Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Japanese white-eye at Tennōji Park in Osaka, January 2016 II.jpg

File:Japanese white-eye at Tennōji Park in Osaka, January 2016 II.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2018 at 06:27:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Japanese white-eye at Tennōji Park in Osaka, January 2016 II.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Japanese white-eye at Tennōji Park in Osaka, January 2016 II.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
•  Info c/u/n by Laitche (talk) 06:27, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Laitche (talk) 06:27, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:16, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Question Is the background natural? The small feathers under the beak and on the back appear to be coloured blue. Charles (talk) 07:20, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

• @Charles :Yes! that's natural. I did not clone anything :) --Laitche (talk) 07:36, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Thanks, Charles (talk) 12:52, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 12:48, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:40, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 14:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 14:53, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:38, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support How is this not a VI? --Peulle (talk) 22:05, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

• @Peulle : How? Why? If why then it's just a serial number. Is this answer OK? --Laitche (talk) 00:27, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

• Laitche: If I may, Peulle is writing in an everyday shorthand version of English where "how" can mean "why". It is short for "How come this is not...". Also, he is not talking about the Roman numerals "VI" (I see that you use the "II" in the file title), but the abbreviation of Valued Image. He is being kind, meaning that the photo is such a good representation of the bird that it should be a VI. --Cart (talk) 08:23, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

• @Cart, @Peulle : HaHaHaHa! I had big misunderstanding. I've forgotten about valued image at all. Thanks, Cart! --Laitche (talk) 08:34, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

• Yes, that was my point; I think this should have been a Valued Image already. :) --Peulle (talk) 09:49, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Support per Basile -- P999 (talk) 22:44, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:18, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:30, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support − Meiræ 03:05, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:39, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --The NMI User (talk) 07:56, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --GeXeS (talk) 15:22, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 19:03, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 12:54, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 17:28, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Adorable --Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:30, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

• @Σπάρτακος: This one was taken by Sigma lens. --Laitche (talk) 06:04, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:15, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Aesthetic and pleasant. Not the best lighting but still amazing imo. ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 02:33, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /[--Cart (talk) 13:28, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes