Commons:Candidatas a imágenes de Calidad

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Jump to: navigation, search
This project page in other languages:

Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Македонски | 日本語 | Polski | +/−
Saltar a nominaciones Saltar a nominaciones
Quality images logo.svg

Éstas son las candidatas a convertirse en Imagen de Calidad. Por favor, que quede claro que no es lo mismo que Imágenes destacadas. Adicionalmente, en caso de que desees información sobre tus imágenes, puedes conseguirla en Críticas fotográficas.

Contents

[edit] Objetivo

El objetivo de las imágenes de calidad es alentar a la gente que son la base de Commons, los usuarios individuales que proporcionan las imágenes para expandir esta colección. Mientras que las imágenes destacadas identifican a las mejores de todas las imágenes subidas a Commons, las Imágenes de Calidad sirven para identificar y alentar los esfuerzos de los usuarios para subir imágenes de calidad a Commons.
Además, las imágenes de calidad podrían ser un lugar donde otros usuarios expliquen métodos para mejorar una imagen.

[edit] Directrices

Todas las imágenes nominadas deben ser el trabajo de los usuarios de Commons.

[edit] Para los nominadores

A continuación se incluyen las directrices generales para Imágenes de Calidad, Below are the general guidelines for Quality images, y un criterio más detallado está disponible en Directrices de imágenes.

[edit] Requisitos de las imágenes

  1. Status de Copyright. Las candidatas a Imagen de Calidad han sido subidas a Commons por el dueño del copyright bajo una licencia adecuada. Los requerimientos completos de licencia están en COM:CT
  2. Las Imágenes de Calidad han de ser categorizadas, tener un título principal y una descripción. Esto incluiría el nombre taxonómico de los organismos.
  3. Sin anuncios o firmas en la imagen. Los derechos de autor y la información de la autoría deberían estar localizadas en la página de la Imagen y puede estar en los metadatos de la imagen, pero no debe interferir con los contenidos de la imagen.

[edit] Requisitos técnicos

Criterios más detallados están disponibles en Directrices de imágenes.

[edit] Resolución

Las imágenes de Commons no sólo se pueden usar para verlas en la pantalla. También pueden usarse para la impresión y o para su visualización en monitores de alta resolución. No podemos predecir qué dispositivos se usarán en el futuro, por lo que es importante que las imágenes que sean nominadas tengan una razonablemente alta resolución. Normalmente el límite inferior son 2 megapíxeles, pero para imágenes 'fáciles de tomar', los revisores pueden exigir mucho más. (No aplicable a las imágenes SVG).

[edit] Calidad de las Imágenes

Las imágenes digitales pueden sufrir diversos problemas originados en la captura y procesamiento de la imagen, como el ruido, los problemas con la compresión JPEG, falta de información zonas de sombra o de relieve, o problemas con la captura de colores. Todos estos temas deben ser manejados correctamente.

[edit] Composición e iluminación

El arreglo del sujeto principal de una imagen debe contribuir a la propia imagen. Los objetos de fondo no deben distraer. La iluminación y el foco también han de contribuir al resultado global; el sujeto ha de destacar, ser completo y estar bien expuesto.

[edit] Valor

Nuestro objetivo principal es favorecer la calidad de las imágenes que contribuyen a Wikicommons, algo valioso para los proyectos de Wikimedia.

[edit] Cómo nominar

Basta añadir una línea de este formulario en la parte superior de la lista de candidatos de la sección de Nominaciones

Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination| muy breve descripción --~~~~ |}}

La descripción no debería ser más que unas pocas palabras, y por favor, dejar una línea en blanco entre su nueva entrada las demás. La adición de más de un par de imágenes a la vez puede considerarse flood, que está mal visto.

[edit] Evaluación de las imágenes

Cualquier usuario registrado puede revisar una nominación.
Cuando un revisor evalua una imagen debe considerar las mismas directrices que el nominador.

[edit] Cómo revisar

Examina cuidadosamente la imagen. Ábrela en la máxima resolución, y mira si se cumplen los criterios de calidad.

  • Si decides promover la nominación, cambia la línea relevante de
Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination| muy breve descripción --~~~~ |}}

a

Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion| muy breve descripción --Firma del nominador | Por qué te gusta. --~~~~}}

En otras palabras, cambia la plantilla de /Nomination a /Promotion y añade tu firma, a ser posible con algún pequeño comentario.

  • Si decides declinar la nominación, cambia la línea relevante de
Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination| muy breve descripción --~~~~ |}}

to

Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline| muy breve descripción --Firma del nominador | Por qué no te gusta. --~~~~}}

En otras palabras, cambia la plantilla de /Nomination a /Decline y añade tu firma, a ser posible declarando los criterios por los que la imagen falló (puedes usar títulos de la sección de las directrices). Si hay muchos problemas, por favor notifica sólo los 2 o 3 más severos, y añade multiple problems. Cuando declines una nominación, por favor explica las razones en la página de discusión del nominador - como regla general, ser agradable y alentador! En el mensaje deberías dar una explicación más detallada de tu decisión.

Note: Por favor, evalúa primero las imágenes más antiguas.

[edit] Período de gracia y promoción

Si no hay objeciones en un período de 2 días (exactamente: 48 houras) desde su revisión, la imagen se prumueve o no, de acuerdo con la revisión que recibió. Si tienes objeciones, mueve la imagen al estado Consensual review.

[edit] Cómo ejecutar una decisión

QICbot actúa automáticamente estos 2 días después de que la decisión se ha tomado, y las imágenes promovidas son guardadas en Promovidas recientemente a la espera de la inserción manual en una apropiada página de Imágenes de Calidad. Así que lo siguiente es principalmente para fines informativos:

Si se promueve,

  1. Añadir la imagen al grupo o grupos apropiados de páginas Imágenes de Calidad. La imagen también necesita ser añadida a las sub páginas asociadas, sólo 3-4 de las imágenes más nuevas han de ser mostradas en la página principal.
  2. Añadir la plantilla {{QualityImage}} al fondo de la página de descripción de la imagen.
  3. Mover la línea con la nominación de la imagen y la revisión a Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 2009
  4. Añadir la plantilla {{QICpromoted|image:imagename.jpg}} a la página de discusión del usuario.

Si crees que has encontrado una imagen excepcional que merece el estatus de Imagen destacada, entonces nomínala también en Commons:Featured picture candidates

Si declinaste, mueve la línea con la nominación de la imagen y la revisión a Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 2009.

  • Las imágenes que esperan una revisión, se muestran en un recuadro azul.
  • Las imágenes que el revisor ha aceptado se muestran en un recuadro verde.
  • Las imágenes que el revisor ha aceptado se muestran en un recuadro rojo.

[edit] Imágenes no asignadas (recuadro azul)

Las imágenes nominadas que han sido promovidas ni declinadas, o acabó en consenso (hubo igual número de oposiciones y apoyos) tras 8 días en esta página deberían ser borradas de esta página sin promoción, archivadas en Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 2009 y la Category:Unassessed QI candidates añadida a la imagen.

[edit] Proceso de la revisión de consenso

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

[edit] Cómo preguntar por la revisión de consenso

Para preguntar por la revisión de consenso, mueve la línea de la imagen de la cola principal a la sección de #Consensual review y ncambia el formato a:

=== ImageNameHere ===
[[Image: ImageNameHere.jpg |none|180px]]
{{/Discuss| muy breve descripción --~~~~| revisión y tus comentarios están insertados en la plantilla }}

Si esto parece demasiado complicado, sólo cambia /Promotion, /Decline a /Discuss y añade tus comentarios inmediatamente tras la revisión. Alguien la moverá a la sección de revisión de consenso. O sólo intentalo, acertarás si sigues cuidadosamente lo que todo el mundo hace.

Por favor, sólo envía cosas a la revisión de consenso que hayan sido revisadas como promovidas / declinadas. Si, como revisor, no puedes tomar una decisión, añade tus comentarios, pero deja el candidato en esta página.

[edit] Revisión de las reglas de consenso

Ver Commons:Quality_images_candidates#Rules

Actualización de la página: purge this page cache

[edit] Nominations

Due to changes in the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have Javascript enabled. If you do not have Javascript enabled please manually sign with --''yourname'' (ctrl-click)">[[User:yourname|yourname]] 09:10, 7 December 2009 (UTC)


[edit] December 7,2009

  • Nomination Drummond castle. --Eusebius 08:41, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Bonaparte's Gull (Chroicocephalus philadelphia) --Basar 03:50, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Fabulous quality. --99of9 05:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Liru Shield, part of Uluru --99of9 03:55, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain --Bgag 01:37, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Sweets in La Boqueria market, Barcelona.jpg --Bgag 01:26, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed

[edit] December 6,2009

  • Nomination A rock, the ocean and the boys, who never stood still :)--Mbz1 22:53, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Karrenberg --Böhringer 21:13, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Cool or rathe cold :)--Mbz1 22:53, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Hasenspuren --Böhringer 21:08, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Euthrix potatoria --Böhringer 21:04, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination skyline of Frankfurt am Main. -- Der Wolf im Wald 18:01, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination avenue in Darmstadt. -- Der Wolf im Wald 18:01, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination B3 in Frankfurt am Main. -- Der Wolf im Wald 18:01, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination 15th-century carving of a mermaid in Clonfert Cathedral, County Galway, Ireland. --AFBorchert 17:06, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Great quality and interesting. Is it unusual to see a mermaid carving in a Cathedral, or I am mistaking?--Mbz1 22:53, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Statue of a dragon, Parc de la Ciutadella, Barcelona --Bgag 15:49, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Horse cart on the top of a fountain, Parc de la Ciutadella, Barcelona --Bgag 15:49, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Animation to illustrate motionblur -- Niabot 14:40, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Excellent work!--Korall 15:35, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Temple in Japan --Jnn 13:27, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Shrine in Japan --Jnn 13:27, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Pagoda in Japan --Jnn 13:27, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Celestine - aragonite and sulphur Sicily, Italy --Archaeodontosaurus 13:26, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Excellent. --Cayambe 14:16, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination An Ursus C-451 tractor; photo by myself --Airwolf 11:22, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 14:16, 6 December 2009 (UTC) actually a very good image. However I would consider a square crop even better. --Ikiwaner 22:24, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Jordan, Modern church at the baptism site --Berthold Werner 10:19, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice work. --99of9 12:01, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] December 5,2009

  • Nomination PBY Catalina. Photo by myself. --Airwolf 21:02, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Ryanair's Boeing 737. Photo by myself. --Airwolf 21:02, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination HMCS St. John's. Photo by myself. --Airwolf 21:02, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Discussion good --George Chernilevsky 11:57, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Noisy. --Eusebius 13:25, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Office building in Warsaw --Sfu 20:04, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --George Chernilevsky 11:57, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Office building in Warsaw --Sfu 20:04, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Manor house in Chotynia, Poland. --Sfu 20:04, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice stitching job! Yerpo 08:11, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Vineyard in Napa Valley --Mbz1 16:23, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice. --99of9 05:18, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Vineyard in Napa Valley --Mbz1 16:22, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Pillar Point Harbor --Mbz1 15:13, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion lovely mood and composition, good stiching work. Thank you.--Korall 15:27, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Flowers of the Virginia Bluebell. --Huwmanbeing 13:06, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Noisy. - Darius Baužys 21:05, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Train of the Aqaba Railway Corporation at Rum Station --Berthold Werner 10:11, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Excellent. --Cayambe 14:21, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Springbocks in Namibia --Ikiwaner 08:44, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good.--Mbz1 15:13, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Please, please, I wanna see the full colour version!--Korall 15:28, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Coat of Arms of Caravaggio. Fale 08:35, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Coat of Arms of Offagna. Fale 08:35, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Coat of Arms of Solofra. Fale 08:35, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Green sand in lava rocks --Mbz1 03:58, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good. --Cayambe 11:04, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Fountain of Ciutadella Park, Barcelona --Bgag 02:05, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Ceramics on Castell dels Tres Dragons, Barcelona --Bgag 02:05, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed

[edit] December 4, 2009

  • Nomination Statue, Alésia (Côte-d'Or) --Siren-Com 23:10, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Streetlamp, Milan --Fale 22:22, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Poor composition, dull tones. TimVickers 22:39, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Sunset on Garda Lake, Italy --Fale 22:22, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Green flare. --99of9 04:26, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Path in Liguria, Italy --Fale 22:10, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Candies --Fale 22:05, 4 December 2009 (UTC). Nice composition, but I think there's a yellowish cast, can you try to adjust the white balance? --99of9 22:28, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
    ✓ DoneBetter now?Fale 22:43, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I had a go at it myself, picking the neutral colour from the egg white. Feel free to revert if you don't like it. Would someone else care to judge now? 99of9 02:37, 5 December 2009 (UTC).
    Thankyou to the fix :) Fale 08:32, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good now. --Cayambe 11:19, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Euthrix potatoria --Böhringer 20:23, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline I like the composition and colours but I cannot promote because of image noise and lack of sharpness. I know it is not an easy shot and ID, and I myself have not done much better on similar subjects but the quality is not there. --Korall 23:54, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Acronicta rumicis --Böhringer 20:15, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Its not razor sharp but its fairly large and I think It would be good in 2MP resolution so Im promoting.--Korall 23:54, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Honda Accord, the fourth generation --MattiPaavola 19:17, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Well composed. --99of9 03:01, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Gothic stained glass window in Tours cathedral. --Eusebius 18:34, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Can IMHO be tighter cropped --Berthold Werner 18:54, 4 December 2009 (UTC) I wanted to keep a 3:2 ratio. --Eusebius 19:48, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
    What's the story with the blacked out faces? --99of9 22:26, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
    The three pictures I have taken of this window show this. Maybe it is a shadow from something outside, but I think the window is stained or damaged (it is about 700 years old). --Eusebius 22:39, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
    Intriguing, it seems almost deliberate! I'm with BW regarding the crop, I don't see any reason for 3:2 in this case. Users can extend with however much black they want. --99of9 02:57, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
    Feel free to nominate a cropped DW instead, but for me I'll keep this format, I think it is more balanced than a tight crop. --Eusebius 07:59, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
    Should be cropped IMO too. The black parts do not add anything. Otherwise good. Thanks for the helpful annotations. --Cayambe 11:17, 5 December 2009 (UTC).
  • Nomination Evangelical Church, Prejmer --Pudelek 18:21, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Prejmer (Tartlau) - stone monument from evangelical church --Pudelek 18:21, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Prejmer (Tartlau) - WWI monument in evangelical church --Pudelek 18:21, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The perspective is assymmetrical, the left hand wing is taller than the right hand one. Also (hard to avoid) the pew intrudes. --99of9 03:05, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Evangelical Church, Prejmer --Pudelek 18:21, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Evangelical Church, Prejmer --Pudelek 18:21, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Indian Elephant. --MathKnight 17:54, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good.--Mbz1 16:38, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination African Elephant. --MathKnight 17:54, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good.--Mbz1 16:38, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Addax nasomaculatus. --MathKnight 17:54, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Composition - the foreground half-Addax is a bit distracting. --99of9 04:29, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Petunia - unproccessed version. --MathKnight 17:48, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Sorry it seems like the posterization was there from the beginning. If you looka at the soil, it almost look like being painted with aquarell or something. I also think a closeup showing at least one flower in detail would be of better educational value. --Korall 15:39, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Celestine, Italy--Archaeodontosaurus 16:47, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think the crops would be better if they gave a consistent amount of black around all 4 sides. Also not sure about this level of noise. --99of9 04:34, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The light is placed on the Celestine, to differentiate it from aragonite --Archaeodontosaurus 11:17, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The lighting is good, I meant the crop. I just want an equal border of black on all sides. --99of9 20:15, 5 December 2009 (UTC)✓ Done Like that? -- Archaeodontosaurus 08:00, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
    It looks the same? What did you change? --99of9 08:47, 6 December 2009 (UTC)Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentI can change only the top of the image. See here : Category:Celestine. I think I'll remake this picture because you're right. Archaeodontosaurus 10:38, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Medical thermometer --Berthold Werner 15:49, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good and useful. --Cayambe 11:49, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Radio mast near Aabey, Lebanon - Peripitus 09:41, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I really like the colors and the lighting - well done! However, when zooming in, I see some strange artifacts mainly on the needles. Maybe too strong JPEG compression or maybe it is just my monitor or eyes. I would request a second opinion concerning the "needle artifacts".
    (response) - Unless viewing at 100% you may see the artifacts from the mediawiki jpeg compression. I cannot see the artifacts - Peripitus 21:16, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Mountains in Lebanon, near the middle east's highest peak - Peripitus 09:41, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Wadi Rum, race of Toyota Land Cruisers --Berthold Werner 08:44, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Perfect -- Archaeodontosaurus 16:37, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] December 3, 2009

  • Nomination Village of Belazao, Madagascar --Bgag 21:27, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Coat of Arms of Angrogna. --Fale 21:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Do we have to review any single variation over already promoted content? There is nothing significantly new in such a file from the other files you have submitted. Is it just a file count issue for you? I'd rather evaluate individual heraldic charges. --Eusebius 22:18, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
    The ones that are all variations on a theme are very easy to evaluate though. However, in this particular case it would be worth checking the font of the A - where is the original? 99of9 23:06, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
    I created it myself. --Fale 23:32, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
    The original one is cmr10 --Fale 23:38, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
    I don't understand your answer. What I'm hoping to check is the font of the letter A. Is there a recognized image that we can check against? --99of9 03:08, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
    [Here] there is a png version (I think that is the only other one on the wiki world. Fale 08:23, 5 December 2009 (UTC))
    Thanks for linking that. There are significant differences (acorns, blue ribbon, narrow crown), are your choices based on an older original, or otherwise deliberate? --99of9 09:40, 5 December 2009 (UTC) Are deliberate based on the definition given by the municipality:"a green A on white field, insignia of municipality". I know that are a little bit different the two versions, this because the definition is not so strict. About the stuff out of the shield, they are the insignia of municipality. Fale 10:17, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
    Ok then I'm worried that this might not match the insignia of the municipality? --99of9 03:22, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
    It seems that you are worried about this, but this isn't true. I spoke even with other Italian people involved into municipal CoA and they told me that our is right, while sometimes the ones found the web are not exact. Fale 09:48, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
    OK, I'll take your word on that, but it would still be nice to be able to cite an independent source for whether there should be olives on the olive branch, etc. --99of9 02:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Petunia flowers in Weizmann Institute of Science. --MathKnight 16:10, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Looks really posterized to me. Did you post-process it? Sorry --Korall 16:51, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
    * Yes, adjusted level in Photoshop. Do you think the unprocessed version has a chance? --MathKnight 18:06, 3 December 2009 (UTC) Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Cant tell if I havent seen it. I usually upload original images and overload or link to processed ones. In that way anyone has the possibility to modyfy my images in they way thay want. No processed file contains more information than the original one. --Korall 01:44, 4 December 2009 (UTC) Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Here is the unprocessed version: File:Petunia-Weizmann001pure.jpg. --MathKnight 17:50, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] December 2, 2009

  • Nomination Amphitheatre of Tarragona, Spain --Bgag 22:19, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 18:02, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination The cargo Global Helena. --Eusebius 21:58, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --George Chernilevsky 14:36, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination BMW on IAA 2007 -- Der Wolf im Wald 16:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Mercedes Benz on IAA 2007 -- Der Wolf im Wald 16:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Campfire -- Der Wolf im Wald 16:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Skyline of Frankfurt am Main -- Der Wolf im Wald 16:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Excellent IMO. Could benefit from a slightly tighter crop at the bottom. --Cayambe 15:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination 'Internationale Automobil Ausstellung' 2007 -- Der Wolf im Wald 16:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Frankfurt city hall -- Der Wolf im Wald 16:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination christmas tree in Frankfurt am Main -- Der Wolf im Wald 16:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Is this tinted towards green? Location-tag? Would maybe benefir from perspective correction? --MattiPaavola 00:00, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Hohenzollernbridge and the Rhine in Cologne -- Der Wolf im Wald 16:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion I would promote this, but I only comment because this would be my first promotion and I'd like someone else more experienced to comment it too.Fale 17:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm a newbie as well, but this looks exclent to me too. --MattiPaavola 23:33, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination market hall in Stuttgart, Germany -- Der Wolf im Wald 16:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 16:43, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Mito Art Tower. I added some blue sky for the composition not to be too tight and want to know if its OK. I nominated for deletiobn cause I was unsure of panaroma freedom in Japan but it looks like its staying so I think i can nominate for QI.--Korall 16:35, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Tidepools at Pillar Point at low tide --Mbz1 15:30, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Toyota Land Cruiser for excursions to Wadi Rum --Berthold Werner 07:22, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Cumulus humilis clouds. --99of9 02:37, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. Yerpo 21:53, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] December 1, 2009

  • Nomination Panoramic view of Trento --Fale 18:42, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed

[edit] November 30, 2009

  • Nomination Celestine on septarias - France (6.5x6.2cm) --Archaeodontosaurus 17:36, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Sorry not sharp enough and looks posterized. --Korall 16:17, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination A small fall in Golden Gate Park. --Mbz1 15:55, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Maison Alphonse Desjardins, Lévis, Quebec --Bgag 14:58, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Barrington Levy singing in Stockholm --Korall 14:16, 30 November 2009 (UTC)Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentPlease look in full format, the thumbnails are broken.
  • Promotion Good. -- Der Wolf im Wald 16:22, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination twilight --Böhringer 13:01, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Old mural - exterior of St. Nocholas church in Braşov (Kronstadt, Brassó) --Pudelek 12:04, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Braşov (Kronstadt, Brassó) - Şchei. Entrance to cemetery --Pudelek 12:04, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Petra, view on Al Khazneh from the siq --Berthold Werner 10:28, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Tree bark with embedded barbed wire --Loadmaster 04:44, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed

[edit] November 29, 2009

  • Nomination Bridge in Le Bono. --Eusebius 10:21, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed

[edit] November 28, 2009

  • Nomination brandenburg gate in Berlin. -- Wolf im Wald 23:14, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Resolution seems to be high enough. -- Nicolas17 19:53, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Apache Trail, Arizona --Bgag 21:41, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
  • Nomination Namsan Tower in Seoul. -- Elmor 17:35, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice idea, but quite noisy. --MattiPaavola 17:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Consensual review

[edit] Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Or QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision - Promoted or Not promoted - will be registered at the end of the text and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the image will stay in Consensual Review for a maximum period of 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and Symbol support vote.svg Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".

[edit] Consensual Review

[edit] File:Moderna galerija Ljubljana by night.jpg

Moderna galerija Ljubljana by night.jpg

  • Nomination Gallery of modern arts, Ljubljana, by night. Yerpo 19:41, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Discussion Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A big greenish spot on the right in sky. Some CA. --MattiPaavola 17:44, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I erased the dust spot and corrected purple fringing a bit. Better now? Yerpo 18:12, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, but now there are (two) black spots instead and there's still CA e.g. on the statue. Anyway, before wasting your time more, I would like to ask someone else more familiar with the QI criteria to judge if the perspective and the composition meet the high criteria. --MattiPaavola 23:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your comment; I cloned out the spot instead of painting over it with black (which was pretty stupid now that I think of it), and CA is barely noticeable IMO, now that the purple is out of the picture. Yerpo 08:00, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:P1160243 Calopteryx splendens.jpg

P1160243 Calopteryx splendens.jpg

  • Nomination Banded Demoiselle (Calopteryx splendens). Male. - Darius Baužys 13:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent photo --George Chernilevsky 13:58, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Posterized & noisy. --kallerna 11:09, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very very good! -- Der Wolf im Wald 16:55, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mbdortmund 17:26, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Archaeodontosaurus 18:28, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sharp, beautiful. Huwmanbeing 12:59, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Mbdortmund 17:22, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Puebla - Museo Amparo - Tampon lapin Mexica 1500dC.JPG

Puebla - Museo Amparo - Tampon lapin Mexica 1500dC.JPG

  • Nomination Aztec stamp of a rabbit, 1500 CE --Éclusette 14:10, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Discussion Very noisy and strong compression artefacts. As it is a very interesting object, could you upload a version as it came out of the camera (full resolution etc.), so someone could try to enhance quality? -- Smial 12:52, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It actually comes out of the camera I used, an Olympus Camedia C-2500L from the Ancient Ages of Digital Photography (1999). Maybe it would better suit another category of promoted images such as the valued images ? - Éclusette 14:14, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
    Sorry, I did'nt look at the camera model. If this is the full resolution, I'll try to enhance it a bit. Maybe this evening. -- Smial 15:19, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thanks! - Éclusette (talk) 18:12, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose; sorry, but I have to agree with the comment about noise. This image should really be nominated for a valued image instead. -- Yerpo 14:58, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Rapana_Black_Sea_2009_G4.jpg

Rapana Black Sea 2009 G4.jpg

  • Nomination Veined rapa whelk Rapana venosa. A Black Sea beach at sunset --George Chernilevsky 08:46, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Supportuseful topic, good picture, lack the size of the subject --Archaeodontosaurus 10:23, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Overexposed parts on the main subject. --Eusebius 11:21, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Darius Baužys 17:25, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Mbdortmund 20:30, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Tabla del tiempo (día 8 tras la nominación)

Sun 29 Nov → Mon 07 Dec
Mon 30 Nov → Tue 08 Dec
Tue 01 Dec → Wed 09 Dec
Wed 02 Dec → Thu 10 Dec
Thu 03 Dec → Fri 11 Dec
Fri 04 Dec → Sat 12 Dec
Sat 05 Dec → Sun 13 Dec
Sun 06 Dec → Mon 14 Dec
Mon 07 Dec → Tue 15 Dec
Retrieved from "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Candidatas_a_im%C3%A1genes_de_Calidad"