User talk:Erik Baas

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Babel user information
nl-N Deze gebruiker heeft het Nederlands als moedertaal.
en-2 This user has intermediate knowledge of English.
VG-2
Users by language
Archives

2007, 2008, 2009


Stoomtram NMVB Trooz[edit]

Ik kan gewoon de onderkant afknippen en dan zijn de grootste problemen weg. Maar ik vrees dat een of andere politieagent het beeld toch in de ban doet. De onderliggende website is namelijk een verkoopsite waar onder andere oude briefkaarten worden verkocht. Daarin worden fotos getoond van de te verkopen briefkaarten met juist genoeg details om te zien wat erop staat. Iemand heeft hiervan een printscreen gemaakt en dat in de commons geladen. De postkaart zelf is licentievrij (1910 oud genoeg). Alleen de gemaakte foto van de briefkaart is wel beschermd.

Ik knip de onderkant eraf en ik zie wel hoe ze reageren. Ik heb altijd iets van "maak geen slapende honden wakker". Dat is ook een nadeel van de wiki overleggen: alles is openbaar en je kan niets vertrouwelijk mededelen. Smiley.toerist (talk) 10:12, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Ik had er misschien beter kunnen afblijven. Nu gaat een bot vragen naar licentie, die ik niet kan geven. Smiley.toerist (talk) 10:48, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Het geeft allemaal niet, 't is alleen zonde van alle moeite... - Erik Baas (talk) 13:22, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Ik geef een 70+ licentie. Ik denk niet dat de ze nog zullen vallen opdat het beeld van een verkoopwebsite is genomen. Daarom is namenlijk ook zo klein.Smiley.toerist (talk) 22:54, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Autopatrol[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching RecentChanges to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 00:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much. :-) - Erik Baas (talk) 00:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Terry McGovern (actor).jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:38, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Erik Baas!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 2 July 2010 (UTC)


Do not delete my photos[edit]

the photo i upload was all including with the watermark, is the original one, so there got a name. I can't change. Do not remove it, thank you for your cooperation.Kalon macau (talk) 12:14, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Also[edit]

if you continue to direct against on me, please refer to the following files also, they also have watermarks, it is the traditions on chinese wiki to add a watermark on the photos, but if you go to remove my file, then delete the following files also!

  • File:Carreira_11_da_Sociedade_de_Transportes_Colectivos_de_Macau_SARL.jpg
  • File:Carreira_12_da_Sociedade_de_Transportes_Colectivos_de_Macau_SARL.jpg
  • File:Carreira_15_da_Sociedade_de_Transportes_Colectivos_de_Macau_SARL.jpg
  • File:Carreira_18_da_Sociedade_de_Transportes_Colectivos_de_Macau_SARL.jpg
  • File:Carreira_19_da_Sociedade_de_Transportes_Colectivos_de_Macau_SARL.jpg
  • File:Carreira_21A_da_Sociedade_de_Transportes_Colectivos_de_Macau_SARL.jpg
  • File:Carreira_22_da_Sociedade_de_Transportes_Colectivos_de_Macau_SARL.jpg
  • File:Carreira_23_da_Sociedade_de_Transportes_Colectivos_de_Macau_SARL.jpg
  • File:澳門公共汽車有限公司二十五路線巴士.jpg
  • File:Carreira_30_da_Sociedade_de_Transportes_Colectivos_de_Macau_SARL.jpg
  • File:Carreira_MT1_da_Sociedade_de_Transportes_Colectivos_de_Macau_SARL.jpg
Er, "continue to direct against on me" ?? I only added "Watermark"-tags to some of your images, so they (the watermarks, not the images) can and will be removed by an expert. In spite of any "traditions on chinese wiki", files on the commons should not have watermarks. Please also read this. - Erik Baas (talk) 12:45, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
then, you should also added "watermark"-tags to the images i reported to you. right?Kalon macau (talk) 08:48, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Yes, those and (probably) a couple of thousand others. And I will, given time. - Erik Baas (talk) 10:16, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Just a heads-up, since you're looking into this user's contribution: I just reverted about 50 instances of 182.93.49.243 tagging Kalon macau's uploads as copyright violations solely on the basis that they were watermarked. In the instances where it didn't already have a {{watermarked}} tag, I added that instead. The only one I didn't touch was File:Percurso AP1 da Transmac Macau 2.jpg, because in that one, the watermark is directly contradictory to the licensing. LX (talk, contribs) 08:36, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for explaining. - Erik Baas (talk) 23:06, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

completely different buildings..[edit]

But how would we know that? Please just write a reason next time to convince us moving admins, I for example don't have any knowledge on nederlandish buildings ;)--DieBuche (talk) 21:24, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Right, of course. Even better: I'll try to upload my photos with a correct title, next time... ;-)
Same goes for File:Hoorn, Achterstraat 6 gevelsteen.jpg‎‎: in Hoorn is a "Achterstraat" as well as a "Korte Achterstraat", so that one is also rather important.
BTW, about File:Hoorn, Draafsingel IM012678.JPG‎: that one was not that important, so never mind. - Erik Baas (talk) 21:32, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Tuin_Harinxmastate_Beetsterzwaag.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tuin_Harinxmastate_Beetsterzwaag.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gouwenaar (talk) 05:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

thx for reverting[edit]

I have blocked User:Kalon macau for 3 days. Amada44  talk to me 10:40, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your fast response. - Erik Baas (talk) 10:42, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Sig Rodejong.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:37, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Re: Unknown station[edit]

Hello,

I don't know location of the station in the photo but I can assure it is definitely NOT in Slovenia as there are no such trains in Slovenia and the station building doesn't look familiar to me. Unfortunately the resolution is too low. If it were higher I could try to read inscription on trains which would be of great help. I am also 99% sure it is neither Switzerland as more or less all Swiss railways are electrified. My next guess was Austria but I couldn't find anything relevant on English and German Wikipedia. Then I gave up. So good luck with searching --Ajznponar (talk) 17:39, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your efforts anyway. I think it might be in Czech Republic, because I found some info (and a webcam-picture that seems to be at the same location !) on http://camelive.info/index/index/continent_code/EU/country_code/CZ/region/52/ :-) - Erik Baas (talk) 22:54, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

File:ENI 02101735 ROEK (02).JPG[edit]

Wat gaf je aanleiding aan te nemen dat deze foto moest worden gedraaid? Kijk bij de tekst achterop de roef en dan zie je dat de richting klopt. Dat dan naast mijn eigen wetenschap dat het schip met de stuurboordzijde tegen de wal ligt. (Al jaren zo afgemeerd, overigens.) --Stunteltje (talk) 22:58, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Nee, misverstand: de foto moet niet gespiegeld worden, maar een graad of 2 linksom geroteerd, omdat de camera niet helemaal waterpas stond; zoals het nu is staat o.a. het station uit het lood... ;-) - Erik Baas (talk) 00:24, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Je had gelijk. Normaal valt het me gewoon zelf wel op maar bij deze foto keek ik er vierkant overheen. Het vreemde is dat ik nu een inderdaad 2 graden gedraaide foto geupload heb en de oude foto overschreven, maar zo te zien gaat dat nog niet in één keer goed. Even wachten tot morgen, wellicht moet de server dat nog corrigeren of zo. --Stunteltje (talk) 06:46, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
De eerste versie van de foto hing nog in een cache, ik zie inmiddels de nieuwe al (ziet er goed uit). - Erik Baas (talk) 13:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Ronald_McDonald_sitting.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ronald_McDonald_sitting.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

guerreritoboy (talk) 21:38, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Location[edit]

Hallo. I noticed this your edit. Please respect that the position of "location" info into the "description" field was not a mistake but fully intentional and purposefull. Coordinates of the camera or of the object is an integral part of description of the depicted content. Coordinates have no relation to author field, license field, date field, but it's purpose is to be a precising of the description text. I know that the present graphic design of templates isn't perfectly adjusted to such sorting but the informative purpose of templates is primary, in my view. Thank You. --ŠJů (talk) 21:46, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

But {{Location}} was designed to be used this way. - Erik Baas (talk) 22:32, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Maybe, {{Location}} was designed badly or imperfectly. But the informative purpose of templates has more importance than some erstwhile idea of template creator, in my view. The desired condition should be that all informations about a file are rationally sorted, grouped and integrated. See also this discussion from February 2009, this, this etc. The fact that {{Information}} template doesn't contain location field is an old known problem. Affixion of {{Location}} output at the end of {{Information}} output is not a real solution but only a cosmetical masking. A pointless change from the better form to the worse form is also not a good way. --ŠJů (talk) 01:56, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
I answered your objection but you didn't answered my objections. Do you mean that stubborn reverts are a constructive way how to do with a dilemma between two different views and how to destine which of them has a higher priority? If there is no consensus, no general rule and no perfect solution, it would be proper to respect the rational choose by the file uploader. --ŠJů (talk) 00:08, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Please read:

Erik Baas (talk) 11:50, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
I know that "WHEN two data-templates (such as Location, Information etc.) are next to eachother they merge into a single box as an extra row." But this surely DOESN'T MEAN that two data-templates must be next to eachother. I never denied it. But I can also write:
"WHEN the Location template is included in the Description field then all description informations are efectively grouped together." What is more useful - when information are accidentaly merged, or when they are rationally sorted and grouped?
And repeatedly: I answered your objection but you didn't answered my objections. Do you mean that stubborn reverts are a constructive way how to do with a dilemma between two different views and how to destine which of them has a higher priority? If there is no consensus, no general rule and no perfect solution, it would be proper to respect the rational choose by the file uploader. --ŠJů (talk) 21:47, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
I answered you not once but twice, but you chose to ignore it. Not my fault. - Erik Baas (talk) 22:25, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

毫無雅量的人[edit]

閣下不喜歡他人覆蓋閣下所上傳的檔案,此行為可用華文的「毫無雅量」來形容。T0118163 (talk) 08:33, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Translation, please ? - Erik Baas (talk) 10:18, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
I think what he means is that (he thinks) you are arrogant and stubborn, being unwilling to accept the reupload of your files by others. NoNews! 11:44, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
I see, thank you. I'm not even going to answer him. I think he should know by now why he should not uplad new versions of my files (and those of many other people), that is if he understood these two messages... - Erik Baas (talk) 11:50, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported[edit]

Hello. You have a message at File talk:Moto Guzzi 500 GTV Side 1948.JPG. --Ligabo (talk) 17:51, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Unidentified buildings[edit]

Hi Erik Baas, I came across your uploads recently and noticed they lack description of any kind. For example these uploads, they have no description, no location and no categories. Like this it's not very useful, if someone will find them at all.

Could you look to it to prevent this in the future and/or look back at these to see what you can do to make them easier to find and describe ?

See also here (nl). –Krinkletalk 23:56, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Komt goed, ben nu even druk met andere dingen. - Erik Baas (talk) 00:10, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Värnamobilder0197.jpg[edit]

Please be more specific about the rotation you suggest for this file. You have added {{rotate}} three times without detail. I can rotate it 2 or 3 degrees CCW, but I am not sure that will improve things. Finavon (talk) 21:00, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I can't... Most important (IMO) is the church-tower, which needs a rotation of ca. 2.5 deg. CCW, that's all I can say. If I had the tools I would do it myself, but my old "Paint Shop Pro" can only rotate images by 2 or 3 degrees (no decimals !). Would you please try 2.5 deg. CCW ? - Erik Baas (talk) 23:32, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
2.5 degrees done. You may be interested in the editing software I use: http://www.getpaint.net/index.html and http://www.shiftn.de/. Finavon (talk) 21:12, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
It looks fine, probably because the first impression is good. There is also some lens-distortion, but that doesn't seem important. Thanks a lot. :-)
I already have ShiftN installed, and I'll take a look at Paint.NET, but first I have to be sure the .NET framework does not interfere with Visual Basic 6. Thanks for the hints. - Erik Baas (talk) 23:38, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Pino_Gagliardi.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pino_Gagliardi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Avron (talk) 19:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Please name files more clearly.[edit]

please name these files more clearly. Also, please add more information on the location of these buildings.

File:PèreRochais.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:PèreRochais.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dereckson (talk) 23:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

File:BSicon uextBS2lg.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:BSicon uextBS2lg.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-- Tuválkin 17:07, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Workum NH Gertrudis (3).JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Workum NH Gertrudis (3).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 13:50, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Vector NL.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Vector NL.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 07:47, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Bowie.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bowie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:53, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Dedriegapers 10-03-2009 17-36-38.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dedriegapers 10-03-2009 17-36-38.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 14:36, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

File:BSicon udKBHFre.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:BSicon udKBHFre.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 15:05, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Photo requests in Amsterdam[edit]

Do you take photo requests in Amsterdam? WhisperToMe (talk) 07:30, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Are you in proximity to Amsterdam and/or The Hague? If so, I have some photo requests for those cities.

Thank you! WhisperToMe (talk) 06:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC)