User talk:Túrelio

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Busy desk.svg This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

العربية | Беларуская‎ | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | English | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Simple English | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ATTENTION: Please use my talk page rather than emailing me.


noframe

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic.

All requests for and notifications of re-use of my images on Commons have been moved to Requests & Notifications.

If you can't find a comment or an older discussion here, take a look whether it is in one of my archives:
Archive1 (latest), Archive2 (2007), Archive3 (2008) (big!), Archive4 (2009) (huge!), Archive5 (2010) (huge!), Archive6 (2011) (huge!), Archive7 (2012) (huge!), Archive8 (2013) (huge!), Archive9 (2014), Archive10 (2015).


Contents

AJ Styles WWE[edit]

Hello im Photolover33 and i have this question for you: If this image has a problem can i reupload it as not my own work just to publicity please? Awnser when you can please. I'm waiting goodbye Photolover33

File:Parti européen - Logo.jpg + File tagging File:Parti européen - Affiche.jpg + File tagging File:Louis de Gouyon Matignon.jpg[edit]

Hi, I am Louis de Gouyon Matignon, fondator of the Parti européen.This images are mine and they are free to be used. You will find them easely on my website www.louisdegouyonmatignon.com and www.partieuropeen.com.

I am totally clear with this issue you are making. Those are my pictures and I use them as I want.

Thank you very much,

Louis

File:Blank-map-world-reversed.png[edit]

Hi. On 8 October 2011, you redirected File:Blank-map-world-reversed.png to File:Blank-map-world-south-up.png with the summary "Redirecting to duplicate file". Actually, the latter was a duplicate of the former. Also, judging by the talk page of the original, the user who created the duplicate, may have actually created a different map. Apparently (I commented on the talk page at the time, though I don't remember), the original was a flipped map, rather than a rotated map like the duplicate. Is there anyway to restore the original? Mclay1 (talk) 04:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Undo[edit]

Hi, I notice that:

IMO all edits of Buxeria are copyviol.--Pạtạfisik 22:13, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Patafisik,
thanks for notifying. However, currently I am busy in RL and rarely online. --Túrelio (talk) 14:22, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Die WikiEulenAcademy gratuliert zur EhrenEule[edit]

Hiermit verleihen wir
Túrelio
die Auszeichnung
Wikieule 1 cropped.tif
EhrenEule
als Anerkennung für
herausragende Arbeit
im Dienste der Verbesserung
unserer Enzyklopädie.
gez. WikiEulenAcademy

Hallo Túrelio,


die WikiEulenAcademy schließt sich nun den Glückwünschen an und gratuliert dir recht herzlich zur WikiEule 2014.

Es ist uns eine Ehre dir neben der Eule für den Schreibtisch eine WikiEule für deine Benutzerseite zu überreichen.

Sollte dir diese zu groß sein, haben wir einen entsprechenden Babel vorbereitet:

Wikieule 2 cropped.tif
Dieser Benutzer ist stolzer Preisträger der EhrenEule 2014.

Danke, für deine tatkräftige Unterstützung.

Wir wünschen dir noch viel Freude und hoffen auf weitere großartige Beiträge.

Vielleicht sieht man sich auch bei anderen Treffen oder der nächsten WikiCon wieder?


Liebe Grüße,
die WikiEulenAcademy (talk) 01:44, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Herzlichen Dank, welche Ehre! Schade, dass ich am Samstagabend schon nicht mehr in Köln war und die Verleihung deshalb verpasst habe. --Túrelio (talk) 19:27, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Túrelio Good Morning[edit]

I received a dire or disturbing message here [2] to which I replied forthwith; [3] and another reply; with all due resepec, I cannot understand why after more than 101,000 edit files I upload only since February this year, 2014, I am attacked and accused of many bad things; as you see in my reply, I only not opted or chose to create 2 categories and rather placed the category in one Category as sub-category; I am accused of violating the Rules on Meta or Over-Categorization; but the accuser failed to point to me the specific provision or rule that I violated; I deny the violation, for I am faithfully adhering to the rules; the thing speaks for itself; good faith in editing is presummed; no editor or administraor has messaged me on this, but only this editor, since I started this February, 2014; It is very painful and terrifying to edit and contribute and at the same time being personally attacked; Please, with your kindness and integrity give me some protection, and if I am wrong, please help me be corrected; I chose not to use my user name but just an IP Address for reasons of security. Muchas gracias Túrelio--124.106.77.79 04:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm busy in RL. I'll try to look into in the evening. --Túrelio (talk) 11:57, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for you time, Túrelio. I forthwith received in my talk page, a more dire message in this manner which I am quoting because of its importance and I underscore it, to wit: ::::* Sorry xxx I have given up on xxx He just does his own thing, thinking that his pictures will make "Commons a better place for researchers", "a wiser tool of knowledge for the future" and "benefit in the future". Obviously he is thinking way too much of himself and his pictures! But really, he is using Commons as his personal storage device. We have told him many times to be selective, to categorize properly, even to add better descriptions. Even after pointing out the problem, he still doesn't go back to his uploads to correct them, but leaves it to others to clean up after him. That shows that either he doesn't understand English, or he is too arrogant to care. We should just dump all his pictures in a special category like Category:Photographs by Ramon F Velasquez or Category:Photographs by Judge floro, and there nobody will be able to find them or make sense of the mess... [4];

Will all my 101,000 files [5] since February 2014, disappear[edit]

And does User: P199 which, as is shown the other account or alternate of User:Briar fallen, have the power, administrative or otherwise, to delete all my 101,000 photos and dump them in hidden category as these Users P 199 and Briar fallen decide to dump in ""a special category like Category: Photographs by Ramon F Velasquez or Category: Photographs by Judge floro, and there nobody will be able to find them or make sense of the mess... as they proclaimed, announced and stated? Hence, all my photos are rendered nugatory, hidden and can no longer be found in Commons and Wikipedia, is this for real? Please help me, thanks, Very sincerely yours.--124.106.77.79 14:29, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Grund der Angelrute, warum zwei Konten?[edit]

Ich habe ein zweites Konto beste Turelio instant Rute unter dem Benutzernamen, dass mehr auf Ihr erklärt habe ich erstellt. Ich bin so Peter van der Sluijs. ich nur die Grundausbildung Fotograf. also abgeschlossen haben ich verbessert Dateien hochgeladen haben. Ich habe viele besondere Fotos mit Wikipedia von dort teilen möchtest. Verständnis für Menschen zustimmen, die Licht und Autist wie ich sind.Wikipedia ist manchmal sehr schwierig für mich.Große Dateien hochladen möchte bleiben. Großen Einsatz von Übersetzungs-Tools durch den Computer damit zu machen

Ich bin schon Gambia heuer, 22. November 2014 zu diesem Foto Bericht. Datum 7 November. die alten Bilder sind von 1998 drin, ich habe, einige Dateien verbessert, so dass Menschen können sie auch für Bettwäsche etc. Fragen sie mindestens 1 mb

Die letzten 100 Fotos auf meinem Konto sind Reisen Gambia Angelrute 7 November bis 22. November 2014. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishengel (talk • contribs)

Hello[edit]

A Very Good Day to You !!!

Yesterday I saw this -> FOP case,and afterwards thought to bring forward some of my pages to your consideration,These are some of my Photographs in Commons (see below),If you think that they too come under this law,please feel free to delete them without further discussion,because I don't want to break the prevailing law in my country (Sri Lanka),notification is not necessary,NB:There could be more such Photographs in my uploads which are NOT listed below,Thanks.

1 Regency Hotel I 2 Regency Hotel II 3 SAITM I 4 SAITM II 5 SAITM III 6 SAITM IV 7 SAITM Hospital I 8 SAITM Hospital II 9 SAITM Hospital III 10 SAITM Hospital IV 11 Polgahawela Monastery 12 MIT 13 SLIIT Engineering Department

Face-smile.svg--MediaJet talk 11:05, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Vœux[edit]

Windmills wishes.jpg Meilleurs vœux pour 2015 !
Hello Túrelio,
Je te souhaite une très bonne année
Et beaucoup de plaisir à contribuer !
Cordialement,
— 
Racconish 📥 11:29, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Dealing with a problematic user[edit]

Dear Túrelio,

Hello. I am pasting a query with regard to a problematic user on my Hindi Wikipedia user talk. I need your valuable help in the matter:

issue[edit]

i would like to inform you about serious rules violation by user named User:राजु सुथार (this is his latest id).....he has created no less than 10 sock puppet ids here check user result......and you must have noticed that even after blocking his 1 id he is immediately creating a new 1......user is indulging in self advertisement, spamming, vandalism of pages and uploading of self pictures and family member's picture here.........and recently he is being found uploading self pictures on commons, 1 of which was deleted earlier can see discussion by clicking here and the account from which he uploaded the picture was blocked on commons click here, but again he uploaded his picture on commons this time from another account which has been nominate for deletion click here

my question is....is there any way to block his access permanently from editing on wikipedia?? blocking of ip it seems is of no use because he is using dynamic ip which is changing every time......can we block him by identifying his machine mac-address??
more over i would like to request you to raise this question on commons because this guy is causing head ache here.....something should be done about such users......Sperm whale fluke.jpg Darth Whale वार्ता 03:42, 23 जनवरी 2015 (UTC)

Regards, --Muzammil (talk) 05:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Pictures Reinier Sonneveld and Emanuel Rutten[edit]

Hi Túrelio, you asked some questions about the licenses of the pictures I uploaded. All the pictures I uploaden were given personally to me by the photographers themselves. For every picture I named the organisation they work for or their professional name. I can not give full evidence of this, in juridical sense, but maybe this site proofs some points: [6] Here some of the pictures I uploaded are presented also, with the assurance that they are licence-free. I hope this will satisfy your questions! --Fosburyflop (talk) 13:26, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Schau mal 3M[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AIPRobin&diff=154359325&oldid=154343367

Der Benutzer kann mir den Unterschied zwischen Category:Rolling stock in Wuppertal und Category:Trains in Wuppertal nicht erklären und droht mir mit VM, außerdem ist sein Bildmaterial farblich so etwas von schlecht. Ich weis nicht. Ich glaube sein Sensor hat ein Farbfehler... was meinst du? --Atamari (talk) 21:55, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

copyright violation[edit]

Hi, please explain about this edit. the photo copied from here (with better quality) and uploaded in one of fa.wiki Spam-blacklist URLs (irdub.ir) with new watermark and this is a copyright violation. this website using CC-BY-SA license but all of contents are copy from other websites. --Arash.pt (talk) 14:18, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi Arash
I had seen then the CC note at lower right and had assumed it's their own content. If you are sure that they copied it all from other websites, I can restore the copyvio-tags. --Túrelio (talk) 14:25, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
I'm sure they violating copyright and most of their photos must be deleted from Commons but I dont know about all contents. the website is dubbing[7] and sell[8] hollywood movies without any permission and their work is illegal. --Arash.pt (talk) 16:44, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Oppose-Hi. I am not agree with Arash.pt because If you check watermarks of the two photos [9]-[10] and compare them, you can't see any retouch in each of them. either of them are original. I think there are two possible: 1-The Association of Tehran Young Voice Actors published these photos without any watermark and then add watermark to them, but some black sites, copy it's pictures before adding watermark. 2-some bloggers, stole a few original pictures of The Association of Tehran Young Voice Actors and show them in their weblogs.

