User talk:YooChung

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Daejeon Expo Bridge arches.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daejeon Expo Bridge arches.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Daejeon Culture and Arts Center.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daejeon Culture and Arts Center.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Golden Maitreya Statue at Beopjusa.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden Maitreya Statue at Beopjusa.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hanbit Tower in Expo Science Park.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hanbit Tower in Expo Science Park.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fira at Santorini (from north).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fira at Santorini (from north).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Daecheong Dam.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daecheong Dam.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Please donate![edit]

At your web page, http://homepage.mac.com/chungyc/daejeon/ , I found lots of excellent photos. Could you donate them to wikimedia commons? I'd like to put them in the wikipedia articles. -- 129.254.186.81 09:18, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

While the images are still copyrighted by me, almost all of them are under the CC-BY-SA license (which is only mentioned in the image metadata). But I've uploaded high resolution versions of only a few of them to the Commons, since I did not think that most of them would have much value for Wikimedia projects. I'll probably go through them again for other pictures to upload. In the meantime, let me know which ones you're interested in so I can prioritize the ones to upload first. YooChung 13:39, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Photos related to the scences of Daejeon, not the animals or natures. Those are invaluable to the articles iin the Daejeon project. -- 59.26.176.239 02:13, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
I've uploaded other high resolution versions of photographs specifically related to Daejeon that I think could be useful for Wikimedia projects. If there is a photograph you would like to use but I haven't uploaded, please point out the specific image so I can upload it. YooChung 11:11, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Daejeon[edit]

Hello,

This project is not the English Wikipedia, therefore rules for the English Wikipedia don't concern Wikimedia Commons. In particular, there are no articles in Commons, and categories are the basis of the classification in Commons. So, some guidelines like Wikipedia:Categorization and subcategories are irrelevant for our project.

As far as possible, a gallery page is categorized only in one matching category, in order to easy maintenance and to prevent cluttering of categories. --Juiced lemon 08:23, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Can you point me to the relevant discussion where this was decided to be a good idea? Thanks. YooChung 22:26, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Commons:Bistro/archives/octobre 2006#Du sens de la catégorie dans certains cas. --Juiced lemon 00:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Hmm, no discussion where at least half of the Commons users could understand? YooChung 05:11, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cheondang Waterfall at Seoraksan.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cheondang Waterfall at Seoraksan.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Daejeon Government Complex.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daejeon Government Complex.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Bomunsan[edit]

Hi Yoo Chul Chung 씨, since you are "not a very talkative person" I do not expect any answer; but nevertheless I want to tell you that I visited & browsed you website, and I found something funny: I am born in Innsbruck, I studied information technologie, my wife is from one of the Yoo tribes (柳), and I walked in the Bomunsan. I intend to upload some pics and when this is done, I will kindly ask you: if you could spare a bit of time, may be you can complete and correct the description, and add a Hangul line? sarang사랑 03:19, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 08:01, 15 December 2013 (UTC)