Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stambecchi nel Parco Nazionale del Gran Paradiso.jpg

File:Stambecchi nel Parco Nazionale del Gran Paradiso.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2020 at 09:29:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Stambecchi nel Parco Nazionale del Gran Paradiso.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stambecchi nel Parco Nazionale del Gran Paradiso.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
•  Info created & uploaded by Luca Casale - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 09:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support resolution is a bit small, but very nice picture which I think worths the star. -- Tomer T (talk) 09:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Wilfredor (talk) 12:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support A bit small indeed, but a nice composition, the two bucks are very sharp. However, an exact description of the animals is missing. --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:16, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment The photographer captured a special moment and the composition is spot on. However, I don't like the postprocessing: the heavy-handed selective sharpening and blurring makes the image look overprocessed; upon closer inspection, the animals have a woodcut-like quality. All of this could be easily fixed, though. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:28, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

• Agree, it's a shame this photographer over-processes (example) -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Weak support per Frank Schulenburg. Cmao20 (talk) 17:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support Per Frank Schulenburg and due to the image size. I also have the impression that there could be more editing here as I'd expect but cannot prove it. Poco a poco (talk) 17:42, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:57, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:16, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support But the description could be better --Llez (talk) 04:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per others: Irresistible composition but poor description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:38, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support wow --Fischer.H (talk) 09:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support Quite small but the animals are sharp enough --StellarHalo (talk) 10:18, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:24, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support even if I would prefer less postprocessing, per Frank. --Aristeas (talk) 16:43, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Amir Pashaei (talk) 18:54, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 22:15, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 22:55, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:10, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:35, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose over-processed Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose per Charles; they look like diorama models. Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support beautiful, low resolution, missing exif info. --Trougnouf (talk) 13:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:28, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)