User talk:Alchemist-hp/Archive/2013
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Algarve Portugal Cabo de Sao Vicente Letzte Bratwurst vor Amerika.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
- This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:38, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:35, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
- Hallo Heinrich, ich hab durch Zufall bermerkt, dass du 2 Stimmen bei der POTY-Wahl abgegeben hast, ich dachte ich informiere dich mal, vielleicht ist da was schief gelaufen. Nicht das du eine Stimme gestrichen bekommst die du nicht willst. VG Stefan --Ritchyblack (talk) 08:05, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- Ups, tatsächlich. Habe es korrigiert. Muss wohl ein Scriptfehler sein. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:31, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012-02-23-Fotoflugkurs Cuxhafen HP L9326 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
- This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oryx gazella male 8054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
- This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
What is that?
Can you explain to me what is that?--Spillik (talk) 10:39, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- Ups, sorry a false touch on my smartphone :-( --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:54, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hafnium pellets with a thin oxide layer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
- This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rhodium 78g sample.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
- This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello Alchemist-hp, thanks to have reviewed my picture on FPC, I've brightened the sky and think it's a bit better, and you what do you think about it? -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:05, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
potd
Guten Abend, eigentlich interessiert es mich normalerweise nicht, aber da ich fuer is.wikty die POTD fuer die Hauptseite stets aktualisiere, bin ich beim Dezember 2013 auf dieses hier gestolpert. Ich verstehe nicht, wie ein solchermaszen verunstaltetes Bild ein POTD werden konnte. Warum ich Dich kontaktiere ist, weil Du die Vorlage fuer Dezember 2013 erstelltest, vielleicht ist Dir ein Fehler unterlaufen? Falls nicht, wundere ich wirklich, wie auch immer, lG. und noch einen schönen Restsonntag, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 20:23, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- Laut Versionsgeschichte hast Du die Vorlage erstellt, es ist Nr. 15, ich aendere da gar nix, da ich mich damit nicht auskenne und auch nicht auskennen will, lG., --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 20:35, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- Ah, verstehe. Ich habe nur den Monat Dez. 2013 angelegt, nicht den: Tag: 15.12.2013. Ich ändere das mal. Habe selbst noch ein FP Bild, das noch kein POTD war ;-) Grüße, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:42, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Bay Psalm Book
Hi,
This is a very rare book (only 11 copies still known), which is one of the criteria for a FP, and a high resolution scan. So I don't understand your critic. Could you please explain? Yann (talk) 16:47, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
German Wikipedia FP
Hi Alchemist-hp,
I wanted to nominate a second image for German Wikipedia FP but could not find instructions on whether this is allowed or not with one already being reviewed. Thanks-Godot13 (talk) 00:42, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Godot13,
- it is always allowed to nominate an image from all. Please use the function: "Neuen Kandidaten einstellen". A voting from the image owner for the German (FP) KEB-side usual: {{Eigennominierung}} similar to {{Neutral}}. It is also desirable to have a good German description Done and a use in the German Wikipedia Done. Best regards, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:42, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Many thanks for the German translation of the information and the instructions.-Godot13 (talk) 16:38, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- You're welcome :-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:11, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello Alchemist-hp, thanks for your opinion, I've uploaded a new version of this file. --Christian Ferrer 14:48, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for having changed your vote but I just try to improve my technique. I have still downloaded new versions for these both files, so if you have ideas, do not hesitate. --Christian Ferrer 17:13, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- I told it too: perhaps "the golden hour" with their unfavorable colors is the main problem?! I can't told it more exact what's wrong. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:36, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Request for help
Thank you for your helpful comments at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Streisand Estate.jpg/2.
Perhaps you could help me please?
Are you good with image editing?
Maybe you could upload it under a different name like File:Streisand Estate edited.jpg, to correct for:
- Tilting, and
- Image curve tonality correction
??
Or maybe you can suggest another Wikimedia Commons user who is good at editing images in that way?
Thank you for your time,
-- Cirt (talk) 17:29, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps you could see the comment by Christoph Braun at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Streisand Estate.jpg/2 and adjust the image File:Streisand Estate edit.jpg with that in mind? -- Cirt (talk) 23:45, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 21:49, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- I don't understand this, these images are already w:WP:Featured Picture quality on three (3) different language Wikipedias and in use on many other language Wikipedias, this nomination seems quite silly, -- Cirt (talk) 22:03, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
2014 !
* * * 2014! * * * | |
Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:07, 22 December 2013 (UTC) |
- Thank you, for you too George. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:16, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
- This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
HDR Tone mapping
Hi Alchemist- I've noticed that you use HDR tone mapping in some of your images. I use CS6 which has a HDR feature. I've just started to experiment (not yet even saving any images) and some images look better and some worse. Are there any criteria you use to determine which images (scenes) would benefit from HDR? Many thanks in advance--Godot13 (talk) 23:58, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Godot13,
- please take a look here: HDR. I don't know more ... I'm still experimenting too. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 01:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- And I use Photomatix for better results of HDR/Tonemapping images. I tested a lot of other software, but for my taste: Photomatix have the best results. Regards, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 09:38, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info.--Godot13 (talk) 04:46, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:58, 28 October 2014 (UTC)