Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Puente de la Margineda, Santa Coloma, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 08-10 HDR.jpg

File:Puente de la Margineda, Santa Coloma, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 08-10 HDR.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2014 at 23:00:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Puente de la Margineda, Santa Coloma, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 08-10 HDR alt.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Puente de la Margineda, Santa Coloma, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 08-10 HDR alt.jpg

12

746

3373

4569

3551

5327

crop suggestion by Kreuzschnabel

•  Info HDR shot of the Pont de la Margineda is a bridge located in Santa Coloma d'Andorra, Andorra la Vella Parish, Andorra. The bridge was built in the 14-15th century and spans the Gran Valira river (biggest in the country). The archstones are pumice, to keep the structure light whereas the walls are made of granite. All by me, Poco² 23:00, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 23:00, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support The dramatic river is really good.  Question Is it a normal light traffic sign at the very right? The red cross looks somehow retouched. --Tuxyso (talk) 23:05, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

  There is no edition apart of the HDR fusion, but I could edit it to make it "smoother". It is not a normal traffic light, but rather a sign to specify the direction of a lane that changes during the day. It could be that the cross was even blinking, I am not sure. Poco² 23:16, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Picturesque. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:33, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose lacking objectiveness for an encyplopedic picture, average technical accomplishment --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:55, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

• @Taxiarchos228: we are he on Commons, not on a Wikipedia! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:32, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment I suggest to crop out the top part (top left is very blurry, and the steel pylon doesn’t add value) and a bit off the right to get rid of the traffic signage. This crop would shift the bridge over the center close to golden ratio. See image note on nomination page. --Kreuzschnabel 10:27, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support I like the way the eye follows the river to the bridge and the distant hills. I would be reluctant to crop out any of the sky, which adds to the overall picture. It is unfortunate that one's browser tends to start viewing a 100% picture at the top-left, where the image is most blurred, but the rest of the image is sharp. -- Colin (talk) 13:25, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:32, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer ^{Talk / Images} 12:46, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Why not encyclopedic? Because of long exposure or because of HDR? Nice image. --Kadellar (talk) 13:32, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Very Nice. The long exposure displays perfectly the fluid flow around the rocks, is a great example of turbulent flow in channels formed by spaced obstacles as in industrial heat exchangers, the photo it perfect for this exemplification. Added the category fluid flows. The other cut is better but I prefer this one, I like cirrus, are beautiful. -- Lauro Sirgado^contribs 12:15, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --· Favalli ⟡ 22:26, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Alternative

Featured picture candidates/File:Puente de la Margineda, Santa Coloma, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 08-10 HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Puente de la Margineda, Santa Coloma, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 08-10 HDR.jpg

•  Info Alternative with new crop Poco² 19:50, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose as above --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:55, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support This one is better. Yann (talk) 15:43, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Composition wise, I like this one more. While the sky was nice, it now seems to have a better focus on the main subject (the river and the valley). It is not too light, not too tight. What comes to the objectiveness, the colors look quite natural to me. The major enchancement seems to have been done for bringing back the sky (otherwise overblown) where the use of HDR is quite reasonable. To be honest, I don't see a major lack of encyclopedic value - atleast not because of that. --Ximonic (talk) 15:55, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support — revi_msg 16:48, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Because commons is art too, the perfect is enemmy of art --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 23:42, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:50, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 14:33, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but I do not like the top crop with the truncated hill at the left. --Tuxyso (talk) 15:55, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support I like this version for focusing mainly on the bridge :-) --Kreuzschnabel 16:52, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Kruusamägi (talk) 17:35, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose I support the other one -- Christian Ferrer ^{Talk / Images} 17:57, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Cathy Richards (talk) 16:19, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --.snoopy. 21:20, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Christian Ferrer ^{Talk / Im. / Fav.} 12:53, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges

The chosen alternative is: File:Puente de la Margineda, Santa Coloma, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 08-10 HDR Edit.JPG