User talk:AngMoKio: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Edg (talk | contribs)
Edg (talk | contribs)
Line 35: Line 35:
C. Hornung
C. Hornung
*{{done}} --[[User:AngMoKio|AngMoKio]] ([[User talk:AngMoKio#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 19:51, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
*{{done}} --[[User:AngMoKio|AngMoKio]] ([[User talk:AngMoKio#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 19:51, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

July 28 - Ney York City Image -
Would like permission to use the followong image in a non-commercial online publication, to accompany a story about retrofitting in NYC: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Manhattan3_amk.jpg You will be attributed with the caption "NYC benefits from green building retrofits". Please email leigh.ewbank(at)raia.com.au to confirm.


==Quality Image Promotion==
==Quality Image Promotion==

Revision as of 05:56, 28 July 2010

Archive 1 [June 2006 till July 2007]
Archive 2 [August 2007 till April 2008]
Archive 3 [May 2008 till December 2008]
Archive 4 [January 2009 till April 2009]
Archive 5 [April 2009 till February 2010]

User page design

Hi, Just wanted to let you know that I liked your user page design and have borrowed some of the code. :). Prashanthns (talk) 09:46, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Panning racecar

Hello! I wanted to use your picture as a great example of panning photography in a lecture course for a student run class at UC Berkeley, with credit given, of course! Nothing will be used without prior consent.

67.164.93.228 06:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC) (apolloae on the English Wikipedia)[reply]

International Photoworkshop

Hello, motivated by the six Fotoworkshops of the German Wikipedia an international Photoworkshop in the Swedish Nyköping will be launched during the Easter Weekend 2010. Nyköping was chosen since Skavsta Airport is a Ryanair Base and very close to Stockholm. Further information can be found on Commons:Photoworkshop_Nyköping_2010. --Prolineserver (talk) 06:23, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DTM Mercedes W204 Di Resta2010 amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --kallerna 14:49, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DTM Audi A4 Tomczyk2010 amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --kallerna 14:49, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New York

Hi!

I would like to use you photo, Manhattan on an early morning, on my soon to be on-line website. It is a travel game for children. I will be selling postcards on the site, but I would like to use your photo only for editorial purposes on the New York City pages.

Please contact me at sopran2000@hotmail.com. I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Best regards!

C. Hornung

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamborghini Super Trofeo 99 2010 amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. Jafeluv 10:21, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DTM Mercedes W204 Green2010 amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 13:35, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taipei 101 2009 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice! Good blend of nature and a man-made structure! --Jovianeye 22:35, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiang Kai-shek memorial 2 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments No doubt, this is a quality image: lighting, colors, sharpness, composition - everything is O.K.! -- MJJR 19:20, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Formel3 Dallara F308 Félix da Costa 2010 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. Jafeluv 21:29, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DTM 2009 Engel Tomczyk amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --kallerna 05:17, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sehr geehrte Herr宏茂侨

ich bin Assistent an der Uni in Taiwan und in Ihrer Userpage habe ich ein Foto von National Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall gesehen. Es fand ich sehr schön.

Ich möchte Sie fragen, ob ich das Foto benutzen darf?

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Alex Hsu

你好 Alex, 我想给你写电邮。 你能给我你的电邮地址(eMail-Adresse?)? --AngMoKio (talk) 13:51, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

to AngMokio : 好的,我的电邮地址是hyhsu[at]dorise[dot]info , 谢谢

Ich hab gelesen du wolltest das Bild beim deutschsprachigen Wiki nominieren, aber hast legale Zweifel. Also einerseits wurde das Bild nicht in Deutschland aufgenommen und andererseits liegt es in Amerika auf dem Server - es gibt also keine deutsche Jurisdiktion für das Bild. Gruß Hekerui (talk) 13:13, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall 2009 amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Absolutely. Jafeluv 21:41, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Crocodile head photo useful

Thank you for your photo "Crocodile Crocodylus-porosus amk2.jpg" my 8 year old son found it while researching Salt Water Crocodiles and has included it in his classroom presentation.

Thanks for the info. I hope the classroom presentation went well :-) --AngMoKio (talk) 08:54, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you see the unsharp areas and overexposed FFFFFF places? The fur is sharp enough. Thanks.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:05, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i think that the whole photo is shaken thus unsharp. The overexposed area is on left side of the nose. Feel free to put the photo to discussion on the QIC-page. My vote doesnt have to be the only one. --AngMoKio (talk) 16:39, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the scape seems shaken, but the animal itself not.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:54, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You should move it to the discuss section on QIC. Then others can also give an opinion too. This seems to make sense here. --AngMoKio (talk) 19:51, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Chiang Kai-shek memorial 2 amk.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chiang Kai-shek memorial 2 amk.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:02, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pagode Lotus Lake Kaohsiung amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Cayambe 19:52, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ralf Schumacher 2 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Cayambe 19:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seat Leon Fulin 2010 2 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I'm willing to promote... once the unattractive upper white oblique band will have been completely cropped away. --Cayambe 08:45, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I cropped it --AngMoKio 19:56, 19 May 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Ok now :-) --Cayambe 20:56, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
[reply]

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Taipei 101 2009 amk.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Taipei 101 2009 amk.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:09, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

St. Paul.

Hi, I am the webmaster for a local Catholic Church. I plan the use the St. Paul image on http:///www.hoosiercatholic.org , check back for the new website within a few weeks. Thank you for this wonderful image.

thanks a lot for the info. Glad you like the photo --AngMoKio (talk) 19:52, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You voted to support this. I can only presume you haven't thouight this through:

Consider:

  • Those that nominate good FPs must wait 10 days to nominate again.
  • Those that noiminate bad FPCs need only wait 5 days (Rule of fifth day closure) or even just 1-2 days (FPX).

This means that the spammers will be able to put out more than the good contributors at a rate of as much as 10 to 1 in the worst cases.

Further, it's not unusual for potential FPCs to get finished in batches. A photographer comes back from vacation, or a restorationist finishes several projects in a burst of enthusiasm.

This proposal would force people to work on a timescale lengthy enough to kill all enthusiasm.

It gets worse:

This gives a strong disincentive against nominating work by anyone but yourself. People who go through and select high-quality works by others are usually to be praised, however, this proposal causes them to be punished.

I would ask that you reconsider your vote, and consider options 2 or 5, which are more restrictions than are currently in place, and which may always be built upon or increased later. Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:50, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Floods in QI

You might be interested in an ongoing discussion regarding QI floods of late, here. Cheers, ianaré (talk) 19:21, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Picture usage

I would like to use this picture for my article on the 2014 Super being hosted in New York on suite101.com. Thank you.

- Collin

thanks for the info. When the picture be online? --AngMoKio (talk) 21:02, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting me to look at this again - I finally figured out why the sheep looked just a little odd when everything else looked good: One of the inks is shiny, and scans much brighter than it looks.

That said, I own the original, and was adjusting colour according to it. This is, of course, a good thing, but if scanners did colours accurately every time, you wouldn't really need me. =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:56, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adam, I uploaded a file which shows a bit what I mean. Here you can see that in some dark areas details get lost compared to the original scan. Btw I used the first time this upload tool for derivative work, it said that a link to my file will be added to your upload which doesn't really makes sense in this case. I checked so far this link didn't get added - we might have to remove it once it gets added. --AngMoKio (talk) 11:31, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've checked File:The Sunday at Home 1880 - Psalm 23 cropped.jpg against the original. The right image better reflects what is actually seen. The details which are more distinct in the original scan are not distinct in the original.
It's not particularly unusual to get some spurious detail (which isn't in the original) in the original scan, before colours are adjusted, though it usually manifests more in the lighter areas, as vastly increased amounts of paper grain. I'm honestly not sure what's producing the effect here, as the details you point out on the left have some parts that ought to be visible with the naked eye if they were really there, and aren't. At a guess, as the scan came out very light, we're seeing details of the paper grain under the ink, which is very subtle in the original.
Also, just to put this in perspective: the spurious details you're looking at - and I have literally compared this on the image - are about the width of a human hair. If you're going to ask about anything smaller than that, I'm going to need a better magnifying glass. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:23, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Formel3 Dallara F308 Wittmann 2010 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DTM Audi A4 Jarvis09 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not bad, but it is interesting that the front of the car came out better than the back did.--Mbz1 21:12, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DTM Audi A4 Winkelhock09 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments As with File:DTM_Audi_A4_Jarvis09_amk.jpg, rear is a bit blurred but otherwise very good. Mattbuck 03:21, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamborghini Super Trofeo 22 2010 amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Motorcycle stunt Schwarz amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some people really are crazy. Mattbuck 02:44, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Motorcycle stunt Schwarz 2 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. ZooFari 21:06, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeppellin NT 2 amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good to me. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:40, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfahlbaumuseum Unteruhldingen 2 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI--Elekhh 00:39, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfahlbaumuseum Unteruhldingen amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice --George Chernilevsky 21:19, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeppellin NT 3 amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI & useful --Ianare 20:36, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeppellin NT amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. --Jovianeye 04:08, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

want to use image

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Manhattan3_amk.jpg

i would like to use this image in a book cover that will probably never be published. it will be heavily edited in manipulation programs. please email me at metreonfuture@gmail.com to let me know if you approve of this usage of your image.


could i use this one as well?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d7/Manhattan4_amk.jpg

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, AngMoKio!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Pfahlbaumuseum Unteruhldingen amk.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pfahlbaumuseum Unteruhldingen amk.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:04, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice new mode!

Herr AngMoKio,

You have a very nice FIFA world cup mode-- 德国加油! But why don't you use 國? :P

德國加油德國加油!!! :D

Frau Ma, hehe

Dear Miss Ma,
'國'是不好的中文. 你怎么不知道吗?:P
Herr大王

Dear Herr 大王

國是对的中文, 国是不对的~hahaha 国是炉国人的~~hehe 你是炉国人嗎??

Frau Ma

Frau Ma,
我不是炉国人我是疯国人!!

Manhattan picture=

Hi AngMoKio,

I'd like to use your Manhattan panorama photo on my work's website (www.actioncenter.org). Please let me know if that is OK and send me your name so I can credit you accordingly. My email is mnieman@nyc.mercycorps.org.

Thanks,

Marianne

HAHA!

施魏因施泰格加油!! 你昨天吃了小豬嗎??:P

from瘋國小馬

我昨天吃小猪,可是我是不好的厨师。

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seat Leon Breslin 2010 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perfect -- George Chernilevsky 08:10, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seat Leon Bebion 2010 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perfect -- George Chernilevsky 08:14, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seat Leon Klein 2010 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perfect -- George Chernilevsky 08:14, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaiseradler Aquila heliaca 5 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Makele-90 01:36, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaiseradler Aquila heliaca 6 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Zeppelin Photo

Hi We would like to use your Zeppelin Photo on a medical patient information brochure. Would that be ok for you when adding your name? Thanks Christian

Hi thanks for your request. can you please send me a mail to . Thanks. --AngMoKio (talk) 09:18, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reuse the photo of Confucius temple

Hi, Just let you know that I use your photo on Confucius temple on our website: bayvut.com.au ( attribution to you). Thanks

File talk:Italy Anguillara 2006 2.jpg

Herr 瘋國人, I used this pic for my article and I will surely credit it. :D Xie xie...

Bye bye! :P

Frau 瘋國女王 xxx

Ni hao 瘋國女王 :) are you writing an article about Anguillara? --AngMoKio (talk) 11:38, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]