User talk:Ltljltlj

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Interstate sign[edit]

How do you create a interstate sign.



RI 195[edit]

Unfortunately, I've never seen a photo of a shield or a real shield. --SPUI 04:40, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

County[edit]

The ones without county names are for general use, like in browse boxes - see en:County Road 427A (Florida) for an example. As 427 goes in multiple counties, putting one or the other is wrong. --SPUI 03:57, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As for "county road", that's the term used in Florida, so that's why I put the category there. --SPUI 03:58, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clearview[edit]

yeah, i used Roadgeek 2005 Series EW; it matched the pictures of clearview exactly. Atanamir 04:08, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Clearview.svg


When you're done withit, tell me

Dupage County Route shields[edit]

Hi, just informing you that you're Dupage County Route shields have been nominated for deletion here since they have been superseded by shields of the type Image:DuPage County Route 1 IL.svg/Lokal_Profil 16:28, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Interstate shields[edit]

I've seen your changes to the shields. I unfortunately have to revert all of the new Business shields, as they do not fit in with the MUTCD (the numbers are way too big). And when you were making the new templates, why didn't you upload under the same name as the old ones?  V60 干什么? · VContribs 22:21, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The MUTCD overrules pictures. According to that, the numbers are smaller. You've been through this with SPUI before; you don't want to go through this with me and the rest of the Commons community.  V60 干什么? · VContribs 23:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
All I have to do is revert to SPUI's version, as those are the correct ones. In your version, the numbers are way too big. And as a side note, please sign your comments.  V60 干什么? · VContribs 00:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed with V60, these shields can't be too big, they have to be acurate. -- JA10 T · C 00:12, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not revert again. I've checked the MUTCD carefully, and some other users (not present at moment) as well as myself have concluded that your numbers are way too big.  V60 干什么? · VContribs 19:20, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Returning with new facts here, the customary MUTCD is misleading. That's why SPUI and I used the metric MUTCD to design the shields off of.  V60 干什么? · VContribs 21:35, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate[edit]

I removed the duplicate tag on these images: Image:US DOT FHWA MUTCD SHS 2004 3-2 M1-2 750x600mm 000.svg, Image:US DOT FHWA MUTCD SHS 2004 3-2 M1-2 750x600mm 000.svg, Image:US DOT FHWA MUTCD SHS 2004 3-3 M1-3 600x600mm 00.svg, Image:US DOT FHWA MUTCD SHS 2004 3-3 M1-3 750x600mm 000.svg because they are not identical to the ones you were claiming they were. If you want them to be deleted, please send them through deletion review by requesting deletion on each image. Thank you for understanding. MECUtalk 19:01, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your image under attack[edit]

Hi there, just wanted to give you a heads-up that your image Image:Handicapped Accessible sign.svg and some others containing the same symbol, all from the MUTCD, are currently under a deletion debate. Since you have contributed a large number of images based on the MUTCD, I'm hoping that you could help me out in convincing these folks that the images are not copyrighted. I appreciate your help...thanks! lensovet 06:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image creation[edit]

What application do you use to create your road sign images? 66.188.171.193 16:58, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

S glyph in RoadGeek fonts[edit]

I noticed you replaced some of my PDF->SVG road sign conversions with actual to-spec road signs that you created yourself. Nice work; it really is too bad they don't spec colours for RGB as Pantone->RGB is hardly an exact science. Anyway, my question is if you know why the "S" glyph in the Series C font is broken. If you look on the inner curve of the lower half of the S, near the centreline, there is a clear 'unsmoothness' to the curve. It's the only glyph and only font where I've seen this problem - but if I remember correctly this appeared even when I extracted the images from the govt's PDF, so perhaps the RoadGeek fonts are true to the real spec - or maybe they were generated from the same PDF and show a processing error.

In any case, this aberration is visible at native size in Image:Stop sign MUTCD.svg, and if you squint, even at smaller sizes. IMO should be corrected regardless of the 'spec', since this is clearly (I hope?! Not from the USA) not in real STOP signs.

Please respond on my w:User:Ktims wikipedia talk page. --Ktims 06:42, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image categories[edit]

Hi. Re [1] your removing categories from images-- please explain if you think it is necessary to do that. Images should be in categories; if an image is in a wrong category please put it in a correct one. If there is some sort of problem with an image, please say what the problem is, or nominate the image for deletion. Thanks. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 15:27, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved this category to Category:Warning signs of the United States, since when nouns are not proper they are not capitalised. United States should not be abbreviated either. 哦,是吗?(User:O) 04:13, 17 December 2007 (GMT)

Your image of the I-76 shield is not currently displaying properly in Firefox on enwiki or commons. It seems fine in Safari. (Both browsers running on Mac OS X 10.4). Do you know why this might be? --CComMack 02:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ramsey county shields[edit]

Hello,

Great work with all of the shields! I have a request for Ramsey County routes 30, 32, 34 and 52 if possible.

Thanks!

Romeo Bravo (T | C) 02:41, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Where did the wheelchair accessibility sign come from? What is the recommended size for reading something on the car in front of you, such as a bumper sticker?

Image deletion warning Image:US DOT FHWA MUTCD SHS 2004 3-1 M1-1 750x600mm 678 NY.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 03:14, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arkansas state-name interstate shields[edit]

Can you just upload those shields.
Image:I-30 (AR).svg Image:I-430 (AR).svg Image:I-530 (AR).svg Image:I-630 (AR).svg Image:I-40 (AR).svg Image:I-440 (AR).svg Image:I-540 (AR).svg Image:I-55 (AR).svg Image:I-555 (AR).svg

We don't now have state document entry for Arkansas, so the ARDOT assumes Arkansas still uses normal state name shields. Same with Kansas. Kansas don't have access to state document either, but I think they use sunflower tag, which workers brought them copy, and contractors, do make war over state-name interstate and neutral shields over KTA, and KDOT. I think ARDOT still use state-name interstate shields, and I like you to make those shields for us.--OC15 19:35, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anyways time zone UT-4 where is it?You mean Easter time, anyways what state you live in, and how old are you. This gets me a picture of what time you are available, because I live in California Pacific time, and also, this tells me the latest time I came post message, because people works, and they have school homework, and they have to sleep. There is no way people can be on Wiki-24-7, and average people can only spend up to 3 hours a day, because alot of them go to work, and they only go on Wiki at work breaks when they come home at lunch at lunchbreaks least about 90 minutes.--OC15 21:35, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind uploading those shields please? Please answer to those questions.--OC15 19:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok dude. I finished those shields for ya.
Image:I-30 (AR).svg Image:I-40 (AR).svg Image:I-55 (AR).svg Image:I-430 (AR).svg Image:I-440 (AR).svg Image:I-530 (AR).svg Image:I-540 (AR).svg Image:I-555 (AR).svg Image:I-630 (AR).svg
I even made the Arkansas state shields that they had back in the day.
Image:I-30 (AR) Metric.svg Image:I-40 (AR) Metric.svg Image:I-55 (AR) Metric.svg Image:I-430 (AR) Metric.svg Image:I-440 (AR) Metric.svg Image:I-530 (AR) Metric.svg Image:I-540 (AR) Metric.svg Image:I-555 (AR) Metric.svg Image:I-630 (AR) Metric.svg
Hope you like!

And to answer your other question, I live in Michigan, and I'm 27 years old. I come here every day after I get off work, so between 12 midnight and 4am (eastern time), I'll probably be on. --Ltljltlj 05:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid wars with interstate-issues[edit]

Lets just for the sake of time, would you do me a favor to upload this and this image on a file please. Those dumb peoples just insists on putting the state-name shields back on the page, and the map on interstate-guide is semi-correct on black shade. All I want you to do is upload this on image galaery by file name whatever name you want. Thanks for Arkansas shields.--Freewayguy 00:27, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind upload the Alaska interstate-state-name shields just for personal interest.--Freewayguy 00:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:I-A1 (AK).svg Image:I-A2 (AK).svg Image:I-A3 (AK).svg Image:I-A4 (AK).svg

Done and done. I made the shields along with the metric versions too. Let me know if you need any other ones made. --Ltljltlj 16:40, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:I-A1 (AK) Metric.svg Image:I-A2 (AK) Metric.svg Image:I-A3 (AK) Metric.svg Image:I-A4 (AK) Metric.svg Image:I-95 (MD).svg Image:I-95 (MD) Metric.svg Image:I-97 (MD).svg Image:I-97 (MD) Metric.svg

new state-name shields[edit]

Well, Somebody went ahead and undelete all the MD shields I delete, lets just have those shields as long as we dont use them in infobox. for your interest--Freewayguy 20:01, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:I-215 (NV).svg Image:I-515 (NV).svg Image:I-180 (WY).svg Image:I-215 (UT).svg Image:I-126 (SC).svg Image:I-526 (SC).svg Image:I-585 (SC).svg Image:I-475 (GA).svg Image:I-495 (ME).svg Image:I-275 (FL).svg Image:I-271 (KY).svg Image:I-471 (KY).svg Image:I-295 (NV).svg Image:I-124 (TN).svg Image:I-190 (IL).svg Image:I-355 (IL).svg Image:I-129 (NE).svg Image:I-16 (GA).svg Image:I-516 (GA).svg Image:I-12 (LA).svg Image:I-395 (CT).svg Image:I-270 (CO).svg Image:I-378 (PA).svg Image:I-289 (VT).svg

Just to be consistance I would just for the sake of time, I like you to upload those images. Just take your time, and you should get some sleep too. Beacsue skipping 24 hours without sleep is not good for your healt, you should get about 7 to 8 hours of sleep at least. Being up 12 to 4 in midnight is not healthy without getting any sleep. Or you sleep at noon from 3 pm to 11 pm?--Freewayguy 00:18, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I work the afternoon shift. I go to work at about 1pm and I get home about midnight. I go to sleep about 4am, so I have about 7-8 hours of sleep a night. --Ltljltlj 05:07, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will you make those shields anytime soon, or I ask too much at one time. Let me know the limits of shields, like 15 at most, also when ul make those shields.--Freewayguy 20:37, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate if you upload those image for me. For future let me know how many shields you want one at a time. Asking too many might make difficult for you to digest, for now just upload those images.--Freewayguy 03:30, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, as you can see, I made your shields. I don't know why you asked for I-295 in Nevada for, there's no such thing, but I made it for ya anyway. By the way, give me about 20 at a time for now. If I can get to make more, I'll let you know. Here are the metric versions of the shields too:
Image:I-215 (NV) Metric.svg Image:I-515 (NV) Metric.svg Image:I-180 (WY) Metric.svg Image:I-215 (UT) Metric.svg Image:I-126 (SC) Metric.svg Image:I-526 (SC) Metric.svg Image:I-585 (SC) Metric.svg Image:I-475 (GA) Metric.svg Image:I-495 (ME) Metric.svg Image:I-275 (FL) Metric.svg Image:I-271 (KY) Metric.svg Image:I-471 (KY) Metric.svg Image:I-295 (NV) Metric.svg Image:I-124 (TN) Metric.svg Image:I-190 (IL) Metric.svg Image:I-355 (IL) Metric.svg Image:I-129 (NE) Metric.svg Image:I-16 (GA) Metric.svg Image:I-516 (GA) Metric.svg Image:I-12 (LA) Metric.svg Image:I-395 (CT) Metric.svg Image:I-270 (CO) Metric.svg Image:I-378 (PA) Metric.svg Image:I-289 (VT) Metric.svg
--Ltljltlj 06:45, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will like to have more shields. I appreciate if you make those shields.--Freewayguy 22:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:I-43 (WI).svg Image:I-494 (MN).svg Image:I-694 (MN).svg Image:I-465 (IN).svg Image:I-265 (IN).svg Image:I-269 (MS).svg Image:I-220 (MS).svg Image:I-491 (CT).svg Image:I-315 (MT).svg

There you go. And here are the metric versions too.
Image:I-43 (WI) Metric.svg Image:I-494 (MN) Metric.svg Image:I-694 (MN) Metric.svg Image:I-465 (IN) Metric.svg Image:I-265 (IN) Metric.svg Image:I-269 (MS) Metric.svg Image:I-220 (MS) Metric.svg Image:I-491 (CT) Metric.svg Image:I-315 (MT) Metric.svg--Ltljltlj 01:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The North-Central States[edit]

