User talk:Seraphimblade

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Leave new messages at the bottom.

File:Official Aam Aadmi Party logo from their website.png

[edit]
File:Official Aam Aadmi Party logo from their website.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 22:57, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Official Aam Aadmi Party logo from their website.png

[edit]
File:Official Aam Aadmi Party logo from their website.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 13:23, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Jayarathina (talk) 08:11, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Geo Swan

[edit]

Apologies for leaving this here, but since I am blocked on Wikipedia, I can't reply directly to Geo Swan's accusation there. Geo Swan is barely able to edit articles about boats without making mistakes and should have been blocked from editing any BLPs years ago. Based on what I've seen, he has at least one wikistalker, but takes any revert by an IP to be evidence of harassment and justification for edit warring. I have absolutely no idea why Geo Swan would assume that I had anything to do with this ANI comment. That wasn't me. Feel free to ask a Commons checkuser to confirm. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 23:33, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

There should be no reason to delete the logo. It is not in violation of any copyright. I am the original designer of the logo, and it was gifted to the borough for the borough's use. I would like to request that it be put back as it is the official town seal.

Thanks!

Hello Dpetersen65, unfortunately it looks like that claim is not verifiable. You'll need to send in evidence of permission/ownership as detailed here. Once the confirmation takes place, someone can undelete the file for you. Seraphimblade (talk) 15:33, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked my account

[edit]

What was the reason for you to block the account of Teak11? You’re completely misinformed on the topic I’ve been trying to create a Wiki page for. The block is unfair and unreasonable. Either you’re completely bored and mean as a person. Remove the block immediately so that I can make corrections to the page I’m working on. Teak11 (talk) 05:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to think an awful lot of people are misinformed. If you wish to appeal the block, the block message contains instructions on how to do so. Seraphimblade (talk) 05:42, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For your information I did appeal your block, however I was informed that it's only up to you to remove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teak11 (talk • contribs) 09:29, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know where or how you tried to do that, but you have never placed an unblock template on your English Wikipedia talk page. While it is true that I can remove the block, any other admin who reviews your request also could do so. Please handle your appeal there, not on Commons. If you intend to return to editing about the same individual, I will not lift the block. Seraphimblade (talk) 13:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rossy's Art & Crafts Picture

[edit]

The picture which I took in 2020, it is not copyright because I am the one who took the photo. This is just confusing the fact that it is my picture and it is considered copyright? from who? I don't think I can give myself credits when I already have the credits... — Preceding unsigned comment was added by an unspecified IP address (talk) 19:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

142.196.61.197, you will need to confirm that you are the copyright holder of the photograph via Commons:OTRS. Seraphimblade (talk) 19:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hey! I see that you have marked my image as copyrighted and as the owner being balkancar.org. I am the owner of this image and I am able to use this. That is also why I have written that no one else may use this image without permission from balkancar.org WikiFan202 (talk) 19:56, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiFan202, please see Commons:Licensing. Wikimedia Commons accepts only media which is licensed under a free license, such as the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike, which permits anyone to reuse the image for any purpose. If you are not willing to grant those permissions for the image, it cannot be hosted here. Seraphimblade (talk) 19:58, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright I see thanks for the information! I will look into it. WikiFan202 (talk) 20:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi What copyright infringements is my file infringing. it's a HDPACK for Mesen Emulator, it's not an actual original assets of Super Mario Bros, they Are HDPACKS made by modders by Redesigning everything. Please have a look This is the Original Version https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgqTmKZ4-UA

This is the HDPACK MODS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNQChRa8KxA HDPACK are images made by fans on photoshop redesigned KaderRocket (talk) 01:36, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

KaderRocket, the issue is not whether you made the changes. Rather, the issue is one of being a derivative work of Super Mario Brothers. When you license an image here under the CC-BY-SA license, you are telling reusers that they may modify and reuse the material in any way they like, including commercial and for-profit purposes. Since you do not, presumably, own the rights to the Super Mario Brothers franchise, you do not have the authority to grant people such rights. And unless you had their permission to make the modified graphics package, the derivative is itself a copyright infringement, which certainly cannot be hosted here. Seraphimblade (talk) 01:48, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay we have to just delete the file then KaderRocket (talk) 05:36, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.


Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:15, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Seraphimblade&oldid=944231946"