User talk:Ahonc/Archives/January 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Files to check

Hi Ahonc, You restored some images: File:Ziemia Polska w piesni 351.jpg, File:Ziemia Polska w piesni 350.jpg, File:Ziemia Polska w piesni 349.jpg, File:Ziemia Polska w piesni 313.jpg, File:Ziemia Polska w piesni 314.jpg, File:Ziemia Polska w piesni 308.jpg, File:Ziemia Polska w piesni 231.jpg, File:Ziemia Polska w piesni 215.jpg, File:Ziemia Polska w piesni 109.jpg. Probably because the deletion tag was not removed from the pages, the files are deleted again. Can you check if these files should be deleted or undeleted? Romaine (talk) 03:55, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

цей файл потрібно вилучити. оригінальний текст при завантаженні:

{{Зображення
|Назва=Стадіон
|Опис=Головна Футбольна арена Халимонова =)
|Автор=
|Джерело=
|Час створення=
|Ліцензія=
}}

потім було редагування BotCat-а, а потім редагування френда:

{{Зображення
|Назва= Кінно-спортивний комплекс у Халимоновому
|Опис= Кінно-спортивний комплекс у Халимоновому
|Автор=[[Користувач:SemyonX|SemyonX]]
|Джерело=
|Час створення= 2010
|Ліцензія= {{PD-author|[[Користувач:SemyonX|SemyonX]]}}
}}

до перенесення файл поставив User:Максим Підліснюк, а я поставила шаблон про відсутність ліцензії. оскільки я забулася прийняти шаблон про перенесення, бот його переніс. вікіпоштою писала користувачеві, але він не відповів мені досі. у будь-якому випадку файл без ліцензії --アンタナナ 16:11, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Template:ISOdate

Hello, Ahonc/Archives. You have new messages at Jarekt#Template:ISOdate's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

--Jarekt (talk) 02:17, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Видубицький монастир-3.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Видубицький монастир-3.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:08, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Coppauefa.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 17:31, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Greta Garbo Portret 1936.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

We hope (talk) 22:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Which part do you not understand?

Source = {{own}} = Own photograph

Author = Pkravchenko

I suggest that you remove your "edit" which I regard as vandalism, or I will make a complaint against your unsubstantiated and possibly politically motivated vandalism. Pkravchenko (talk) 11:46, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Ok, make complaint.--Anatoliy (talk) 12:11, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Maybe you don't understand plain English - I asked you a question first - so please answer this. In other words, please supply your rationale for making an evidently false claim that I have not provided a source or author in the image. Pkravchenko (talk) 02:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Own photograph of picture is not always free, see COM:DW.--Anatoliy (talk) 12:55, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
I fully understand what a derivative work is - as you should appreciate - given the Wiki principle of "good faith". As I have labelled the photo correctly - in accordance with Commons requirements, including "Source" and "Author" and a detailed and accurate description of the content, date and context of the photo — on what basis have you made the extraordinary claim that "This media file is missing essential source information"? Please provide your explanation for your incredible action in making such an unsupported assertion and your threat to delete this photo. --Pkravchenko (talk) 23:50, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
From description I understand that it is photo of painting by Michael Sadowskyj, but when Sadowskij died? Are his works in PD now?--Anatoliy (talk) 23:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Does this look like a painting? I don't mind if your English is not very good - but please do no delete photos when you do not understand fully the text accompanying images! The text clearly states that the photo was taken at an event where the Cardinal was presented with a painting (
йому подарували картину
) in the larger photo (of which this is only a cropped detail). The non-visible painting has nothing to do with this particular photo. I would have preferred to also upload the larger photo, but as it shows someone else's painting, I would have to seek out the copyright owner of the painting to get their permission to use it on Commons. I have added some text to help clarify this, including text in Ukrainian. Pkravchenko (talk) 06:50, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Well, you claim that it is your own photo of cardinal, so how old are you?--Anatoliy (talk) 09:46, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for correcting the Ukrainian grammar in the information section - I do appreciate this as Ukrainian is my second language. Unless it is specific Wikipedia/Commons policy of demanding birth certificates from anyone who has taken a photo from 1968, I feel that at this stage I will politely decline answering your question. Instead of wasting more time on this, I think that it would be more profitable for both you and I to continue our other creative work on Wikipedia/Commons, rather than continue on a personal struggle for self-righteous justification. --Pkravchenko (talk) 10:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Маленькі трагедії Врубель.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

1989 16:58, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Пам'ятна дошка Миколі Лемику.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ymblanter (talk) 06:58, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Повістка до воєнкомату.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anatoliy (talk) 17:00, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

I am not any original uploader, so never place your warning boxes at my (or somebody's) discussion page without checking the real source of the image, please. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 18:38, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Script for DR-nominations warns all uploaders of image.--Anatoliy (talk) 18:40, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Volodymyr Biletskyy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:57, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, INeverCry 04:19, 26 January 2015 (UTC)