User talk:GFreihalter

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diane from St Georges de Montagne in Musée d'Aquitaine[edit]

Hello GFreihalter, I saw you put on commons several pictures from "Musée d'Aquitaine" in Bordeaux. Did you photograph a little sculpture from Diana ([1]) when you were there ? Could you put it on commons ?I actually work on the french wikipedia on a similar opus (statuette de Ganymede de Carthage) which had been stolen on november 2013. Thanks and sorry for my english ;-). Pradigue (talk) 09:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I am sorry, I did not take photos of this sculpture. --GFreihalter (talk) 09:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Paris Friedhof Montparnasse A. Lhote 1026.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Paris Friedhof Montparnasse A. Lhote 1026.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

109.216.49.109 00:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Paris Saint Séverin vitrail572.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Paris Saint Séverin vitrail572.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

83.204.162.151 23:44, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Paris Saint Séverin vitrail571.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Paris Saint Séverin vitrail571.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

83.204.162.151 23:44, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze[edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Hallo GFreihalter,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Regensburg St. Jakob Eckblatt 836.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Regensburg St. Jakob Eckblatt 836.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Regensburg St. Jakob Portal 805.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Regensburg St. Jakob Portal 805.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Paris La Villette 140.JPG[edit]

Hi, I have deleted one of your files, File:Paris La Villette 140.JPG, because it represented copyrighted text. Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in France. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:08, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rodrigolopes (talk) 01:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paris Bois de Boulogne La Défense 116.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris Bois de Boulogne La Défense 116.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:03, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen[edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Hallo GFreihalter,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

Hör endlich auf.[edit]

Was du mit der Category:Stained glass windows of Collégiale Saint-Thiébaut de Thann durchführst, ist Vandalismus, den ich jetzt melden werde. Warum benimmst du dich wie ein Chaot? --Edelseider (talk) 13:57, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Edelseider, Immer sachte, wollte dir gerade eine Nachricht schreiben. Category:Stained glass windows of Collégiale Saint-Thiébaut de Thann sollten in der Kirchenkategorie sein und nicht in der Category:Interior of Collégiale Saint-Thiébaut de Thann. Fenster sind zwar in der Kirche, haben aber nichts mit der Kategorie Interiors of churches zu tun. Freundliche Grüße--GFreihalter (talk) 14:03, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked soon[edit]

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  português  suomi  Türkçe  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  فارسی  +/−


float
   This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Commons.

Stop editwarring on Category:Stained glass windows of Collégiale Saint-Thiébaut de Thann.Yann (talk) 14:32, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Camera Barnstar Hires.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Danke jedenfalls für deine tollen Fotos. Ehre, wem Ehre gebührt. Edelseider (talk) 16:51, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Category:St. Benedikt (Odelzhausen)[edit]

Hallo GFreihalter, danke für die vorgenannte Bearbeitung. In Fällen wie diesem ist es allerdings besser, die Zielkategorie nicht neu anzulegen, sondern die vorhandene zu verschieben und dann auf die in der ursprünglichen Kategorie entstandene Weiterleitung ein {{Speedydelete}} oder ein {{Bad name}} zu setzen. Gruß, --Achim (talk) 11:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Jüdische Kultur und Geschichte im Kreis Ahrweiler[edit]

A barnstar for you![edit]

Camera Barnstar Hires.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Thank you for your photos of Eure-et-Loir, and specially those of stained glass windows. Freundliche Grüße. Le Passant (talk) 16:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Vitrail Visitation Cathédrale de Pontoise[edit]

Dear GFreihalter, I 'm trying to contact you about your picture from Pontoise's Cathedral (Vitrail de la Visitation). I would like to publish it in a french education book, could you please tell me if it is possible ? You will find my e-mail address and our work on our website www.jaunecitronkids.com. Thanks and regards, FB for JauneCitron — Preceding unsigned comment added by JauneCitron (talk • contribs) 06:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Ellingen Schlossbrauerei Logo 105.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ellingen Schlossbrauerei Logo 105.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 14:55, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland[edit]

Hallo GFreihalter!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter info@wikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

Kloster Irsee[edit]

Hallo GFreihalter, ich habe gesehen, dass du eine Menge Bilder vom Kloster und umliegenden Gebäuden hochgeladen hast und auch die Cats grad aufräumst. Bin nicht mit allem einverstanden, finde es insgesamt aber eine sehr runde und seit langem überfällige Aktion - Danke dafür! Wirst du auch im Artikel arbeiten (ich hab das Projekt hierliegen, bin aber bisher noch nicht dazu gekommen, weil der Komplex einfach so gross ist)? --Ordercrazy (talk) 10:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Ordercrazy, hast du andere/bessere Vorschläge zur Kategorisierung bei commons? Den Artikel Kloster Irsee werde ich wohl kaum überarbeiten, ich würde einen eigenen Artikel zur Klosterkirche anlegen. Grüße--GFreihalter (talk) 10:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Gfreihalter,

Kategoriebäume überlasse ich gerne anderen - die machen mir zuviel Ärger :) - ansonsten wäre Irsee in de:WP ein sanierungsfall: es bräuchte einen artikelkomplex, um das sinnvoll darzustellen: kloster, klosterkirche, aussenstelle des bkh, t4 in irsee und schwabenakademie etc. Material hab ich hier zu genüge liegen, aber mir graut davor,. damit anzufangen :) --Ordercrazy (talk) 11:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Re:El Puente del Arzobispo[edit]

Gracias por la corrección, ya he creado la categoría específica Category:Azulejos in El Puente del Arzobispo. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:36, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Waalhaupten Zur Schmerzhaften Muttergottes Barbara 780.jpg[edit]

Bei dem Foto ging was schief, unten fehlt was. Fehler beim Hochladen, dann bitte einfach überschreiben. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 18:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Danke für die Nachricht. Scheint erledigt zu sein, ich kann keinen Fehler mehr erkennen.Grüße--GFreihalter (talk) 18:51, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Nein, schau dir das Bild in Vollansicht an. Unten ist ein weisser Streifen, da fehlt was. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 19:10, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
File:Waalhaupten Zur Schmerzhaften Muttergottes Barbara 780.jpg, ist die neue Version besser? Ich kann keinen Unterschied erkennen. Grüße--GFreihalter (talk) 19:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Danke, jetzt OK. Wenn du hier unten keinen weissen Streifen siehst, dann lösch mal deinen Browser-Cache und schau dir meinen Link noch einmal an. Das es einen Unterschied gibt, siehst du an der Dateigröße: Altes Bild 10MB, neues Bild 10,15MB. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 19:34, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Jetzt sehe ich den Unterschied. Danke! Grüße--GFreihalter (talk) 19:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Weissabgleich[edit]

Moin GFreihalter, sorry, das ich schon wieder nerve. Mir wurden im Laufe der Vorjury einige Fotos von dir zur Bewertung vorgelegt. Dabei fiel mir auf, das deine Kamera einen irgendwie falschen Weissabgleich benutzt. Die süddeutschen Barockkirchen sind unheimlich farbig. Ich bin kein Spezialist für solche Fälle, habe aber versuchsweise ein Foto von dir mit der Automatikfunktion von Gimp bearbeitet.

Die Spezialisten für solche Fotos findest du in der Bilderwerkstatt. Die helfen gerne und machen das manuell und nicht wie ich automatisch.

Die waren in Hogwarts und können wirklich zaubern, Nichts für ungut! Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 19:48, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Nightflyer, ich verwende den automatischen Weißabgleich meiner Kamera. Manchmal ist es ziemlich dunkel in den Kirchen und dann kommen die Farben nicht so gut heraus. Die von dir bearbeitete Version ist auf meinem Bildschirm ein bisschen grell und an manchen Stellen zu hell. Neuer Versuch: File:Leeder Mariä Verkündigung Stuck 008.jpg, etwas mehr geschärft und leicht heller. Danke für die Mühe--GFreihalter (talk) 08:18, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Schade, ich hätte dies Foto gern unter den ersten Einhundert bei WLM gesehen. Nun ist der Wettbewerb vorbei, Änderungen werden nicht mehr akzeptiert. Ich hab dein Foto mal mit eingeblendetem Histogramm dazugeklebt. Man sieht deutlich, das sowohl die tiefen Farbtöne wie auch die hellen in der Kurve fehlen. Durch verschieben der Regler bei Gimp kann man das spielend ausgleichen, andere Bildbearbeitungsprogramme machen das genauso. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 20:44, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Weil ich hierdurch aufmerksam geworden bin, eine kurze Anmerkung: Es geht hier wohl weniger um den Weißabgleich (einen Farbstich seh ich nämlich nicht) als vielmehr um die Belichtung und Gradation des Bildes?! Auf Grund der hellen Motivfarb hat die Kamera das Bild einfach etwas unterbelichet. Und weil diese Ecke der Kirche wohl nicht ganz so hell war sind die Kontraste einfach sehr flach. Von daher geht Nightflyers Bearbeitung in die richtige Richtung. Sie ist mir persönlich nur insgesamt etwas zu hart: Die Farben in Rockoko waren schon sehr pastellig und hell. // Martin K. (talk) 10:56, 3 October 2017 (UTC) Ich hab auch mal eine Variante erstellt, von der ich annehme, dass sie der tatsächlichen Wirkung recht nahe kommt, und oben in die Galerie eingefügt. // Martin K. (talk) 11:26, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Deutschland![edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo GFreihalter!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über mehr als 20.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 15. Oktober die Gelegenheit, Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu sichten und zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst, die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Gern kannst Du auch deine und andere Bilder in Wikipedia einbinden.

Fotos bewerten »
Bilder in die Wikipedia einbinden »

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an info@wikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(Martin Rulsch (WMDE) im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 9. Oktober 2017)

Category:Verracos_de_piedra[edit]

Category discussion warning

Verracos de piedra has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


-- Tuválkin 14:29, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Linnich St.Martinus711.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Linnich St.Martinus711.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Linnich St.Martinus713.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Linnich St.Martinus713.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Linnich St.Martinus732.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Linnich St.Martinus732.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Linnich St.Martinus715.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Linnich St.Martinus715.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Linnich St.Martinus716.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Linnich St.Martinus716.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Linnich St.Martinus722.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Linnich St.Martinus722.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Linnich St.Martinus723.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Linnich St.Martinus723.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens281.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens281.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:18, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens757.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens757.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens289.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens289.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens288.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens288.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: artist died in 1965, no fop
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens287.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens287.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens286.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens286.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens285.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens285.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens284.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens284.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens283.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens283.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens282.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens282.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens280.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens280.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens279.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens279.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens278.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens278.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens277.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens277.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens276.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens276.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens275.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens275.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens274.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens274.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens273.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens273.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens272.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens272.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter17.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter17.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter19.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter19.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter20.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter20.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter21.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter21.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter22.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter22.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter4020.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter4020.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter449.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter449.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter451.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter451.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter456.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter456.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter466.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter466.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter471.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter471.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter478.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter478.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter479.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter479.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter484.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter484.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter493.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter493.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter75.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter75.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)


File:Georges Clemenceau 01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Georges Clemenceau 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 08:56, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Category:Agilolfingerplatz_2-3_(München)[edit]

Category discussion warning

Agilolfingerplatz 2-3 (München) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


195.200.70.38 06:37, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:Agilolfingerplatz_2-3_(München)[edit]

Category discussion warning

Agilolfingerplatz 2-3 (München) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


195.200.70.38 06:38, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Mamhofen[edit]

Hallo GFreihalter,

ich bin z. Zt. dabei, mir Material für einen geschichtlichen Ausbau der Seite "Mamhofen" zusammenzusuchen. Nun sah ich eben bei Commons, dass Du das Gut letzte Woche besucht hast. Kannst Du mir bitte mitteilen, ob Du einen Artikel über St. Jakob und Philipp planst? Dann würde ich mich bei der Kirche auf einige notwendige Eckdaten beschränken. Der Rest wäre in Deinen fachkundigen Händen sicher besser aufgehoben.

Danke und beste Grüsse --I. Berger (talk) 13:35, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Hallo I. Berger,

leider habe ich außer Dehio (Bayern IV) keine weitere Literatur. Die Kirche war nicht zu besichtigen und ich konnte keine Innenaufnahmen machen, deshalb habe ich zur Zeit keinen Artikel zu St. Jakob und Philipp in meiner Planung. Viele Grüße--GFreihalter (talk) 14:40, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Danke für die schnelle Nachricht. Das ist schade - aber ich weiß, das ist da etwas kompliziert. Man muß zuvor bei der Verwaltung anrufen. Falls Du es jemals planen solltest, bitte melden. Ich kann dann gerne aus der Starnberger Stadtgeschichte, Band 4, "Ein Stück vom Himmel" die entsprechenden Seiten einscannen. Schönes Wochenende --I. Berger (talk) 15:47, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Erlaubnis zur Verwendung Ihres Bildes beantragen: Datei: Merseburg Dom Chorgestühl 187.jpg[edit]

Hallo GFreihalter,

Ich arbeite im Auftrag von Professor Ben Quash und Dr. Jennifer Sliwka, um hochauflösende Fotos und Genehmigungen für ein innovatives akademisches Forschungsprojekt am King's College London zu sammeln, das Visual Commentary on Scripture (VCS). genannt wird. Das VCS ist ein kollaboratives Forschungsprojekt, das eine internationale Gruppe von Wissenschaftlern aus allen Disziplinen der Kunstgeschichte, Theologie und Bibelstudien zusammenbringt. Das Projekt wird eine Online-Publikation mit offenem Zugang sein, deren Ziel es ist, mit sorgfältig ausgewählten Kunstwerken theologische Kommentare zur Bibel zu geben und zu demonstrieren, wie visuelle Kunst selbst eine Form des theologischen Kommentars sein kann. Nutzer der Website werden eingeladen, der Bibel durch Kunstwerke zu begegnen, die aufgrund ihrer Fähigkeit ausgewählt wurden, einen neuen Einblick in den Text zu ermöglichen. Jeder VCS-Beitrag ist als "Mini-Ausstellung" um einen bestimmten biblischen Text strukturiert. Gelehrte, die für das Projekt schreiben, agieren als "Kuratoren" dieser Mini-Ausstellungen und machen kunstgeschichtlich informierte Auswahlen, die zur Beleuchtung des Textes verwendet werden können, die von kurzen, akademisch rigorosen Kommentaren begleitet werden.

Die Online-Publikation wird aus 1.500 Mini-Ausstellungen bestehen, die die gesamte Bibel umfassen werden: die alttestamentliche / hebräische Bibel, das Neue Testament und Teile der Apokryphen. Geschrieben und unterstützt von einem internationalen Team von Wissenschaftlern, die sich der Forschungsexzellenz verschrieben haben, wird das VCS eine wertvolle Ressource für diejenigen sein, die in Universitäten, Museen und anderen Bildungskontexten arbeiten.

Im Rahmen einer der Online-Mini-Ausstellungen möchten wir Ihr Bild von "Aaron vor dem Altar" 1446, von den Chorgestühlen des Merseburger Doms, verwenden [Datei: Merseburg Dom Chorgestühl 187.jpg]

Aufgrund anderer Lizenzvereinbarungen können wir die Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported-Lizenz leider nicht nutzen. Wir fordern: Nicht-exklusive, weltweite Rechte, in allen Sprachen das Kunstwerk / Foto / Urheberrecht zu reproduzieren, einschließlich, aber nicht beschränkt auf Online-, Print- und elektronische Editionen, Bildungs- und Werbezwecke und in allen digitalen Medien, für immer.

Projekt Information: Titel: Visual Commentary on Scripture (VCS). Autor (en): Eds. Professor Ben Quash und Dr. Jennifer Sliwka Herausgeber: King's College London / Der visuelle Kommentar zur Stiftung der Heiligen Schrift Sprache / Vertriebsgebiet: Alle / Weltweit Erscheinungsdatum: Beginn: 6. November 2018

Vielen Dank für Ihre Mitarbeit und Unterstützung bei diesem Projekt. Sollten Sie Fragen haben, wenden Sie sich bitte hier oder über visualcommentaryscripture@gmail.com an mich. Und lassen Sie mich wissen, wenn Sie weitere Informationen wünschen. Ich freue mich von Ihnen baldmöglichst zu hören.

Gina

Foto Forscher På vegne af Visuelle Erläuterungen zur Schrift Und Professor Ben Quash und Dr. Jennifer Sliwka


Copyright status: File:München-Moosach Dachauer Straße 275–287 910.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:München-Moosach Dachauer Straße 275–287 910.jpg

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:München-Moosach Dachauer Straße 275–287 910.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:16, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Sortierung in Category:Church clocks in Bavaria[edit]

Hallo GFreihalter, bitte beachten, die nicht ganz kleine Kategorie ist bisher nach der angezeigten Zeit der jeweiligen Uhr ziemlich duchgängig geordnet/sortiert. Viele Grüße --DALIBRI (talk) 11:07, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Hallo DALIBRI, diese Sortierung halte ich nicht für sinnvoll, wie sollen denn neue Fotos darin einsortiert werden? Üblicherweise erfolgt die Sortierung doch alphabetisch, d.h. nach dem Ort des fotografierten Objekts. Grüße--GFreihalter (talk) 15:41, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Hallo GFreihalter, im Normalfall kann man von den Uhrenbildern in dieser Kategorie die Tageszeit ablesen. Bisher habe ich die angezeigte Zeit zwecks Sortierung als Zahl von 0000 bis 1200 bei den Bilder hinterlegt. Ich würde das gerne beibehalten. Viele Grüße --DALIBRI (talk) 05:37, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

File:München-Schwabing Christian Hierneis 903.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:München-Schwabing Christian Hierneis 903.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sadads (talk) 17:46, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Köln St.Kunibert569.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Köln St.Kunibert569.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 17:47, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Frauenberg(Euskirchen) St.Georg161.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Frauenberg(Euskirchen) St.Georg161.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 11:14, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Bensberg(Bergisch-Gladbach)St.Nikolaus191.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Martin Sg. (talk) 18:14, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Longpont-sur-Orge Affiche 509.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Bopfingen St. Blasius 460.JPG[edit]

#invoke:Autotranslate Martin Sg. (talk) 15:50, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Odenthal St.Pankratius 27Gf.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:51, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Odenthal St.Pankratius28.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:52, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Odenthal St.Pankratius29.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:52, 9 July 2019 (UTC)


Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:14, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Bensberg(Bergisch-Gladbach)St.Nikolaus650.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:59, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Bensberg(Bergisch-Gladbach)St.Nikolaus649.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:00, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Bensberg(Bergisch-Gladbach)St.Nikolaus190.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:00, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019[edit]

WLM-Banner-Bg.jpg
Hallo GFreihalter,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019[edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8313 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

St. Silvester in Hausen[edit]

Hallo GFreihalter, ich habe in Deinem Foto von der Hausener Kirche die Perspektive korrigiert und nehme an, dass Du einverstanden bist. Wenn nicht, bitte auf die vorige Version zurücksetzen. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem ([[User talk:Spurzem|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:22, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Pumpwerk Pasing[edit]

Sehr geehrter Herr Freihalter. "Fragerei" Sie zeigen einige Fotos des Areals an der Planegger Straße 150, das ehemalige Pumpwerk Pasing. Frage 1. Haben sie zur Begehung des Grundstücks einen extra Termin mit den Wasserwerken München vereinbart, oder konnten sie direkt vor Ort nach Rückfrage das Areal betreten? Frage 2. Sie zeigen in der Bildergalerie zum Pumpwerk auch einen Brunnen, haben sie zufällig auch die Plakette am unteren Rand des Brunnens ablesen können, und sich den Text irgendwie notiert? bzw. wissen sie um welchen Brunnen es sich hier handelt? Grüsse,richard --Fentriss ([[User talk:Fentriss|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:30, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Hallo User:Fentriss! Ich habe vor Ort um Erlaubnis gefragt, dort fotografieren zu dürfen. Zum Brunnen auf dem Gelände habe ich keine weiteren Informationen. Auf meinen Fotos kann ich entziffern: "Herrn Hermann ?????? zur Fertigstellung der Betriebsaußenstelle im Juni 1907 (?)". Mit freundlichen Grüßen--GFreihalter ([[User talk:GFreihalter#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:06, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Danke für die schnelle Antwort und die enthaltenen Informationen. Der Brunnen ist von besonderem Interesse, da ich noch nach einem verschollenen Kustermann Brunnenständer suche, der einst nahe Maria Einsiedel, an/vor der Mühle stand, an der Benediktbeuerer Straße, bis 198x. Wenn aber an dem Schildchen das Jahr 1907 steht, kann es dieser gesuchte fast nicht sein. Zu dem "Pumpwerk Pasing", Max Megele nennt es Pumpwerk, er notiert im Jahr 1956 folgendes; Pumpwerk Pasing, Planegger Straße 42. Auf dem Gelände des Pumpwerks wurde 1920 ein Materialschuppen und die Trafostation errichtet. 1924 entstand das Gebäude des Pumpwerkes und 1928 die Garage, Entwurf, Josef Lang. Quelle; (110 C 7, in der Lokalbaukomission München, Baulinien- und Bebauungspläne, Hochbau- und Entwässerungsakten..)
Oh, und danke für die Fotos. Das Areal dort sah schon immer so interessant aus, hatte aber irgendwie nie die Möglichkeit direkt am Gebäude zu stehen. Wirklich prima!. Grüsse,richard --Fentriss ([[User talk:Fentriss|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:16, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Auf der Denkmalliste steht Template:Wd, D-1-62-000-5384 Planegger Straße 150. Wasserwerk Pasing, ein- und zweigeschossiger Dreiflügelbau mit Walmdach um runde Brunnenanlage, mit Stuckdekor, von Josef Lang, 1919-21 Grüße --GFreihalter ([[User talk:GFreihalter#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:41, 1 February 2020 (UTC).

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate TheSandBot ([[User talk:TheSandBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:49, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate TheSandBot ([[User talk:TheSandBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:01, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate TheSandBot ([[User talk:TheSandBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:39, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate TheSandBot ([[User talk:TheSandBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:23, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate TheSandBot ([[User talk:TheSandBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:24, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate TheSandBot ([[User talk:TheSandBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:10, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

Yours sincerely, Jonteemil ([[User talk:Jonteemil|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:05, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Bilder aus der Serie 'Plozévet Chapelle de la Trinité NNN.jpg' vom Mai 2019[edit]

Hallo GFreihalter, beim Abgleich einiger alter Bretagne-Urlaubsbilder von 2012 bin ich auf eine Diskrepanz bei den Bilden der Kategorie 'Chapelle_de_la_Trinité_de_Plozévet' gestossen. Unter den Bildern der Chapelle (mit kleinem Turm über der Vierung) fanden sich einige Bilder Deiner Serie 'Plozévet Chapelle de la Trinité NNN.jpg'. Es stellte sich heraus, das diese Bilder zur Kategorie 'Église_Saint-Demet_de_Plozévet' (mit hohem Westturm) gehören. Die Bilder der Aussenansichten habe ich neu kategorisiert, bei einigen Detailansichten konnte ich es mangels (eigener) Vergleichsbilder nicht sicher beurteilen - auch wenn der Serienname dafür spricht. Nebst der Kontrolle der weiteren Bilder der Serie wäre es natürlich auch sinnvoll, einen Antrag auf Namenskorrektur zu stellen. Dies möchte ich jedoch nicht über Deinen Kopf hinweg veranlassen. (Selber benötige ich jetzt nur mehr jemanden, der mir ein paar Bilder einer Kirche mit einer Galerie um den Turm in 24 Minuten Entfernung zur obigen Chapelle zuzuordnen weiss ;-)) Grüße, --PtrQs ([[User talk:PtrQs|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Danke, da ist mir offensichtlich ein Fehler unterlaufen. Die Fotos gehören zur Category:Église Saint-Demet de Plozévet, ich habe Kategorie und Filename korrigiert. Freundliche Grüße--GFreihalter ([[User talk:GFreihalter#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:52, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate TheSandBot ([[User talk:TheSandBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:43, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Pasing - Am Stadtpark 53 - niemand dort?[edit]

Hallo GFreihalter. Habe gesehen, daß sie das Gebäude so wunderbar eingefangen haben. Steht denn das Anwesen momentan leer? Es wirkt so verlassen. Grüsse,richard --Fentriss ([[User talk:Fentriss|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:26, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Die Villa steht zur Zeit leer (siehe Süddeutsche Zeitung vom 27. Dezember 2019: Neue Büros in alter Villa). Grüße --GFreihalter ([[User talk:GFreihalter#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:59, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Gut zu erfahren, so kann man noch ungestört fotografieren. Danke. Grüsse,richard --Fentriss ([[User talk:Fentriss|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:59, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Hohenwart St. Georg Deckenmalerei 400.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:00, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Hohenwart St. Georg Deckenmalerei 401.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:00, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Houdan Castle[edit]

Dear GFreihalter,

I am writing a local history book about Longtown Castle on the English/Welsh border. Our castle resembles Houdan and I believe they are connected. Would it be possible to use your photograph in the book?

If you agree, the publisher doesn't want to use URLs in captions, so how should I attribute the picture to you.

Martin Cook Template:Unsigned2

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:50, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:52, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:24, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:26, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:26, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:28, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:30, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:12, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:15, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:17, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:18, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:08, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:28, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:08, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Wenigmünchen (Egenhofen) St. Michael Malerei 338.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:00, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Paris 7e Petit Hôtel de Villars 025.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Tzknt ([[User talk:Tzknt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Paris 7e Petit Hôtel de Villars 025.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Tzknt ([[User talk:Tzknt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:07, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Koordinaten gesucht[edit]

Template:Ping Ist es dir möglich, für das von dir erstellte Bild File:Archshofen Kriegerdenkmal 926.jpg Koordinaten anzugeben? Siehe auch die de:Liste_der_Kriegerdenkmale_im_Main-Tauber-Kreis#Creglingen. Viele Grüße Triplec85 ([[User talk:Triplec85|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Leider habe ich keine Koordinaten. Viele Grüße--GFreihalter ([[User talk:GFreihalter#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:42, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Okay. Trotzdem Danke. Grüße Triplec85 ([[User talk:Triplec85|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Paris 6e Jardin du Luxembourg Édouard Branly 132.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:7409:929F:26BE:8481 20:36, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:26, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:35, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:41, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Mehlem(Bonn)St.Severin728.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Rösrath-St.Nikolaus von Tolentino591.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:41, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Niederau (Düren) St. Cyriakus5708.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:43, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:48, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Insul St.Rochus u.Sebastian Fenster632.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Westum(Sinzig) St.Peter Fenster813.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Remagen Friedenskirche 140604.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:54, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Niederzissen St.Germanus Fenster578.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:13, 14 March 2021 (UTC)