Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:TR Izmir asv2020-02 img57 Salepçioğlu Mosque.jpg

File:TR Izmir asv2020-02 img57 Salepçioğlu Mosque.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2020 at 13:51:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:TR Izmir asv2020-02 img57 Salepçioğlu Mosque.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:TR Izmir asv2020-02 img57 Salepçioğlu Mosque.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Turkey
•  Info Interior of the Salepçioğlu Mosque in Konak, İzmir ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 13:51, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 13:51, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:01, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  15:57, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose CA on highlighted windows. It is blurred in corners (above). --Mile (talk) 16:36, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

  Certainly not true. --A.Savin 16:57, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

• Hmm, A.Savin correct me. Actually King of ♥ just confirmed in comment bellow. But also question for King, so if this would be on 10 Mpx, from some other user which owns "poor" camera, you would oppose, because of less pixels !? I look opposite, this is expensive camera, giving photographers all what needs to remove mistakes, since each pixle has much more infos than would some 10 Mpx have. --Mile (talk) 09:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

•  Support The CA is just not significant enough to worry about, and the corners are fine given the high MP count. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:23, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:49, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support The image would be definitely better cropping a bit left and right to get right of the door frames Poco a poco (talk) 18:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 20:42, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose. Beautiful mosque, but compared to other interiors we've been promoting, I'm not that impressed with the sharpness, and I think that should count. I'll add that I'm not penalizing the photo for being large and judged the sharpness at 60% of full size. The upper parts of the dome are not within the focus. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:04, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Sharpness could be better, but good composition. --XRay 💬 07:29, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per KoH, a big, beautiful, thoroughly impressive file. I don't want to quibble about minor imperfections on something this good. Cmao20 (talk) 11:57, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 13:20, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 13:46, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:13, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:59, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Mile and Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 03:34, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:26, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Turkey