Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Copenhagen Opera House 2014 05.jpg

File:Copenhagen Opera House 2014 05.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2015 at 12:45:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Copenhagen Opera House 2014 05.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Copenhagen Opera House 2014 05.jpg

•  Info all by me. — Julian H.^✈ 12:45, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support - I really like this architecture, I think it looks best at this time of day and the smooth water and lack of people present it in a clean way. — Julian H.^✈ 12:45, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Question - Great quality picture, but I'm not sure about the blue at the top. Would it look better if a patch of sky ran right across the top of the image? --Charles (talk) 14:00, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, you can see here that the tower is quite high, and I don't find it essential here because it blends quite well with the sky. This way, the focus is only on the central front section of the building (which is also why I cut the right and left areas off). — Julian H.^✈ 14:28, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose The top is disturbing. Even when zoomed in it is difficult to understand what that ugly grey thing is. With that cropped, it would be FP in my opinion. -- Pofka (talk) 14:44, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support It took me quite a while to understand what this blue/grey top part was but after having understood I can say that it's a great picture. --Code (talk) 17:30, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Pugilist (talk) 20:26, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Kadellar (talk) 22:18, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support One of those times when an image of a building works both as a depiction of the architecture and a pleasing abstraction. Daniel Case (talk) 22:51, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support--LivioAndronico talk 13:45, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:49, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:03, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl (talk) 00:37, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer 05:45, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support. Very nice, and I agree with Daniel, it works as an architectural photo and an abstract. Diliff (talk) 09:44, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support--Σπάρτακος (talk) 12:28, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support beautiful composition. I think photography is also about showing people point of views you won't expect of a subject. This one is very successful at this to me. - Benh (talk) 19:41, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Baresi F (talk) 23:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:20, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jebulon (talk) 20:48, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Some of the comments above about the big grey thing on the top of the building just show that these people have no idea about the architecture of opera houses. These things on the top of many opera houses have a purpose. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 17:13, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment … but you’re not going to tell us what it is, I suppose? --Kreuzschnabel 20:27, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment go here to see Category:Copenhagen Opera House the thing on the roof top. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 08:08, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
      • I would guess that the stage decorations and curtains are pulled up into this space. — Julian H.^✈ 10:02, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Halavar (talk) 15:13, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /KTC (talk) 00:15, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture