MBH (talk) 11:32, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Добавил. VFC тоже годится. Sealle (talk) 11:47, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Category:Historical images of Moscow Metro[edit]

Здравствуйте! Получается, что если на фотографии изображён указатель станций, на котором отсутствуют добавленные позднее станции, то это не историческое изображение? --Michgrig (talk) 17:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

  • Я уже потом уловил логику. Верните, если хотите. Строгих критериев нет и быть не может, просто я привык к слову исторический примерять некие временнЫе промежутки, лет этак в 30—50. Sealle (talk) 18:34, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
    • С другой стороны, в головной категории Category:Historical images есть вот такое определение:

      This category is for non-contemporary photographs and other images such as old postcards or paintings (suggested deadline: pre-WW2), and for images of objects that do not exist anymore, or that have heavily changed in appearance since their depiction displayed here.

      Так что, наверное, моя логика тоже не совсем подходит. Добавление нескольких станций на указатель вряд ли можно назвать heavily changed... --Michgrig (talk) 06:52, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Genrikh Yagoda and Ida Averbakh 1922.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Genrikh Yagoda and Ida Averbakh 1922.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Armenius vambery (talk) 12:24, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pogrzeb_Lenina1924.jpg[edit]

If my file is violation, then the one in subj is also violation but digitally remastered :)

Please delete--Armenius vambery (talk) 16:46, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Российский университет спецназа, Чабборз М-3, Чабборз М-6[edit]

Добрый день. Большую часть фотографий, которую я заливал за последние несколько месяцев вы удалили согласно авторским правам, но дело в том, что я получил разрешение от пресс-службы РУСа на использование этих фотографий. Я бы хотел решить вопрос, снять с них запрет и снова красиво оформить странички, которыми я решил заниматься. --Katerbarg (talk) 16:03, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

  • Следуйте процедуре, описанной на странице COM:OTRS/ru. Sealle (talk) 16:09, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

“No valid reason for deletion” but no answer to the question[edit]

Hello Sealle ,
the alone answer for Commons:Deletion requests/File:Montreal Comiccon 2016 - Lucca (27643958944).jpg and File:Chrono cosplay 10.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chrono cosplay 10.jpg. (Archimëa and Kigsz) is « COM:COSTUME ».
According to this element the answer is: “no valid reason for deletion”. Sealle 11:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

But there is only one question: "is the photographed subject over the age of legal majority?"

--Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 14:33, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

COM:DEL is not a village pump, it is not about asking questions, it's about bringing sufficient arguments to administrators so that they can make a decision. Sealle (talk) 16:57, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello Sealle,
it would have been nice of you not to bite!
  1. My language is French and I make the effort to question you politely in English;
  2. I did not know that my reasoning depended on the administrators and logically I turned to the contributor who had done the removal;
  3. it would have been nice of you to tell me the administrators page.
Thanks --Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 21:32, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Try Help desk or Village pump. Sealle (talk) 21:40, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Андрей Алексин[edit]

Здравствуйте. Не связана ли эта заливка с нарушением правил загрузки файлов? К пользователю, загрузившему эти фото, я обращаться не стал, поскольку плохо разбираюсь в файловой политике Викисклада в частности и не могу ничего юзеру посоветовать или обратить на что-либо его внимание. Может быть, вы поможете?

Кстати, пользователь успел проиллюстрировать всем этим одну-единственную статью в Википедии, нарушив, на мой взгляд, правило ВП:НЕГАЛЕРЕЯ.

Спасибо. 95.221.69.249 21:03, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

  • Копаться в этой шелухе не очень хочется, и это всё, конечно, не собственные работы, но абсолютное большинство этих грамот пройдёт либо по тривиальности, либо как государственные документы. Sealle (talk) 21:12, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

«Авторы»[edit]

Продолжаем нашу «Санта-Барбару». NBS (talk) 19:53, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

✓ Special:Contributions/Romeo4755[edit]

В основном, скриншоты для статьи об этом сайте. NBS (talk) 19:53, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

✓ Special:Contributions/Letters_ss[edit]

Этот м.б. и готов корректно оформить через OTRS - но всё это делается в рекламных целях (см. ru:ЦАРКА). NBS (talk) 15:36, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

✓ Special:Contributions/Kolledgeart[edit]

Ещё один. NBS (talk) 19:44, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

[edit]

Hi Sealle. Can you clarify whether the logo you deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone Logo klein.svg is the same one being discussed at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone 2017.svg? -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:51, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

  • Hello, here is a logo similar to the deleted one. The color gradient was a key point. Sealle (talk) 08:12, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Нанотехнологии[edit]

Здравствуйте. На моей СО вы оставили предупреждение о возможном удалении файла. Этот и другие файлы, которые вызывают Ваши сомнения, используются в статьях русской Вики о нанотехнологиях. Материалы сайта доступны по лицензии Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0 Unported, что я и указал при загрузке файла. Что еще я должен сделать во избежание удаления файлов? Simba16 (talk) 06:36, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

  • В соответствии с правилом COM:EVID/ru Вам следует разместить в поле |Permission= на странице описания каждого файла работающую ссылку на страницу, где указано, что данные изображения распространяются под свободной лицензией. Если в сети её нет, Вы можете загрузить сюда скан этой страницы. Ещё вариант – оформить разрешение правообладателя через OTRS. Sealle (talk) 06:43, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
    • Проверьте, пожалуйста. Simba16 (talk) 14:32, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
      • Спасибо, шаблоны снял. Sealle (talk) 18:27, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

File:NIVavilov Voskresenskoe bust.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:NIVavilov Voskresenskoe bust.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

A.Savin 18:40, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

User:Jallow sherif adding fake Flickr licenses[edit]

Bonjour J'ai reçu des messages sur ma page wikipedia sur le sujet des mes images importés sur common qui dise que les images non pas de licence.ces images,Je l'auteur des ces photos sur flickr .si vous voulez vérifier ces images allez j'y, ces photos je suis l'auteur.

Merci Jallow sherif (talk) 21:37, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

@Jallow sherif: Je vois que vous publiez vos photographies avec © Tous droits réservés, et vous devriez changer la licence pour CC-BY-SA. Ceci nous permettrait d'utiliser vos photographies sur de projets Wikipédia et Wikimédia. Pour rendre facile l'utilisation de vos photographies en bonne et due forme, pourriez-vous effectuer les deux opérations suivantes:
Une fois que vous avez terminé, nous pourrons utiliser vos photographies dans nos projets. Sealle (talk) 21:49, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

User:Jallow sherif adding fake Flickr licenses[edit]

Oui j'ai modifié la licence j'ai mis sur domaine public (cc0) mais les photos ont été supprimé Jallow sherif (talk) 22:35, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Mura di Udine[edit]

Answers on following pictures:

File:Porta pracchiuso2.jpg File:VedutaUD.jpg File:Porta pracchiuso.jpg File:Porta grazzano.jpg File:Arco Grimani.jpg File:Porta Aquileia.jpg File:Porta Ronchi Udine.jpg Dear sir, all pictures are dating back second half of XIX century (average 120-150 years ago). According to law 633/41, any possible copyright status (if any) has expired and no license is needed at all. No information has ever been available on original author. Please do resume the pictures, thanks.


Answer on following picture:

File:Veduta Udine II cerchia.jpg Dear sir, the map displayed in this picture is dating back to XV century. This is a public document displayed in a public library, as specified in the relevant description. No copyright or license applicable at all. Please do resume the picture, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francezeta (talk • contribs) 19:40, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Preceding comment added by Francezeta (talk • contribs) 06:07, 6 April 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francezeta (talk • contribs) 19:41, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

A word before is worth two after. Try COM:UDEL. Sealle (talk) 22:44, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Файлы[edit]

File:20180411105602!Линский - Троцкий.jpg
File:20180411111546!Линский - Ленин.jpg
--Sergkarman (talk) 12:35, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Шаблон[edit]

А вы можете добавить вот это изображение: File:European Southern Observatory (ESO) logo.svg вот в этот шаблон Template:ESO? Для красоты. --Sergkarman (talk) 06:04, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Слева вверху я думаю изображение было бы уместно. --Sergkarman (talk) 07:40, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Deleted File:Dipromisto Odesa GP.jpg[edit]

Hello, Sealle. You have deleted File:Dipromisto GenschemePS.jpg used for the page Dipromisto in tree languages due to the fact that it isn't free for use. But you could saw in the description of the file that The General Scheme of Planning of the Territory of Ukraine has been adopted by the Law of Ukraine and this way became totaly open and free for using as any other legislation. Deleted by you picture is one of the schemes of this addopted by Law document. How else can I prove the right to bublish it on Wikimedia Commons? --OleAna (talk) 10:56, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Tagging Mbz1's photos[edit]

Hi Sealle, please do not tag Mbz1's photos with {{no permission since}} as you did here. The attribution was changed by request and refers to the uploader's web site. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 06:53, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Copyright[edit]

Hello and thank you for notifying me about the problem with the pictures' copyright. I am new in Wikipedia and I am just creating the page for a project. I thought I could use the pictures from Wiki because it is a public page where everyone can edit, just like in Wikipedia. Would you mind explaining me from which pages can I use pictures or how to properly use them in the page without violating any copyright? Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marme55 (talk • contribs) 13:18, 17 April 2018 (UTC)