Commons:Candidatas a imágenes de calidad

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Quality images candidates and the translation is 77% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Quality images candidates and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Saltar a nominaciones
Other languages:
العربية • ‎čeština • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎español • ‎français • ‎日本語 • ‎македонски • ‎Nederlands • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎русский • ‎svenska
float

Éstas son las candidatas a convertirse en Imagen de Calidad. or favor, que quede claro que no es lo mismo que Imágenes destacadas. Adicionalmente, en caso de que desees información sobre tus imágenes, puedes conseguirla en Críticas fotográficas.

Objetivo

El objetivo de las imágenes de calidad es alentar a la gente que son la base de Commons, los usuarios individuales que proporcionan las imágenes para expandir esta colección. Mientras que las imágenes destacadas identifican a las mejores de todas las imágenes subidas a Commons, las Imágenes de Calidad sirven para identificar y alentar los esfuerzos de los usuarios para subir imágenes de calidad a Commons.
Además, las imágenes de calidad podrían ser un lugar donde otros usuarios expliquen métodos para mejorar una imagen.

Directrices

Todas las imágenes nominadas deben ser el resultado del trabajo de los usuarios de Commons.

Para los nominadores

A continuación se incluyen las directrices generales para Imágenes de Calidad, y un criterio más detallado está disponible en Directrices de imágenes.

Requisitos de las imágenes
  1. Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
  2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
  3. Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
  4. No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the Image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.


Creator

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Requisitos técnicos

Criterios más detallados están disponibles en Directrices de imágenes.

Resolución

Las imágenes de Commons no sólo se pueden usar para verlas en la pantalla. También pueden usarse para la impresión y o para su visualización en monitores de alta resolución. No podemos predecir qué dispositivos se usarán en el futuro, por lo que es importante que las imágenes que sean nominadas tengan una resolución razonablemente alta. Normalmente el límite inferior son 2 megapíxeles, pero para imágenes 'fáciles de tomar', los revisores pueden exigir mucho más.

(No aplicable a las imágenes SVG)

Calidad de las Imágenes

Las imágenes digitales pueden sufrir diversos problemas originados en la captura y procesamiento de la imagen como ruido, problemas con la compresión JPEG, falta de información, zonas de sombra o de relieve, o problemas con la captura de colores. Todos estos temas deben ser manejados correctamente.

Composición e iluminación

El arreglo del sujeto principal de una imagen debe contribuir a la propia imagen. Los objetos de fondo no deben distraer. La iluminación y el foco también han de contribuir al resultado global; el sujeto ha de destacar, ser completo y estar bien expuesto.

Valor

Nuestro objetivo principal es favorecer la calidad de las imágenes que contribuyen a Wikicommons, algo valioso para los proyectos de Wikimedia.

Cómo nominar

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Nota: Hay un artilugio que acelera las nominaciones. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the Image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.


Number of nominations

Carefully select your best images to nominate. Adding more than a couple of images at once can be considered flooding, which is at least frowned upon or may even lead to immediate decline.

Evaluación de las imágenes

Cualquier usuario registrado puede revisar una nominación.
Cuando un revisor evalúa una imagen debe considerar las mismas directrices que el nominador.

Cómo revisar

How to update the status

Examina cuidadosamente la imagen. Ábrela en la máxima resolución, y mira si se cumplen los criterios de calidad.

  • Si decides promover la nominación, cambia la línea relevante de
Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination| muy breve descripción --~~~~ |}}

to

Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion| muy breve descripción --Firma del nominador | Por qué te gusta. --~~~~}}

En otras palabras, cambia la plantilla de /Nomination a /Promotion y añade tu firma, a ser posible con algún pequeño comentario.

  • Si decides declinar la nominación, cambia la línea relevante de
Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination| muy breve descripción --~~~~ |}}

to

Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline| muy breve descripción --Firma del nominador | Por qué no te gusta. --~~~~}}

En otras palabras, cambia la plantilla de /Nomination a /Decline y añade tu firma, a ser posible declarando los criterios por los que la imagen falló (puedes usar títulos de la sección de las directrices). Si hay muchos problemas, por favor notifica sólo los 2 o 3 más severos, y añade multiple problems. Cuando declines una nominación, por favor explica las razones en la página de discusión del nominador - como regla general, debes ser agradable y alentador! En el mensaje deberías dar una explicación más detallada de tu decisión.

Nota: Por favor, evalúa primero las imágenes más antiguas.

Período de gracia y promoción

Si no hay objeciones en un período de 2 días (exactamente: 48 horas) desde su revisión, la imagen se promueve o no, de acuerdo con la revisión que recibió. Si tienes objeciones, mueve la imagen al estado Consensual review.

Cómo ejecutar una decisión

QICbot actúa automáticamente estos 2 días después de que la decisión se ha tomado, y las imágenes promovidas son guardadas en Promovidas recientemente a la espera de la inserción manual en una apropiada página de Imágenes de Calidad.

Si crees que has encontrado una imagen excepcional que merece el estatus de Imagen destacada, entonces nomínala también en Commons:Featured picture candidates

  • Las imágenes que esperan una revisión, se muestran en un recuadro azul.
  • Las imágenes que el revisor ha aceptado se muestran en un recuadro verde.
  • Las imágenes que el revisor ha aceptado se muestran en un recuadro rojo.

Imágenes no asignadas (recuadro azul)

Las imágenes nominadas que no han sido promovidas ni declinadas, o acabaron en consenso (hubo igual número de oposiciones y apoyos) tras 8 días en esta página deberían ser borradas de esta página sin promoción, archivadas en Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives diciembre 2014 y añadirle a la imagen la Category:Unassessed QI candidates.

Proceso de revisión de consenso

La revisión de consenso es un lugar utilizado en el caso en que el procedimiento descrito anteriormente sea insuficiente y necesite discusión para que surjan más opiniones.

Cómo preguntar por la revisión de consenso

Si esto parece demasiado complicado, sólo cambia /Promotion, /Decline a /Discuss y añade tus comentarios inmediatamente tras la revisión. Alguien la moverá a la sección de revisión de consenso. O sólo intentalo, acertarás si sigues cuidadosamente lo que todo el mundo hace.

Por favor, sólo envía cosas a la revisión de consenso que hayan sido revisadas como promovidas / declinadas. Si, como revisor, no puedes tomar una decisión, añade tus comentarios, pero deja el candidato en esta página.

Revisión de las reglas de consenso

Ver Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Actualización de la página: purge this page's cache


Contents

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have Javascript enabled. If you do not have Javascript enabled please manually sign with

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 13:58, 29 diciembre 2014 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC).
  • Please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first, many are still unassessed.
Thank you.
The new rule is effective now. Please nominate only a maximum of 5 images per day. [1]

December 29, 2014

December 28, 2014

December 27, 2014

December 26, 2014

December 25, 2014

December 24, 2014

December 23, 2014

Jebulon

December 22, 2014

December 21, 2014

December 20, 2014

December 19, 2014

December 18, 2014

December 17, 2014

December 16, 2014

December 15, 2014

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and Symbol support vote.svg Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review

File:2014_Gagra,_Plaża_(05).jpg

2014 Gagra, Plaża (05).jpg

  • Nomination The beach. Gagra, Gagra District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 11:49, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:32, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think it is too soft in focus on th left-hand side. Let's discuss. -- Slaunger 17:44, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Ferlach_Bodental_Bodenbauer_16102013_964.jpg

Ferlach Bodental Bodenbauer 16102013 964.jpg

  • Nomination Bodenbauer (slow. Podnar) in Bodental slow. Poden, a side valley of the Loibl valley in the Karawanken, municipality Ferlach, district Klagenfurt Land, Carinthia / Austria / EU by Johann Jaritz
    --Hubertl 06:24, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nice place and colors but the overexposed clipped areas on the house are for me an issue, sorry. For info CAs top left. --Christian Ferrer 07:58, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
    Discussion and more opinions --Hubertl 08:32, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Siem Reap .- Danse Khmer (Cambodge).jpg

Siem Reap .- Danse Khmer (Cambodge).jpg

  • Nomination Siem Reap .- Danse Khmer (Cambodge)--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:14, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice motif, but there is not enoug sharpness level and most of all - there are lots of artifacts. --Halavar 10:16, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
    Thanks for your note, I corrected the image with a better sharpness level --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:59, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
    I'm afraid now it's much worse. --C messier 23:36, 26 December 2014 (UTC) That's what I thought. Sorry, I've done worse than better!! so I also post the original photo without any artifact..--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:58, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
    OK now. --Yann 09:25, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Mediaslunas, café en jarrito y agua mineral en Café El Gato Negro.JPG

Mediaslunas, café en jarrito y agua mineral en Café El Gato Negro.JPG

  • Nomination Traditional serving of merienda in Café El Gato Negro, Buenos Aires. --ProtoplasmaKid 22:37, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. DoF too small. Subject is the cup of coffee and the glass of water, but the glass of water is unsharp and cropped. --XRay 08:25, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
    OK for me. --Yann 09:30, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
    I had changed the Symbol support vote.svg Support to Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the XRay's vote,because he sign support but write for decline --Livioandronico2013 13:24, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Always the same ... Sorry. I like to promote more.--XRay 08:35, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
No problem XRay,is my job Face-grin.svg --Livioandronico2013 11:21, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose anyway per XRay --LivioAndronico talk 11:22, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Ramu-Keval_Devi,_folk_art,_Bharatiya_Lok_Kala_Museum,_Udaipur,_India.jpg

Ramu-Keval Devi, folk art, Bharatiya Lok Kala Museum, Udaipur, India.jpg

  • Nomination Ramu-Keval Devi, folk art, Bharatiya Lok Kala Museum, Udaipur, India. --Yann 10:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Harsh flash shadow. --Mattbuck 16:01, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting question.svg Question Can it be corrected? --Yann 09:56, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Strokkur,_Área_geotérmica_de_Geysir,_Suðurland,_Islandia,_2014-08-16,_DD_082.JPG

Strokkur, Área geotérmica de Geysir, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-16, DD 082.JPG

  • Nomination Strokkur, Geysir Geothermal Field, Suðurland, Iceland --Poco a poco 10:47, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment DOF is pretty shallow (are you sure, that the 105 mm was the best choice?) and there are cropped feet on the background. --Iifar 12:45, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
    Yes, I do, I wanted to show detail, that area is fenced so how else could I've done it? DoF of the hole of the geyser is IMHO acceptable. I uploaded a new version and got rid of the feet. Poco a poco 18:19, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
    The bottom is too blurry IMO. Mattbuck 16:01, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
    OK for me. --Yann 09:57, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Terelj à Nalaikh, Mongolie (11).JPG

Terelj à Nalaikh, Mongolie (11).JPG

  • Nomination Camp du Parc national Gorkhi-Terelj, en Mongolie.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 09:02, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I do not agree. It's blurred everywhere. ~Definitely it's not a QI.--Halavar 22:38, 28 December 2014 (UTC)


✓ DoneI corrected sharpness of this image who was taken after the sun set that explains It's blurred --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:38, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Amaj_Mata,_folk_art,_Bharatiya_Lok_Kala_Museum,_Udaipur,_India.jpg

Amaj Mata, folk art, Bharatiya Lok Kala Museum, Udaipur, India.jpg

  • Nomination Amaj Mata, folk art, Bharatiya Lok Kala Museum, Udaipur, India. --Yann 10:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality for QI. May be more space at the bottom would be better. --XRay 09:02, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Rather harsh flash lighting IMO. --Mattbuck 15:52, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Can it be corrected? Yann 09:54, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Narsing_Mata,_folk_art,_Bharatiya_Lok_Kala_Museum,_Udaipur,_India.jpg

Narsing Mata, folk art, Bharatiya Lok Kala Museum, Udaipur, India.jpg

  • Nomination Narsing Mata (English description is wrong ;oD), folk art, Bharatiya Lok Kala Museum, Udaipur, India. --Yann 10:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality for QI. May be more space at the bottom would be better. --XRay 09:02, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Rather harsh flash lighting IMO. --Mattbuck 15:52, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Can it be corrected? Yann 09:54, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Tragopogon porrifolius - Purple salsify.jpg

Tragopogon porrifolius - Purple salsify.jpg

  • Nomination Seeds of wild purple salsify (Tragopogon porrifolius) --Zeynel Cebeci 21:43, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but too little depth of field when using Aperture 2.8. Only the second row is sharp. --Steindy 22:37, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I´m not sure, If we should take this as a bug or a feature. Third opinion please. --Hubertl 12:16, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support weak support allthough --Hubertl 21:18, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good use of DOF. Feature, not bug. -- Smial 00:14, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I often upload multiple versions of a subject, one with low DoF and one with high DoF. Not every use of a macro plant shot need be of maximum DoF, it just need to be useful in some reasonable way. This meets that goal and does not have any other technical flaws of note. Ram-Man 03:06, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Ötscherbach_04.JPG

Ötscherbach 04.JPG

  • Nomination The Ötscherbach in the Ötschergräben, nature park Ötscher-Tormäuer, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 07:04, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose blurred areas and overexposed --Christian Ferrer 22:51, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
    More opinions, please! --Uoaei1 10:30, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I would support if overexposition is corrected. Probably possible if you have the RAW image. Regards, Yann 09:22, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I have uploaded a new version with reduced brightness, based on the RAW file. --Uoaei1 14:49, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support for me ok now.--Hubertl 21:20, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Steindy 20:52, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ram-Man 03:08, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Symbol support vote.svg Promoted   --LivioAndronico 11:29, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Kuala_Lumpur_Methodist-1-2-Brickfields-Girl-Primary-School-02.jpg

Kuala Lumpur Methodist-1-2-Brickfields-Girl-Primary-School-02.jpg

  • Nomination Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Sentral Vista building. In the foreground the Methodist 1 & 2 Brickfields Girl Primary School --Cccefalon 08:40, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Symbol support vote.svg SupportGood quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:59, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The sky is very overexposed for me. --Steindy 13:52, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
    Have a look at the histogram and you will see at the first glimpse, that there is nothing overexposed. --Cccefalon 15:58, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
    I am aware that your photos are always perfect. Only my photos are ░▒▓█▓▒░ in your eyes. --Steindy 22:27, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support QI to me --DKrieger 15:08, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support a white sky but with no details lost --Christian Ferrer 17:32, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support There may be a slight technical deficiency in the sky, but it's not overexposed and it's so minor that I only notice if looking for it. The rest of the image is fine, so good for me! Ram-Man 03:11, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:14-08-13-helsinki-RalfR-17.jpg

14-08-13-helsinki-RalfR-17.jpg

  • Nomination: Helsinki, Ravintola Vltava --Ralf Roletschek 18:31, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Review
  • Please add a correct categorization. "Helsinki/unsortiert" is not complying with commons category system. --Cccefalon 20:25, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Dark, perspective issues. Mattbuck 10:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I do not see what it is supposed to be dark. The perspective corresponds well to the natural perspective. I do not understand why does everything always have to be ironed. --Steindy 22:53, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok for me. --Code 22:26, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose shadows are too dark --Christian Ferrer 09:43, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --LivioAndronico 11:29, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:14-08-13-helsinki-RalfR-04.jpg

14-08-13-helsinki-RalfR-04.jpg

  • Nomination: Helsinki, Suomenlinna Ferry --Ralf Roletschek 06:31, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
    Needs sharpening and brightening of low levels. Mattbuck 07:45, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
    Please add a correct categorization. "Helsinki/unsortiert" is not complying with commons category system. --Cccefalon 20:25, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Review ✓ Done --Ralf Roletschek 19:59, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
    Photo issues not corrected. Mattbuck 10:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg SupportFor me, the quality is quite sufficient in comparison to other photos. --Steindy 13:10, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose shadows too dark --Christian Ferrer 09:40, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --LivioAndronico 11:29, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:14-08-13-helsinki-RalfR-18.jpg

14-08-13-helsinki-RalfR-18.jpg

  • Nomination Helsinki, main post building --Ralf Roletschek 06:31, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentPlease add a correct categorization. "Helsinki/unsortiert" is not complying with commons category system. --Cccefalon 20:25, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Perspective correction not done, a lot of empty space at the bottom, cropped thing at the top. Mattbuck 10:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The slightly converging lines correspond perfectly to the natural vision. Not all photos are straightened. Otherwise, good quality. --Steindy 13:10, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Mattbuck – even if PD is acceptable, the framing is still very unfavourable. --Kreuzschnabel 12:18, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Symbol declined.svg Declined   --LivioAndronico 11:29, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Cascade de Aïn Legradj à Bordj Bou Arreredj.jpg

Cascade de Aïn Legradj à Bordj Bou Arreredj.jpg

  • Nomination 10th place in Wiki Loves Earth 2014 (by Chettouh Nabil) –Be..anyone 02:30, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Please use an appropriate description of the file content. --Cccefalon 06:07, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
    Bad CA, bit oversharpened. Mattbuck 10:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support I see no disturbing CA, but a wonderful photo that speaks to me of the design. Especially nice that the water is not frozen. For me, of course QI. Tastes and views are just different. --Steindy 13:10, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me. Yann 11:41, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment IMHO, it's quite yellow. --C messier 18:57, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Symbol support vote.svg Promoted   --LivioAndronico 11:29, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Gagra,_Plaża_(11).jpg

2014 Gagra, Plaża (11).jpg

  • Nomination The beach. Gagra, Gagra District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 01:03, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Picture is unsharp --Jacek Halicki 20:55, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I disagree. How sharp do you want it? Look at the stones. Its getting a little unsharp in the upper third part, but the rest is really ok. If you want more sharpness, you need a tilt/shift-lens from this position. --Hubertl 21:25, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment ✓ Done Sharpness added. But this is maximum I can add. More would create artifacts. --Halavar 23:17, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Tamula järv 2013 09.jpg

Tamula järv 2013 09.jpg

  • Nomination Lake Tamula in Võru (by Vaido Otsar). Kruusamägi 13:32, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality and pretty. I linke this warm colors. --Steindy 18:19, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Possibly the jpg artefacts escaped your attention. You can see them especially in the sky. --Cccefalon 20:09, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Sag, bist jetzt am Pixelzählen und beim Steindy-Nachstellen? Es fällt langsam auf! (verärgert und kopfschüttelnd)--Hubertl 23:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
      • Kein Grund, meine Reviews auf eine persönliche Ebene zu stellen. Sind da Artefakte oder nicht? --Cccefalon 05:27, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
        • Lasse ihn doch, Hubertl. Manchen Gutmenschen verschafft das Bashing anderer Benutzer eben Spass und Befriedigung. Das zieht sich schon seit Wochen wie ein roter Faden durch QI. Diese Freude sollst Du ihnen doch nicht verderben ;-) --Steindy 13:20, 25 December 2014 (UTC) PS: Im Zweiten darunter siehst Du gleich den nächsten, dem dies persönliche Freude bereitet.
          • Vorsicht mit solchen Kommentaren, als linkslinke Zecke gehöre ich zu den Gutmenschen...--Hubertl 19:48, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The JPEG quality is low indeed. This should be easily fixable IMO. --Code 08:55, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry per Cccefalon --Livioandronico2013 11:01, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support artefacts and noise in the sky eliminated, new file uploaded by me.--Hubertl 00:10, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality now. --Code 22:40, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Symbol support vote.svg Promoted   --Steindy 01:00, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Kuiper_belt_-_Oort_cloud_numbered.svg

Kuiper belt - Oort cloud numbered.svg

  • Nomination Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud. --Medium69 21:30, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Technically interesting, if you used it to construct the Arab JPEG. But 26,000 lines in the data URL for an embedded PNG is gross. The validator and Chrome barely managed it, one picture extension crashed (first time ever). The source JPG containing the Oort cloud cutaway is 60KB, why embed this as huge PNG? –Be..anyone 13:41, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
    PNG is automatically created by Adobe Illustrator. For the rest, I hesitated for vector and matrix. I am aware that the picture is complicated.--Medium69 16:07, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
    Suggestion, upload the used (crop of the) source JPG, it should be anyway free; and I'll try to get a shorter data JPG data URL, the quality in the Arab JPG is actually better than the AI PNG. The huge SVG is certainly an interesting test case for librsvg etc. –Be..anyone 00:18, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
    @Be..anyone: ✓ Done Finally, I took the original JPG and I extracted the Oort cloud into a transparent PNG. I have included it in PNG image, and I admit it's much prettier.

File:AT-13765_Michaelertrakt_-_Figuren_-_hu_-_6524.jpg

AT-13765 Michaelertrakt - Figuren - hu - 6524.jpg

  • Nomination Figures at the facade of the Michaelertrakt, seen from Michaeler square --Hubertl 00:26, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Perfect. --Steindy 01:14, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for now. Not perfectly perfect, could benefit of a better categorization: identification of coats of arms is necessary !--Jebulon 19:52, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment the topic of this is not the coat of arms, the topic is the figure group on the facade of the Michaelertrakt. But I´m waiting right now for two historical-scientific books (the only ones) about the Hofburg, each for 90 US-$. I hope, I will get the answer from there. --Hubertl 09:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me. Yann 11:50, 24 December 2014 (UTC).
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good quality...anyway Jebulon included two categories and identified the CoA --Livioandronico2013 10:19, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Symbol support vote.svg Promoted   --Steindy 00:56, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Manifestación_contra_la_Ley_Mordaza_en_Madrid_20-12-2014_-_06.jpg

Manifestación contra la Ley Mordaza en Madrid 20-12-2014 - 06.jpg

  • Nomination Demonstration against the "Gag Law" in Madrid, 20th December 2014. --Kadellar 14:07, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeInsufficient quality.Very parts blurred,some overexposed area --Livioandronico2013 22:48, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
    Focus is where it has to be, on the man with the gag. --Kadellar 10:17, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
    Yes, but the majority of the total picture is blurred --Livioandronico2013 11:25, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
    This picture, for example, is mostly out of focus, and it's great. It's called attracting your eye and attention to the part on focus. Composition is not only about rule of thirds. --Kadellar 16:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
    For you is a great for me is the oppose --Livioandronico2013 17:57, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportFor me a well done reportagephoto. --Steindy 18:38, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me. Yann 11:51, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. Sharpness not 100% on the eyes, but good enough for street shot in the crowd. --Smial 15:12, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Symbol support vote.svg Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 11:28, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Barbaros Koyu - Palaiapolis 02.jpg

Barbaros Koyu - Palaiapolis 02.jpg

  • Nomination Valley to Barbaros Bay (Palaiapolis ancient city), Mersin - Turkey --Zeynel Cebeci 21:35, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Halavar 22:10, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
    I disagree, its oversaturated (yellow/green) seems unnatural to me --Hubertl 02:26, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Malaysia_Traffic-signs_Warning-sign-24a.jpg

Malaysia Traffic-signs Warning-sign-24a.jpg

  • Nomination Traffic signs in Malaysia: Warning sign "Merging traffic / Intersection with a minor crossroad" in Kuala Lumpur) --Cccefalon 06:27, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The traffic sign is well made and sharp, but the background is the most part of the photo and this looks grainy and muddy. --Steindy 09:55, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thank you fo reviewing. I know, that there are different opinions about the right choice of DoF, so I would love to hear another opinion. For this photo, I would say, the background is not grainy and muddy, but it is just the bokeh of the lense. In my series of malaysian road signs, I often used this shallow DoF to expose the main object. --Cccefalon 10:23, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Okay, but something in the trees is odd. –Be..anyone 06:10, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
What exactly do you mean with "something"? Sure, that you dont mean the Bokeh? --Cccefalon 06:15, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Exactly, I didn't know that this effect has a name—BG-1. Smile fasdfdsfoiueire.svgBe..anyone 06:21, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Good :) It is not a quality issue, it is a quality feature. --Cccefalon 07:59, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me. Yann 10:57, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Absolutely --Livioandronico2013 18:00, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Some parts of the sky and some further details burnt. Ugly, disturbing bokeh. Longitudal CA (yellow type) all over the background. -- Smial 15:24, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Out of date clock icon 2.svg Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Steindy 00:58, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Udo Jürgens - Der Soloabend 2010 (09).jpg

Udo Jürgens - Der Soloabend 2010 (09).jpg

  • Nomination On the occasion of the death of the great Austrian composer and singer Udo Jürgens on December 21, 2014 some pictures from the Open Air Concert 2010 in the Roman Quarry in St. Margarethen (Austria) --Steindy 22:58, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:34, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unsharp, unfortunate facial expression, resolution just slightly above 2MP.Just had a short look at the show; Steindy is right: He is looking all the time in this way. --P e z i 20:27, 25 December 2014 (UTC) --P e z i 22:02, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm just too tired to fight against the „so well-intentioned“ comments. I especially Christmas and not feel like it. I wish all my colleagues a Merry Christmas and that under the Christmas tree a package with AGF is. By the way, some above (2014-12-21) are two photos more, you can deselect. --Steindy 13:45, 23 December 2014 (UTC) – @ P e z i: I can not do anything for that typical facial expression that Udo Jürgens always wore while singing in his concerts. --Steindy 13:52, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support despite the difficult situation (especially light) during any concerts, its QI for me. You cannot compare it with normal shootings. And the facial expression? This was in fact Udo Jürgens, at this time a 76 year old man. --Hubertl 21:42, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Udo war Vorbild im Ausdruck für Viele, manche haben es aber übertrieben!! Siehe hier und hier... --Hubertl 22:09, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. Somewhat too blurred regarding the image size, but very good composition and nice colors. -- Smial 15:37, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Symbol support vote.svg Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 11:27, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Udo Jürgens - Der Soloabend 2010 (14).jpg

Udo Jürgens - Der Soloabend 2010 (14).jpg

  • Nomination On the occasion of the death of the great Austrian composer and singer Udo Jürgens on December 21, 2014 some pictures from the Open Air Concert 2010 in the Roman Quarry in St. Margarethen (Austria) --Steindy 22:58, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Hubertl 01:06, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

* Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unsharp, very unfortunate facial expression, resolution just slightly above 2MP.Just had a short look at the show; Steindy is right: He is looking all the time in this way. --P e z i 20:24, 25 December 2014 (UTC) --P e z i 22:00, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

  • weak Symbol support vote.svg Support – the only sharp one of this set. Expression is not unbearably bad for an old man singing. --Kreuzschnabel 09:59, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Withdrawn since the nominator obviously did not want me to support. Merry Christmas. --Kreuzschnabel 07:10, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm just too tired to fight against the „so well-intentioned“ comments. I especially Christmas and not feel like it. I wish all my colleagues a Merry Christmas and that under the Christmas tree a package with AGF is. By the way, some above (2014-12-21) are two photos more, you can deselect. --Steindy 13:46, 23 December 2014 (UTC) – @ P e z i: I can not do anything for that typical facial expression that Udo Jürgens always wore while singing in his concerts. --Steindy 13:50, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Do I get it right that you don’t want me to support? Okay, withdrawn. And don’t forget to buy a large AGF packet for yourself. Not everyone opposing your nominations is nothing but a bad guy wanting to hurt you. --Kreuzschnabel 07:10, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Answer: Do so as you like. If you do not understand it, then re-read who was meant. By the way, my photos are the only images that show him in his typical bathrobe. Finally, I think that the photo used in many articles is copyright infringement since no release is here and the management of Udo Jürgens basically no images have been released. --Steindy 13:39, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. Slight overexposure with clipping on his "bathrobe", sharpness not overwhelming, but acceptable. Again very good composition.-- Smial 15:39, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Symbol support vote.svg Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 11:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Steenvoorde - la maison du COQ (1664).JPG

Steenvoorde - la maison du COQ (1664).JPG

  • Nomination: Immeuble Au Coq Steenvoorde.- 59114 Nord (département français)--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Review Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment crop too tight at top Ezarate 14:25, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Thank you. I corrected the photo--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 20:27, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Crop is ok now but it's the picture is tilted --Ezarate 12:26, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Thank you. I've corrected the inclinaison of picture--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:41, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support it isn't too sharp but is acceptable Ezarate 14:19, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Insufficient quality of the sky. --Iifar 19:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Sorry, northern France the sky is not blue often, I added a little cyan ----PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:59, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info 'Insufficient quality of the sky' doesn't mean 'Not a blue sky' but rather that the sky is overexposed. The sky could be correct even with clouds (ex). It is even worse by adding cyan IMO, you should rather try to lower high lights. Gyrostat (talk) 18:32, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done,thank you for your information, I corrected the original photo's prospects and exposure on the sky--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:43, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK now. Yann 09:29, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Out of date clock icon 2.svg Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Livioandronico2013 11:25, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Anas December 2014-2.jpg

Anas December 2014-2.jpg

  • Nomination Female Mallard Duck. Gulbenkian Garden, Lisboa -- Alvesgaspar 22:40, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • There is an existing category for this place, please use it before a promotion --Christian Ferrer 16:00, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Sorry, but a duck is a duck is a duck. This is not a depiction of the Gulbenkian Garden -- Alvesgaspar 17:13, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Yes it is and if you think not thus follow your logic and do not write it in your descriptions (file and nomination!), you know the place so you categorize. --Christian Ferrer 17:30, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose until it’s fixed.
  • To put photos of plants or animals in the category of the garden where you took these photos is very relevant and essential if you know it. A garden or a park contains plants, a category for this garden contains images of these plants. Logic, isn’t it? I have even been kind enough to you to find this category. It's one of the rules here for all of us, when a file has the adequate information so it must be correctly categorized accordingly. (final comments from me for this nomination, maybe see you later on your next nominations…) --Christian Ferrer 20:14, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • I added a category and used this image at Gulbenkian_Park#Features. A duck is a duck is a duck; but we need a duck from that garden to use there. Jkadavoor 04:10, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral ok for me --Christian Ferrer 05:47, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me. Yann 10:59, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unsufficiant lighting, hard shadows, lots of overexposed reflections. Unsuccessful direct flash snapshot with way too high contrast. -- Smial 20:31, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Symbol support vote.svg Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 11:24, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Tabla del tiempo (día 8 tras la nominación)

dom 21 dic → lun 29 dic
lun 22 dic → mar 30 dic
mar 23 dic → mié 31 dic
mié 24 dic → jue 01 ene
jue 25 dic → vie 02 ene
vie 26 dic → sáb 03 ene
sáb 27 dic → dom 04 ene
dom 28 dic → lun 05 ene
lun 29 dic → mar 06 ene