User talk:NEUROtiker

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hopan[edit]

Bitte Fehler in der Struktur von Hopan ausbessern: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hopan.svg Am C-9 muss ein Wasserstoff hin, sonst geht auch die Isoprenregel nicht auf. Quellen: http://www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/iupac/sectionF/terpenoid/terp25a.html, http://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=R553565

A barnstar for you![edit]

Brilliant Idea Barnstar Hires.png The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
I'm probably discovering the New Alzeihmer profile !

Research need you ! Hypergnosos (talk) 23:27, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Software for creating structural formulas[edit]

Which software do you use to create symbols of chemical structures? I noticed that many great ones on Wikipedia were created by you and would like to get started somehow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johrpan (talk • contribs) 12:20, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AFAIK he used ChemDraw. --Leyo 23:09, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:D-Galactose Haworth.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:D-Galactose Haworth.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! —Mykhal (talk) 16:50, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Category:L-Amino_acids_physiological[edit]

Category discussion warning

L-Amino acids physiological has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Wostr (talk) 20:42, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]