User talk:Sarah(83)

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Sarah(83)!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 09:43, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Laboratories.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Laboratories.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

XenonX3 (talk) 16:54, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Catty und Holzberg.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

XenonX3 (talk) 16:55, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Heidelberg College um 1900.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

XenonX3 (talk) 16:55, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Zu den Bildern mit Heidelberg-College-Bezug

[edit]

Hallo, Sarah, hier mal konkret:

  • Die beiden Wappenbilder Wappen des Neuenheim College.jpg und Wappen Heidelberg College.jpg sind relativ unkritisch. Sie sind offensichtlich schon so alt, dass sie als gemeinfrei gelten können. Ich habe bei beiden entsprechende Änderungen durchgeführt. Es wäre trotzdem nützlich, soweit möglich, die Erschaffer und das Datum der Kreation herauszufinden. Du hättest beide Wappen in Deinem Artikelentwurf lassen können.
  • Das Bild Heidelberg College 2017.jpg ist bisher von niemandem in Frage gestellt worden, das hättest Du ebenso im Artikelentwurf lassen können. Ich hoffe, Du hast es nur aus übergroßer Vorsicht herausgenommen. Solltest Du auch hier nicht die Fotografin sein, dann müsste vom Originalfotografen eine Freigabe erfolgen. Mehr dazu auf Nachfrage. Du könntest übrigens auch das unabhängig hochgeladenene Foto eines anderen Autoren nutzen: Heidelberg Neckarufer Stadthäuser IMG 1474.jpg.
  • Schwierig sind die drei Bilder Catty und Holzberg.jpg, Heidelberg College um 1900.jpg und Historical Heidelberg College Laboratories.jpg (letztere Datei von mir so umbenannt, ursprünglich Laboratories.jpg). Du bist auf keinen Fall die Fotografin der Originale, deshalb kann auch die Lizenz nicht stimmen; vermutlich sind die Bilder aber sogar gemeinfrei – das hängt davon ab, wann der Fotograf gestorben ist. Ist kein Fototgraf angegeben und man kann ihn auch nicht mehr herausfinden, dann gelten die Bilder als anonymes Werk, was sie bei dem Alter auch gemeinfrei macht. Aber auch das Datum stimmt definitiv überhaupt nicht. Das müsste gelichfalls geändert werden; das Datum scheint ja irgendwann um 1900 herum zu sein, das könnte man so eintragen. Laut Deinem Entwurf ist klar, dass das Direktorenbild vor 1914 entstanden sein muss. Bitte recherchiere alles so gut, wie irgend möglich.

— Speravir – 21:41, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]