Also, quality of this picture is not better than original picture and blogger just resized original picture because if you check their hitogram, you can see a Histogram! Is this an accident?!

Any way, I can't see any convincing reason to approve that Association of Tehran Young Voice Actors, borrowed pictures of it's studio recording from a cheap website.Moghime ARAK (talk) 18:43, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

If Arash.pt claims that irdub.com borrowed it's pictures from another websites, he must show us original address of every one pictures of this gallery. can he?Moghime ARAK (talk) 18:52, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

  • the source page (jazzaab) with photos fetch from archive.org: 7 january 2012
  • the file that uploaded in common is from here and you can see the upload date here: 03-Jun-2013 (1 year later). --Arash.pt (talk) 22:15, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

I told that a blogger could steal 4 pictures of the company and publish them before piblishing by the owner. Is n't it logic? I emphasize: there are hundreds of official pictures of the company in it's gallery and Arash.pt wants us ignore them for just 4 stolen pictures?!

Until now, two admins accepted these photos ([11] and [12]) and an admin deleted the pictures had been tagged by you.(see in my talk page) Now, what is your decision?

thanx.Moghime ARAK (talk) 23:19, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of photo[edit]

Hi, I am 22balin and I asked on 1 of may to delete history or delete fully photo of Leonardo painting.The reason why I am asking for this is that owner of the painting allows that this painting can be uploaded only in resolution 708 × 1,017. Could you delete history file or fully delete photo that I can reload it& — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.171.62.230 (talk • contribs)

Retard pour l'envoi de l'autorisation du fichier: Pierre Saint-Paul, André Morain 1999.jpg[edit]

Je reviens vers vous, André Morain vient de me tel, il n'a pas encore renvoyé l'autorisation: il bloque sur le fait que l'on peut utiliser l'oeuvre dans un but commercial, et pouvez-vous m'indiquer "...des exigences imposées par la licence... (pour les modifications)" et il veut garder le droit d'être cité. Pouvez-vous m'indiquer la licence la plus appropriée (avec son texte) pour cette demande?

Bien cordialement, --Philippe HENRION (talk) 10:53, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Copyright issues[edit]

Hello. I will research whether or not I have a right to publish these photos with my father either tonight or tomorrow. He's been helping me on wikinews, and he's better at organization and research than I am. I don't want to do it on my own because when I did things on my own on English wikipedia and simple English wikipedia I just made a bunch of mistakes, but I will address your concerns. I believe that those photos were all already in the public domain, but if I was mistaken I will delete them. PaulBustion88 (talk) 20:10, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

You may delete "File:יפעת שאשא-ביטון Yifat Sasha-Biton.JPG" that I have uploaded[edit]

The image was given to her as a present, so I figurd she is the copyrightholder and can give me a permission, but by any case I will upload another image. I talked to Knesset Member Yifat Sasha-Biton and she will give me a different image, this time from someone close to her so it will be easy to rearch him and ask his permission. --Midrashah (talk) 18:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Anacleto Milani-1.jpg[edit]

Mi scusi, io sono proprio novizio per questi scambi elettronici.La mia madre lingua è l'italiano ma parlo e scrivo correntemente in francese. Potrebbe, per favore, dirmi cosa scrivere come fonte per una foto di famiglia, che possiedo da anni, e che ho fotografato per metterla su una pagina Wikipedia che sto preparando. Grazie --Amidavegre (talk) 14:29, 25 May 2015 (UTC)25 maggio 2015

Bureaucracy?[edit]

Hello. I'm sure you're aware of the discussions at the bureaucrat board. Would you be willing to stand as a candidate? Green Giant (talk) 16:01, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, I would also like to look forward to a candidacy of yours :) You would be an asset in a 'crat team. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 10:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your trust. For the moment I don't think that's for me. However, I am willing to support and contribute ideas for improvement to the bureaucrat team. --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Sinkope image[edit]

You should wait some time before deleting content and the work of other people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarkMoMo (talk • contribs) 2015-05-26T06:41:37 (UTC)

Well, no. You did upload an image which did clearly violate our licensing policy at the time of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 07:50, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Túrelio banned me[edit]

Hi Túrelio, tks for your response. Now I undesrtood why you banned me. But I think of it as a mistake. Mine and your.

Let me explain by parts: You said:

"I have deleted it because the content was merely promotional and thereby out of our scope." Excuse me, but the content I published is non promotional: it's my CV. IIt was the first post I did and I put my CV because think that is important to people know who is contributing to Wikimedia Commons. No fonts, no names, for me, means, no commitment.

You acted as a cop who see a black guy running on the streets and, just because he is black, decides to shoot him presuming that he had seal someone. You shooted me first (banning) to reply before. Calm down brother. If you see a cooker with 2 eggs in hand, you can't say that "the cake will awful". The cooker can be planning to do an omelet and not a cake ;)

Then you said: "So far, you have no contributions/uploads to Commons. In case you want to contribute valuable/useful free content to Commons, you should do so. In that case you can put on your userpage some information about use (such as language skills) which is of use for other Commons' user who want to communicate with you."

Hey man, came on: I wont lose my time entering to WikeMedia Commons if I had not anything to contribute. I love the concept of copyleft or free use of ideas, images, musics or anything and that can help to make a better world.


At least you said: "However, if you actually do not want to contribute content to Commons, you should not use Commons as a substitute for Facebook. Regards." Who tells you I do not want to contribute? It's sad to see people like you, who acts like a cop blocking people like me, who is just starting at WikiMedia Commons. I'm here thinking how many people you had block by preconceive. People who could be doing great contributions to WikiMedia, but was not allowed because Túrelio block them.

Pls, if want a better world, do a favor to yourself and to all the people who wants a different place for our children: don't judge by your first impression. Our planet had already losts many important ideas by this kind of behavior.

Sincerely, with the best wishes for a better world and future for you :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.45.105.217 (talk • contribs)

Hi unknown,
sorry, but I have no idea what is your account as you didn't provide your username. In addition, your likening of getting an upload to Commons deleted or getting temporarily blocked from Commons (if that really happened at all) to shooting people is completely inappropriate. The volunteers who run this project every day have to filter out and delete hundreths of either copyviolating or out-of-scope uploads. Due to the huge workload it can happen that every now and then we mistakenly delete something which contrary to our first impression wasn't a copyvio or out-of-scope. However, this requires evidence to be presented. --Túrelio (talk) 07:30, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Lukarsius[edit]

Erneut erbitte ich Sie um Stellungnahme zu den gelöschten, frei zur Verfügung stehenden Bildern. Gegen die Lizenzvereinbarung wurde NICHT verstossen. Falls es doch so sein sollte, würde ich gerne wissen gegen was verstossen wurde. beste Grüße Lukas

Hi,
ich hatte dir vor 2 Wochen geantwortet, der Thread ist inzwischen aber archiviert, siehe hier. --Túrelio (talk) 12:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Photo deletion[edit]

I own the photos, somebody seems to have copied and uploaded them without my permission. Could you please delete the photos?--Sirmagoo (talk) 16:15, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

You can delete the photos.[edit]

You can delete the photos you mentioned on my talk page. Apologies for the mistake of uploading them. I should not have uploaded them. They do not fulfill the copyright criteria of Wikimedia Commons.--Commons00 (talk) 18:05, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Email to MEP[edit]

Could you share the text of your email at Commons:Freedom_of_Panorama_2015#Email_campaign? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:06, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Lucíola Maria Inácio Belfort.jpg[edit]

If you think it's better please delete it, I just was trying to create a page about Lucíola Maria Inácio Belfort, but now I left it, this picture I found in every site with informations about her therefore I thought this image was free for use. Eliézer Fialho de Souza (talk) 02:40, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

File:The Trekker's Guide to the Himalaya and Karakoram 02.jpg[edit]

Sir, thanks for leaving me a message regarding the image. Infact the image is 'own work' that I made myself from the book. The aim of giving the link to the source was to provide authenticity to the pic. Moreover, I am still not very much clear about the licensing info on WikiCommons. I may be wrong in giving the correct kind of license to pics, so I would require your help. For now, I understand that this image is probably not a free image and hence can I add a Non-free use rationale to it or something? Thanks. TripWire (talk) 04:42, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @TripWire: 'Own work' refers not only to the image itself, but also to the copyrightable material that it contains. When scanning an image from a book (personally) you should use {{Self-scanned}}, not own work, and then indicate the source and copyright status of the source book.
From the help page for {{own work}}:
“Use this to say that you personally created the entire original image by yourself (for example, you drew the picture on paper, you used a camera to take the photograph, you painted the picture on canvas, etc.). Do not use this tag for any images that you saw on any website, downloaded from any source, scanned from a book, newspaper, or magazine, or copied from anything.”
'Work', in the sense we use it, does not refer to the 'labor involved' in making the image, but to the 'copyrightable work' that is being discussed. Revent (talk) 01:21, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

512px-Drogenbeschaffungskriminalitaet_9526-Wikimedia Commons[edit]

Hi Turelio

I would like to use your image of the broken car window '512px-Drogenbeschaffungskriminalitaet_9526' in teaching materials to illustrate crime. These materials will be used in a class about PTSD to psychiatry students in a public university. I will credit you as creator

Thanks/Danke

Niall — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:770:98:400:85f5:785f:5b57:8002 (talk • contribs)

Hi Niall, thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 18:28, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Sign artwork[edit]

Thanks for the cleanup -

Can you do the same for- File:Concealed Water3.svg (same rationale), which perhaps should also be renamed to File:Concealed Water2.svg in the process?

BTW I'd Like some feedback on how to do "research" on how comprehensible these are.

Thanks ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:08, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Delegate_Kathleen_Murphy.jpeg[edit]

I think I uploaded this using the wrong licensing info, and now I can't reupload it. I own the image and would like to upload it. It is an official portrait for an elected official.

Oghitta420 (talk) 17:56, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Torre de Romilla.jpg[edit]

Buenas tardes, sorry for the template copyright violation,duplicate ? because thanks to see this difference, for me it's the same photo (without discussion) but it's impossible to put the same author in 2007 and 2012 ! Regards --Doalex (talk) 19:36, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

problems with File:Adriano Franceschini Ferrara (1920 - 2005).jpg[edit]

Hello, I apologize. What if no one helps me even here? [13]. The only image that interests me is to Franceschini. I put on commons as well the original image of the grave, to clarify its origin. For other I explained that I accept the cancellation. thanks for your attention.--Lungoleno (talk) 14:20, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Categories Herrenchiemsee und Frauenchiemsee[edit]

Hallo Túrelio, die Liste der Orte im Landkreis Rosenheim sagt zu diesem Thema: "Die Gemeinde Chiemsee mit zwei Gemeindeteilen. Das Kirchdorf Frauenchiemsee (Insel). Das Staatsgut Herrenchiemsee (Insel)." Ich würde gerne wissen, weshalb Du Dich entschlossen hast, diese beiden Gemeindeteile zu löschen. Die Änderungen von Herrenchiemsee zu Herreninsel und Frauenchiemsee zu Fraueninsel, die der User ColdCut zuvor vorgenommen hat, sind unkorrekt. Die Bezeichnungen sind lediglich umgangssprachlich im Gebrauch. Welche Möglichkeit gibt es, diese vielen Änderungen auf einen Schlag rückgängig zu machen? Freundliche Grüße --I. Berger (talk) 14:24, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Hallo,
das beruhte nicht auf einer eigenen "Überlegung". Vielmehr waren beide Kat. leer und dementsprechend von User:ColdCut mit "speedy da leere Kat." markiert. Diese SLAs habe ich ausgeführt. Wie ich jetzt ermittelt habe, hatte User:ColdCut beide ursprüngliche Kat. verschoben mit der Angabe
  • "Category:Frauenchiemsee nach Category:Fraueninsel (korrekte Bezeichnung)"
  • "Category:Herrenchiemsee nach Category:Herreninsel (korrekte Bezeichnung)"
Zunächst solltest du User:ColdCut auf das Problem hinweisen. Ich vermute, dass er trotz des Namens deutsch spricht. Ich gehe davon aus, dass das seinerseits kein absichtlicher Vandalismus, sondern vielleicht eine Fehleinschätzung war. Es wäre deshalb gut, wenn du mit ihm eine Einigung erzielst (ggf. auch auf seiner :de-Disku). Wenn das nicht gelingt, dann hole bitte noch 1-2 weitere Benutzer dazu, die ebenfalls ihre Einschätzung abgeben. Danach könnte ich die (meisten) Edits zurücksetzen. Ich werde aber frühestens heute abend dafür Zeit haben. --Túrelio (talk) 14:36, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Danke, ich werde es versuchen. Die Wiederherstellung ist notwendig, da u. a. auch die Liste der Baudenkmäler der Gemeinde Chiemsee davon betroffen ist. --I. Berger (talk) 18:33, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Siehe dazu de:Benutzer_Diskussion:ColdCut#Herrenchiemsee_und_Frauenchiemsee Grüße --Rufus46 (talk) 20:39, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Leider konnte ich keine Einigung erzielen. Da der User:ColdCut inzwischen gesperrt wurde, ist auch keine weitere Stellungnahme von ihm zu erwarten. Ich möchte noch bemerken, dass man ein Thema, das eine so erhebliche Anzahl von Änderungen nach sich zieht, zunächst zur Diskussion stellen sollte, um auch die Meinung derer zu hören, die am Aufbau beteiligt waren.
Nachdem sich auch der User:Rufus46 für ein "Zurück zum vorherigen Zustand" ausgesprochen hat, möchte ich Dich freundlichst bitten, die Edits des UsersColdCut zurückzusetzen. Besten Dank für Deine Mühe. --I. Berger (talk) 17:07, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Deleting (2)[edit]

Hi Turelio. May I ask you to delete this file? I like to upload a new and better photo. Thank you :) Okkisafire (talk) 14:50, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, I would like to use your excellent photo of Mother Teresa in a YouTube video critical of certain religious doctrines. The context for your photo is that some Christian churches say Mother Teresa does not qualify for Heaven because of the way she was baptized. Absurd! Thank you, for being so generous with your work.74.34.66.24 19:54, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Villa en lomas de zamora.jpg[edit]

Thanks for your help Turelio, however, I still have a problem. I've uploaded a new version of the file (you can see in my gallery), but when I refer the image, it still looks as previous version. What I can be wrong? Thanks, Banfield - Amenazas aquí 15:45, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Sure. After I had reset to the original/initial version and had deleted the unwanted second version, you have again uploaded another (probably the same second) version. --Túrelio (talk) 15:48, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
But I didn't uploaded again the wrong version! In my gallery you can see the new version. Here is a thumbnail of what it looks like. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 16:41, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Jake Clemmence.png[edit]

Newspapers will give you a copy of a picture they took of you, sometimes before it gets published (I had that happen to myself once). That doesn't mean that you own the copyright, though... --Randykitty (talk) 09:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Deletion Picture[edit]

Hi, you deleted a picture that I upload. I requested to delet because I needed to change the name of the archive, but now I want to upload the same picture but I cannot, do you know what I can do? This is the picture: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Antonio_Arevalo.jpg The new name is : António Arévalo. Thanks

Template:ByCat[edit]

Hallo Turelio. Ich bin schon seit fast zwei Wochen mit MetaCats beschäftigt, eigentlich nur was Architektur und Kunst betrifft, aber wenn man den verschiedenen Categorien by something nachfolgt bis in jeden letzten Ast, dann kommt man bald ins Unendliche. Was ich tue, ich füge den korrekten MetaCat Template bei, denen Kategorien die ihn nicht haben (also ich ergänze die relativen Flat Lists); ich ergänze oder korrigiere die MetaCat Template die es benötigen (z.B. wenn eine Categorie by city ist und nur {{MetaCat}} oder {{MetaCat|style}} zeigt, dann wird das eben in {{MetaCat|city}} saniert). Nun was ich so bemerkt habe, es gibt viele spezifische MetaCats die aber nur in die generelle MetaCat Flat List enden, weil der Template:ByCat nicht mehr auf den neusten Stand gebracht worden ist. Könntest du mir da helfen? Denn leider habe ich nicht genügend Erlaubniss um es selber zu erledigen. Meine Vorschläge wären: association = institution / collection = institution / diocese = institution / religion = institution / medallist = creator / writer = creator / christian saint = saint / millennium = era / municipality = city / production area = location / media = type / content = subject. Wenn du das machen könntest, das wäre eine grosse Hilfe für mich, und ich wäre dir sehr dankbar. Vor vielen Jahren habe ich / wir gut gearbeitet auf MetaCats als Rocket000 noch aktiv war. Seit dem er nicht mehr tätig ist, habe ich das Gefühl dass die MetaCats total verlassen worden sind. Oder täusche ich mich? Sicher, was ich so sehe, es hat überall tausende von Categorien die den Template nicht besitzen. Für die maintenance ein grosses Handicap, besonders wenn man dann auf den Flat Lists arbeiten möchte um die verschiedenen Categorien zu ergänzen (was ich zum Teil schon begonnen habe...). Herzlichen Dank für alles was du machen kannst oder willst. Liebe Grüsse, --DenghiùComm (talk) 20:42, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi Denghiù, bin momentan auf Urlaub, versuche mir das morgen mal anzuschauen. --Túrelio (talk) 20:57, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Danke. Geniesse unterdessen deinen Urlaub. Wenn du es dann mal angeschaut hast, wàre ich froh um eine Antwort, was du davon meinst. Alles Gute! --DenghiùComm (talk) 20:07, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Turelio. Bist du wieder zurück? Was ist deine Meinung über meine oben benannten Vorschläge? Alles Gute und liebe Grüsse, --DenghiùComm (talk) 09:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Trying to understand a FOP in Costa Rica case[edit]

I know that this happened a VERY VERY long time ago, but since you were part of the "kept" image in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Museo del Oro Entrada.JPG and I was wanting to understand FOP better. A few of my images have unintentionally run into FOP issues in the past. I have always just let them be deleted without augment, as I don't understand where the line is drawn when it comes to building? When dose a building not have "enough originality" as you say to not be copyrightable and kept, like in this case. I've attempted to understand this issue by reading commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Photographs_of_buildings and other parts of that page, but I'm just more confused. Sometimes I think you need to be a lawyer to understand these pages.

For example: I once had an image of a LDS temple located in French Polynesia (if french FOP) that look just like this one in the US, where FOP isn't an issue for building. Why is a building like this copyrightable, but not Museo del Oro Entrada.JPG. Dose it make any difference that this is the same style of most of hte "Small" temples in the LDS Church?--ARTEST4ECHO talk 19:35, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team![edit]

https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3wl7zNEQdp6z9Vb

This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.

To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Arise Logos[edit]

Hi - Would you kindly take a look at these images:- File:Arise Networking Logo 01.jpg, File:Arise Networking Logo 02.png, File:Arise Weblive Logo 03.png, File:Arise WebLive Logo 04.jpg, File:Arise Weblive Logo 05.png, File:Arise_Websolution_Logo_06.jpg, File:Arise Websolution Logo 07.png, File:Arise Websolution Logo 08.jpg, File:Arise Websolution Logo 09.png, File:BizportoLogo.png.

They look to me like commercial logos (possible copyright violations) so maybe candidates for speedy deletion(?). I have little experience with this sort of thing but I noticed that you are an Admin here and have previously dealt with similar files uploaded by User:Arise sajin. (While looking into this I also found reports that "Arise Networking" may be some kind of "work from home" internet scam.)

File:Cell-phone-brain.jpg may also be a copyright violation as it contains a watermark / link at the bottom of the image.

Thanks, Christopher Fynn (talk)) 09:55, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Fotos wiederherstellen bzw. auf Wikipedia verschieben[edit]

Hallo Túrelio! Eine kleine Bitte: Könntest Du folgende Dateien bitte ggf. wiederherstellen und auf die normale de-Wikipedia verschieben?

Bei sämtlichen Dateien ist es nachgewiesen, dass Sie älter als 100 Jahre sind und der Urheber nicht nachweisbar ist. Somit wären die historischen Fotos für die WP absolut okay. Kannst Du das so einrichten? Danach können die Fotos hier auf Commons gelöscht werden... danke! Bei Fragen einfach kurz melden! Schönen Abend noch! hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 21:06, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

PEDIDO DE ELIMINAR SOLICITUD DE BORRADO DE UNA FOTOGRAFÍA.[edit]

Commons talk:Deletion requests/File:Juan Francisco Giacobbe.jpg
De Wikimedia Commons, el repositorio multimedia libre
< Commons talk:Deletion requests

EXISTE UNA "SOLICITUD DE BORRADO" A UNA FOTOGRAFÍA AGREGADA A LA PÁGINA "Juan Francisco Giacobbe" por mí creada.

Motivo de la solicitud del borrado: Hardly own work and surely not from 2015 (depicted died in 1990); found here: http://www.fundacionkonex.org/b1091-juan_francisco_giacobbe . --

SOBRE EL PARTICULAR SE INFORMA QUE:
La fotografía adjuntada a la página en cuestión es como allí se indica 'subida de la copia en papel regalada a mí por el fotografiado en los años de la década de 1970/80 cuando fui su discípulo'. Copias similares fueron entregadas por el mencionado Giacobbe a muchas personas y medios, no sólo a la "Fundación Konex": entre otros también al diario "La Prensa" de Buenos Aires, quien la publicó en el artículo mencionado en la página de referencia, el 22 de febrero de 1979 (página 10) como consta.
No existe por ello ningún conflicto de derecho de autor sobre esa fotografía.

Por lo explicado, ruego de su gentileza se elimine la solicitud de borrado.
Declaro asímismo que existe identidad de persona entre mi nombre Gerardo Chiarella: tanto finalizado con "II" (usuario Gerardo Chiarella II) como con "III." (usuario Gerardo Chiarella III)
Muchas gracias. --Gerardo Chiarella III (talk) 04:47, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi Turelio

I posted a picture of Andrew Korda a few months back when I wrote the article - which was deleted as I was not the copyright owner

The image was subsequently posted by the photographer who took the picture - and it was also removed on 30 October 2015

She through she had the metadata correct, but she must have done something wrong - if you could suggest what she needs to do to have the picture approved for posting it would be really appreciated - want to fix the problem but simply don't know what to do

The image file name is:

Andrew Korda

The detail on commons message is below

16:07, 30 October 2015 Túrelio (talk | contribs) deleted page File:Andrew Korda.jpg (Copyright violation: external source, no license, no permission.)  (global usage; delinker log)

Many thanks for your help - much appreciated

Jonathan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonno lips (talk • contribs) 06:23, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Deleted picture[edit]

Hi Turelio

I posted a picture of Andrew Korda a few months back when I wrote the article - which was deleted as I was not the copyright owner

The image was subsequently posted by the photographer who took the picture - and it was also removed on 30 October 2015

She through she had the metadata correct, but she must have done something wrong - if you could suggest what she needs to do to have the picture approved for posting it would be really appreciated - want to fix the problem but simply don't know what to do

The image file name is:

Andrew Korda

The detail on commons message is below

16:07, 30 October 2015 Túrelio (talk | contribs) deleted page File:Andrew Korda.jpg (Copyright violation: external source, no license, no permission.)  (global usage; delinker log)

Many thanks for your help - much appreciated

Jonathan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonno lips (talk • contribs) 06:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi Jonathan, I'm very busy in real-life currently, will look into this later. --Túrelio (talk) 07:42, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

ΠΑΝΟΥΡΓΙΑΣ ΗΛΙΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ[edit]

[[14]] its ok with the lisence of these photos, check it please. --Viliop (talk) 18:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC) please recall my deleted photos, You deleted them although I have noticed that are my own work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Viliop (talk • contribs)

Look, I did not delete any of your uploads. If I had tagged them for deletion, they were deleted by my colleagues. So, at least 2 admins had an eye on them.
--Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

David Epston photo[edit]

Hello Túrelio,

I've seen your comment for the permission of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:David_Epston.jpg.

The author, David Epston has yet sent a mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. I'm in copy. David agrees to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.

Please (please), do not remove this photo from the David Epston page :)

Regards, Fabrice — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faimetti (talk • contribs)

I've changed to OTRS-pending. --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Fotos de Marthina Brandt Miss Brasil 2015[edit]

Olá Túrelio! Queria lhe dizer que não sabia que aquelas fotos violavam os direitos autorais da Wikipédia. Pois apenas peguei para não deixar a página na Wikipédia da vencedora do Miss Brasil 2015 sem foto. Se você poder encontrar uma foto dela que concordem com os direitos autorais, ficarei eternamente agradecida a você! Peço desculpas pelos meus erros, mais realmente eu não sabia. Um abraço. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maria Diva (talk • contribs) 17:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Some VERY cool cats...[edit]

Hi Túrelio. I know you're a cat-person like me, so have a look at this photoset I found from a cat show in Moscow:

Category:Files uploaded by INeverCry (Cats)

I know...I wish some of 'em lived here at my house too... Face-wink.svg INeverCry 08:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Good material for creating lolcat images. --Túrelio (talk) 09:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
There might be a few that are featured pic material too. I've got to nail down the breed info and polish up the descriptions though, which can be tough. I've got at least a couple hundred more I'll be transferring soon. INeverCry 10:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Examiner article[edit]

You may be interested in this: www.examiner.com/article/deciding-the-fate-of-images-at-wikimedia-commons - Thekohser (talk) 23:07, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

German version of template[edit]

Hello Túrelio,

May I ask you a favor? I updated the text of the German version of Template:PD-Art/de to make it closer to the current text of the English version Template:PD-Art/en. But I am not a German speaker. Could you please have a look at the template and see if it is grammatically correct in German and if there is anything to fix? Thank you in advance. -- Asclepias (talk) 04:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi Asclepias, I have checked the German parts of the template and found very little to fix, which I did already. --Túrelio (talk) 08:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Furkan Tarhan Saul M. Levin Nevzat Tarhan Serdar Karagöz.jpg[edit]

Licensing issue has been fixed, sorry for the confusion.HakanIST (talk) 09:16, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

On the source-site I find only GFDL license mentioned, but not CC-0. --Túrelio (talk) 09:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
The source site and the license information was updated accordingly.HakanIST (talk) 09:45, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your quick response! File is deleted.HakanIST (talk) 07:06, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, should not have been deleted due to OTRS-pending, but it can easily be restored. As you had added OTRS-pending, did you contact the source site and ask to send a permission? --Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

DSHA picture of Centennial and[edit]

I'm not very good at Wikipedia yet. However, this picture was uploaded from a publication that does not have copyright, was written and edited by myself, Angela Pienkos, and the picture itself was taken with my own camera and supplied for use in the booklet. The booklet was handed out free of charge to all attendees of the Centennial Celebration held in 1992. The cover of the booklet reads: Divine Savior Holy Angels. Exemplary Education for Young Women. Centennial Celebration November 1, 1992. It was published by the school. Can you help me reference it properly? --Angelapienkos (talk) 22:40, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Löschanträge im allgemeinen und aktuell Parisaltar[edit]

Hallo, Túrelio! Im April 2015 hattest du mir anläßlich einer Löschgefährdung (Maria Pirwitz) die allgemeinen Hintergründe zur Panorama(un)freiheit dargelegt. Wie elementar niedergemacht - in Abhängigkeit von der persönlichen Vorgeschichte - man sich allein angesichts der einschüchternden Optik der dominanten rotbetonten Warngrafik fühlt, habe ich reaktiv (später nochmals an anderer Stelle) in allen Stadien selbst durchlebt: ungläubig wie gelähmt, tsunamiartig machtlos zu Boden geschleudert, auf jeden Fall nachhaltig verunsichert und vertrauensgemindert. Auch bei mir explodierte der Wortschatz unerwartet ausfallend, blieb aber im "stillen Kämmerlein" stecken. Schließlich einzig fühlbarer Ausweg: sich trotzig auf dem Absatz für immer abzuwenden. Irgendwann findet man dann doch wieder einigermaßen zurück, was auch im gegenwärtigen Fall wirklich sehr und recht bald zu hoffen ist!

Um dem schlechten Beigeschmack eines möglicherweise denunzierungsartigen Missbrauchs zu begegnen, möchte ich mal folgenden Änderungsvorschlag zur Diskussion stellen: Bei zweifelhaften Innenaufnahmen im Sinne der Wikipedia-Prinzipien einen für-/vorsorglichen Warnhinweis anbringen, ähnlich wie bei Google Bilder, z. B.:

"Das Bild ist möglicherweise urheberrechtlich geschützt. Es empfiehlt sich, für weitere Informationen gegebenenfalls den Urheberberechtigten zu kontaktieren."

Dann könnten viele wertvolle Innenaufnahmen bei Commons bestehen bleiben bzw. neu Zugang finden, um betrachtend-forschende User bei ihren Detailinterpretationen zu unterstützen. --Vitavia (talk) 09:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

closing[edit]

Hello.Please end this request.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 17:31, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:03, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Suzanne Rhatigan - To Hell With Love.jpg[edit]

Hi Túrelio,

I uploaded the cover art for Suzanne Rhatigan's debut album "To Hell With Love" which apparently might infringe copyright.

Could you tell me what you need to allow the posting of the album cover?

I would appreciate it very much.

Kind regards,

William Bloody marvelous (talk) 17:38, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi William,
the problem with album covers is that their content is usually above threshold of originality and thereby copyrighted either with the artist or the record company. So, you need their permission to upload an album cover image to Commons. That's even the case if you bought the album; you are not allowed to reproduce the cover image and distribute it to the public. So, you would need to find out who holds the rights in that album cover and then ask them for a permission. --Túrelio (talk) 18:01, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

"Fffdiesel" account for block[edit]

Hi,

Please block a "Fffdiesel" account for indefinite time, doing to massive copyright violations (uploading non-free television screenshots, non-free film screenshots etc.). Files, uploaded by "Fffdiesel", is ready to uploaded only as fair use files in English Wikipedia and any other Wikimedia projects with fair use media approved.

Thanks, Adrianwo 14:05, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Already ✓ Done by Yann. --Túrelio (talk) 22:16, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Deleted photo[edit]

Hi Túrelio! Thanks for warning me about the photo deletion, I already wrote to Magog the Ogre and he helped me with the procedures for the author to legally authorize the upload. The author only had given me his unofficial consent, now I'm waiting for him to send an e-mail to wikimedia admins. Thanks again! Cheers! PedroLopFonMarAlves (talk) 22:13, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Permission[edit]

Hi. Permission is given on croatian wikipedia few years ago (hr:Razgovor:Antonija Šola). By the owner of website who is also a wikipedia user. --Жељко Тодоровић (talk) 21:41, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

O.k But as the :hr page may be removed in the future, it would be better to copy its content in an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org so that our OTRS volunteers can create and store a permission-ticket. --Túrelio (talk) 21:44, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Okay. Can you now remove the warning from file? --Жељко Тодоровић (talk) 21:57, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done resp. replaced by OTRS-pending. --Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Eine Bitte[edit]

Kannst du dich in die Disk de:Benutzer Diskussion:Stabiwupp einschalten. Was in welcher Form Stabiwupp die Lizenz eintragen soll und evtl. an OTRS einliefern soll. Danke. --Atamari (talk) 19:58, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Schau auch auf Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Stabiwupp. --Atamari (talk) 20:02, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Prof-Paul-Enck.jpg[edit]

Hi, ich habe keine Ahnung, wie hier die Kommunikation funktioniert. Ist das der richtige Weg? Das Foto habe ich von Herrn Enck persönlich - Herrn Kaiser kenne ich nicht. Was tun? —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.203.116.176 (talk) 20:52, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Ich habe auf deiner Disku geantwortet. --Túrelio (talk) 22:01, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Mary Ann and Henry Hoolulu Pitman.jpg[edit]

Can you remove the non-free frame version of File:Mary Ann and Henry Hoolulu Pitman.jpg per Template:Non-free frame revdel?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 06:06, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done. However, you need to fix the source issue. --Túrelio (talk) 10:06, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Block[edit]

I think you should block this guy ASAP. Too many violations in the last few hours. Thanks, ƬheStrikeΣagle 19:15, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

I'm looking into it; just checking all his uploads. --Túrelio (talk) 19:16, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Image Permissions[edit]

Hi Túrelio,

I have had several images flagged asking to provide appropriate permissions, as follows:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jan_Vanriet,_Bohemia,_1966.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jan_Vanriet,_Tatlin,_1980.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jan_Vanriet,_compte_%C3%A0_regler,_1988.jpg © 2001 SNOWBOUND, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Keith_Haring,_Simone_and_Jan_Vanriet_at_Venice_Biennial_1984.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jan_Vanriet,_Closing_TIme,_2010,.jpg © H. Maertens Fotograaf - Brugge - ALLE RECHTEN VOORBEHOUDEN
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2005_Sampaio,_Vanriet,_Paola_and_Albert,_queen_and_king_of_Belgium.jpg cannot be "own work" by Vanriet
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jan_Vanriet,_Moszek,_2011.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Photo_working_at_Bourla_ceiling,_1993.jpg

I was given permission by the copyright holder (the artist Jan Vanriet) to upload and use all these images in his wikipedia article, but appropriate permission was not sent to OTRS originally. The artist has now emailed OTRS agreeing to publish all the above images under the free license Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. I have also forwarded our email correspondence to prove this, and edited the file descriptions with the new licenses. Both of these emails were sent on December 8th but I have heard nothing since to suggest that these images are no longer marked for possible deletion. Would it be possible to find out what is going on? Thanks ~~ Ljs90, 12.39, 13 December 2015

Hi Ljs90, now nearly all these file are tagged with OTRS-pending, which should prevent a premature deletion. However, some files carry a copyright-notice in their EXIF data, see above. Vanriet cannot simply claim them as "own work". Also, the image of Vanriet with the king of Belgium is surely not his own work. Finally, the following 2 images you did claim as "own work", but they carry a copyright-notice by Dominique Provost. Please explain.
For questions about the permission sent to OTRS, you need to ask at the Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard, as I have no access to OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 15:12, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Category:Trappist monasteries in Slovenia[edit]

Please, can you renew Category:Trappist monasteries in Slovenia? Thanks, --Janezdrilc (talk) 00:24, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Hey Túrelio[edit]

I have used your Mother Teresa photo to make a video in Youtube. I have given the attribution. Thanks

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother_Teresa#/media/File:MotherTeresa_094.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jerryferry123 (talk • contribs)

Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 13:38, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

My photos about Sailor fuku in Second Life[edit]

Hello. My photos about Sailor fuku in Second Life was licensed by {{Copyrighted free use}} and contained {{Second Life}}.No relationship between license and Flickr --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:49, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
but they were not your own photos. You copied them from Flickr, were they are "All rights reserved"[15]. --Túrelio (talk) 13:38, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Is not this game images licensed for free use?Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 15:11, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
At least not the image on Flickr. It's clearly marked "All rights reserved". --Túrelio (talk) 15:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Therefore, Can I transfer any image from any other site with the same two templates?Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 15:20, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
I don't really understand your question. Any image which is not truly your own work, needs a permission, a license. So, if you find an image on Flickr, Panoramio, or whereever, which has been credibly released under a free license, which is also compatible with our licensing-policy (CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, FAL, GFDL), you can copy it to Commons.
It gets more complicated when the image which you want to transfer, is not fully the own work of the person who offers it under a free license. This is the case when somebody offers a photo of a painting (not by the painter) or any other work of art, which is not already very old. Then on needs also the permission of the original artist. In case of screenshot from games, you may have 2 copyrights; but more important is the copyright of the original creator/developer of the game. --Túrelio (talk) 15:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Ayatolla abolghasem khazali[edit]

Hi Túrelio, I have added the permission to this page and you can check it. Please remove the Tag from this page. Thanks.--Mbazri (talk) 09:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Let me work in peace[edit]

Hey, déjemne trabajar en paz, sólo estoy haciendo un artículo sobre jugadores paraguayos en Wikipedia y no tengo la intención de violar ningún derecho de autor con las imágenes, simplemente las coloco para otorgar mayor atractivo al artículo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HijoDeBarrioObrero (talk • contribs)

If you do not understand that images belong to their original creator and cannot be uploaded to Commons without a valid permission (Commons:Sobre las licencias), you should refrain from further uploads. --Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***[edit]

Christmas Barnstar.png * * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
-- George Chernilevsky talk 19:30, 23 December 2015 (UTC)


Hallo Túrelio[edit]

Jermboy entwickelt zur Zeit wieder ungeahnte Energien. Ich habe den ja schon mit gefälschten Verkehrszeichen (seine Leidenschaft) seit Jahren am Knie. Danke für die schnelle Reaktion. Leider kann ich so meinen neuen Artikel zu den DDR-Verkehrszeichen nur sehr langsam vorantreiben, da ich durch Jermboy vielfach hier gebunden werde und nun wirklich keinen Bock habe den ganzen Tag am Rechner zuzubringen, zumal es ja noch das RL gibt. Leider mußte ich auch meinen Artikel zu den DDR-Verkehrszeichen vorzeitig aus meinem Namensraum in den Artikelbereich bringen, da mich auch da Jermboy schon störte. Und ich hatte Angst daß mir das passiert, was dereinst schon der unsägliche Benutzer Korrekturen einst gemacht hat. Der hat nämlich auch Artikel angelegt, die andere schon in Vorbereitung hatten. Das hat er bei mir auch mal gemacht. So steht er nun als Artikelbegründer in den Analen, obwohl er nur einen winzigen Stub produzierte. Das war sehr ärgerlich. Solche Artikel baut auch niemand mehr groß aus. Mediatus (talk) 20:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Предупреждение.[edit]

Спасибо за предупреждение.К сожалению пошел по пути стандартных грабель.Впредь отнесусь к загрузкам более осмотрительно. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Denis.TW (talk • contribs)

Bitte um Hilfe[edit]

Hallo! Heute kam diese Mail an Spinelli zurück, an den ich geschrieben habe, weil mir Wikimedia Commons zuvor mitgeteilt hatte: "Túrelio has been changed by AleSpinelli":

Hi,

I guess you picked the wrong user: I am not in any way involved with these things. You should send this email to an administrator.

Regards,

       AS

2016-03-17 11:59 GMT+01:00 Agnostizi <wewel@t-online.de>: Hallo! Leider hat es gestern beim ersten Versuch, mein Video "Wolkenwandel" hochzuladen, nicht geklappt, weil mit ogg nur Audio geladen wurde. Deshalb mein zweiter Versuch mit webm, der in Ordnung zu sein scheint. Bitte löschen Sie den ersten Versuch.

Der Pianist Michael Leuschner, hat mir in einer Mail erklärt: "Ich bin damit einverstanden, dass unsere beiden Videos "Wolken" und "Welke Blätter" in Wikimedia Commons unter der Lizenz CC BY-SA-4.0 veröffentlicht werden."

Soll ich diese E-Mail an Sie weiterleiten? Bitte geben Sie mir dann dafür eine E-Mail-Adresse an. Das in der Einverständniserklärung noch genannte Video "Welke Blätter" will ich in den nächsten Tagen eingeben, wenn mit dem Video "Wolkenwandel" alles in Ordnung ist.

Leider verfüge ich kaum über Englischkenntnisse, was sie mir bitte nachsehen wollen, werde ich doch demnächst 85.

Für Ihre Hilfe vielen Dank und freundliche Grüße

Meinolf Wewel

-- This email was sent by Agnostizi to AleSpinelli by the "Email this user" function at Wikimedia Commons.

°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°

Inzwischen habe ich auch das Video Welke Blätter« hochgeladen-

Für einen kurzen Bescheid, ob jetzt alles in Ordnung ist, wäre ich Ihnen sehr dankbar. Freundliche Grüße--Agnostizi (talk) 13:33, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Copyrighted images[edit]

Hi, just wanted to let you know that all of the images I uploaded are completely my content, I took them in real life and I did not steal them from any webpage Trump20016 (talk) 13:38, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy tag for logos[edit]

Túrelio, (again) please be careul when tagging and deleting logos, specially for Mexican ones, where {{PD-Coa-Mexico}} apply (football clubs logos are also included). --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:38, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, are you sure that this applies to soccer/sport clubs? "This file depicts the coat of arms, banner, or emblem of Mexico, one of its states, municipalities, or any other political subdivision, or a similar distinctive symbol belonging to an international or "recognized" organization, or NGO, operating in or outside of Mexico." --Túrelio (talk) 08:30, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Yes, it says similar distinctive symbol belonging to an international or "recognized" organization. As many previous DR resolved as kept, footbaal clubs are considered as a recognized organization, therefore, the license apply. The Ley Federal de Derecho de autor of Mexico is more specific:
Artículo 14.- No son objeto de la protección como derecho de autor a que se refiere esta Ley:
(...)
VIII. Las reproducciones o imitaciones, sin autorización, de escudos, banderas o emblemas de cualquier país,
      estado, municipio o división política equivalente, ni las denominaciones, siglas, símbolos o emblemas
      de organizaciones internacionales gubernamentales, no gubernamentales, o de cualquier otra organización
      reconocida oficialmente, así como la designación verbal de los mismos;
Notice that between no gubernamentales and o de cualquier otra organización is a comma (,), that indicates that no gubernamentales and o de cualquier otra organización are separaetd items, therefore, the recognized organizations (like football clubs) are part of the Art. 14 of the Federal Law; in other words, any logo of recognized organizations are not protected (and there is a precendet with other DRs resolved as kept). So, you should consider the actual law (and worldwide laws) and its correct interpretation, rather than an unofficial translation. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:47, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Löschanträge Moorleichen von Exloërmond und Zweeloo[edit]

Hallo Túrelio Ich komme zurück auf Deine Löschungen von File:Mannelijk veenlijk uit Exloërmond, Drents Museum, 1914 V1.jpg und File:Vrouw van Zweeloo, Dents Museum, 1951 XII13.jpg wegen einer angeblichen Lizenzverletzung. Laut http://museaindrenthe.nl/collectie/indeling/detail/start/6?f_strings_object_name[0]=veenlijk und http://museaindrenthe.nl/collectie/indeling/detail/start/2?f_strings_object_name[0]=veenlijk sind die Bilder CC:BY lizensiert, weswegen ich die Löschung für ungerechtfertigt halte. Ich bitte noch mal um Prüfung. Vielen Dank! Viele Grüße --Bullenwächter (talk) 12:45, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Bullenwächter, ich habe kein Problem damit, die Dateien zu entlöschen, würde damit aber gerne den Ausgang der LD für die Moorleiche abwarten. O.k.? --Túrelio (talk) 17:38, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
OK - User:Christoph Braun hat grad eine Anfrage an das Drents-Museum für eine Lizenzbestätigung für das OTRS-Team gestellt. Ich hoffe, die Freigabe kommt in Kürze. --Bullenwächter (talk) 22:23, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Prima. Dann gib mir bitte Bescheid. --Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Moin Túrelio, museaindrenthe hat in der Zwischenzeit den Disclaimer auf ihrer Seite geändert, um den Status der jeweiligen CC Lizenzen noch mal zu verdeutlichen (vgl. http://museaindrenthe.nl/disclaimer ). http://museaindrenthe.nl/collectie/indeling/detail/start/6?f_strings_object_name[0]=veenlijk und http://museaindrenthe.nl/collectie/indeling/detail/start/2?f_strings_object_name[0]=veenlijk sind nun eineindeutig als CC BY 3.0 ausgewiesen. Scheinbar wurden auch in Europeana deren Inhalte komplett als CC BY NC 3.0 ausgewiesen, was demnächst auch richtiggestellt werden soll. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Meisje van Yde, Drents Museum, N1897 VI1.jpg ist bereits behalten. Bitte kümmere dich um die Wiederherstellung der von dir gelöschten Dateien. Danke. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 05:36, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:15, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Carnymike permissions note[edit]

You might be interested in this category page, as they left a note for us to read that goes over permissions for the images. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:43, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

O.k. I'll look into it tomorrow. --Túrelio (talk) 08:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Copyvio[edit]

Most of them. Thanks in advance. --Fixertool (talk) 04:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 08:13, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Portrait 2015 okt 3 rgb.jpg[edit]

"Urheber dieses Bildes ist Karsten Meißner mit dem Einverständnis zur Nutzung von Katerina Belkina." That means, AFAIK, that the person who made the photo is Karsten Meißner. Now perhaps that's the same person as Luiboy77, but don't we usually require some evidence of that? Apart from "own work", I don't see any claim (and certainly no verifiable claim) that Luiboy77 is Karsten Meißner. If you think that's sufficient evidence, I have a nice bridge for sale that you might be interested in... :-) --Randykitty (talk) 10:00, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

As I am not a native en-speaker, I don't understand your likely figure of speech "nice bridge for sale". Anyway, you are correct that a confirmation might be appropriate in this situation. However, the overall situation in this case makes the claim rather likely. The typical :de-user would hardly disclose his/her realname on-wiki. An online-search for this image did not yield any hits. --Túrelio (talk) 10:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
The typical en user doesn't disclose their real identity that easily either (I for one...) I realize that creates a conflict here, but I don't think we can accept the claim from an anonymous user that they have the copyright and can give it away. If they had only said "own work", it would perhaps have been different, but they give the name of the photographer and that is different from the user name, so I think more proof is needed, which they can submit to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. As for the bridge, that refers to a classical scam where some crook would try to sell a public bridge to some gullible immigrant to the US. It's used when you think someone is being naive in accepting someone's claim :-) Just google "selling someone a bridge" and look at some of those examples. Happy editing! --Randykitty (talk) 11:05, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
The case has developped, in that the artist has sent a permission-statement to OTRS (or actually to the WMF) and has put dropbox-link on her/his talkpage. As I read it from that document, artist and photographer are (sort of) married, as they share the same lastname. --Túrelio (talk) 20:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Looks like everything's solved then. Cheers! --Randykitty (talk) 21:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Deleted image KK Gorstak[edit]

Hello. I found a picture KK Gorstak on google, and you have deleted it. Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vux33 (talk • contribs)

Hi Vux33,
because the source, from which you obtained it, says "Copyright (c) 2014. PortalAnalitika.me. All rights reserved." Only media, which are under a free license (see COM:L), can be uploaded to Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 20:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Request[edit]

Could you check this request: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Request_to_provide_deleted_copies_of_PDF_copies? --Tito Dutta (talk) 12:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of old photos[edit]

Why you speedy deleted this, this and this files without a valid rationale rather than the copyvio tag by Krdbot, considerong that other pictures of Blanche Selva at Commons are tagged with {{PD-old-70}}? --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of my photos[edit]

Hi! First of all, the author of the photos and me, is one and only person :) Secondly, it's not only that photo, but almost all of the photos I've uploaded for competition purposes only. These photos, since last week, are used for commercial reasons in a photography page, so I guess it's not allowed to have them here for free anymore. That way or another, they went unnoticed, so they won't be missed really ;) If anyone used them/downloaded them in between with the previous CC license, there is no problem by me. If there is any other question/objection, feel free to tell me. Christos Doudoulakis (talk) 23:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Perhaps you could have a look[edit]

Túrelio,

Thank you for your report at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems of account NeoTheNazi (talk · contribs). I've blocked the account, and deleted the file in question.

Perhaps you could take a look at the report Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Civility_and_tone regarding what's going on at this deletion discussion and copyright investigation ?

I've taken zero admin actions there myself, merely commenting.

Unfortunately, it seems the tenor and demeanor of certain respondents to the debate has severely degraded in civility, with ad hominems spread liberally around a bit.

Most of the summary of the DIFFs have been helpfully supplied by Winkelvi, who reported the major problems at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Civility_and_tone.

Maybe you could have a look, and take action if you think it's necessary ?

I'll defer to your judgement in this case.

Thank you,

-- Cirt (talk) 20:42, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Hell, couldn't you have offered me something easier, such as collecting 1,000 wild ants or alike. The linked DR-discussion contains nearly 24,000 characters. I'll try. --Túrelio (talk) 21:09, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
ROFLMAO. And I just watched the latest Arrow television episode where they get attacked by a swarm of robotic bees ! Thank you, and good luck, -- Cirt (talk) 21:36, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
I've commented at the DR discussion. AN/U will have to wait for tomorrow, as I've to go to sleep now. --Túrelio (talk) 21:37, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Sounds good, thank you, sweet dreams ! -- Cirt (talk) 21:41, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

I don't know how to do it?[edit]

I do not know how to do it? How could upload a photo of Peter Sagan , for example , without picking directly from the Internet? I tried to run it through programs word, but I preferred not raise it until you know your response — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saul2002 (talk • contribs) 21:59, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Saul2002,
the problem is not that you got it via the internet, but that you took images, which are not under a free license, claimed them as your own work and put them under a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

size_not_found[edit]

Hi, I see you are actively uploading failed uploads. I'm happy that you are taking care of these, but if you find it annoying to do, it may be more efficient if we let a backlog build up and then get a bot task to sort them out. As Flickr or WMF server failures may underpin these failures, they are not going away soon, but it would help if the need were large enough to raise Phabricator tasks for it, or at least become a priority for my volunteer time to set something up with Faebot.

Note that size_not_found would be an easy fix, but partly uploaded failures are more problematic as SHA1 values are not supplied by the Flickr API. This would mean human detection, say by adding failures to a category for re-upload. Anyway, ponder it, there no hurry as if I do need to look at it, it would not be overnight. :-) -- (talk) 11:30, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi Fae,
I don't consider it a bothersome burden to check for a empty scans and for failed uploads, as I do this when not feeling prepared to do more sophisticated work. ;-) Anyway, to catch the failed uploads in-time might prevent some of them to get tagged for deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 10:13, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Image Albertine Zullo[edit]

Hi,

Albertine Zullo gave me this photograph and her husband, Germano Zullo took it. i Have explained to her that I needed an official statement from him, and also I have explained how he could import the photo himself.

Kind regards,

Natacha — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nattes à chat (talk • contribs)

Hi Natacha,
if you get a signal from the Zullos that they send a permission-statement, you can add {{OTRS pending}} to the image-page. --Túrelio (talk) 15:01, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Etoilewiki (talk · contribs)[edit]

Hallo Túrelio,

Du, ich glaube, dass dieser Nutzer (oder, dem Namen nach, Nutzerin), wohl ausschließlich URVen hochgeladen hat... Die Beitragsliste sieht zumindest so aus. Was meinst Du? LG Grand-Duc (talk) 20:52, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Momentan hat er aufgehört. Beim nächsten copyvio-Upload gibt es eine Sperre. --Túrelio (talk) 07:34, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

One deleted but many similar posters...[edit]

Hello.

A few days ago you've deleted this image (Copyright violation: This photo is a photo of a poster, so no proff for the licence of the poster. Aked by Olivier LPB). Uploaded from the same Flikr account, similar files are in this cat:

Thanks a lot for your help. Have a nice week. --LW² \m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 22:52, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

question[edit]

Which copyright rule to i select for the image of the Dark Disciple cover?Thursby16 (talk) 20:24, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

You mean, how to legitimately upload it to Commons? Only after obtaining a general permission by the creator or rights holder of the cover artwork. The fact that you own a copy of this book and shot the reproduction by yourself, is irrelevant in such cases. --Túrelio (talk) 20:27, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

User:Deskpoll[edit]

Hey, feel free to nuke and block these users on sight. These FB groups are known to abuse Commons with massive copyvios --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 09:16, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Delete my page?[edit]

Hey, would you mind deleting User:IagoQnsi/Gadget-QuickDelete-custom.js for me? I don't know how to request a speedy deletion on a JavaScript page, since I can't use {{speedydelete}}. Thanks, IagoQnsi (talk) 20:13, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:14, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

WWU STC[edit]

We are new to Wikimedia Commons- but noticed that our page was moved for deletion? We are the Student Tech Center on WWU's campus and trying to put our documentation up for use in conference (such as on coming up in two days http://www.buildingbridgeswatech.com) as well as share our docs with other institution who might be getting started in 3D curriculum. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WWU STC (talk • contribs)

Hi WWU STC,
as you had only 1 upload at the time when your userpage was created (and also when it was deleted by me), the nominator and I had to assume that it was put up only for promotional purposes, which contradicts our mission and our rules for userpage, see Commons:User pages. In addition, it seems that your uploads are also out of our scope. So, I would recommend, after you upload some files that are really in scope of Commons (and are usable for other people), recreate your userpage, but take care to avoid a promotional wording. --Túrelio (talk) 18:22, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

hilfst du mir bitte...[edit]

Hallo Túrelio,

ich bin in der de:Wikipedia über die Artikel Ludovik Kendi und CantoSonor gestolpert wo mehrere Accounts in der Versionsgeschichte diverse Bilder hochgelden und eingefügt haben. Es ist hierbei ziemlich sicher, dass es sich um Jemanden handelt der die original-Dateien besitzt aber nicht selbst der Fotograf ist... Bitte hilf mir diesen Accounts den rechten Weg zu zeigen um die Bilder in den Artikeln zu belassen bzw. die gelöschten Bilder wiederherzustellen...

Ich habe mittlerweile etwas den Überblick verlohren, aber hier ein paar Accounts die in der de.Wikipedia und auf Commons editiert haben

Und auch:

ich bin etwas rat- und hilflos...

LG --1971markus ⇒ Laberkasten ... 00:27, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Markus ich werds versuchen. Den ersten habe ich mal angeschrieben und Category:Ludovik Kendi angelegt. --Túrelio (talk) 06:55, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Danke für deine Mühen, dass Problem liegt aber an den wechselnden Accounts...
Es ist hierbei ziemlich sicher, dass es sich hierbei um Jemanden handelt der die original-Dateien besitzt aber nicht selbst der Fotograf ist... u.a. wurden in den EXIF-Daten unterschiedliche Fotografen angegeben... Und wie vermag man diesem Uploader zu erklären die Urheberrechte zu beachten?
LG --1971markus ⇒ Laberkasten ... 23:16, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Žebřík v plamenech.jpg[edit]

You can see any reasonable content there? --Gampe (talk) 14:56, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Well, yes. It's a photo of a wood fire, such as is File:Plameny.jpg. Not every image which is uploaded to Commons needs immediately to be used on a (Wikimedia) project. My image File:FunkenflugGrill 9647b.jpg has few on-wiki uses, but many external re-uses. Anyway, feel free to nominate it for regular deletion, but it wasn't a speedy-case. --Túrelio (talk) 15:34, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello: thank you for message: picture ref: PM_024032_B_Ronse: I have been verifying the picture on higher and saw a text left under: signed: Fotolog.com; MataonoIf you download you can look at information on the metadata, can actually be completed. Pol — Preceding unsigned comment added by PMRMaeyaert (talk • contribs)

TimedText files[edit]

Hello, thank you for the following deletions:

  1. (Deletion log); 06:31 . . Túrelio (A) (talk | contribs) deleted page TimedText talk:Tip and Ty again.ogg.en.srt ‎(Empty)
  2. (Deletion log); 06:31 . . Túrelio (A) (talk | contribs) deleted page TimedText talk:Test ogg mp3 48kbps.wav.en.srt ‎(Empty)
  3. (Deletion log); 06:31 . . Túrelio (A) (talk | contribs) deleted page TimedText talk:Print Wikipedia by Michael Mandiberg.webm.pl.srt ‎(Empty)
  4. (Deletion log); 06:31 . . Túrelio (A) (talk | contribs) deleted page TimedText talk:Print Wikipedia by Michael Mandiberg.webm.en.srt ‎(Empty)
  5. (Deletion log); 06:31 . . Túrelio (A) (talk | contribs) deleted page TimedText talk:Play fight of polar bears edit 1.avi.OGG.es.srt ‎(Empty)
  6. (Deletion log); 06:31 . . Túrelio (A) (talk | contribs) deleted page TimedText talk:Open-mid front unrounded vowel.ogg.en.srt ‎(Empty)
  7. (Deletion log); 06:31 . . Túrelio (A) (talk | contribs) deleted page TimedText talk:Open-mid front rounded vowel.ogg.de.srt ‎(Empty)
  8. (Deletion log); 06:31 . . Túrelio (A) (talk | contribs) deleted page TimedText talk:Open Letter for Free Access to Wikipedia (EN subtitles).webm.bg.srt ‎(Empty;subtitles built in)
  9. (Deletion log); 06:31 . . Túrelio (A) (talk | contribs) deleted page TimedText talk:National anthem of East Timor.ogg.en.srt ‎(Empty)
  10. (Deletion log); 06:31 . . Túrelio (A) (talk | contribs) deleted page TimedText talk:Inno di Mameli instrumental.ogg.es.srt ‎(Empty)
  11. (Deletion log); 06:28 . . Túrelio (A) (talk | contribs) deleted page TimedText talk:HardDisk1.ogg.en.srt ‎(Empty)
  12. (Deletion log); 06:28 . . Túrelio (A) (talk | contribs) deleted page TimedText talk:Geografía argentina.ogg.en.srt ‎(Empty)
  13. (Deletion log); 06:27 . . Túrelio (A) (talk | contribs) deleted page TimedText talk:Ellis Island video.ogg.en.srt ‎(Empty)

My deletion reasoning may not have been clear enough, but the target for deletion was not just the TimedText talk page but also the TimedText page. As shown by the TimedText pages, these contain no text and need to be deleted. The reasoning for the speedy deletion template being on the talk page is because TimedTalk pages cannot utilize templates. Riley Huntley (talk) 23:17, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

  • 18:53, 19 April 2016 Túrelio (A) (talk | contribs) deleted page TimedText talk:National anthem of East Timor.ogg.en.srt (Per File:National anthem of East Timor.ogg)
  • Once again, you have deleted the talk page of a page that needs the main page deleted. Please either handle these deletions properly, or do not handle TimedText speedy deletion requests at all. Riley Huntley (talk) 03:44, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
In none of the deleted talkpage-versions from the above list, which I've rechecked now, you had requested the deletion of the TT page itself. Instead you expect that I read your mind. I've deleted quite a number of TT pages before. They themselves had been clearly tagged for speedy deletion. Though they didn't show the regular template-message, they were included in the speedy-deletion-cat and contained some deletion-rationale. As I hadn't tagged them by myself, I don't know how the tagging had been achieved. Nevertheless, it was clear and didn't require mindreading of the nominator. Eventually you, @Riley Huntley:, should consider to be a bit more careful before unfriendly accusing your colleagues of unproper handling. --Túrelio (talk) 21:56, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
So basically... you thought I created 15 pages with the only content being {{speedy|Empty}} just to have them deleted? I'm not a just-for-the-hell-of-it editor. I was not looking for you to read my mind, I was expecting common sense. I'd expect that any admin would review the history of the talk, realize that it was created for the purpose of tagging for deletion, and then review the main page. Or, if the admin did not understand, they should contact the nominator. My accusing of improper handling was only after you deleted one of the talk pages for the second time, after I had left you a message regarding your deletions. I do not wish to be rude, and I apologize for "accusing" but let's use some common sense.. ~riley (talk) 23:17, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Bitte um Prüfung[edit]

Hallo Túrelio, kannst Du bitte überprüfen, ob hier eine Copyright-Verletzung vorliegt:
File:Odontoglossum Povedanum.jpg - Quelle offensichtlich hier: [16]
Dank und Gruß. Orchi (talk) 10:55, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi Orchi, hat wegen Wikipause etwas gedauert. Nun als Copyvio markiert. Danke für den Hinweis. --Túrelio (talk) 20:17, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Hallo Túrelio, viele Dank. Gruß. Orchi (talk) 20:20, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Template NoUploads on Category:Thijs Trompert[edit]

Dear Turelio,

In 2013 you put the template {{NoUploads}} on this category of Dutch scuptures in Dutch settings, warning for use. But according to the Dutch copyright law Auteurswet 1912 article 18, artworks intended for public spaces, can freely be photographed in their public locality without copyright protection for the artist. In the US apparently the same rule applies, compare for example Category:Cloud_Gate, the mirror egg in Chicago. As an exception, this "freedom of panorama" does not hold in Belgium, if i'm right.

  • So can the warning on Category:Thijs Trompert be removed?

Thank you, best regards, Hansmuller (talk) 11:29, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Hansmuller:,
due to a Wikipause my reply comes late. Hmm, the template (at least the German translation) does actually mention the freedom-of-panorama exception. This template should be used in every category for artists, whose works are still in copyright. The idea is to motivate uploaders to think, can this image be uploaded or not, is there a valid exception? For example, if a work of the said artist is installed in Belgium, there would be no freedom-of-panorama exception. However, if there is no "warning" and there are already other images of such works, a new uploader might be mislead to think, everything is fine and I can upload it. --Túrelio (talk) 20:23, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Dear Turelio, @WeeJeeVee
Thanks for your reply. Now i am late. As Thijs Trompert is a Dutch artist and his sculptures are in Dutch public space, i still would like to have this stern warning {{NoUploads}} - it really is in the Dutch version and is perceived to be so - removed, because it bothers people in Amersfoort, Trompert's home town with many of his sculptures in public space. The situation according to copyright law is just the other way around: we are in general free to upload images of art in public space so it should read OkUploads. This warning is unusual on Commons. We are not in Belgium, which is an exception not mentioned in the Dutch version (it appears these weeks a law will be passed in Belgium to give Belgium freedom of panorama). So this intimidating warning really does not belong there. I give you the phrasing in bad Dutch, which you hopefully will be able to understand as standard German is an Eastern Dutch dialect ;-)
Deze werken of werken van deze auteur kunnen mogelijk zich niet in het publiek domein bevinden, omdat de auteur nog niet 70 jaar dood is. Upload geen foto's of scans van werken van deze auteur, tenzij ze voldoen aan een van de volgende uitzonderingen:

    Het werk werd eerst gepubliceerd in de Verenigde Staten en een van de publiek domein-tags van de Verenigde Staten is hier van toepassing;
    Het werk is toegestaan door een wettelijke uitzondering zoals vrijheid van panorama of de minimis;
    Het werk werd door de auteur of diens erfgenamen vrijgegeven door middel van per e-mail bevestigde autorisatie;
    Het werk bevindt zich in het publiek domein vanwege een andere heldere reden.

Voor meer informatie, zie Commons:Licensing en Commons:Derivative works (afgeleide werken).
  • Can you remove the warning template? Thanks, Hansmuller (talk) 08:04, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:Simon Donnelly[edit]

Hi, would you mind restoring Category:Simon Donnelly, as it is now populated? Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 21:44, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:25, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Video[edit]

Hallo, ich habe ein Video, das ich gerne hochladen würde. Kannst Du mir sagen, wie ich das konvertieren kann, damit das klappt? --Nicola (talk) 10:56, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Nicola, vielleicht hilft dir der Any Video Converter for free weiter. Und evtl. Free Video Flip and Rotate wenn ein Video mal hochkant aufgenommen wurde... LG --1971markus ⇒ Laberkasten ... 22:13, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Das probiere ich mal aus. Danke für den Tipp! --Nicola (talk) 05:18, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Hat geklappt [17]! --Nicola (talk) 06:09, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Sorry. Ich war seit 19.4. in Wikipause. Dank an Markus und schön dass es geklappt hat. --Túrelio (talk) 20:29, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Wie sagt man in Köln so schön: „Man kennt sich, man hilft sich“ LG --1971markus ⇒ Laberkasten ... 20:59, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

VFC for deletions[edit]

I'm concerned that recent deletions have not left transclusions in a good state. For example File:Air Line bridge (NYPL b11707669-G90F061 008F).tiff has a gallery with a blank thumbnail where the reverse of the stereogram used to be. Note that adverts, unusual franks and descriptions are relevant to keep for the stereograms, which are all archived at the NYPL with both sides scanned for this reason. Thanks -- (talk) 13:55, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Hmm, if File:Air Line bridge (NYPL b11707669-G90F061 008B).tiff should not have been deleted, then why had it been put into Category:NYPL (mostly blank)? Anyway, I've undeleted it now and removed the category. --Túrelio (talk) 18:50, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
I was not complaining about the deletion (and Choess added it to the mostly blank category, keep in mind that mostly blank does not mean automatic deletion), but pointing out that transclusions should be fixed if there are deletions. Not being an admin, I have no idea if there are processes that can handle that better, I've not investigated. -- (talk) 19:19, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Anyway, if specific of these (nearly) "blank" files are in this special kind of use (and should remain so), the easiest solution to avoid problems would be to remove them from or not put them into that category. Do you know if there are more such cases among my batch-deletions from yesterday? --Túrelio (talk) 20:03, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
I don't know, been focused on other stuff. -- (talk) 20:10, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Use of RechtschreibreformBeiStrassenname[edit]

Hi there we would like to use your image RechtschreibreformBeiStrassenname.jpg in an educational website for the BBC. We will of course credit the work to you. The context is spelling reforms of the German language under the topic of GCSE German.

If that is ok please let us know of how you would like to credited. You can contact me at greg.davies@bbc.co.uk

Many thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 132.185.160.126 (talk) 10:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:26, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of photo[edit]

You deleted a photo that had the CC licensing imbedded in the metadata. This photo was made for CC use and the user would like it restored. Can you restore it? Please help me understand what must be done to assure that it is restored and not deleted. thanks

06:20, 12 April 2016 Túrelio (talk | contribs) deleted page File:Bob wise 01.png (copyrighted image, see http://all4ed.org/people/bob-wise/. It has a copyright notice and no indication of free license.) (global usage; delinker log) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bratcliff (talk • contribs)

Hi,
this was more than 1 month ago! Anyway, the image File:Bob wise 01.png had been sourced by the uploader to http://all4ed.org/people/bob-wise/. However, this site/article is licensed under a a CC-BY-NC-ND license, which is not allowed on Commons. Our policy COM:L requires uploads to be free for commercial use and the creation of derivatives. Both is forbidden under this license. What did you mean by "imbedded in the metadata"? AFAIF, png-files don't have metadata. --Túrelio (talk) 18:25, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Leela Dube / Shehla Rashid Shora[edit]

The photos I have uploaded of Leela Dube and Shehla Rashid Shora are my own work. What is this talk of "possible copyright violation"?

Mukul Dube / payasam

Undeletion request of File:Silsilah-e-Alia Toheedia.png[edit]

Hi, I am copy right holder of this image and uploaded it for free use on wikicommons. Please undelete this file and let me know if i need to do anything more in this regard. Rahmatgee (talk) 15:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedydeletion ??[edit]

Hello Túrelio. I am the uploader of this file, File:Papavero rosso San Francesco.jpg and I requedted assistence, and already Taivo administrator fixed all the bugs, so all is fine! Many thanks AmicidelleCoseSemplici (talk) 12:04, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]

Kitten-stare.jpg

Fayen a momo ana walid

Walid boulifa (talk) 23:52, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Rooye Jaabe copy.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Rooye Jaabe copy.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 00:29, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Undeletion[edit]

Hi Turelio! You already helped me with another issue with an user, so I am asking if you could finalize, as an admin, this undeletion request I made. Two files of mine were cancelled as duplicate, even if they were not duplicates. There is already a positive feedback to the request. It looks like it only miss an admin to finalize the request, otherwise it will be archived soon. Thank you. --Sailko (talk) 15:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Somebody else made it. Thank you! --Sailko (talk) 06:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Undeletion - Reconsider: Belgium now also has FOP[edit]

Hallo,

You have deleted quite a few of my photographs in the past, because Belgium had no FOP exception. It now has (since July 15). Would it be possible to undelete all those files ? Or should I try to re-upload them ? Funkyxian (talk) 11:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Le Centre de Ressources Multimedia en 1980.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Le Centre de Ressources Multimedia en 1980.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

inquiry[edit]

Hello. I noticed this just today: [18] . A similar file is here: [19]. Here is the issue - the data on there is for 1961, not 1953. Hence, I would highly appreciate if you can return the 1961 file as that is the true file. I do not have data to make such a map for 1953 at this time (and who knows if I ever will have such data). (Lilic (talk) 01:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC))