Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Egon Rusina Ghialar Istitut Ladin Micura de Rü 2016.jpg

File:Egon Rusina Ghialar Istitut Ladin Micura de Rü 2016.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2016 at 23:16:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Egon Rusina Ghialar Istitut Ladin Micura de Rü 2016.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Egon Rusina Ghialar Istitut Ladin Micura de Rü 2016.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 23:16, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 23:16, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 01:06, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Truly a minimalist photo, in the best sense of the word, and to me, it looks about as perfect as it could be. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:12, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose I do not see a exciting characteristics!--Morning (talk) 04:10, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
• Good shot, but you have to cut bottom to start with diagonals, but in that case might be too narrow shot. I would try just one part - triangle in the corner, with similar compoisition and good diagonals. --Mile (talk) 06:36, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Like I said. ;) Great minimalistic and abstract pic, perfectly executed. --cart-Talk 09:03, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:18, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose too artificial. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:55, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Question - Where's the artifice? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:44, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose Too asymmetrical to achieve the minimalist look; the amount of negative space on the bottom is much greater than that at the top, and a greater fraction of the 7th rectangle is visible on the left than on the right (and it appears that you are slightly left of center). --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:59, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

   Question where are the rules of "minimalistic look" published? --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 23:26, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

  There are no rules, only whether it looks good enough to be featured to me or not. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:54, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Daring. --AWeith (talk) 11:03, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support So it's an exhibit of paintings? Wow ... I thought it was some unused section of a subway station. Which might have been the point. Daniel Case (talk) 16:23, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Großartig, Wolfgang. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:48, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Jee 06:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Hockei (talk) 10:17, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 06:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects