Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CN 185 Kvam - Sjoa.jpg

File:CN 185 Kvam - Sjoa.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2021 at 19:47:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:CN 185 Kvam - Sjoa.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CN 185 Kvam - Sjoa.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
•  Info Time to join the Kabelleger fan-club. A stunning Norwegian photo that seems the equal of this author's many other FPs. created by Kabelleger - uploaded by Kabelleger - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support This photo has everything: train, fall foliage, and clouds. Quality is not the best, but very reasonable for a drone. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:09, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 23:59, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 02:59, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Great composition --StellarHalo (talk) 03:12, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:00, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Ivar (talk) 08:49, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:24, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:52, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support per KoH. --Aristeas (talk) 14:09, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 14:43, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:29, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 08:05, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Neutral Wonderful composition, but sharpness should be better. Why not f/8 or closer? --XRay 💬 09:42, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment With the drone I have to keep the ISOs as low as possible (100) and with the small sensor f/8 probably wouldn't be the best regarding sharpness anyway. I think around f/4.5 is about as good as it gets. --Kabelleger (talk) 17:44, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
    • @XRay: it's not the relative, but the absolute aperture which counts. On a Mavic 2 Pro (one inch) you can multiply the relative f number by the crop factor (2.7) to get the FF equivalent. f/4.5 = f/12.5 . It means you'll get the same DOF and quality as a FF lens@f/12.5. And as a happy owner of the same drone, I can confirm the results are very good at around f/4 (not narrower). - Benh (talk) 11:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
      • OK. I can follow your arguments. Without respecting the specials and restrictions of the drone photography the middle and the end of the train aren't sharp enough. The composition is still wonderful and I like the image. So I don't gave a contra vote. I'll reconsider the rating. --XRay 💬 11:29, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:04, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:04, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:20, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:52, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support usual gorgeous composition, but the noise reduction might be a little over the top. - Benh (talk) 11:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:38, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Andrei (talk) 14:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:21, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Milseburg (talk) 21:59, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:08, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:11, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Idyllic Poco a poco (talk) 14:26, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 27 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles