User talk:Malber

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "I agree to all of Commons's licensing policies and agree to edit responsibly across all Wikimedia projects. Malber (talk) 19:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC)"
Decline reason: "Declined. I was up to grant unblock based on the provisions made by Mike.Lifeguard. You where told not to relicense your uploads outside the license terms, but you did so abusing multiple accounts. You where told that images on Commons (and Wikipedia) must be licensed irrevocably free, free for everyone and every purpose including commercial use, but you tried to relicense your works to a non-free, non-commercial Creative Commons license. So you not agreed to all Commons licensing policies - not even the basics - and you not followed the request not to abuse other accounts. --Martin H. (talk) 22:37, 13 September 2009 (UTC)"
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(Change local status for a global block)

Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Português | Русский | Simple English | Svenska | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | +/−

It is suspected or confirmed that this user has been abusing multiple accounts.

العربية | বাংলা | Cebuano | Čeština | Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Simple English | Svenska | ไทย | Tagalog | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | +/−

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


And also:

Yours sincerely, Kobac (talk) 19:14, 21 February 2012 (UTC)