Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Stalin-Lenin-Kalinin-1919.jpg

, not delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2009 at 11:03:53

•  Info Reason to delist (Original nomination): Ridiculous resolution of 0.4 Megapixels. We should have more Featured historic images, but that doesn't mean every single one of them has to be Featured.
•  Delist As nominator. -- JovanCormac 11:03, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Delist —kallerna™ 12:09, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Delist --Karel (talk) 13:22, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep Ultra-rare. Stalin, Lenin, Kalinin. Better variant of this photo not exsist on Commons. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:56, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
  • This. Is. Not. Valued. Images. I'm finding it quite difficult to remain calm these days... -- JovanCormac 16:51, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
    • Ok, my friend Jovan. Don't worry, please. I always strongly respect Your opinion. But this my vote is only my opinion. You recently did nominate this photo - very worse by quality, but too old as FP. And it is good. With best regards -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:24, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
      • -- JovanCormac 18:38, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep Historic image. FP is not just about technical quality or size. --Tony Wills (talk) 19:38, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Delist Per Jovan. -- Petritap (talk) 05:57, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep --Avala (talk) 09:51, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Delist The resolution is indeed ridiculous. /Daniel78 (talk) 20:49, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep Rare historical image. Yann (talk) 00:26, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep per Tony Wills Ter890 (talk) 14:17, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Delist Valued, but not featured. -- H005 23:04, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Delist Valued image, but low quality. --JalalV (talk) 23:43, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep For Tony Wills and Yann. Jacopo Werther (talk) 10:21, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Delist - Historical yes, but nothing outstanding in my opinion. - ☩Damërung ☩. -- 09:05, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Delist low resolution --Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 21:58, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep exceptions have to be made for high value historic content, this one definitely meets that. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 18:32, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep Connormah (talk) 22:10, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep --Mbdortmund (talk) 11:21, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 9 delist, 9 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /Daniel78 (talk) 21:24, 25 October 2009 (UTC)