Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alte Bibliothek, Bebelplatz, Berlin-Mitte, 150926, ako.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Alte Bibliothek, Bebelplatz, Berlin-Mitte, 150926, ako.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2015 at 08:07:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture
Info The Alte Bibliothek (Old Library) at Bebelplatz in Berlin-Mitte was built for the Royal Library of Prussia in 1775-1780 in the baroque style. All by me. -- Code (talk) 08:07, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Support -- Code (talk) 08:07, 29 September 2015 (UTC)- Support Blown illumination lights on both sides could have been more white instead of grey, otherwise it's very good. --Ivar (talk) 10:17, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support Very sharp and detailed, nice HDRi. I was trying to be picky but couldn't find the stitching errors :) --Laitche (talk) 10:23, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- Hm. Maybe that's because there are none? --Code (talk) 10:42, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- There shouldn't be any in an external view from such a distance. I assume you used a pano head but you could probably even use a regular ball head and be fine. :-) Diliff (talk) 11:11, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support clearly --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:05, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support. Very nicely done, although I don't like the grey-white overexposure in the lights. Might be worth using an adjustment brush to deliberately overexpose them to true white. Diliff (talk) 11:12, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- +1 for the lights. I actually wanted to comment on them but retracted before submitting my review. - Benh (talk) 11:16, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for the hint. That was something I didn't see when processing the picture. I will try to improve the colour of the lights this evening. Regarding the WB I'm quite sure that it's good the way it is, but I will have another look at it, too. --Code (talk) 11:43, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support Ya wanna be picky, I'm ganna give ya some : maybe wb is on the cool side, but that's subjective. - Benh (talk) 11:15, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:48, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:27, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support Really impressive. grendel|khan 01:45, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support but with David's comment about the lights noted. Daniel Case (talk) 05:00, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Comment Ok, I tried to make the lights a little bit whiter. I hope you like it better now. --Code (talk) 05:55, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- A good improvement IMO. These bright lights are a common problem in HDR photography and sometimes it's better to just accept that they are blown and show them like this. There's no important detail to see in them and our eyes naturally perceive them as 'blown' anyway. Diliff (talk) 13:12, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support--Ralf Roleček 09:20, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Sky colors are way beyond some natural. Software HDR, I would insert sky manualy. --Mile (talk) 10:35, 30 September 2015 (UTC) p.S. I was wondering, was HDR necessary in this case ? I have feeling this could be done in single shot, and bring natural tones.
- HDR was necessary. The illumniated windows would be blown otherwise. The sky looks perfectly normal to me, what's your point? Do you think it's too bright? It was almost sunrise. --Code (talk) 10:42, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support-- Fenerli1978 (talk) 18:34, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:36, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ 19:39, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 02:55, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:58, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture
