Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:P1160808 Palomena prasina.jpg

File:P1160808 Palomena prasina.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2009 at 17:30:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:P1160808 Palomena prasina.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:P1160808 Palomena prasina.jpg

•  Info created by Darius Baužys - uploaded by Darius Baužys - nominated by Darius Baužys -- Darius Bauzys (talk) 17:30, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

•  Support   ■ MMXX^talk  17:53, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose We have very high standards for macro shots, sorry. —kallerna™ 18:09, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very bad image quality, visible even in the thumbnail! What a pity… →Diti the penguin — 18:48, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

 Question What image quality are you complaining about at thumbnail level, do you mean the artifacts around the antenna caused by the wiki scaling software? --Tony Wills (talk) 05:55, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment Not so bad , but quality not enough for FP. Morale support (not as vote) --George Chernilevsky (talk) 07:38, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, we have worse bug FPs than this. --Aqwis (talk) 12:47, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I agree with Aqwis. Jacopo Werther (talk) 13:19, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Brackenheim (talk) 17:05, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Sorry, but what the f... should be so very bad?! I think, it's a really good bug-picture and always good enough for the featured-star. -- Ra'ike T C 17:27, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose While I agree that we have many Featured pictures of bugs that are worse, I also think that, well, we shouldn't. The image suffers from a low DOF, image noise (visible around the antenna) and general low quality in the bottom half, maybe due to overenthusiastic JPEG compression. (And about the bug photos currently Featured that are worse than this: They'll get delisted sooner or later). -- JovanCormac 17:41, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with JC on this one. --Relic38 (talk) 04:59, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:13, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Not everything must be on focus, must be? :O. I find the picture really beautiful.--DPC (talk) 17:04, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Simonizer (talk) 21:08, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --MarisaLR (talk) 09:47, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - good, after second look --George Chernilevsky (talk) 05:25, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--663h (talk) 13:07, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support-- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 08:08, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /TonyBallioni (talk) 00:40, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods