User talk:Olimar

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Olimar!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 09:09, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tervetuloa Wikimedia Commonsiin[edit]

Hei,

Tervetuloa Wikimedia Commonsiin ja kiitos tallentamistasi kuvista. Vaihdoin tallettamiisi SA-kuviin lisenssiksi {{PD-Finland50}}, vaikka museon sivuilla mainitaankin {{Cc-by-4.0}}. Toisen maailmansodan aikaisen kuvan tekijänoikeudet ovat jo vanhentuneet Suomen silloisten tekijänoikeussäännöksien mukaan. MKFI (talk) 07:39, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nojuu, olen tietoinen siitä, mutta kuvatiedostot ovat suoraan Finnasta ja siellä ne on merkitty CC-BY-4.0:lla. Olen vain iloinen, että siellä on julkaistu kuvia yhteensopivilla lisensseillä – vaikkakin joissain kuvissa on lisenssejä, joita niillä ei tulisi olla (esim. valokuvia, jotka eivät selkeästi ole valokuvateoksia vaan niiden lähioikeuden suoja on jo rauennut). Flickr onneksi mahdollistaa nykyään PD-lisenssit. (btw, en ole Commonsissakaan ihan tuore kasvo ;))--Olimar (talk) 09:37, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cajander I.jpg -tiedosto[edit]

Hei, tuo sinun tallentamasi kuva Cajanderin I hallituksesta on kyllä epäilemättä parempilaatuinen kuin minun aikanaan tallentamani, mutta huomannet kuitenkin, että se ei ole sama valokuva. Ministerit istuvat pöydän ympärillä selvästi eri järjestyksessä ja vähän eri asennoissakin. Tämän huomaa helposti katsomalla pöydän oikealla puolella lähimpänä kameraa olevaa ukkelia. Takaoikealla näkyvässä päivyrissä (?) on toisessa kuvassa numero 7 ja toisessa 28. Kun kyse siis on eri kuvasta, se olisi varmaan kannattanut tallentaa eri tiedostoksi eikä alkuperäisen päälle. --Risukarhi (talk) 13:53, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hupsista, totta, kiitos tarkkaavaisuudesta.--Olimar (talk) 16:12, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Afrikan Tähti board.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan2 (talk) 15:18, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my bad, ill upload it locally with fair-use tag to Finnish Wikipedia.--Olimar (talk) 08:00, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Pihlajamäki 1964.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 02:35, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gaudeamus logo2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 05:38, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]