User talk:Túrelio

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Busy desk.svg This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  română  español  português  English  français  Nederlands  polski  galego  Simple English  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  العربية  فارسی  +/−

ATTENTION: Please use my talk page rather than emailing me.


Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic.

Deutsch | English | français | magyar | 한국어 | македонски | +/−

Please keep discussions together:

  • If I was starting a thread on your talk page, please answer there. I will watch your talk page.
  • If you started a discussion here on my talk page, I will answer here.

All requests for and notifications of re-use of my images on Commons have been moved to Requests & Notifications.

If you can't find a comment or an older discussion here, take a look whether it is in one of my archives:
Archive1 (latest), Archive2 (2007), Archive3 (2008), Archive4 (2009), Archive5 (2010), Archive6 (2011), Archive7 (2012), Archive8 (2013), Archive9 (2014), Archive10 (2015), Archive11 (2016), Archive12 (2017), Archive13 (2018), Archive14 (2019), Archive15 (2020).


Visto le numerose foto rimosse, non metterò più foto che trovo su facebook (che sono foto libere di essere prese perchè ho sempre chiesto il permesso all'autore). Alberto. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alberto Davide Lorenzi (talk • contribs)

a strange deletion request[edit]

Hi again. I have gotten a rather strange deletion request for a file that I meticulously researched to ensure it met PD-Russia-1996 rules (I found a 1945 publication of it with no author attribution, and an archivist selling it at an auction gave no indication of who the author was, and author remains unknown). The initial deletion template was rather vague, saying "It looks like an mistaken license.". I thought I was being trolled at first since I was not mistaken with the licence and provided publication information, but apparently it's an experienced user. As requested I provided a link to the publication directly, which I did, but then he went on about how the person at the auction might secretly know the name of the author, (even though the back of the photo card had just a number on it, no photographer name at all) etc. What do you make of this? I've gotten a few similar nominations like this in the past that have turned out to be "keep". I have to say I am a bit annoyed by all the unusual "what-ifs" and goalpost-moving. I mean, if the auctioneer knows/knew the photographer name but kept it secret from the public, one would think it would be considered anonymous still? After all, if a samizdat work was written by a few authors who knew each other but kept their identities secret, it is considered anonymous since the public doesn't know.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:18, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas[edit]

Season's Greetings, Christmas Card from 320 Ranch.jpg Merry Christmas Túrelio

Hi Túrelio, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas
and a very happy and prosperous New Year,
Thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia this past year,
   –Davey2010talk 18:45, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020![edit]

Weihnachtsbaum. Chemnitz. Weihnachtsmarkt. IMG 8190WI.jpg   * Happy Holidays 2020, Túrelio! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Noto Emoji Pie 1f384.svg

recent relation of faulty shower image[edit]

Hi I was wondering why the image was deleted as this image is a free image and was taken myself and has no copyright .kind regards Craig noble — Preceding unsigned comment added by "craignoble666" (talk • contribs) 16:50, 23 December 2019 (UTC)


Hallo @Túrelio:,
Für die kommenden Weihnachtstage wünsche ich Dir alles Gute.
Möge uns das neue Jahr 2020 hier und überall ein friedliches Miteinander und eine erfolgreiche Zeit bringen.
Ganz herzlich möchte ich mich bei Dir für Deine stete Hilfe bedanken, wenn ich hier nicht mehr weiter weiß oder meine Nerven etwas blank liegen.
Danke und beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 20:55, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

File:IMG 0690.jpg[edit]

File:IMG 0690.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Smiley.toerist (talk) 21:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Jochen A. Werner[edit]

Just leaving a note since I remember you speak German. But someone may want to check this for appropriateness. It seems likely to be spam/promotional. GMGtalk 15:26, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Rampant copyright infringements[edit]

Hello. I come from English Wikipedia, and when a contributor is known to have 4-5 or more flagrant copyright violations, we open an investigation of all their contributions, because the violations we find are often merely the "tip of the iceberg". I wonder if any process is available here on Commons, where copyright is possibly much more likely to be infringed? As you know, I have examined the contributions of User:Thuy Ho and found the vast majority to be copyright violations. Administrators have mostly agreed with me, except for a few instances where you merely reverted because you couldn't find any evidence. I suggest that this contributor be investigated. I left some of his uploads alone because they appeared to be simple non-professional panoramic type snapshots that could be taken by anyone. But some people surely have a knack for stealing photos and presenting them as "Own work" and slipping by the copyright filter here. I find them once in a while coming to English Wikipedia and linking to their uploads. I strive to be thorough in wiping out their contributions when I can plainly see they are all copyvios. Is there any help or relief for people like me? Or should I just do them one at a time? Elizium23 (talk) 22:39, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Offensichtliche URV[edit]

Hallo Túrelio,

mir fallen immer wieder offensichtliche URV's auf Commons auf. Schema immer gleich: Niedrige Auflösung für 2019/2020, fehlende Exif-Daten, Pkw-Modelle einer bestimmten Marke, immer wieder neue Accounts mit Ramschuploads (wiederum mit Exif - zur Tarnung?), unterschiedliche Länderkennzeichen und andere Details (mediterrane Landschaft mit Olivenbäumen passt nicht zum tschechischen Kennzeichen). Wegen der niedrigen Auflösung und Unschärfe gehe ich von Screenshots aus Videos aus. Betrifft bis dato folgende User:

Wäre generell für das Löschen eines Großteils der Bilder von neuen Pkw-Modellen und Sperre der User. Was meinst du? Was weiter machen? Danke dir! Pan Tau (talk) 08:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Pan Tau, sorry, ich bin bislang noch nicht dazu gekommen. Hoffentlich am Freitag. --Túrelio (talk) 19:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Túrelio, hat keine Eile. Läuft ja nicht davon. :) Liebe Grüße, Pan Tau (talk) 12:28, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Copyright issues with User:Qiushufang[edit]

Hello. I am contacting you since you were involved in the identification of a copyvio by the said user (1). There is an ongoing discussion about further cases. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 23:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Deletion request question[edit]

Hi Túrelio, can you help me see how you can save the images that were nominated in this deletion request [1] Many of those images were uploaded 10 years ago with licenses in the public domain (Egypt, Lebanon, Syria) respectively. A week ago a reviewing user nominated them for deletion saying that the source was not specified. The images are in the public domain from the beginning of the last or mid-century, are all over the internet and are part of the cultural heritage of those countries that used them for their publications in the newspapers. All of these images are only to illustrate Wikipedia posts. Is there any way I can amend them? thanks.--Derbake (talk) 22:03, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Group delete[edit]

Hi, i need a (Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion) request for all of my uploads.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 20:18, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletes[edit]

Hallo Túrelio; ich habe in letzter Zeit ein paar offene DRs geschlossen, bei denen auf die Datei in der Zwischenzeit ein Schnelllöschantrag gestellt wurde, den du danach umgesetzt, aber dabei den DR offengelassen hattest, Beispiel Commons:Deletion requests/File:Robert Blaich.jpg (DR-Template stand auch immer noch auf der Seite). Wäre vielleicht ganz praktisch, wenn du in solchen Fällen auch gleich den Löschantrag erledigen würdest. Wollte nur darauf hinweisen, keine grosse Sache :-) Gestumblindi (talk) 01:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Danke für die Erinnerung. Hab mir danach Mühe gegeben, immer daran zu denken. --Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Filemover rights request[edit]

Hi there. Several days ago, I put in a request for filemover rights over at Commons:Requests for rights, and the guideline at the top of the page says "[i]f your request has remained unanswered for several days, consider personally asking an administrator".

As I said in my nomination, I'm a prolific file uploader with an unfortunate bad habit of typos in filenames, and I would sooner take on the responsibility of correcting such filename errors myself than burden other editors with my mistakes. (In fact, the reason why your username stuck out to me at Special:ListUsers/sysop was because you've answered a few of my rename requests yourself!)

If there's anything you can do to speed the process along, it would be most helpful and appreciated. Thank you.

-- Andre Carrotflower (talk) 04:16, 7 May 2020 (UTC)


The Cfccreates flickr ID has been a rich source of images of people associated with movies. I've uploaded well over a thousand images they posted on flickr, and about 400 headshots I cropped from those images.

This is the first time they have requested the deletion of an image. I didn't want to say this at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kathryn Emslie at a CFC event in L.A. - Honouring John Fawcett and Graeme Manson (16740223837).jpg - but I think the explanation for the deletion is vanity. Ms Emslie is part of the management team at the Canadian Film Centre. Whoever runs the cfccreates flickr id is presumably a lot more junior than Ms Emslie.

Anyhow, since was one they uploaded, I think File:CFC in L.A. - Honouring John Fawcett and Graeme Manson (16740223837).jpg is unobjectionable.

It never occurred to me to consider the flatteringness of the crop of Ms Emslie. But I don't think File:Virginia Rankin at a CFC event in L.A. - Honouring John Fawcett and Graeme Manson (16740223837).jpg is particularly unflattering. Anyhow, she isn't CFC management. So I am happy to let sleeping dogs lie.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 23:37, 7 May 2020 (UTC)


Category discussion warning

Victims of Islamism has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 02:13, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Another favor[edit]

May this DR page be deleted please (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stanley Kubrick in Dr. Strangelove Trailer (4) Cropped.jpg)? Not the file, but the page. I connected the main DR to the cropped file so it would be more simple. Thanks! StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 11:27, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Nepal maps[edit]

Hi Túrelio, please see also File:Nepal 1M N LD.jpg and File:New Official Map of Nepal.png, which I tagged for deletion before I found out how to use CSD. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 08:13, 25 June 2020 (UTC)


Hallo Túrelio, heute bin ich über diese Seite [2] gestolpert. Kann es sein, dass sich bei den Bildern unter dem Link "Quelle" und weiteren Links der Seite nur Spam befindet? Beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 19:35, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Orchi,
in der Tat. Das ist das typische Bild, wenn der ursprüngliche Domaininhaber eine Seite aufgegeben hat. Die paar Bilder, die ich mir angeschaut habe, sind ja alle 2015 hochgeladen worden. Da sie anscheinend im Kontext irgendeiner Aktion hochgeladen wurden (es gibt ja sogar einen eigenen Baustein), denke ich mal, dass die Lizenz heute nicht unbedingt hinterfragt werden muss; allerdings könnten Nachnutzer durch den heutigen Inhalt des Quuelllinks verärgert werden. Ich werde mal meine Kollegen fragen, ob wir für solche Fälle eine etablierte Vorgehensweise haben. Interessant: bei den ältesten 5 Uploads ist der Inhalt der Quelle noch in Ordnung. --Túrelio (talk) 18:55, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
...die letzten Seiten hatte ich auch gesehen und habe dann etliche Sichproben gemacht. Ich bin mal gespannt, wie wie Du und Deine Kollegen die Angelegenheit sehen. Grüße. Orchi (talk) 19:42, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Request for independent views[edit]

Hi, Túrelio please have a look if interested Commons:Deletion requests/File:Serum-institute-of-india-logo.png. Thank you. ~ Amkgp 💬 18:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020[edit]


Hallo T%C3%BArelio,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Duplicate request[edit]

Hi Túrelio. Would you mind redirecting this duplicate to Denis Thatcher 1988.tif? Thanks, ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 07:57, 27 August 2020 (UTC)


Hi. I do not know which tweets are accepted and which not. The one at File:Yasa teklifi.png shows sensitive personal information about someone. IMO it should be speedily deleted. It does not help Commons at any way either. Thanks for your attention. --E4024 (talk) 15:56, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot[edit]

Thanks for your speedy deletion of my uploads. There was personal information in the exif data.

Do you think I can reupload these files once I have cleaned the exif? Yours sincerely,--Le Petit Chat (talk) 15:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Photo to be deleted[edit]

I would like to delete these 3 photos that I published, I was wrong to publish them, thanks--Samuele Redaelli (talk) 08:36, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

RE:Pala Olimpico image[edit]

Hi, sure, no problem :)--Mannivu · 16:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)


Hello Túrelio, while patrolling I came across these user uploads which I tagged for csd. But I'm not sure about few files. Please have a look here when you're free. Thanks, stay safe. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 07:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Wegkarte - Mecklenburger Kapellenweg.pdf[edit]

Hi, what about File:Logo Mecklenburger Kapellenweg.jpg which is a part from the same publication? --He3nry (talk) 14:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:Objects by provenience in the Metropolitan Museum of Art[edit]

Hi, your given cause for deltion was: "test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content". So. I created this page in 2017. It was not an "accident". There was no "nonsense". The content was "valid". May the times are changing and the way how things becoming sorted are changing. This is OK then. But why, please explain me, why, you give such an defamatory and offensive cause for the deletion? Really, I don't think, my work deserve this. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:13, 27 September 2020 (UTC) PS: gerne auch noch auf deutsch: Du hast das mit der Angabe eines ungemein beleidigenden Grundes gelöscht. Ich verstehe und akzeptiere, wenn sich manche Dinge verändert und man anders sortiert. Alles OK. Aber diese Kategorie war kein Unfall. Sie war kein Unsinn. Der dort gesammelte Inhalt war absolut valide. Warum löschst du also mit einer so ehrabschneidenden, beleidigenden Begründung? Wirklich, ich raffe es nicht.

du meine Güte. Man kann auch etwas überempfindlich sein. 1) nicht ich habe die Kategorie zur Löschung markiert, sondern User:Ruff tuff cream puff. Die gewählte Löschrationale wird dabei automatisch in die edit-summary übertragen. Da ich heute zig leere Kategorien gelöscht habe, genau aus dem Grund, dass sie leer waren (CSD C2), ändere ich nicht jedesmal manuell die edit-summary. 2) Der hier vom SLA-Steller benutzte Löschgrund "CSD G1" ist einer der ganz offiziellen Criteria for speedy deletion. Da die Kat. leer war, hatte sie zumindest jetzt "no valid content", nämlich gar keinen. Das nun als "ungemein beleidigend" und "ehrabschneidend" zu etikettieren, dazu fällt mir nichts mehr ein. Anyway, ich habe den SLA-Steller aufgefordert, für solche Fälle in Zukunft CSD C2 statt CSD G1 zu nehmen.--Túrelio (talk) 21:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

David Neuhaus[edit]

you allowed yourself to remove David Neuhaus's photo while it was himself who provided him for his Wikipedia page!!! Yannick Pichard (talk) 15:05, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

as you have many deleted files already, are you talking about File:David Neuhaus.jpg? If yes: when he "provided it", why did you write "own work" of Yannick Pichard? Anyway, if he has shot it really by himself or has obtained enough copyright from the photographer, he needs to send a statement of permission to which confirms the release of the image under the choosen free license. You find a text-template at: Commons:Email_templates#Email_message_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file. --Túrelio (talk) 15:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


Both of photos are my own and were created by me and later used on other websites. I granted licence to wikimedia.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitic (talk • contribs)


Hola turelio, acabo de subir una foto que es de dominio publico pero me la marcaron como que no y la estamos usando en la wikipedia en español y vamos a subirla a la wikipedia en italiano, acabo de mandar un mail pero realmente tengo dudas de si eso es asi, te pido por favor tu ayuda no se como hacerlo bien la foto es la siguiente

En flickr

Muchas gracias por tu ayuda

Hello turelio, I just uploaded a photo that is in the public domain but they marked it as no and we are using it in the wikipedia in Spanish and we are going to upload it to the wikipedia in Italian, I just sent an email but I really have doubts about whether That is so, I ask you please your help I do not know how to do it well the photo is the following

Thank you very much for your help--Gafr89 (talk) 11:46, 13 October 2020 (UTC)




Ystk911 Ystk911 (talk) 01:14, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Robert Evans' pic[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your message. I am trying to reach him to obtain permission but if the photo must come down in the meantime, c'est la vie. Cheers,--Kalli13 (talk) 01:30, 15 October 2020 (UTC)


Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Túrelio. You have new messages at 轻语者's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

I don’t know if you have received the reminder. I have responded to your question on my talk page. --轻语者 (talk) 14:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)


Why don't this file deleted? Nothing is linked to it. I'm uploading new version by and I thought the original language is replaced by English so I created that file, however after that I realized that the file would have different language when it linked in Wikipedia and separate file isn't needed. Hddty (talk) 15:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Ähem, File:China-pyramid-1982-en.svg is deleted. However, a redirect[3] has been placed on it, to File:China-pyramid-1982.svg. You had reqested that by yourself[4]. --Túrelio (talk) 15:48, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
I request that the page File:China-pyramid-1982-en.svg should also be deleted, not just redirected. Hddty (talk) 13:32, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


Hey Túrelio, I'm wondering why you decided to speedy delete File:Octicons11-alert-24.svg and File:Octicons11-archive-24.svg under COM:CSD#G7. They were uploaded on 17 October 2020 and deletion was requested on 28 October 2020, which is more than the maximum age of 7 days for G7. Thanks, AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi @AntiCompositeNumber, sorry for forgetting to answer your question for that long time. When deciding deletion-requests by uploader I take some liberty after judging the overall situation. In this case, the 2 icons were unused and weren't unique works by the uploader, but simply copied from a still existing website (GitHub). So, in case of need, they could easily be re-uploaded from the original source (or restored on Commons). Therefore, I decided to speedy instead of opening 2 regular DRs. --Túrelio (talk) 10:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Marc Mauillon © INANIS.jpg[edit]

hi I got a message from you and apparently the metadata is really wrong! The photographer who took this portrait of me is known as INANIS You can contact him to check that I bought the rights of this photo for promotion. I'll write to to let them know. Best regards M.


Category discussion warning

Category:Paola_Ghanem has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Lemondethemyscira (talk) 22:35, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Max cainele erou[edit]

va salut ! mi-ati sters fisierul (fotografia) Max cainele erou pe motivul ca am copiat-o dupa pagina de facebook fotografia e facuta de mine si publicata aici tot de mine, pagina ,,Max cainele erou de pe facebook este tot de mine creata asa se explica de ce fotografia o gasiti si acolo, nu am violat nimic, drepturile de autor sunt ale mele, va rog daca se poate sa repuneti la loc imaginea multumesc frumos pentru intelegere cu stima Florica Jianu

I have no idea about which image you are talking. None of the uploads of your account has been deleted. So, what is the exact filename? --Túrelio (talk) 20:41, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

The user you warned seems to have moved to a new acount[edit]

Hi Túrelio, it appears, User:Kroger4, a prolific uploader of copyrighted images, whom you warned, has now moved to a new account, User:Eyes Roger. User:BevinKacon pointed out that much and the edit history pretty well supports this with evidence. Not sure if this is a sock puppet violation and, if yes, what the procedure on Commons is to deal with such an issue. Should or does need anything to be done about this? Calistemon (talk) 01:52, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Wrong Violation Notice[edit]

Hi, I saw that you deleted my File:DA'HAKAN PRESS PHOTO 2019 (Cropped).jpg with the cause of copyright violation: but I sent the photo to Wannart actually. Hope we can fix this misunderstanding and misaction. Thanks for your help. --Palaangelino (talk) 05:06, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, currently busy; will take care in the evening or tomorrow. --Túrelio (talk) 09:34, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Importations de copyvio en nombre[edit]

Bonjour Turellio, le contributeur User talk:Tedrahcir verse depuis le mois de juin 2020 des images images dont il ne peut, de toute évidence être l’auteur. Il faudrait pour cela qu’il soit photographe professionnel et dans la profession depuis plus de quarante ans, ce qui à l’évidence n’est pas le cas… Je pense qu’il serait nécessaire d‘enquêter et de faire cesser ce trafic et de faire une suppression globale. Merci, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 17:00, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Googletranslate : Hello Turellio, User talk:Tedrahcir has been uploading images since June 2020 which he obviously cannot author. This would require him to be a professional photographer and in the profession for over forty years, which obviously is not the case... I think it would be necessary to investigate and stop this traffic and to do a global deletion. thank you, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 17:00, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Ctruongngoc,
complicated looking case. I've tagged all images with evidence-based copyvio-suspicion. But for the majority there were no external hits (neither via Google-Images, TinEye nor direct name-search on Google). Shortly thereafter I received the message below. As the uploader might be the rightsholder (and become a potially valuable contributor), it seems better if a French-speaking user/admin takes over. --Túrelio (talk) 21:21, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Danke sehr für Ihre Antwort ! --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 15:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Un homme en fuite - Roger Jendly.jpg‬ ».[edit]


Je suis le producteur du film "Un homme en fuite" de Simon EDESLTEIN réalisé en 1980. Le droits du film et les affiches m'appartiennent. Bonne soirée. Claude RICHARDET--2A01:CB14:1E9:2700:50F9:20DA:FF7B:C36D 20:52, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

as you were not logged-in, I assume you are User:Tedrahcir, right? I will then transfer this case to a French-speaking colleague. --Túrelio (talk) 21:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

please delete my picture[edit]박윤찬.jpg

user id : 박윤찬 that's my mistake. would you delete my picture? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 박윤찬 (talk • contribs)

Anton Docher pictures[edit]


Hi Turelio, you intend to delete the Anton Docher's related photos. Before to do so, here’s what I know about these pictures. I found them in an old family album in my grandparents' attic. They were sent to his brother (my grandfather’s grandfather) by Padre Docher himself, who was then a missionary in America. My family being affiliated with the padre. They date for the most part from the 19th century or early twentieth (except that of the burial which is of 1928) and are the work of one or more unknown authors (no signature present on both sides). So I scanned the original prints, found in the album, to donate them to Wikimedia Commons thinking that they had historical (even modest) importance. I don’t know how to assign them a rights license or anything, I did my best to improve the license, but I don’t know if that’s enough. Please tell me what is correct to apply them as a copyright in this case. Thank you for your help.--Bougnat87 (talk) 05:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Photo replacement[edit]

Good afternoon. Please help me please replace the Main photo on my page. New photos have been uploaded to the Wiki warehouse with an open license. I don't know how to replace the photos. Please help me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petr Elfimov 1980 (talk • contribs)

Requesting support[edit]

New year greetings,

Earlier in Octo.2020 @ village pump Copyright received your positive response for assistance in uploading old images from a research paper in PDF but the web link did not open then.

Now I find a new PDF link @

Subsequently after some wait resource request @ Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange got positive response that 2 images are already on commons and with assistance is now needed in uploading 4 images according to following info.:

Page number and image numbers in bracket: 244(8.2), 252(8.3), 254(8.4), 259(8.6) of new PDF link @ ( For article en:Superstitions in Muslim societies )
8.2: Better image here
8.3: Better image here
8.4: Better image here (on the dropdown at the top of the image viewer, select "f. 38 b")
8.6: Better images here
8.2, 8.3, 8.4 are certainly out of copyright, as understood by Commons policy; they're either super-old two-dimensional works,... 8.6 consists of photos (of a three-dimensional work) over which the Smithsonian claims copyright, and so may still be copyrighted (need to be confirmed for copyright status).

I do not find myself technically competent to complete activity on my own hence Requesting your kind assistance in above respect.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 05:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Bookku,
I will look into that, but it may take some time. --Túrelio (talk) 13:54, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Greetings, I hope I am not making request too early again. It's not that it is too urgent, and you can take your time, but it is quite likely that I might forget myself over a period of time. Since I was visiting commons thought it's better to drop in a message.

Thanks for your support and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 10:42, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Karamjeet Madonna[edit]

Hallo Túrelio, Du schreibst, Deutsch ist Deine Muttersprache - dann also auf Deutsch! :-)

Erstmal danke, dass Du Dich um diese URV gekümmert hast. Der Nutzer hat einen ganzen Haufen Bilder von dieser Frau hochgeladen, einige davon praktischerweise gleich mit "during a photo shoot" gekennzeichnet, also gewissermaßen selbsterklärte URV. Etliche davon findet man auch auf ihrer Website wieder; ich hab's jetzt nicht bei allen überprüft.

Ich hatte hier schon angefragt, ob es für sowas nicht eine Art Stapelverarbeitung gibt, aber ich weiß nicht, ob das da jemand sieht. Muss man womöglich jetzt jedes Bild einzeln markieren? -- 13:29, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Inviting you to join the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons![edit]

Dear Túrelio,

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a draft policy (available in many languages). We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am perfectly aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 11:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons![edit]

Dear Túrelio

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC[edit]

Hello Túrelio,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


Guten Tag. Beschaeftige mich hier seit Jahren als IP mit verschieden Biographien, vor allem betreffend Zweite Polnische Republik. Bei Bearbeitung der Vermissten Personen baue ich ein Info über den zuletzt bekannten Verbleib der Person ein (weil man soetwas in wikidata nicht einbauen kann oder ich habe keine Ahnung wie man es tut). Solche Infos werden sehr oft von "User:Микола Василечко" enfernt und revertiert. Es gibt Biographien mit sehr seltenen Nachnamen die wirkliche "Einzelstuecke" bei der Wikiprogrammen sind und deswegen existieren keine automatischen Kategorien fuer eben solche seltene Namen. Fuer solche Faelle benutze ich die Schablone "DEFAULTSORT:Nachname, Vorname" damit alles richtig kategorisiert wird ... und hier das naechtste Problem : "User:Микола Василечко" enfernt diese defaultsort Schablone und danach es wird nach dem Vornamen kategorisiert. Wenn er schon so etwas tut dann soll er auch dafuer sorgen das die Dateien (die von ihm revertiert werden) nach dem Nachnamen kategorisiert werden. Da ich systematisch mit Bibliothek und Buch-Quellen arbeite ist wirklich sehr schaedigend wenn ich immer wieder in meiner Arbeit zurueckgeworfen werde. Falls Sie nicht in der Lage sind weiter zuhelfen dann leiten Sie es bitte an jemanden der es kann. Hier einige Beispiele: [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Vielen Dank. Gruesse. 2A01:C22:8448:7100:1C55:E597:187C:264D 13:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of Peruvian commemorate coins[edit]

Hi, Your bot deleted nearly all the photos I made and published of Peruvian commemorative coins. I am referring my work to the Wikipedia page of German commemorative coins. The German government obviously has no problem publishing fotos of commemorative coins. I am very sorry that the Peruvian BCRP is more restrictive than the German government and I hope you checked this fact briefly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BennoBu (talk • contribs)

Bitte um Umbenennung[edit]

Hallo @Túrelio:,
bei der Aufarbeitung der Humboldtfotos habe ich was verwechselt, 29 Bilder in der inzwischen korrekt umbenannten Chan Chan Kategorie laufen fälschlicherweise unter "Vichama-Kultur", beim ersten Foto habe ich schon eine Verschiebung zu "Chimú in Chan Chan 01" beantragt. Gibt es ein Tool, um die 28 anderen umzubenennen, mit dem ich das vielleicht selber machen könnte? Und noch was: Die Kategorien für die Einzelthemen der Humboldttour habe ich jetzt mit dem Datum vorne benannt, so wie wir das früher bei den WAF-Exkursionen praktiziert haben. Dazu setze ich jeweils noch die Themenkategorie wie bei wie bei den umzubenennenden Bildern "Chan Chan". Sollen die Datumskategorien mit hidden versehen werden. Cat a lot ist mir inzwischen geläufig, dank TKarcher, der mir das beigebracht hat. Vielen Dank und herzliche Grüße aus München --Pimpinellus((D)) • WikiMUC • 16:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

@Pimpinellus Könnte ich mit User:Perhelion/massrename.js erledigen. Ansonsten könntest du eventuell COM:Filemover-Rechte beantragen, um das in Zukunft selbst klären zu können. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:55, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Vielen Dank 1234qwer1234qwer4 für die Informationen, ich werde gelegentlich mal versuchen, die Filemover-Rechte zu erlangen. Da ich bei den Commonsrules nicht so versiert bin, wäre dennoch gut, wenn jemand auf meine Aktionen weiterhin ein aufmerksames, wohlwollendes Auge hätte. Grüße aus München --Pimpinellus((D)) • WikiMUC • 06:36, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
@Pimpinellus Alles klar. Habe die Dateien mal selbst verschoben. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:30, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Administrator Barnstar Hires.png The Admin's Barnstar
For quickly cleaning up things I tag with speedy deletion, thank you! Elli (talk) 08:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC)


Hello Túrelio, Today, you deleted the picture File:Frédéric_Fréry_en_mars_2020.jpg However, there is no copyright violation with this picture: it is fully free of rights, and this is the reason why the website is using it. Please undelete this picture and restore it on the Frédéric Fréry Wikipédia page: there is no reason to delete it from Wikimedia Commons. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 21:38, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Unknown,
problem is that this image is just a b/w version of the image File:Frédéric Fréry.jpg, which was dealt with in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Frédéric Fréry.jpg. So, we still need a permission by author Wojciech WOJCIK. --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Túrelio,
Thank you for your prompt answer. I confirm that author Wojciech WOJCIK sent a permission to on September 24, 2020.
Can you check this mailbox and restore the image? Thank you in advance —Preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 08:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
I can't check that by myself as I have no access for that. But I've asked at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --Túrelio (talk) 09:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Now we have an answer; see Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Permission_by_Wojciech_WOJCIK_for_File:Frédéric_Fréry.jpg_?. --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Túrelio,
Thank you for your answer. Can you tell me what is a « completed permission statement » and where it must be sent ? I will transmit this to the author, Wojciech WOJCIK. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:CB09:8047:C7F:9079:1771:7C95:D39C (talk) 14:13, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, better you contact directly the OTRS-volunteer, who answered this question (linked above). I am not on OTRS and have no access. --Túrelio (talk) 14:14, 29 March 2021 (UTC)


Hi. You have already deleted, as have done other admins before, several uploads by this user. I understand they have no interest in contributing positively to Commons. Why don't you simply delete all their junk uploads and give them a warning? Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 20:52, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]

Cute grey kitten.jpg

Bin gut drauf und schick dir jetzt ein Kätzchen! Ach ja, bleib gesund!

RealAppleFreak (talk) 12:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Johnny McGhee Trumpeter.jpg[edit]

Hi Túrelio. Would you mind looking at File:Johnny McGhee Trumpeter.jpg? I think it's a reupload of a file you deleted on February 19, 2021. This latest version is now at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Johnny McGhee Trumpeter.jpg and there is a post by the uploader at File talk:Johnny McGhee Trumpeter.jpg. I came across this file via en:WP:THQ#Johnny Mcghee where the uploader was asking about it at the English Wikipedia Teahouse. For what it's worth, I think the uploader means well, but perhaps might be getting some bad advice. She states she asked a lawyer about the photo, but I wouldn't have too much confidence in any lawyer who says or implies that photographing someone else's creative work means there's been a transfer of copyright. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Sobre el uso del Escudo del Huila[edit]

Hola, Túrelio He subido una nueva versión del escudo del Huila (en Colombia), que conozco por nacimiento. Como verás, la versión de 2010 no se parece en mucho a la versión oficial, como podrás comprobar en varios enlaces como el de la Gobernación, el de los símbolos del Departamento, y otras versiones (1) (2) que se han intentado publicar en Wikipedia. Te agradezco puedas ayudarnos a conservar este nuevo archivo SVG e, incluso, si puedes, ayudarnos a borrar las versiones anteriores, que son imprecisas en su apariencia heráldica y representativa del Departamento del Huila.

Escudo del Huila.svg

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jose Collazos (talk • contribs) 13:59, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]

Red Kitten 01.jpg

Thanks a lot for your deletions! :)

Sannita (WMIT) (talk) 20:10, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Open deletion requests[edit]

Hello Túrelio, firstly thank you for your speedy deletion logs and deletion requests process. Commons:Deletion requests#Lists of requests Here, there has been a lot of request waiting to be closed since June 2020. For example, there are some requests will be closed what I opened since September 2020. As Commons admins, can you reduce these? Of course, you can't do it alone, I think some Commons admins can it together. Sorry if I'm worrying unnecessarily for deletion requests. Regards. Uncitoyen (talk) 20:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

WikiDefender Barnstar.png The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
You are a hero on commons. Thank you for your help and guidance..245CMR.👥📜 10:58, 13 May 2021 (UTC)


Hey, just wondering if you would mind granting me rollback, so I could undo bad edits / block evasion faster. Per the rollback policy, asking an admin is preferred, and you've done me some favors before with deleting some files, so I hope you wouldn't mind. Thanks! Elli (talk) 01:26, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Anti-Lithuanian activity on Commons[edit]

@Túrelio: Hello, thanks for deleting the falsely named category of "Lithuanian occupation of Vilnius". Could you please take a look at this dispute as well: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Files_named_with_meaningless/disruptive_names_(motivated_renaming_was_reverted_without_any_valid_reason) because it is a similar anti-Lithuanian story, which is full of disruptive naming and editing. The activity is performed by a Belarusian ultra nationalist who calls the Lithuanians as rubbish (1, 2, 3). -- Pofka (talk) 09:47, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Pranay Dongre 27[edit]

Hi. All of the images this user uploaded are copyright violations. Would you look into it and delete them when you have time? —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2603:301D:22B2:4000:95EB:5DB9:B94D:1C83 (talk) 14:10, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Little help[edit]

I found this image on pt.WP uploaded under a fair use rationale. As the image was uploaded on Flickr under a 2.0 license, I decided to upload it here and nominate the Pt.WP image for deletion. However, when the image was already uploaded I find out that another identical, but with lower resolution, image was uploaded here sometime ago. What to do in this case? Regards.

Tulério, it seems that things are more serious than I thought. Could you please give it a look at this user uploads (see his Talk page). It seems that he's engaged in COM:LL. He uploaded several images from Flickr accounts that only uploaded images to be uploaded on Commons. I created a thread here, but things seems worse that I thought, and I would like someone experienced to look into beforehand. Thanks again for your time.--SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 02:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi SirEdimon,
the account in question seems to be a sort of complex case. While he has many uploads deleted as copyvios, the above mentioned image, the 2nd version (low res), got an OTRS-confirmed permission. As I am on holiday for some weeks, I cannot devote too much time currently to analyze his upload-pattern. We should simply be on watch and check all his uploads. --Túrelio (talk) 11:06, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Tulério. First, I'm sorry to bother your holidays, and thanks for answering my message. What should I do about the images? Can we merge both? Which of them should be deleted? What should I do? Regards.--SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 00:50, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:President Joe Biden and First Lady Jill Biden with Queen Elizabeth II.jpg[edit]

Hi Turelio, could you take a look at the deletion request above? You deleted File:President Joe Biden meets with His Majesty The King of Belgium and Prime Minister Alexander De Croo.jpg under similar circumstances, and I'm not sure why. Bait30 (talk) pls ping me when you reply 14:09, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Bait30, wrt the later image: it seems I missed to realize the version-history. However, as both files were uploaded this month, it seems justifiable to retain the high-res image over the low-res image, though the latter was uploaded a bit earlier. --Túrelio (talk) 19:08, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Ok, but why not rv File:President Joe Biden and First Lady Jill Biden with Queen Elizabeth II.jpg to the high res version, which I uploaded first, and then delete File:P20210613AS-1419 (51269148664).jpg as a duplicate instead? By doing this you can keep the version and page histories intact. Bait30 (talk) pls ping me when you reply 22:53, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

We need your feedback![edit]

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Deletion request for File:Sajan Prakash (swimmer).jpg[edit]

Hello, Thanks for starting this delete discussion. As I had mentioned in the speedy request it is quite obvious by comparing the original uncropped image and the wikipedia image of Cherantha de Silva that this image has been wrongly labeled. Also google search for the two swimmers, Sajan Prakash and Cherantha de Silva can confirm the mistake. I was wondering if any more information is needed to confirm the deletion. Shantham11 (talk) 16:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

You are invited to comment![edit]

You commented in the original Heather Moreton-Aboudaner RfD. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Continental European breed files from Heather Moreton-Abounader Flickr stream is now open, your comments would be appreciated. --Pitke (talk) 20:52, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Delecte picture[edit]

Hi Túrelio

You deleted this picture

I'm the photographer and owner of this picture and I agree to give to wikimedia

So what is your advice ? Request to delete on the website ttp:// this pictire ? Add a special copityght ?

Or aonther advice

Thanks for your assistance


--Jennifer55 (talk) 08:39, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Jeni,
but it wasn't even your upload, but that of User:Travelworld1606. Is this also your account? (It's not forbidden to have 2 accounts, though it's recommended to disclose it)
WRT your question: No, that is neither necessary nor would it help. When an upload to Commons, claimed as own work, is found prepublished elsewhere[12], this is a suggestion of copyright-violation, i.e. that the uploader might not bei the photographer.
Now, in such cases it is required that the photographer or the rightsholder sends from his/her official/business email address a statement to clarifying the copyright-holdership and the intent to release this image under the choosen free license (Be aware that a release "only for Wikipedia-use" is not possible. The accepted free licenses allow everybody to use such images, even commercially!). You may use the highlighted permission-text from Commons:Email templates#Email message template for release of rights to a file as a template. --Túrelio (talk) 10:03, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Re:File:Antonio Quarracino (recepción) 1.jpg[edit]

Hello Turelio, Already verified. I got the wrong URL and I have already corrected it. Thank you very much and regards, Macucal (talk) 11:07, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

File:TW 0068 Purim.jpg[edit]

The Dek-D page is dated to October 2020 the earliest, and clearly copied the image from Commons. The image is also clearly a crop of File:Purim AngKaew.png, which doesn't seem to appear elsewhere on the web. I don't see any evidence of copyvio. --Paul_012 (talk) 22:18, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Cc: User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh, who tagged the image --Paul_012 (talk) 22:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

@Paul 012: Hmm... Seems that I made a mistake. Sorry. Unnamed UserName me 22:55, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
You are right. Image undeleted. --Túrelio (talk) 07:12, 4 September 2021 (UTC)


Hello Túrelio. I'd like to report to you about a spelling error and a user who's continuing misspelling it. The error is the name "Ciriè", an Italian town that should be written "Cirié". All the articles of Wikipedia in any language spell it correctly "Cirié", as it's spelled in the official site of the town ([13]). A few months ago an IP changed the accent of all the categories in Commons on his own and requested to delete the previous category names too, you deleted them believing that renaming them to "Ciriè" was correct, but as you've seen now it isn't, it was correct before. This IP did the same in Wikidata, where all the Wikipedian articles listed are spelled "Cirié" while all the labels are spelled "Ciriè". Quite ridiculous... Well, today the errors were corrected, but a registered user, Arbalete, almost immediately started restoring the wrong spelling. I suspect that Arbalete and the IP are the same person, but apart from this consideration the point is that in Commons and Wikidata the town name is misspelled. I've told you because you're the one who deleted those categories months ago, I've preferred to tell you about this error and explain the situation than start an edit war with Arbalete. So, please, could you restore the correct categories and descriptions? You're an administrator, so I believe that I did the right by calling on you to fix this issue. If, instead, you thought that I should ask someone else, I'd write to another user. Please let me know, thank you. Otaperab (talk) 21:10, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

I've asked User:Arbalete for an explaination, User_talk:Arbalete#Cirié. --Túrelio (talk) 09:18, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to ask you what's your opinion, as an administrator, about this issue. Do you think that my request was right? Or that Arbalete's reverts were correct? Should we leave the things as they are to avoid possible edit wars? To me it isn't so important that his mass edits are reverted, but I think that I've shown quite clearly why they were actually inappropriate. Anything you say would be ok for me! Otaperab (talk) 21:40, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Otaperab,
as an administrator on Commons I don't have specific competence or authority for such questions. We usually prefer such questions first to be answered/decided on the Wikipedia concerned, which would be :it in this case. However, I acknowledge that this didn't seem to work in this specific case. I'll try to put the question up for discussion on the COM:VP over the weekend. Let's see if that works, which is not guaranteed. --Túrelio (talk) 21:50, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Thanks Túrelio. In the concerned Wikipedia there was a discussion indeed, linked by Arbalete, where it was proposed to change the name to Ciriè but the proposal was rejected precisely because Cirié is the name used in the website and in the Stature of the municipality, linked by me, and nowhere else it was proposed such a move as far as I can see. Anyway, putting the discussion where you said is a good idea. May I ask you to wait doing it because in the next days I'll have very short time to follow a possible discussion, please? I could do it when I'm back online. In my humble opinion, I really hope that dictionary won't be considered a more authoritative source than an official Statute, not so much for this specific town name but because there's the risk that many more pages of Italian towns will be renamed to an unofficial name, such as "Jesolo" to "Iesolo" in my example... Otaperab (talk) 22:20, 10 September 2021 (UTC)


Hallo, is not a good source. The question is disputed there, anywhere I used the ortography of the official dictionary of writing and pronounce of the Italian language.--Arbalete (talk) 10:50, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Here. The official site of the town is not a good source (unfortunately Italians use often to mistake é with è or also with e', and on this site you can find Cirié, Ciriè and Cirie'.--Arbalete (talk) 10:55, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
And also the Italian national enciclopedy, the Italian Touring Club and the Italian statistical institute write Ciriè.--Arbalete (talk) 11:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Ok. Has there been anywhere an on-wiki discussion about this issue, which reached a consensus? --Túrelio (talk) 11:03, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
There is a discussion on the page Cirié of As it often happens, nothing was decided.--Arbalete (talk) 12:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

The official site of the municipality spells the name "Cirié", also in its statute ([14]). There's no doubt that the correct name of the town is that (I've also checked my paper geographic encyclopedia and it spells it "Cirié" too). Do you think that the "official site of the town is not a good source", Túrelio? It happens sometimes that the official name of an Italian municipality, when ending in -é or -è, is spelled differently somewhere else, such as in some dictionaries like the one linked above. Well, in Wikipedia as far as I can see it's always been preferred the "official" version, contained in the institutional website or in the statute, over any different version contained in dictionaries. The official spelling always prevails. An example: that dictionary also spells "Roé", but in the institutional website of the town it's spelled "Roè" and this has always been the spelling of this Lombard town in any page of Wikipedia. The decision is between a correct name, officially spelled "Cirié", and a wrong name that somebody writes "Ciriè". Luckily, in Wikipedia it's always been spelled correctly everywhere, even if here in Commons and in Wikidata there's a user who for some reasons is now disagreeing with the rest of the Project. Not too bad actually, there're just categories and file names here, rather than start edit wars we might leave things as they're now. Otaperab (talk) 12:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

The communal statute is not a good source about ortography. Anyway the same statute also uses somewhere Ciriè, so it's clear that it was written without care, as unfortunately often happens in Italy. The other sources I mentioned are much more precise.--Arbalete (talk) 12:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
You, Arbalete, are saying that. Wikipedia is based on reliable sources, and an ordinary dictionary can't prevail over an official statute. According to the dictionary you linked, the town of "Jesolo" should be spelled "Iesolo", and the same goes for other towns starting with J-. What should we do now, rename all Italians town like Jesolo, Jesi and similar to their dictionary versions starting with I-? Wikipedia is based on reliable sources, an institutional website fulfils this requirement, if other less reliable sources disagree we can't prefer them to an official source. I don't see any reason in your massive renaming of your own accord and against a stable situation since the beginnings of Wikipedia... But let's stop using Túrelio's talk page for our own conversation (I apologize!), if you want we can continue in yours or mine, and in case he has anything to ask us we'll come back to reply. Otaperab (talk) 13:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Image deletion help[edit]

Hi Túrelio, I hope you are well. I was wondering if you could please help me delete two images. A few years ago I uploaded two images and I no longer want them to be on Wikipedia but I am having trouble deleting them. I was wondering if you could please help me with deleting them for me? Thanks so much.

Hallo Turelio, ich hoffe es geht dir gut. Ich habe mich gefragt, ob Sie mir bitte helfen könnten, zwei Bilder zu löschen. Vor ein paar Jahren habe ich zwei Bilder hochgeladen und möchte sie nicht mehr auf Wikipedia haben, aber ich habe Probleme sie zu löschen. Ich habe mich gefragt, ob Sie mir bitte helfen könnten, sie für mich zu löschen? Vielen Dank Fabi121302 (talk) 06:09, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Fabi121302,
I did find only 1 image: File:Giovanni Niubo Freak Night 2015.jpg. However, as the first DR (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Giovanni Niubo Freak Night 2015.jpg) has been keep-closed, you need a new rationale (and a bit of luck) to "win" a second DR. If you are still active in public life, you might consider releasing a newer, more suitable image, which could then replace the older one. In case of non-success you might also request that your username is removed from the author-entry of the image, if that is a problem. --Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Grafika na Commons[edit]

Czemu wy zgłaszacie grafiki do usunięcia i nie informujecie autora o powodach? Explain me your actions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Campió99 (talk • contribs) 09:07, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Did you ever read your own talkpage User talk:Campió99? There you find the rationale in each of the problem-notices. For File:Grafika FCB.jpg there is also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos and symbols of FC Barcelona. Your uploads are not your own work, violate the copyright of its creators and expose re-users to litigation for copyright-infringement. --Túrelio (talk) 09:22, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
So why this image wasn't deleted yet?ünchen_logo_(2017).svg Campió99 (talk)
That's not the same logo. Different logos and legislation may have different copyright-rules. Also see File talk:FC Bayern München logo (2017).svg. --Túrelio (talk) 10:27, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
and those File:FC_Barcelona,_Camp_Nou(Ank_Kumar_)_02.jpg, File:FC_Barcelona,_Camp_Nou(Ank_Kumar_)_01.jpg, File:FC_Barcelona,_Camp_Nou(Ank_Kumar)_08.jpg, File:FC_Barcelona.jpg, File:Camió_FC_Barcelona_-_Campions_Lliga_2012-13.JPG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Campió99 (talk • contribs) 23:08, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
First, sign your posts. Second, link images properly (wiki-syntax) please. I will look into these. --Túrelio (talk) 10:27, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Creation blocks[edit]

Hi there. You've deleted a few files I've tagged as speedy G4. I've had to retag some, as they've been uploaded yet again. Could you put a creation block on them? These are the ones I've found so far:

Could we also do something about this user, who continues to upload previously-deleted files even after numerous requests to stop. The user has promised to stop, but also states that he is "trying to finish that photographer". (See, for example, User talk:Orizan/Archive 3#Please quit re-uploading files). Mindmatrix 00:42, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

He just uploaded two more for the third time:
File:CHG Top Chef Finale (5790209107).jpg
File:CHG Top Chef Finale (5790208201).jpg
This needs to stop. Mindmatrix 00:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I've deleted all files, except one which could eventually remain in the cropped version, which I've created. I've instructed Orizan to adjust his upload-process to avoid such a mess. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Portret van Gerardus Johannes Petrus Josephus Bolland, hoogleraar Wijsbegeerte te Leiden Icones 313.tiff[edit]

Hi Túrelio, thanks for deleting this file yesterday, I guess, with the argument: (The author Georg Rueter died in 1966; the source says emphatically "This resource is protected by copyright"). That sources indeed now states the work is copyright, because it was altered three days ago after I had contacted them four days ago. Now I was still in the process of discussing this matter and wanted to check one more thing. Could you tell how you came to delete the image right now? Was it tagged as copyvio and if so by who? -- Mdd (talk) 13:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, I think I found the answer myself:
  1. First I added the NoUploads template two days ago to the Category:Georg Rueter, see here, which might have triggered Gouwenaar
  2. Second the next evening instead of tagging the file as copyvio (which I would have contested), @Gouwenaar: filed a speedy delete request, and notified the original uploader Mr.Nostalgic, see here
  3. Third you deleted the file about five minuted later on.
Personally I would appreciate if I would be given a chance to contest the speedy delete request based on the local copyright policy here, and the precedent of a previous case. -- Mdd (talk) 15:37, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Mdd,
at least I put the file into Category:Undelete in 2037. Now, if there is a serious possibility that the image will not infringe the painter's copyright, I can undelete and put it into a regular DR. --Túrelio (talk) 16:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the offer, but I pass. I found another way, see here to check the one thing, and might start a discussion at the appropriate place. -- Mdd (talk) 23:42, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Mohammad Hassan Akhund (cropped).jpg[edit]

Hi Túrelio, I am unable to see File:Taliban Leader-Mohammad Hassan Akhund.jpg, but File:Mohammad Hassan Akhund (cropped).jpg has been uploaded as a derivative of that claiming the deletion reason does not apply. This seems dubious, but bringing it to your attention in case there is something an admin could see behind that deletion. Thanks, Chipmunkdavis (talk) 14:43, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 16:08, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Afghanistan new emblem[edit]

You shouldn't have deleted the new emblem of afghanistan. You clearly did'nt read the refernces. It is comfirmed to be the official. Next time don't delete a file without knowing —Preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 16:53, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

As you didn't specify the files you are talking about, I cannot comment. On Commons we usually do not delete for "not being correct", but for missing permission. --Túrelio (talk) 17:48, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Possible copyvio[edit]

Hello, you deleted File:UCP.png on copyvio grounds. The same user has also uploaded File:Umesh CP.png -- another photo of the same guy. I haven't been able to find a copy on the web, but I find it highly unlikely for the user to be a photographer. FYI, the same user has also attempted to create an article on en.wp, only for it to be declined. 2405:201:4013:802D:B92A:3B90:3279:A294 21:34, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

They have also uploaded File:Umesh Padala with Sonu Sood.jpg, File:Umesh Padala Image.jpg which are from the Padala's Facebook page (as per Google), File:Umesh Padala .jpg, possible copyvio from 1/2/3. Overall, seems like a paid editing scenario though. 2405:201:4013:802D:B92A:3B90:3279:A294 21:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

About File:DEM logotipo(2007).png and File:Datena (cortado).jpg[edit]

Hello @Túrelio: how are you doing? Both of these images shouldn't be deleted. The fist File:DEM logotipo(2007).png is a former political party symbol. Party logos are not copyright free but they have what is called fair use by wikipedia, which allows the redistribution of the photo. The licensing should have this information:

This is a logo of an organization, item, or event, and is protected by copyright. The use of low-resolution images on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, of logos for certain uses involving identification and critical commentary may qualify as fair use under the Copyright law of the United States. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. Certain commercial use of this image may also be trademark infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Logos. Use of the logo here does not imply endorsement of the organization by Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation, nor vice versa.

Plus, the very same image is already on Wikimedia Commons but without the png format: File:DEM2.jpg

About the second photo, it was already on wikipedia, and I uploaded cropped version of it. File: O Governador do Estado de São Paulo, João Doria, participa ao vivo do Programa Brasil Urgente do Datena. Local São Paulo-SP. Data 23 07 2019 Foto Governo do Estado de São Paulo (48359534426) (cropped).jpg

Thank you, Przelijpdahl (talk) 17:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Przelijpdahl,
wrt to your fair-use rationale: you need to know that on Commons we are not allowed to host fair-use material. Such material can only be uploaded locally, i.e. to :en, if you want to use it on :en.
The 2nd image, File:Datena (cortado).jpg, had already been deleted by a colleague. But that is a bit your own fault: you claimed it to be own work, which it is not, and you did not mention the source-file from which it had been cropped. Cropping an image does not give you any own copyright. I've restored it now with a corrected description. --Túrelio (talk) 18:32, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
@Túrelio: Hello, then I don't understand how virtually every political party has its logos on Wikipedia and this one can't. I searched for the wikimedia commons guidelines on this subject (political party logos), but all I could find was this page in which they say that party logos are fair use but we can upload them into wikimedia commons anyway. I am currently working on these articles (I'm expanding everyone of these election articles from 1945 to 2022) and I need the former symbols of the parties. Even though a few parties only recently changed their logos, someone not concerned with information and archive deleted them from wikimedia commons! Hence why I'm reuploading them, but as I told you, I didn't find the proper guidelines as how political party logos operate on Wikipedia. Do you mind sending me a page with this information if there is one? Oh and thank-you for the help with the second photo. Przelijpdahl (talk) 19:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
First of all, you have to make a strict distinction between Wikipedia and Commons. Our policies are not identical. As I had explained (and linked) already above, fair-use material is not allowed (per US law) on Commons. :en Wikipedia has an exemption policy. It requires local upload (on :en) and presenting a fair-use rationale for each such image/use; see en:Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline. I don't know whether other Wikipedias also have such exemption-policies. You need to ask that locally. --Túrelio (talk) 13:42, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

File:111122-M-MM918-006 (6425584105).jpg and File:091205-N-4021H-004_(4161307030).jpg[edit]

Can these files possibly be undeleted? I completely understand the user's concerns, but IMHO, it is not the job of admins to respond to threats of harm, rather the job of WMF office staff; there is the email list if an image poses a threat to those depicted off-wiki, and WMFOffice may decide to delete files if they believe that it is in the interest of the public. I do see there is a line in the deletion policy that images that are used in a way that violate their personality rights (like by doxxing them) can be deleted by admins, but I do not know otherwise. If needed, the deletion discussions can be reopened so Commons users can address those concerns. Aasim 05:42, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I'm not simply going to restore these images in this case. I see my approach justified by my responsibility as an admin to avert potentially threatening damage if I come across it. See Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#how_to_deal_with_DRs_of_identifiable_Afghans_feeling_threatened_by_Taliban?. --Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

what is ur problem[edit]

what is ur problem — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pehlivanmeydani (talk • contribs) 09:18, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

See User talk:Pehlivanmeydani. --Túrelio (talk) 09:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Dalida image on commons[edit]

Hi, thank you very much for your quick intervention on File:Dalida Ciao ciao bambina EP.jpg. I haven't used wiki uploader for a while so I accidentally uploaded the image to commons rather than usual wiki. I went nuts cause I was scared of some admin report... I wanted to request speedy deletion immediately, but you were quicker! Thank you very much! Cordially.~~~~ Dalida Editor please ping or message me 10:50, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 10:58, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Help me please[edit]

I need upload the profile picture of the professional soccer player Luis Carlos Sánchez, if you can do it for me I will appreciate it. Thank you so much. Bipro23 (talk) 21:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Bipro23,
I am sorry, but I don't have time for that. You might search on Flickr for a image of him, which is under a Commons-compliant free license (CC-BY, CC-Zero, CC-BY-SA; but not CC-NC or CC-ND). Or you may try to find a Wikipedian in es:Vitória (Brasil), who might go to a game an take a shot of him. --Túrelio (talk) 07:30, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Redirect still here[edit]

You may also want to delete this redirect File:Irish stamp. Roger Halpen, 2003.jpg of a file you recently deleted. Thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 10:24, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:54, 17 September 2021 (UTC),File%3ANazis-%20Nzhdeh%20propaganda%20brochure-.jpg,-%5Bedit%5D[edit]

This is a Nazi Propaganda brochure that was made in 1942 you can find it everywhere in internet. There is no copyright owner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerçekler (talk • contribs) 10:53, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

"There is no copyright owner." Well, then how can you release them under a CC license, which can be done only by the copyright-owner? The images/photographies on these 2 pages/leaflets may still be under copyright. Usual copyright lasts for 70 years after death of the author, not 70 years after publication. Even if you want to claim unknown-author ({{PD-anon-70-EU}}), you need to do research and try to identify the original source/author. --Túrelio (talk) 11:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)


Hello, and thank you for deleting some of the files of this category. May I ask why you proceed 20 by 20? Is it possible to massdelete them, so the task is solved earlier? See my talk page if you need the rationale of this deletion request.

All the best — WikiLucas (🖋️) 13:21, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

I am not aware of a possibility for mass-deletion; Nuke works account-related, not cat-related. So, I have to delete them one by one, which means at least 3 mouse-clicks per file. --Túrelio (talk) 15:34, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Eric Brown.jpg[edit]

Hi Túrelio. Would you take a look at File:Eric Brown.jpg? You deleted it a file of the same name on December 9, 2020 for not having proper permission. That file was attributed to someone's Facebook page who doesn't seem to be the uploader. A few weeks later the same uploader uploaded another photo with the same name, but this time claimed it as their own work. I can't see the first file that was deleted, but you can. Perhaps this is just file is just a misunderstanding of what "own work" means or maybe it just needs to be VRT verified, but I wanted to check with someone before tagging it again with {{Npd}} since this might be a case of a previously published image needing further verification. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:26, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

It's the same image, as the previous one. Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 07:41, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of the image "File:MasafumiNakagawa.jpg"[edit]

Recently the image "MasafumiNakagawa.jpg" was deleted from Wikimedia Commons, which I had uploaded. The picture was supplied from Dr. Masafumi Nakagawa (中川雅文) himself with a word of copyright free. Therefore I uploaded it as my own picture which is handed over personally from the image owner. Is this a copyright violaton case? If so, how do I re-upload it properly? Thank you for your advice in advance. Cf: the page 中川雅文 in ja.wikipedia ( --IyataYada (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

To Túrelio: I uploaded a new image which is new on the Web. See "File:MasafumiNakagawaMD.jpg" for the detail. Thank you --IyataYada (talk) 16:06, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi @IyataYada, it took some time to reply, as I was busy with other things.
With regard to the currently deleted File:MasafumiNakagawa.jpg: it was likely not shot by Dr. Nakagawa himself, right? So, if you want to have it undeleted, you need to ask him who shot it and whether he (Nakagawa) has really the full copyright over it. If he has, then he should send a confirmation of the choosen license (cc-by-sa-4.0) from his business email address to (VRTS). If he has not, then he needs to ask the photographer to send such a confirmation to VRTS. (You can find a template for such a confirmation here: Commons:Email templates#Email message template for release of rights to a file). --Túrelio (talk) 21:26, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

To Túrelio: I gave up this image. I prefer new image upload to re-upload of this image, because new one is better than this. Danke!--IyataYada (talk) 00:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Dr. Nakagawa's picture again: Additional explanation[edit]

I found the site ”” but this might be a mirror site. Visit ”" instead of "," you'll find no image page, because the "" violated the copyright of the image (Dr. Masafumi Nakagawaa). However, my picture on Wikimedia Commons is my own because Dr. Nakagawa gave me for the purpose of upload to the Wikimedia Commons. Thank you again! --IyataYada (talk) 16:55, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

To Túrelio: I uploaded a new image which is new on the Web. See "File:MasafumiNakagawaMD.jpg" for the detail. Thank you --IyataYada (talk) 16:07, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi @IyataYada,
for the new image, the same procedure as described above is required. So, Mr. Hirofumi Nakagawa needs to send a confirmation of the choosen license for this image from his official email address to (VRTS). My personal advise: do not use a CC-Zero license for portraits of living persons, as you give up nearly all your rights. Better choose a CC-BY-SA license. --Túrelio (talk) 21:32, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

To Túrelio: I asked the original photographer for an Email confirmation of copyright transfer limited to the Wikimedia use. Vielen Dank!!!--IyataYada (talk) 00:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)