User talk:Siebrand

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

How do you like my clean talk page?a love it

File:LocatieBreukelen.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:LocatieBreukelen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:15, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Psychonaut[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
User talk:Psychonaut has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page ⧼pageinfo-talkpage⧽, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AWhiteElk (talk) 19:11, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

瑋倫照片[edit]

請問你為什麼刪她大頭照?
為什麼要這麼做啊? 她生前有得罪你嗎?
我有看過她頁面過去五年的編輯紀錄
還有人搞破壞 說她是男藝人
不然就是刪條目內文和來源
真的是很誇張+囂張耶!
瑋倫死得那麼慘
你們這些正義魔人就幫她留點尊嚴不行嗎?
不要再鬧下去了!

雅婕留言

Lucas Paz[edit]

Caro, Siebrand.

Estudei todas as regras e diretrizes da wikipédia lusófona e realizei todos os ajustes necessários para impugnar a elimnação da página Lucas Paz, argumentando tudo na página de discussão: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucas_Paz

Solicito, por gentileza, que analise e, se possível, aprove os ajustes realizados evitando sua injusta eliminação.

Grato desde já.

Márlio Esmeraldo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marlioesmeraldo (talk • contribs) 15:28, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Putten,_Gelderland[edit]

Category discussion warning

Putten, Gelderland has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Andy Dingley (talk) 12:12, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ligne de Benrath.PNG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Ligne de Benrath.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(talk) 16:46, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adjustments to Wikimedia Commons Welcome bot[edit]

Hello Siebrand,

I'm contacting you in regard to the Wikimedia Commons Welcome bot, which received some discussion last year regarding a potential shut down. Majora noted in the closing comments of that discussion that you might be the bot's operator. As someone who does not frequent this wiki, I'm not particularly invested in whether the bot should be removed or kept, but I will say that as a new member I was taken aback by the bot's operating procedure. It seemed to me that the bot had detected my presence on the site and had 'responded' by placing a 'welcome message' on my talk page. I found this action to be invasive of my personal privacy and was highly disturbed by its automatic action. I understand now that the bot is triggered upon 'account creation'. However to my knowledge I had not created a Wikimedia Commons account. Indeed, the user creation log shows that the account "was created automatically" without my explicit knowledge or permission. I was hoping to discuss with you potential options to change the bot's default operating behavior so as not to trigger until a user has actually made an edit on the associated wiki. I'm not new to wikis, and we have bots on the wikis where I edit, but I would not wish my first interaction with a wiki to be one where I am called out by a bot the moment I step on the platform, as a result of an account that was automatically created without my knowledge. I felt like I had set off a trap upon my arrival and immediately felt unwelcome and ill at ease. Sunmarsh (talk) 16:04, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--IN (talk) 12:16, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zaza Map.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Zaza Map.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Beshogur (talk) 09:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abhandlung von den Zähnen (Pfaff) 219.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Abhandlung von den Zähnen (Pfaff) 219.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Orizan (talk) 17:43, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moclobemide horizontal.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Moclobemide horizontal.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 10:51, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

File:00%.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:00%.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : DemonDays64.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 03:15, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]