Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Daurian redstart (female) in Sakai, Osaka, February 2016 III.jpg

File:Daurian redstart (female) in Sakai, Osaka, February 2016 III.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Feb 2016 at 08:59:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Daurian redstart (female) in Sakai, Osaka, February 2016 III.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Daurian redstart (female) in Sakai, Osaka, February 2016 III.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Laitche (talk) 08:59, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Laitche (talk) 08:59, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 10:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Nicely sharp feathers. --Rftblr (talk) 13:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - As Rftblr points out above, it's a brilliant photo of the bird. The only thing that bugs me somewhat is the blurriness of the stump in the bottom foreground. If there were a way to crop it out from the bottom without cropping out part of the bird, I'd suggest that, but that isn't possible. I'll tolerate it, but I'd find it better if it were sharpened just a bit, as the presence of a bright blurred thing in the foreground is distracting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:52, 19 February 2016 (UTC) 
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:16, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose I like the bird, but not the tree. INeverCry 18:51, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:32, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support It was either get the whole bird or get rid of the unsharp stump. Since the bird's the subject I can live with it. If it had been me I might have cropped away the branch at left to lessen the impact. But that's the photographer's choice, and I can live with it. Daniel Case (talk) 03:31, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support well balanced Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:15, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Good composition. --XRay ^talk 08:26, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support the trunk doesn't bother me --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:53, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Per Robert. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support I Like...this shot are very rare and not simple --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 13:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:34, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes