User talk:Benh/Archive/2012

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Greetings[edit]

Hi Benh! It is very nice of you and other wikiusers to "welcome" new users like me. It has been nice to join you guys and I have felt encouraged and inspired by your excellent work in the Wikipedia. It really makes you feel part of something big and important. I certainly will stay around for some time, also keeping in mind how little high-quality material is found from my country, which means I have some important job to do there. Thanks for the greetings, I wish you and your family all the best, have a great 2012! --Paolo Costa (talk) 15:36, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012[edit]

Monsieur Citron,

j'apprécie souvent tes nominations sur la page FPC qui sortent de l'ordinaire. Il fallait bien le dire. J'en profite du coup pour souhaiter que ça continue, et qu'en 2012, tu resteras en bonne santé pour passer de bons moments avec les personnes que tu aimes. Et que la crise t'épargne ! - Benh (talk) 20:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Salut M. Benh !
Content que mes nominations te plaisent, c'est un vrai plaisir de trouver des pépites et de les partager. J'espère aussi pouvoir continuer malgré mes impératifs ! Quant à toi, continue de nous montrer tes super clichés des quatre coins du monde ! Mais surtout ceux de ma ville, Paris ! Bonne année à toi et tes proches. Amicalement--Citron (talk) 13:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Greetings[edit]

Hi Benh, my family and friends have commended my photographs but getting compliments from a photographer of your stature is something. Thanks for the greetings and I wish you the same. I miss your panos and I hope more will be coming :) --Muhammad (talk) 16:20, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Louvre_2007_02_24_c.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Convivial94 (talk) 22:26, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

permission to use your eiffel tower picture[edit]

Hi. I ask your permission to use your eiffel tower pic in a print and online publication. Would you like to be acknowledged and how? I am submitting the picture as an illustration to the Journal of Hand Surgery. Regards. Shafic Sraj , MD please reply to this email- shaficsrajmd@gmail.com

Your photo in the WMF annual report[edit]

Hi Benh,

as you may have noticed, one of your photos has been used in the recently published annual report of the Wikimedia Foundation (also in the summary version that was translated into six languages). Printed copies of the report have since become available, and we would be happy to send you one as a thank-you for your work - let me know your postal address by email if you would like us to do so!

Regards, Tbayer (WMF) (talk) 02:55, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Foundation Blog Feature[edit]

Hi Benh,

My name is Elaine and I'm a communications intern with the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco. We're starting a new feature on the Foundation blog to profile the photographers behind the beautiful photos that become Picture of the Day (POTD) on the Commons home page. Given that your photo is scheduled for 3 April 2012, we'd love to do a short interview with you either by phone, Skype, or email to discuss your work and your POTD.

If you're interested, please let me know by email at communicationsintern@wikimedia.org.

Thanks,

Elaine CommIntern (talk) 19:51, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise St Vaast Wikimedia Commons.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks very good IMO. --ArildV 11:50, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St-Vaast Phare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit of noise in the sky, but acceptable and nice composition --Poco a poco 09:50, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hunting Cheetah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Is the scientific latin ID a mandatory only for plants, among the living species ? Clin --Jebulon 23:08, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Scientific names are only really mandatory in the categorization of the image. For the interested parties: this is an Acinonyx jubatus. Clin. Biopics 07:11, 7 June 2012 (UTC). Obvious QI to me.--Jebulon 16:34, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Hi Behn. I like your v high res panorama of this cirque. I like the new crop with the roads and mountains forming diagonals with the corners. But I have a couple of questions. Firstly, I see the colours are quite different from the previous versions. They appear quite (possibly too) vivid to me. What is your recollection? Was the original duller than reality? Secondly, some of the houses, poles and trees are not absolutely vertical (the centre is fine). What perspective did you use? Have you tried one that preserves verticals? Did you supply vertical control points to Hugin? The slightly sloping walls aren't a deal-breaker to me as the subject is the landscape, not the houses, and any perspective is going to have some distortion. Cheers, Colin (talk) 19:27, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Colin, yes, I set the colours to a much warmer tone and pushed the saturation a bit farther. Not sure this is more faithful to reality, but not unrealistic I think, and far more to my tastes :). The lighting was very harsh and vertical (was taken around noon if I'm right), so the first versions are certainly too dull. Truth is certainly between the two versions. As for the projection, it's a rectilinear. I could set the viewpoint to keep the verticals so (I would have to direct it to somewhere above the cascade), but I'm not sure this would improve this much. If I had more time, I would try, but right now it's hard (don't even have time to get rid of the stains in the sky). At least the middle part is vertical, so I think it's OK. Thanks for the useful review. I'll keep this aside for a rainy weekend ;) - Benh (talk) 20:48, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've just noticed you have an even larger version with more detail. Amazing. How many shots composed this image? I'm not sure I understand your comment about viewpoint. I'm still learning about how best to use Hugin and projections. I've been setting vertical control points on each component image, as I find that makes them align even better and saves trying to fix the final image. For my recent pic File:King's Cross Station Euston Road 2012-05-27.jpg I was happy to get straight verticals all over as a result. I first tried a rectilinear projection, as it is just within the limits of that projection, but it stretched the vehicles and people at the edges, making them fatter/shorter. So I chose a cylindrical projection. On a different picture (not uploaded as it had paralax problems) I've been playing with the Panini General projection, which has the interesting property of keeping-straight the verticals and also any diagonals coming from a centre-point of perspective. Lots to learn... Colin (talk) 22:15, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

POTD[edit]

Hi Ben,

Congratz with the POTD today. I have enjoyed watching it a lot several times today. It is truly a magnificent shot!

Best wishes, --Slaunger (talk) 21:58, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photo usage[edit]

Hello :-) I just wanted to say "Thank you very much" for your pictures:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pha_That_Luang_Vientiane_Laos_Wikimedia_Commons.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cote_Emeraude_Fort_La_Latte.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cappadocia_Chimneys_Wikimedia_Commons.jpg


My name is Daniel, i used those pictures in my little "travel around the world" puzzle game for android.

When a player sees one of your images (when completing a level) there is a short sentence describing the location visible on your panorama and also you are credited directly as "Photographer". Hopefully you are fine with that, if you want any changes please contact me directly. :-)

2012-08-09 User Sirleto / Wikipedia User:SirLeto

Hello Benh, first of all many thanks for your interest and time to improve this picture! I like your version and you can get the RAW file if you want. I am curious, how did you select the area that you darkened? Manually or via an automated way? Can such a change just be introduced "on the fly"? All the best, Poco a poco (talk) 01:02, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Poco, I could do it for you from the RAW file, but if you own Lightroom, it's easy to do it yourself: I used Lightroom "local" adjustment feature. I added a gradient on the bright left part side and reduced exposure and boosted contrast + saturation to match right side. It doesn't matter to perfectly place it (but you can try as many time as needed if you r not satisfied). Wasn't sure if you would like. Current version is already nice anyways! - Benh (talk) 05:39, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hello Benh, it took me a while, but I think that it looks definitely better. It took me a while because I didn't use Lightroom before, but this one was the right excuse to do so (Miguel -Lmbuga- tells me the whole time that that software is great). I downloaded the trial version, applied a gradient filter (decreasing exposure and increasing contrast) and later increased exposure overall. Since I am convinced about the result I didn't open a parallel nomination. I hope, that is not a problem. Thanks for the hint and all the best! Poco a poco (talk) 16:38, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Pair of Merops apiaster feeding.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pair of Merops apiaster feeding.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Benh, I saw your comment in FPC about providing a bit of more ground in the bottom of the image. As you can see in the different versions of the document that is possible, but I am not sure about touching the image, since the reception has been so far very good (you know, don’t change a running system). Changing the crop does also change the perception of the image, that’s why I am not sure. Best regards, Poco a poco (talk) 13:03, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Poco ! That's mostly a personal taste issue, so I think you shouldn't care too much and present the subject the way you intend to. No one but me seems to care anyways :) As mentioned, I think it's already very good, with proper lighting emphasizing volume and texture (which is the most important). - Benh (talk) 15:11, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Benh, did you review the picture after I made my last comment in the FPC page? The sharpness is almost to the minimum and since I take the picture in RAW, they have no sharpness when I process them. I have in all my pictures usually 3 times more sharpness than what I have in that picture. About the building in the background, could you add a note? I don't know which one you mean. Maybe it is just late and my faculties are not fit anymore. I will leave it for today. Good night Poco a poco (talk) 23:29, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot see anything. Could you add a note to a spot where the problem is obvious? Right now I don't know what I am looking for. I have been playing with the sharpening live and going below 30 (out of an scale of 150) in ACR would guide to clear loss of sharpening, that would be in my eyes contraproductive. I don't observe the typical halos and artifacts due to overshapening until I go up to 100. Thanks for your patience, maybe I am just getting old Poco a poco (talk) 22:26, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion du trou de Bâle[edit]

je viens de te lire dans la discussion sur l'usine à gaz du changement de règles en FP.

tu vas te faire attaquer en diffamation, mais j'avais remarqué aussi ce soudain afflux de soutiens d'outre-Rhin juste avant la forclusion, un pur scandale !
Étant en conflit permanent avec l'auteur de cette photo, je me tiens éloigné, mais je vais peut être quand même faire part de ma façon de penser, qui d'ailleurs suit la tienne...--Jebulon (talk) 21:59, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pas grave, j'ai de très forte présomptions. Et j'ai déjà vu ça sur le même auteur, je n'accuse pas sans minimum d'indices. Ça m'énerve justement qu'on ne dise rien par peur de représailles. (NB: je ne t'ai pas oublié pour un déjeuner, mais ça va être tendu vu nos contraintes respectives à mon avis ;) ) - Benh (talk) 22:12, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Trop fort ? Pourquoi ? Je dis la même chose que toi, mais sur la page elle-même, et avec des mots plus explicites, c'est tout. N'y a t'il pas eu, tout soudain, un rameutage de Germains en vue d'assurer la promotion de l'image de l'un des leurs ? Donc, " l'Allemagne par dessus tout ", voilà, c'est dit.
En QI, c'est encore pire. Le petit jeu à-toi-à-moi entre Taxiarchos 228 et Ralf Roletschek (et inversement) crève les yeux et manque vraiment, à la longue, de subtilité.
Quant à un déjeuner, on doit sûrement pouvoir si on veut, mais on n'est pas obligé. Si l'idée te plaît, ne te gêne pas pour me proposer des dates ! Sinon, pas grave.--Jebulon (talk) 23:07, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Lions Family Portrait Masai Mara.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lions Family Portrait Masai Mara.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:07, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:City Lights of the United States 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:City Lights of the United States 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for the Wikipedia Pictures[edit]

Hello, My name is Duane Hurst and I recently made a free (non-commercial) English web site to share information with people. I added links to your Wikipedia/Wikimedia freeware pictures (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Arc_Triomphe.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Louvre_Museum_Wikimedia_Commons.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Paris_Night.jpg and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pont_des_Arts_Wikimedia_Commons.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Toulouse_Capitole_Night_Wikimedia_Commons.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Verdon_Trescaire.jpg). I also gave credit to you on my web pages for your work. Thank you for sharing with the public. My website is:

http://www.freeenglishsite.com/

I add pictures such as yours to one of the following major sections of my site: 1. World section - contains information and over 10,000 images of every world country and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/index.htm

2. USA section - contains information and images of every USA state and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/usa/index.htm

3. English section - "Mel and Wes" lessons in conversation format. Stories are located in various USA states and world countries such as China, England, Germany, Japan, Mexico and Thailand. Each lesson has many slang terms and idioms, which I link to my Slang Dictionary. This eventually will have over 5,000 terms. Currently, it has about 3,000 slang and idioms. I regularly add new lessons and slang terms. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/lessons/index.htm Slang Dictionary link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/slang/Eslang_a.htm

Prior to retirement, I taught English at several private and public universities in the United States.

Please share this free site with your friends. I hope all will enjoy the pictures and find the English information useful. Sincerely,  Duane Hurst in Utah, USA

Email address: duanerhurst@freeenglishsite.com --75.162.209.2 16:16, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]