User talk:Llez/Archives/2021 (2)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eatonina fulgida, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vineyard cottage - Weingarten 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Favartia minatauros 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thiara scabra, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:33, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vineyard - Weingarten 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ergalatax contracta 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:03, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plicopurpura patula (Wide-mouthed Purpura). shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:28, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Favartia minatauros, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:16, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vineyard cottage - Weingarten 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:49, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 05:45, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drupa clathrata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 05:45, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 03 - Vierzehn Nothelfer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:50, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neocancilla maculosa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:50, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monoplex gemmatus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Ermell 07:35, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Drupa clathrata (Clathrate Drupe), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 05 - Empore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:08, 4 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 14:50, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neocancilla maculosa, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Michaelskapelle, Untergrombach, view from south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Only in scope, good, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 16:58, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 06 - Ikone der Eleusa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drupina lobata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Valvata cristata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:32, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Michaelskapelle, Untergrombach, gallery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:32, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Michaelskapelle, Untergrombach, pulpit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:43, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monoplex gemmatus (Jeweled Triton), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:59, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 07 - Ablasstafel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:06, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Condylomitra bernhardina 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:05, 6 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Túllio F 02:45, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pond - Jardim Municipal do Funchal 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pond - Jardim Municipal do Funchal 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 08 - Geschichtstafel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:54, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scabricola bicolor 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:52, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Porphyrobaphe iostoma bilabratus 01.JPG, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porphyrobaphe iostoma bilabratus 01.JPG. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Michaelskapelle, Untergrombach, indulgence plate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Condylomitra bernhardina, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Drupina lobata (Lobate Drupe), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:26, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Michaelskapelle, Untergrombach, Eleusa icon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 10:24, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 09 - Deckengemälde Michael.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:31, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 10 - Deckengemälde Petrus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:36, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pterygia crenulata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:35, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Potamopyrgus antipodarum, shell with the typical black earthy coat.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:12, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scabricola bicolor, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:22, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Buidhe (talk) 21:33, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 11 - Deckengemälde Vitus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:02, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vasula melones 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:01, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 12 - Deckengemälde Verkündigung des Herrn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morum joelgreenei 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pterygia crenulata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:40, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 13 - Deckengemälde Tobias.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:28, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vasula melones (Gourd Rock Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 14 - Josef.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tylothais virgata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morum joelgreenei (Joel Greene's Morum), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --GRDN711 (talk) 15:42, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 16 - Michael.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:56, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nipponaphera habei 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:55, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 15 - Mutter Gottes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tylothais savignyi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 03 - Vierzehn Nothelfer.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 03 - Vierzehn Nothelfer.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xeroleuca renati, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful, and quite an interesting shell shape. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tylothais virgata (Virgate Rock Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 17 - Michael.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:51, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vineyard cottage - Weingarten 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 06:57, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vineyard cottage - Weingarten 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 10:53, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vineyard cottage - Weingarten 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:35, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vineyard cottage - Weingarten 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:14, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perna viridis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:59, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zafra hahajimana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria --Ercé (talk) 06:56, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nipponaphera habei (Habe's Nutmeg), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mitrella nympha, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ohridohauffenia depressa, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 23:52, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tylothais savignyi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:04, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Perna viridis (Asian green mussel), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Ercé (talk) 05:49, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vineyard - Weingarten 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:20, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Perna viridis 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Perna viridis 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zafra bilineata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:39, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudamycla formosa, shell, pale form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful and used --Andrei (talk) 10:54, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glycymeris obovata baldii 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 08:46, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudamycla formosa, shell, dark form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vineyard - Weingarten 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:38, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glycymeris obovata ssp. baldii, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 19 - Hauptaltar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:57, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 18 - Innenraum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 09:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zafra pumila, shell, dark variety.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 09:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:10, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Michaelskapelle, Untergrombach, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:37, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:10, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:26, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glycymeris obovata baldii 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:48, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 20 - Altarkreuz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:48, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

