User talk:Mbdortmund/Archive/2011/March

File:Brandt Markenzwieback Portionspackung.JPG

Danke fürs Löschen. Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 07:25, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Kein Problem. mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 15:36, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Main Dome of Taj Mahal Palace Hotel.jpg

Hello, I have adjusted the histogram for the image. --JovianEye (talk) 06:32, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

I changed my vote. --Mbdortmund (talk) 12:01, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Richfields.jpg

Kann es sein, daß dieses Bild oder eins mit demselben Namen schon einmal gelöscht wurde? Ich habe starken URV-Verdacht, konnte das Foto aber gestern nicht anderswo ergoogeln. Typische geringe Web-Auflösung, keine Kamera-EXIF, offensichtlich professionell angefertigtes Portrait. Uploader ist in einem Wiki schon gesperrt und sieht nach single purpose account aus. -- smial (talk) 17:00, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Sieht so aus, finde aber auch nichts. Stell doch nen DR, die Amis findens vllt. --Mbdortmund (talk) 20:12, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Ich hab's mal versucht. -- smial (talk) 21:32, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Besichtigungstermine...

• http://www.wuppertal.de/pressearchiv/meldungen-2011/maerz/102370100000273398.php

Interessant:

Sonntag, 20. März, um 11 Uhr, Manuelskotten

Montag, 21. März, um 14 Uhr, Klärwerk Buchenhofen

Mittwoch, 23. März, um 14 Uhr, Wasserturm Hatzfeld

Donnerstag, 24. März, um 14 Uhr, Wasserwerk Herbringhausen

--Atamari (talk) 20:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis, es ist allerdings fraglich, ob ichs schaffe. Ich melde mich dann. mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 20:50, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

File:HH-110314-19819-Hafen-Alter-Elbtunnel.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 00:20, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

File:HH-110314-19818-Hafen-Alter-Elbtunnel.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 00:21, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

File:HH-110314-19817-Hafen-alter-Elbtunnel.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 00:21, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Mandrill skeletton

Hello Mbdortmund

Vielen dank für nomination in QIC

I didn't nominate this image, because of the unsharpness due to the fact that this image was taken through a glass,

but well, if you think it's good enough, let's play !!

This picture is a VI for the scope "Mandrill, skull"

But I've suggested to Archaeodontosaurus to initiate a MVR with his last one of the same subject, which is far better, I think.

Anyway, thanks again, it's very kind of you !--Jebulon (talk) 00:00, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi Jebulon,

I think it's good enough, let's see what will happen *g*

--Mbdortmund (talk) 00:48, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HH-20110316-11-Peterstrasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments well done --AngMoKio 15:20, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg-20110317-0026-Hafen-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo -- George Chernilevsky 11:58, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg-20110317-0013-Hafen-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 11:57, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 22:26, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HH-110314-19814-Jan-Molsen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 07:35, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HH-110314-19796-Hafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice composition. -- Felix Koenig 20:03, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg-110314-19789-Landungsbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice atmosphere -- George Chernilevsky 16:50, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg-110314-19797-Hafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK -- George Chernilevsky 16:52, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 22:27, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HH-110314-19794-Hafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great.--PetarM 19:01, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 22:27, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg-20110317-0058-Deichtorzentrum-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:46, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 22:27, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HH-20110316-07-Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 21:31, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HH-20110316-06-Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 21:32, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HH-110316-20042-Rathaus-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 20:55, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 22:27, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Landsendcliff.JPG

Hallo MB, ich hab da wohl versehentlich obiges Bild für QI ohne Unterschrift und Begründung promotet. Kann ich das einfach zurückziehen? Fatalerweise ist es auch noch das erste Bild des Kollegen, daß einen grünen Rand da bekommen hat, vgl. meine Disk.. Ich finde aber, daß das Foto aktuell links (File:Landsendtyw7.JPG) daneben kompositorisch besser. Als Handy-Foto ist die technische Qualität leider nicht so toll. --Alupus (talk) 05:37, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Bitte begründe kurz Deinen Fehler gegenüber dem User, ich habe die Promotion zurückgesetzt mit kurzer Begründung. Aus meiner Sicht ist keins der Bilder QI. --Mbdortmund (talk) 12:42, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg-090612-0158-DSC 8255-Jugendherberge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. A.Savin 09:07, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HH-110314-19802-Hafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's rather dull, though nice and sharp. Can you increase the contrast a bit to make the white whiter? Mattbuck 12:54, 23 March 2011 (UTC) How about this new version? --Mbdortmund 18:54, 23 March 2011 (UTC) Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 21:36, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg-20110317-0005-Hafen^-Speicherstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 12:42, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HH-20110316-08-Peterstrasse-cor-Fenster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 22:36, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 12:42, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HH-20110316-01-Landungsbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK -- George Chernilevsky 11:06, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HH-20110315-02-Landungsbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and composition --Carschten 08:35, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HH-20110316-05-Michel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HH-20110316-08-Michel-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HH-20110316-4-Heinedenkmal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI and Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 09:54, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 12:42, 26 March 2011 (UTC)