User talk:Tournasol7/Archive22

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paedagogium at the Palatine Hill (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paedagogium at the Palatine Hill (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 13:28, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue des Traineaux in Avoriaz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 13:07, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pointe de Nantaux viewed from Avoriaz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:25, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Vallon 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:47, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Joux Plane 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
WB far too cold. --Ermell 20:18, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. --Tournasol7 06:04, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:57, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Pointe de Nantaux 06.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pointe de Nantaux 06.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Divus Augustus in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:48, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forum Romanum (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:32, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forum Romanum (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:58, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pulsatilla alpina in Avoriaz (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support There are some artifacts arount the center flower, but in my opinion it is good quality overall. The plant is well described. --Nefronus 14:48, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melan carthusian monastery 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:26, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Blaise church in Seysses (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:57, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady in Rodez 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:48, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Francis church in Annecy 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:49, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontane leonine on the Piazza del Popolo (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 16:39, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Mary church in Chateauneuf-la-Foret (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:54, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhone River near La Balme 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:54, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Tavaneuse 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:54, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruins of tabernae novae (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 19:30, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruins of tabernae novae (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 20:29, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Montriond 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lilium 'Casablanca' in Jardin des 5 sens (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:40, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Bruno chapel in Bellevaux 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:42, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Library in Villecomtal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:37, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trollius europaeus at Lac de Tavaneuse (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:42, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria of Loreto church and Holy Name of Mary church in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:42, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue at the House of the Vestals in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 19:38, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 399 rue des Traineaux in Avoriaz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:21, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Vallon 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 09:20, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pointe de Nantaux (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. ---Lmbuga 11:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melan carthusian monastery 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 07:14, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pointe de Nyon & Pointe d'Angolon (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:21, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from La Bourgeoise 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:32, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domus Flavia in Palataine Hill (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 17:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domus Flavia in Palataine Hill (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forum Romanum (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 17:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leucanthemum maximum in Jardin des 5 sens (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dranse de Montriond 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. But: Please check WB. IMO a touch of magenta. --XRay 06:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former Episcopal Palace of Annecy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:07, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:08, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais de l'Isle in Annecy 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support I like it --Mike1979 Russia 06:32, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria of Loreto church and Holy Name of Mary church in Rome (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 16:59, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centaurea nervosa at Col de Tavaneuse (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casino Boccapaduli in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre della Moletta in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhone River near La Balme 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:09, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Sainte-Colombe (Rhone).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:09, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oratory in Curieres 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:34, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Vallon 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:35, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Larus michahellis in Forum Romanum (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:43, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Larus michahellis in Forum Romanum (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:45, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Blaise church in Seysses (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 12:47, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Name of Mary church in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:06, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Joux Plane 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:06, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rouleau de Bostan 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Rome 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 19:39, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Citta del Vaticano train station 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Vallon 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:05, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amanita muscaria near Lac de Mines d'Or (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Massif du Mont-Blanc from Lac de Joux Plane 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 19:19, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Tavaneuse 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forum Romanum (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:14, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruins of the House of the Vestals in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:52, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forum Romanum (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forum Romanum (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Larus michahellis in Forum Romanum (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Larus michahellis in Forum Romanum (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via Arenula 55 in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Lodeve (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison de l'Aumone in Narbonne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:20, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 Place des Arcades in Sauveterre-de-R.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:05, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! National horse stud farm in Rodez 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:05, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Please fix dust spot in the upper right. -- Ikan Kekek 07:58, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Leipzig (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paedagogium at the Palatine Hill (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Replica of the Equestrian statue of Marcus Aurelius in Rome (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality (Description correct ? "at night"). --F. Riedelio 15:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Teodoro al Palatino in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support NR is a bit strong, but IMHO, still it is a QI. --C messier 20:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Peyrilhac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument of Seismit-Doda in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:23, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Frayssinhes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:11, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stone Cross in settlement Sainte-Austremoine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palace in Lwowek (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:52, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place des Arcades in Sauveterre-de-R 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:52, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of Mercy chapel in Rodez 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:12, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forum Romanum (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:15, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria of Loreto church and Holy Name of Mary church in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:40, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forum Romanum (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:37, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palatine Hill from Circus Maximus (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:37, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruins of tabernae novae (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:37, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via Capo di Ferro 7 in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:12, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint John church in Najac (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:13, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martial church in Rieupeyroux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:39, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Portunus in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:33, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forum Romanum (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Very nice! This seems to not be rectilinear projection (I guess the horizontal angle is too large for that), can you perhaps mention the projection used in the description? In any case, good quality. --Domob 08:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lake Pukaki & Aoraki Mount Cook 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Du Hugin Skulblaka (talk) 20:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bust of Federico Gattorno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:36, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bust of Augusto Elia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:36, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Taurines 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:40, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9 Rue de Bonald in Rodez 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:23, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gardens in the Vatican City (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:42, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape in Morzine 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment For a landscape like this, I'd love to have a bit more detail; but IMHO it is good enough for QI. Is this tonemapped HDR? It looks a bit like it to me. --Domob 09:15, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Not much detail, but acceptable I think. --Nefronus 18:40, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forum Romanum (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:04, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Villecomtal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:40, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opera in Leipzig (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:20, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Am Kreuz 8 in Alsfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:20, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo del Monte di Pieta in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:59, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palace of Saint Charles in the Vatican City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Domob 08:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stradone dei Giardini in the Vatican City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Amans Church in Rodez (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cloister of Priory Saint-Michel of Grandmont (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. --Alexander Novikov 09:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City hall of Nancy (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Remontees 22:39, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via Arenula 20-22 in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Clamecy (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:24, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Radegund church in Ste-Radegonde (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 17:23, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Am Buergerhaus 3 in Bensheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:08, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue du Caire in Pegairolles-de-l'Escalette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Some minor traces of CAs, but not irritating, and overall good and nice. --Aristeas 11:22, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bust of Raffaele Cadorna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jonadrews 13:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain at Piazza Farnese in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Domob 15:40, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Mandosi Mignanelli in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. A picture more from the front would be better, but perhaps that's not possible in this situation and for me not too relevant for QI. --Domob 15:40, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markt 2 in Wittstock Dosse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 25 Rue du Bourguet in Najac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Portunus in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some misidentified images of knapweed[edit]

Hi Tournasol7/Archive22, I found several misidentified knapweed photos in Category:Centaurea montana. I changed the ID for all except for File:Centaurea montana in Montriond (4).jpg and File:Centaurea montana at Col de Joux Plane (1).jpg. In addition to this, the images should be renamed and Category:Misidentified plants can be removed afterwards. The first 10 images in the gallery above are your photographs and they were presumably misidentified. Please note that the ID for File:Centaurea montana at Col de Joux Plane (4).jpg is probably correct. I also added a sample image of each of the three species to the end of the gallery. The most important difference of the respective species are their involucral bracts. Centaurea nervosa has got very long, brown, feather-like appendages at the involucral bracts covering the main part of the involucral bracts, Centaurea montana has got green involucral bracts with black edges with short teeth and Centaurea jacea has got light brown involucral bracts, sometimes with some teeth. Also, the showy large flowers of Centaurea montana are blue, whereas the flowers of Centaurea jacea and Centaurea nervosa are usually magenta, never blue. There are more species, of course, but I assume that my assignments are correct. With best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 15:38, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert Flogaus-Faust; thanks for your review. The 3rd and 4th photo is the same plant, and also for 7th and 8th is the same plant too. Thank you and have a nice day! Tournasol7 (talk) 06:41, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dranse de Montriond 09.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dranse de Montriond 09.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument to Giuseppe Garibaldi in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlossberg 8 in Gotha (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:11, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist church in La Fouillade 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:11, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arcades at Place des Arcades in Sauveterre-de-R 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:11, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! National horse stud farm in Rodez 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:33, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Jerome church in La Capelle-Bleys 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Cecilia church in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Najac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:19, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Soubes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:41, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Saint-Christophe in Sauveterre-de-R 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Taurines 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:38, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sant'Agata in Trastevere (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality! --Radomianin 18:41, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo dei Cavalieri Ossoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Pretty motif and good quality. --Radomianin 19:15, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria della Scala in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, beautiful motif! --Radomianin 19:02, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Naucelle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:02, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lupus church in Jouels 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:02, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison d'Armagnac in Rodez 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:14, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hersfelder Strasse 11 in Alsfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:14, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza S Francesco d'Assisi in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:31, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Saint-Christophe in Sauveterre-de-R 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall in Lodeve 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via del Portico d'Ottavia 46 in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tiber river at Lungotevere de' Cenci.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Ricci in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:59, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via Arenula 4 in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:28, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Roch church in Bladzim 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo della Pantanella in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of Rome from Belvedere dei Salviati 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality Banner --Fernando.tassone 14:53, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via dei Riari 59 in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:52, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Medici, S Carlo al Corso & S Salvatore in Lauro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:52, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Amans Church in Rodez 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Leipzig (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hanfsack 5 in Bad Hersfeld (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martial church in Rieupeyroux (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:10, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oratory in Gramond (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:10, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavillon Jacquet in Nancy (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Only very small parts are burnt. --Aristeas 10:45, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of Rome from Gianicolo Hill 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality Banner --Fernando.tassone 14:57, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of Rome from Gianicolo Hill 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 13:30, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of Rome from Gianicolo Hill 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality Banner --Fernando.tassone 14:57, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castel Sant'Angelo & St John of the Florentins basilica from Gianicolo Hill (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Remontees 21:26, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre delle Milizie, Chiesa del Gesu & Sant'Andrea della Valle V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Remontees 21:26, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison de Benoit in Rodez (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Lo Scaligero 06:22, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedenstein Castle in Gotha 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Lo Scaligero 06:22, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in La Capelle Saint-Martin 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Lo Scaligero 06:22, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in La Primaube 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:55, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Croce alla Lungara church in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:18, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via della Luce 37 in Rome (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Remontees 21:36, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Saint-Martin-de-Cormieres 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 18:46, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protestant city church in Bad Hersfeld (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 18:50, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bust of Maurizio Quadrio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 16:24, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Rome from Viale della Trinita dei Monti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 14:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Blaise church in Meljac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 14:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Saint-Vital in Sauveterre-de-R. 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 09:26, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Taurines 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 09:26, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza del Popolo 3 in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Arcanhac 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Lo Scaligero 10:07, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place des Arcades in Sauveterre-de-R 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 10:41, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Lwowek (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:04, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of La Capelle-Bleys.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Lo Scaligero 10:07, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of Rome from Gianicolo Hill 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:47, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of Rome from Piazza San Pietro in Montorio (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:47, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Rome from Piazza San Pietro in Montorio (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:10, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faro di Roma (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:01, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sant'Agata in Trastevere (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Braschi in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Platanus acerifolia at the Pincio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Nefronus 19:34, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzetto Salviati-Mellini (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:52, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo del Collegio romano in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:11, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza della Rotonda 73 in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 13:14, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Unal in Sauveterre-de-R 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:54, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! National horse stud farm in Rodez 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:47, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of La Fouillade 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:47, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 21:53, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptmarkt 28 in Gotha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:28, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Najac 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:28, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bust of Urbano Rattazzi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:11, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lathraea clandestina in Aveyron 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 19:31, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Cecilia church in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:07, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Lunac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Onet-le-Chateau (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Excellent sharpness on the complete tower. There are two dustspots (see image notes), else very good. --Aristeas 10:51, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 09:56, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 14:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stigmatisation of St Francis church in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:01, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza dei Calcarari 2 in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:01, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Altieri in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corso Vittorio Emanuele II 1-5 in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 03:55, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Besso in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 17:53, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Austremonius church in Salles-la-Source (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:33, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martial church in Rieupeyroux (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:58, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison de Benoit in Rodez (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:33, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption in Boussac (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:58, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue du Barriou in Najac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:58, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bust of Cavour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:57, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in La Mouline 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:28, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via dei Riari in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 23:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16 rue Rouget-de-Lisle in Narbonne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support. Meet the QI requirements. Dmitry Ivanov 18:25, 12 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahnhofstrasse 13 in Bensheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support. The top of the bilding is rather soft, but acceptable. QI. Dmitry Ivanov 18:29, 12 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Groeperstrasse 4 in Wittstock Dosse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 23:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cloister of Priory Saint-Michel of Grandmont (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 23:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santi Maria e Gallicano in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 23:10, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Notre-Dame-de-Vanc 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Quite good, yet the right side and the back of the roof are a bit blurry. --Nefronus 23:00, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via di S Francesco a Ripa 67 in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support.QI. Dmitry Ivanov 18:12, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via in Piscinula in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 22:57, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Christopher church in Sauveterre-de-R (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:26, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Onet-le-Chateau (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 11:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5 Rue Saint-Barthelemy in Najac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:27, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Besso in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obergasse 11 in Alsfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Untere Frauenstrasse 33 in Bad Hersfeld (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poststraße 35 in Wittstock Dosse (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town Hall of Bad Hersfeld (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedenstein Castle in Gotha 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old stock exchange in Leipzig (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saints Mary and Martin church in Wittstock Dosse 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:10, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place aux Herbes in Uzes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Pontanel in Uzes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 16:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Pontanel in Uzes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 16:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 plan Saint-Etienne in Uzes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Courthouse in Ales.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 10:31, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Ricateau in Ales 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 10:31, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Ricateau in Ales 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 11:52, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casernes Thoiras in Ales 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 10:31, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koenigshaus in Leipzig (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:09, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hainstrasse 3 in Bad Hersfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:03, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orangery in Gotha (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:29, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! S Maria in Montesanto & S Maria dei Miracoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. A little bit soft, but still good, beautiful evening colours and very atmospheric. --Aristeas 08:45, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Segur 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall in Lodeve 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bust of Menotti Garibaldi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza di Spagna in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Ales.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:45, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Lafare Alais in Ales.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:30, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist Cathedral of Ales 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:30, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist Cathedral of Ales 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:23, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hanfsack 2 in Bad Hersfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:55, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Alsfeld (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lo Scaligero 06:46, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchplatz 4 in Alsfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lo Scaligero 06:46, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahnhofstrasse 14 in Bensheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lo Scaligero 06:48, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saints Mary and Martin church in Wittstock Dosse 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Александр Байдуков 06:45, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza del Popolo in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Not very sharp but IMHO good enough. --Domob 08:24, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Soubes 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:30, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Annecy 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedenstein Castle in Gotha 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:59, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Am Kreuz 2 in Alsfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:59, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Am Buergerhaus 5 in Bensheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:59, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedenstein Castle in Gotha 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:59, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protestant city church in Bad Hersfeld (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:59, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist Cathedral of Ales 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:01, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albergo del Sole al Pantheon in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:36, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via Sistina 64 in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:29, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross oratory at Piazza dell'Oratorio in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Domob 15:56, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! All Saints church, S Giacomo in Augusta church and St Peter's basilica (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:51, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! All Saints church, S Giacomo in Augusta church and St Peter's basilica (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:51, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vicolo delle Orsoline in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Nice. There is just a single very big dust spot in the sky – see image note; else very good. --Aristeas 14:43, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 20:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 14:43, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Rome from Piazza della Trinita dei Monti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment It' slightly hanging to the left --Moroder 11:16, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 19:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC) Good quality --Moroder 10:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inselstrasse 2 in Leipzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 18:26, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hinterer Steingraben 14 in Bad Hersfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:52, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedenstein Castle in Gotha 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:42, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protestant city church in Bad Hersfeld (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:42, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old city hall of Leipzig (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:30, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Protestant Temple of Ales 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:19, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Protestant Temple of Ales 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:19, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Protestant Temple of Ales 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:19, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Vieux in Ales 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:09, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Vieux in Ales 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:09, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont de Rochebelle in Ales 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:09, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedenstein Castle in Gotha 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Walpurga church in Alsfeld (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 08:12, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markt 14 in Alsfeld (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poststraße 35 in Wittstock Dosse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 08:12, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Predigerhaus in Leipzig (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Protestant Temple of Ales 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 17:27, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Protestant Temple of Ales 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 17:27, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casernes Thoiras in Ales 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 07:26, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Rome from Terrazza del Pincio (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Good quality, but dust spots, sorry.--Lmbuga 13:09, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 19:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 10:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Nice--Lmbuga 21:57, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gardon in Ales 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 03:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gardon in Ales 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gardon in Ales 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gardon in Ales 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protestant city church in Bad Hersfeld (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 16:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markt 9 in Leipzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Am Markt 8 in Bad Hersfeld (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koenigshaus in Leipzig (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church of Rochebelle in Ales 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:09, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont de Rochebelle in Ales 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:09, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of Ales 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 14:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Uzes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlossberg 6 in Gotha (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stiftskirche in Bad Hersfeld (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:58, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptmarkt 2 in Gotha (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old town hall of Gotha (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old city hall of Leipzig (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:57, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of Ales 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via della Luce 37 in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Uzes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:11, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Uzes 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:14, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Uzes 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Uzes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:18, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saints Mary and Martin church in Wittstock Dosse 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reichsstrasse 2 in Leipzig (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:47, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pulverturm in Bad Hersfeld (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:47, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Querstrasse 21 in Gotha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markt 13 in Alsfeld (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Uzes (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 17:50, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Uzes (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:04, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktstrasse 26 in Gotha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:56, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markt 14 in Alsfeld (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:40, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Untere Fulder Gasse in Alsfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:55, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Wittstock Dosse 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:41, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Uzes (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:43, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Uzes (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Uzes (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower of the Cathedral of Uzes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower of the Cathedral of Uzes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bust of Giovanni Costa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, great lighting. -- GuavaTrain 18:13, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bust of Carlo Mayr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:32, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old city hall of Leipzig (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:31, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johannesstrasse 6-8 in Bad Hersfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:31, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dudenstrasse 10 in Bad Hersfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:31, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedenstein Castle in Gotha 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:31, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptmarkt 36 in Gotha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:31, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Uzes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:34, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Uzes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:34, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlinkengasse 7 in Bensheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:46, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town Hall of Bad Hersfeld (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:00, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saints Mary and Martin church in Wittstock Dosse 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:58, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opera in Leipzig (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:59, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedenstein Castle in Gotha 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:59, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower of the Cathedral of Uzes (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:35, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont du Gard (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:35, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont du Gard (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont du Gard (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Querstrasse 2-4 and Marktstrasse 26 in Gotha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:32, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old town hall of Gotha (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:08, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedenstein Castle in Gotha 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:31, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hanfsack 5 in Bad Hersfeld (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:30, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Untergasse 1-3 in Alsfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:08, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Uzes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont du Gard (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 12:04, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont du Gard (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 15:57, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont du Gard (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 15:57, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont du Gard (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:28, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hirtenturm in Blankenheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:44, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lambertus church in Muenster (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 10:59, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Presbytery of Salvator churche in Pruem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 10:59, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markt 8 in Alsfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 10:59, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bust of Bartolomeo Filipperi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 06:29, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument to Giuseppe Garibaldi in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 06:29, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument to Anita Garibaldi in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 06:29, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Uzes (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 06:25, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Uzes (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 06:25, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Uzes (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 06:25, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Thomas church in Leipzig (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:58, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptmarkt 3 in Gotha (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:25, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktplatz 16-18 in Bensheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:48, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Paul cathedral in Muenster 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:17, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont du Gard (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont du Gard (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 12:17, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont du Gard (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:41, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont du Gard (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:41, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchplatz 1 in Wittstock Dosse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:52, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opera in Leipzig (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:43, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thomaskirchhof 13-14 in Leipzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:43, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saints Mary and Martin church in Wittstock Dosse 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:43, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont du Gard (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:13, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bust of Guglielmo Oberdan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:14, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont du Gard (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont du Gard (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Untere Frauenstrasse 33 in Bad Hersfeld (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:01, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedenstein Castle in Gotha 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:18, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markt 6 in Leipzig (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:03, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Margaret church in Gotha (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:59, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old city hall of Leipzig (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:59, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont du Gard (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. A bit soft (frontfocus? diffraction? noise removal?), but still OK and a nice view. --Aristeas 11:49, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of Ales 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is a large dust spot in the upper right, otherwise good --PantheraLeo1359531 14:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ New version uploaded, Tournasol7 05:47, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 14:08, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geschwister-Scholl-Haus in Leipzig (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:02, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blankenheim Castle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:02, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Predigerhaus in Leipzig (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:04, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont du Gard (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:05, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont du Gard (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:21, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neumarkt in Gotha (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markt 6 in Alsfeld (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:05, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old city hall of Leipzig (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, nice and good light. --Aristeas 10:17, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markt 7 in Leipzig (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Am Markt 14 in Bad Hersfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:23, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Predigerhaus in Leipzig (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:41, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dluga 2 in Bydgoszcz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bes river in Marchastel (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:25, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptmarkt 40 in Gotha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:15, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bruehl 8 in Gotha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:53, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old town hall of Gotha (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 14:41, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thomaskirchhof 15 in Leipzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 14:41, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont du Gard (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, interesting perspective. --Aristeas 08:51, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]