About {{Artwork}}

{{Artwork}} is more suitable when there is a work of art involved, this allows adding more information about the work in a more detailed way. --Wilfredor (talk) 00:38, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 20 - Linker Seitenaltar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:08, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glycymeris obovata ssp. baldii, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:25, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:45, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 22- Rechter Seitenaltar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 14:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 09 - Deckengemälde Michael.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 09 - Deckengemälde Michael.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 23 - Deckengemälde Wappen Hochstift Speyer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mitrella loyaltyensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:34, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mitrella bellula, shell, juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Ercé (talk) 05:30, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:19, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 24 - Herz Jesu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments That's quite good. -- Ikan Kekek 05:23, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mesomiltha plana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 05:37, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 25 - Regina caeli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:32, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mesomiltha plana, shells.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Andrei (talk) 00:25, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from the Chapel on the Michaelsberg on the Upper Rhine Plain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:46, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Michaelsberg on the Upper Rhine Plain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:51, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anodontia alba 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:46, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mitrella eximia, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:05, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf dem Michaelsberg - Untergrombach 04 - Kanzel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 14:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vineyard - Weingarten 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:38, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mitrella moleculina, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anodontia alba (Buttercup Lucine), fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prunus spinosa 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:30, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zafra obesula, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:12, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woodland edge - Weingarten 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 05:46, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucardium grateloupianum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 05:46, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Metanachis laingensis, shell, juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zafra ornata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:55, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bucardium grateloupianum, internal mould.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Metanachis laingensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vineyard - Weingarten 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Venus nux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:58, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nassarius coronatus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:27, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euplica bidentata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Venus nux, right valve, fossil.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --বাক্যবাগীশ (talk) 18:34, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrene splendidula 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:34, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nassarius coronatus (Coronate Nassa), nodose form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aequipecten seniensis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:39, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euplica bidentata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mahlbergturm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:28, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Microcithara harpiformis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:28, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pyrene splendidula (Splendid Pyrene), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:35, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graphicomassa ligula 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:52, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mahlbergturm - Gedenkplatte 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:53, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graphicomassa ligula 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:09, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Microcithara harpiformis (Harp Dove Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Ezarateesteban 21:41, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:20, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aequipecten seniensis, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Nassarius arcularia 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nassarius arcularia 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anadara diluvii 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:30, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Graphicomassa ligula, shell, dotted form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:43, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Graphicomassa ligula, shell, unicoloured form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and used. --বাক্যবাগীশ (talk) 03:48, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graphicomassa ligula 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:35, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anadara diluvii, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:56, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turriconus praecellens 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graphicomassa ligula 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:52, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mahlbergturm - Panorama 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:52, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anadara diluvii 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fulica atra - Weingartener Moor 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:35, 22 May 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 17:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Graphicomassa ligula, shell, form with flame-like pattern.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:29, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Conus praecellens forma aliguay, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info See also here --Llez (talk) 04:58, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
* Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Graphicomassa ligula, shell, white form with brown pattern.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pionoconus fischoederi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfinztaler Skulpturenweg - Gesichts- und Geschichtslose - Margit Lehmann-Asperg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anadara diluvii, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfinztaler Skulpturenweg - Skulptur - Pavel Miguel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phasmoconus andamanensis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mural painting - Rua de Santa Maria - Funchal 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mural painting - Rua de Santa Maria - Funchal 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Conus fischoederi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:41, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:12, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfinztaler Skulpturenweg - Fangnetz - Gisela List - Karin Siegel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:59, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cominella tasmanica 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astarte omalii 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Conus andamanensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:44, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfinztaler Skulpturenweg - Ohne Titel - Edwin Neyer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO. --Tournasol7 05:44, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cominella tasmanica, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Buidhe (talk) 16:49, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Astarte omalii, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --বাক্যবাগীশ (talk) 03:22, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Buidhe (talk) 04:35, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfinztaler Skulpturenweg - Wachstum - Hedda Brahms.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:33, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pisania jenningsi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:33, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfinztaler Skulpturenweg - Micropolis - Marc Reibel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chauvetia lefebvrii, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:24, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chauvetia retifera, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolabella auricularia 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:44, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfinztaler Skulpturenweg - Hochspannung - Annegret Kalvelage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:50, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astarte omalii 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfinztaler Skulpturenweg - Alo, Alo's - Eugen Schütz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Set Promoted to FP

• 
• 

★ This set has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The set Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Anadara diluvii, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Anadara diluvii has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another set, please do so !

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clavus canalicularis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:31, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ptychobela vexillium 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:21, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfinztaler Skulpturenweg - Caspar, David, Friedrich - Claudia Dietz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 5 June 2021 (UTC) In my opinion the sculptures should be centered, there is less space on the right. --Nefronus 08:29, 5 June 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Very good photo IMO --George Chernilevsky 10:41, 5 June 2021 (UTC)  Done Cropped --Llez 18:28, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfinztaler Skulpturenweg - Flussgöttin - Helena Müller.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:42, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parainoceramya dubia 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:42, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfinztaler Skulpturenweg - Grenzen - Rotraud Hofmann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batillaria calcitrapoides 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:46, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfinztaler Skulpturenweg - Ohne Titel - Günter Braun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:46, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Astarte omalii, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:45, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pisania jenningsi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Buidhe (talk) 22:25, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dolabella auricularia (Wedge Sea Hare), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ptychobela vexillium, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clavus canalicularis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --বাক্যবাগীশ (talk) 06:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 23:39, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weingartener Moor - See.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lampanella minima 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lampanella minima 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:19, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfinztaler Skulpturenweg - Hockender - Anette Mürdter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:18, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parainoceramya dubia, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Batillaria calcitrapoides, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Tagooty (talk) 15:59, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lampanella minima (Caribbean False Cerith), shell, black and white form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:44, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:47, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oliva oliva var stellata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:51, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Modiolus minutus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:38, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Modiolus minutus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lampanella minima (Caribbean False Cerith), shell, brown form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancilla ampla 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oliva oliva var. stellata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olivella columellaris 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:16, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Viriola intergranosa, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancilla ampla (Wide-mouth Ancilla), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Tagooty (talk) 06:17, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:50, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lirophora latilirata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 05:38, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olivella semistriata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:36, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Olivella columellaris, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lirophora latilirata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:42, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:14, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ooliticia meriani 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:15, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Olivella semistriata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used in 6 Wikipedias. --Tagooty (talk) 02:48, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:03, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trepospira discoidalis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:20, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ooliticia meriani, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lirophora latilirata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:34, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Weingartener Moor - See.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Weingartener Moor - See.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trepospira discoidalis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glabrocingulum grayvillense 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:54, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitreola labratula 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High-quality photos (as always) --Александр Байдуков 05:23, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glabrocingulum grayvillense, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:55, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Buidhe (talk) 07:44, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lirophora latilirata, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:47, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Natica subglaucinoides 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mitreola labratula, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:25, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glycymeris cor 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:47, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Natica subglaucinoides, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 08:16, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neverita olla 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:23, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glycymeris cor, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:44, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 07:28, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hindsiclava perspirata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:46, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neverita olla, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Tagooty (talk) 03:19, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turricula exorta 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:54, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hindsiclava perspirata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 07:30, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Modiolus bipartitus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:06, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turricula exorta, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:55, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 12:40, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eucithara funiculata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:42, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 June 2021 (UTC)