I will like these shields. I appreciate if you make more of these. They are fine just as long as they are not use in infobox or small icon. So please do me a favor to make these just for sake to be consistance.--Freewayguy 16:15, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:I-90 (SD).svg Image:I-29 (SD).svg Image:I-190 (SD).svg Image:I-229 (SD).svg Image:I-94 (ND).svg Image:I-29 (ND).svg Image:I-194 (ND).svg Image:I-480 (OH).svg Image:I-675 (OH).svg Image:I-184 (ID).svg Image:I-99 (PA).svg Image:I-27 (TX).svg Image:I-37 (TX).svg Image:I-130 (AR).svg Image:I-287 (NJ).svg Image:I-278 (NJ).svg Image:I-293 (NH).svg Image:I-393 (NH).svg

Here are the metrics:
Image:I-90 (SD) Metric.svg Image:I-29 (SD) Metric.svg Image:I-190 (SD) Metric.svg Image:I-229 (SD) Metric.svg Image:I-94 (ND) Metric.svg Image:I-29 (ND) Metric.svg Image:I-194 (ND) Metric.svg Image:I-480 (OH) Metric.svg Image:I-675 (OH) Metric.svg Image:I-184 (ID) Metric.svg Image:I-99 (PA) Metric.svg Image:I-27 (TX) Metric.svg Image:I-37 (TX) Metric.svg Image:I-130 (AR) Metric.svg Image:I-287 (NJ) Metric.svg Image:I-278 (NJ) Metric.svg Image:I-293 (NH) Metric.svg Image:I-393 (NH) Metric.svg--Ltljltlj 06:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here is some more I want:
Image:I-H201 (HI).svg Image:I-175 (FL).svg Image:I-105 (OR).svg Image:I-405 (OR).svg Image:I-205 (OR).svg Image:I-376 (PA).svg Image:I-676 (PA).svg Image:I-57 (IL).svg --Freewayguy 20:04, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Metrics:
Image:I-H201 (HI) Metric.svg Image:I-175 (FL) Metric.svg Image:I-105 (OR) Metric.svg Image:I-405 (OR) Metric.svg Image:I-205 (OR) Metric.svg Image:I-376 (PA) Metric.svg Image:I-676 (PA) Metric.svg Image:I-57 (IL) Metric.svg--Ltljltlj 21:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New state shields Part 2[edit]

Image:I-295 (NC).svg Image:I-295 (NC) Metric.svg Image:I-795 (NC).svg Image:I-795 (NC) Metric.svg Image:I-140 (TN).svg Image:I-140 (TN) Metric.svg Image:I-635 (TX).svg Image:I-635 (TX) Metric.svg Image:I-275 (MI).svg Image:I-275 (MI) Metric.svg Image:I-375 (MI).svg Image:I-375 (MI) Metric.svg Image:I-90 (IL).svg Image:I-90 (IL) Metric.svg Image:I-295 (DE).svg Image:I-295 (DE) Metric.svg Image:I-95 (DE).svg Image:I-95 (DE) Metric.svg Image:I-195 (NJ).svg Image:I-195 (NJ) Metric.svg Image:I-280 (NJ).svg Image:I-280 (NJ) Metric.svg --Freewayguy 22:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Ltljltlj 23:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I will want more of these.
Image:I-359 (AL).svg Image:I-459 (AL).svg Image:I-165 (AL).svg Image:I-385 (SC).svg Image:I-10 (FL).svg Image:I-39 (WI).svg Image:I-70 (IN).svg Image:I-94 (IN).svg Image:I-49 (LA).svg Image:I-45 (TX).svg Image:I-66 (DC).svg Image:I-66 (D.C.).svg Image:I-66 (DOC).svg Image:I-695 (DC).svg Image:I-695 (D.C.).svg Image:I-695 (DOC).svg Image:I-580 (NE).svg Image:I-359 (AL) Metric.svg Image:I-459 (AL) Metric.svg Image:I-165 (AL) Metric.svg Image:I-385 (SC) Metric.svg Image:I-10 (FL) Metric.svg Image:I-39 (WI) Metric.svg Image:I-70 (IN) Metric.svg Image:I-94 (IN) Metric.svg Image:I-49 (LA) Metric.svg Image:I-45 (TX) Metric.svg Image:I-66 (DC) Metric.svg Image:I-66 (D.C.) Metric.svg Image:I-66 (DOC) Metric.svg Image:I-695 (DC) Metric.svg Image:I-695 (D.C.) Metric.svg Image:I-695 (DOC) Metric.svg Image:I-580 (NE) Metric.svg
--Freewayguy 00:09, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Ltljltlj 18:50, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clean-up sheilds[edit]

You should do more of these.--Freewayguy 04:58, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:I-10 (NM).svg Image:I-25 (NM).svg Image:I-40 (NM).svg Image:I-5 (OR).svg Image:I-82 (OR).svg Image:I-81 (VA).svg Image:I-90 (MA).svg Image:I-95 (ME).svg Image:I-15 (NV).svg Image:I-80 (NV).svg Image:I-184 (RI).svg Image:I-PRI1 (PR).svg Image:I-PRI2 (PR).svg Image:I-PRI3 (PR).svg Image:I-10 (NM) Metric.svg Image:I-25 (NM) Metric.svg Image:I-40 (NM) Metric.svg Image:I-5 (OR) Metric.svg Image:I-82 (OR) Metric.svg Image:I-81 (VA) Metric.svg Image:I-90 (MA) Metric.svg Image:I-95 (ME) Metric.svg Image:I-15 (NV) Metric.svg Image:I-80 (NV) Metric.svg Image:I-184 (RI) Metric.svg Image:I-PRI1 (PR) Metric.svg Image:I-PRI2 (PR) Metric.svg Image:I-PRI3 (PR) Metric.svg

There you go. --Ltljltlj 14:22, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fix and incompletes[edit]

You should upload these.--Freewayguy 01:09, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:I-H1 (HI).svg Image:I-H2 (HI).svg Image:I-H3 (HI).svg Image:I-26 (SC).svg Image:I-77 (SC).svg Image:I-85 (SC).svg Image:I-95 (SC).svg Image:I-185 (SC).svg Image:I-326 (SC).svg Image:I-96 (MI).svg Image:I-4 (FL).svg Image:I-80 (OH).svg Image:I-380 (PA).svg Image:I-20 (SC).svg Image:I-520 (SC).svg Image:I-70 (CO).svg Image:I-76 (CO).svg Image:I-25 (CO).svg Image:I-225 (CO).svg Image:I-470 (CO).svg Image:I-H1 (HI) Metric.svg Image:I-H2 (HI) Metric.svg Image:I-H3 (HI) Metric.svg Image:I-26 (SC) Metric.svg Image:I-77 (SC) Metric.svg Image:I-85 (SC) Metric.svg Image:I-95 (SC) Metric.svg Image:I-185 (SC) Metric.svg Image:I-326 (SC) Metric.svg Image:I-96 (MI) Metric.svg Image:I-4 (FL) Metric.svg Image:I-80 (OH) Metric.svg Image:I-380 (PA) Metric.svg Image:I-20 (SC) Metric.svg Image:I-520 (SC) Metric.svg Image:I-70 (CO) Metric.svg Image:I-76 (CO) Metric.svg Image:I-25 (CO) Metric.svg Image:I-225 (CO) Metric.svg Image:I-470 (CO) Metric.svg

Would you mind uploading them?--Freewayguy 22:36, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry its taking long. I've had a lot of other things to do lately. As soon as I can upload them, I will. --Ltljltlj 15:43, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I finally got them done for you. Sorry for the wait. --Ltljltlj 18:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA[edit]

Dear Ltljltlj,

Following the lack of consensus on your RfA, I have closed it as unsuccessful. This does not mean that you are forever barred from being an admin on Commons: someone with your experience and knowledge of this project is a great addition to the admin team. My bit of advice is to ponder on some of the criticism that was made in your RfA and seek to improve such referred areas. if you have any questions, we're here to help. Cheers, Patrícia msg 22:39, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Yavapi County Route 15 AZ.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Scott5114 [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 07:19, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am a bit curious as to why you changed the values for the RGB equivalents for the Pantone colors specified on FWHA's website. I am curious as to where you got the RGB values you were using. The ones I got were from a document off of Pantone's website dictating the equivalent RGB values for Pantone colors, so I'm wondering why yours are different. I would presume what Pantone's document says is the final word, but perhaps there is a reason I am incorrect so I'd like to know why. RTCNCA (talk) 05:36, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Let's see what the difference is: Brown - 469 New       Old       ; Yellow - 116 New       Old       ; Red - 187 New       Old       ; Green - 342 New       Old       ; Blue - 294 New       Old       ; and Orange - 152 New       Old       .
Looking at these more carefully I think that except for red the results are identical, and I do think the "new" red does look better than the "old" one but I'm still curious where the values came from. RTCNCA (talk) 05:53, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I got my data from http://www.mediarocket.com/colorchart.html --Ltljltlj (talk) 00:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The interstate shields[edit]

I thought Image:I-470 (MD).svg is clsoer to MUTCD today. See the BUS interstates and they use C Series under green background. Which one is closer to MUTCD the ones you make of the ones Jueff makes. The Wikiprojects say to use neutral shields until we find the proper specs. 75.47 IPs likes to use Google St view to spot the highway signs even Google St View is totally wrong. Can you answer me quickly?--SCFReeways 23:46, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you think the I-470 MD should be fix you can do so if you want. But Jeff say the small letters is accurate.--SCFReeways 23:48, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty much doing all types of shields that I see on InterstateGuide. I'm just giving some different names and such. But I don't think none of them should be deleted. --Ltljltlj (talk) 00:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You did them the opposite way. The MUTCD PDF (M1-2) shows the state-brand shields except is BUS Interstate, they use C Sers in Green background rather than blue. The smaller number should be normal version, and bigger text should be the metric versions. Do you still make interstate signs or you no longer.--SCFReeways 00:10, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong, English or Metric doesn't matter they use D, what does matter is whether or not the State Name is still present. They use the smaller numbers. -- KelleyCook (talk) 21:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Begin plates[edit]

I noticed that while you've uploaded the North, South, East, West, and End plates in the white, blue, and county color schemes, I can't seem to find Begin plates in any of the color schemes. Have you uploaded them? If not, I think you should. 173.63.41.217 20:41, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Artwork[edit]

Dear Ltljltlj, I was wondering how you create your artwork/where you get your signs from. I work for a sign company (SmartSign), and I've noticed that we have very similar artwork. (ex. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Yield_Ahead_sign.svg vs. http://www.roadtrafficsigns.com/Yield-Sign/Yield-Ahead-Sign/SKU-X-W3-2a.aspx) If you could get back to me about this question, I'd greatly appreciate it.

My email is amy@smartsign.com

Thanks!

File:Dead End sign.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 17:49, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yield Ahead sign.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 18:34, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stop Ahead sign.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 18:35, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Advance Warning sign.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 18:39, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:No Right Turn sign.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 21:13, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:No Parking symbol sign.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 21:44, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yield sign.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 21:16, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stop sign MUTCD.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 21:18, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The file was lost due to an server bug. Recovering is very expensive or even impossible. Please reupload this image if the source is still accessible to you. Yours sincerely McZusatz (talk) 13:52, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, do you think you could make an Interstate Loop variant of this shield? Google Street View image --Geopgeop (talk) 04:53, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can I reuse your signs in a book[edit]

Sept, 28, 2013

Hi. Thank you for creating your road signs.

I am writing a book about Rochester, NY. A few of the road signs you created I noticed have a creative commons license of:

grants anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.

Does this mean I can use them in a e-book that I would be selling online?

Thank you. Regards, Jennifer Kumar authenticjourneys@gmail.com

Yes, you can. --McZusatz (talk) 19:14, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, AdmrBoltz 14:57, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, AdmrBoltz 05:04, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:US DOT FHWA MUTCD SHS 2004 3-1 M1-1 750x600mm 678 NY.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fredddie 00:07, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Road Closed 1000 Feet sign.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Centralismo (talk) 07:05, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Novayn731@gmail.com[edit]

Si 201.130.58.157 23:43, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]